Re: Router only speaks IGP in BGP network
Hello Tarig, Setup a gre tunnel between the two bgp speakers and do ibgp over the gre tunnel? (not clean but it works) or mpls.. If you implement the other solution mentioned you're creating routing loops. On 23 December 2010 19:18, Tarig Yassin wrote: > > Dear all > > In my network, I have a router in a middle only speaks OSPF. > is there any solution (without redistribute BGP into OSPF) for this kind of > problem? > > thanks > > -- > Tarig Y. Adam > CTO - SUIN > www.suin.edu.sd > > > > -- Wouter Prins w...@null0.nl
ipv6forum.com/nav6.org contacts
hi all, Is there anyone active on this list who is actively working on/at ipv6forum.com/nav6.org? I tried to contact both administrative and technical contacts listed under the domain, but no response so far. Please unicast me in case you do. :) Thanks in advance! -- Wouter Prins w...@null0.nl
Re: 2000::/6
Hi, ::/24 is also present: AS-PATH 8455 13030 9498 7602 Mailed the tech-c 2 weeks ago, no response so far. On 10 September 2014 14:33, Alain Hebert wrote: > As of 8h30m EST. > > *>i 2000::/6 1001000 3257 3549 i >Last update to IP routing table: 21h23m56s > > - > Alain Hebertaheb...@pubnix.net > PubNIX Inc. > 50 boul. St-Charles > P.O. Box 26770 Beaconsfield, Quebec H9W 6G7 > Tel: 514-990-5911 http://www.pubnix.netFax: 514-990-9443 > > On 09/10/14 07:20, Tarko Tikan wrote: > > hey, > > > > 2000::/6 with aspath 3257 3549 has appeared in global routing table. > > Surely we can't be only ones seeing it. Looks like someone messed up > > interface/route config at 3549 by omitting 4 from the prefixlen. > > > > According to https://stat.ripe.net/2000%3A%3A%2F6#tabId=routing > > "2000::/6 is visible by 79% of 92 IPv6 RIS full peers." > > > > -- Wouter Prins w...@null0.nl
Re: Brocade MLX Feedback
Hi Graham, Do you have any special features you need? MLX-e's are great and fulfill most standard environments fine. Full table convergence time is pretty fast on MLX-e's. Be sure to pick the right modules, switch fabrics and management blades (or contact a partner to do it for you) when you go for a mlx-e. You may want to consider the CER-RT (fixed 1U box) if you dont need a modular chassis. On 14 January 2015 at 20:10, Graham Johnston wrote: > We are looking at Brocade MLX routers to act as Internet edge routers. > They will initially handle two to four full tables, plus peering on an IX. > The price is certainly attractive. We are coming from Cisco 7600 series > devices. Can anyone comment about their use of them? Are you happy with > them? Any gotchas? Particularly we are interested in convergence time to > full FIB population. > > Thanks, > Graham Johnston > Network Planner > Westman Communications Group > 204.717.2829 > johnst...@westmancom.com<mailto:johnst...@westmancom.com> > P think green; don't print this email. > > -- Wouter Prins w...@null0.nl
Re: Invalid prefix announcement from AS9035 for 129.77.0.0/16
Hi Matthew, You are not the only one having this issue. They are announcing some other prefixes as well! 2009/10/9 Matthew Huff > About 4 hours ago BGPmon picked up a rogue announcement of 129.77.0.0 from > AS9035 (ASN-WIND Wind Telecomunicazioni spa) with an upstream of AS1267 > (ASN-INFOSTRADA Infostrada S.p.A.). I don't see it now on any looking glass > sites. Hopefully this was just a typo that was quickly corrected. I would > appreciate if people have time and can double check let me know if any > announcements are active except from our AS6128/AS6395 upstreams. > > If this were to persist, what would be the best course of action to resolve > it, especially given that the AS was within RIPE. > > > > Matthew Huff | One Manhattanville Rd > OTA Management LLC | Purchase, NY 10577 > http://www.ox.com | Phone: 914-460-4039 > aim: matthewbhuff | Fax: 914-460-4139 > > > > -- Wouter Prins w...@null0.nl 0x301FA912
