Re: So I've got this 2.5gig wave, what do I do with it?
On 4/16/09 6:34 PM, "w...@loopfree.net" wrote: > Due to the vagaries of telecom pricing, I've ended up with a 2.5gig > wavelength service between two locations when what I really wanted was a > gig-e or two. > > I'm really not sure if this is a "transparent" wave service or not... > the carrier is using gear from Ciena to hand it off to us and they seem > to be big on transparent waves, so maybe it is, but nobody seems to be > able to say for sure. We use these types of circuits and I manage several others for clients. Every time I turn one up I make sure I talk to an engineer and ask if they are expecting a 2.5Gig signal and just going to use transponders to put my 1310nm signal into a DWDM color send it to the other side, and transponder it back to 1310nm. They've always said that's exactly what they are doing. I used Cerent 15454 (now Cisco) w/ Oc48 IR 1310 cards facing the wave, and proper cross connect and Gig cards (carefull here) facing my gig switches. Shoot me an off list message and I'll help you w/ the ins and outs and share the costs we budget for such. I haven't used MRV but they look appealing, would love to hear other folks experience with them as I'm about to have to turn another two of these up... -- W. Kevin Hunt CCIE #11841
Fusion Splicers
Anyone here with any experience with Jilong fusion splicers ? Our old Fujikura has died and I have to at least consider the Jilong.
Anyone seeing Level3 issues in Dallas ?
All my traces die one hop into Broadwing/L3 Dallas. After noticing it, I killed my peer w/ them, and still had issues getting to anyone I know prefers L3 for peering. I turned it back up when I saw some L3 destinations working via TW 10 mins later, I noticed my paths to yahoo took me through teleglobe. In the first 10 mins of the issue, traces to www.yahoo.com (3:06 Central) 1. cat6009-1.thatsfast.com 0.0% 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.1 2. hb207-29-223-25.huntbrothers.com 0.0% 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.0 3. 65.91.216.161 0.0% 12.1 12.1 12.1 12.2 0.1 4. ??? 30 mins later (3:36pm Central) 1. cat6009-1.thatsfast.com 0.0% 54.8 35.6 0.5 100.5 40.8 2. hb207-29-223-25.huntbrothers.com 0.0% 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.1 3. 65.91.216.161 0.0% 12.1 12.2 12.1 12.3 0.1 4. 216.140.4.158 0.0% 12.8 12.9 12.8 13.0 0.0 5. P7-0.C0.gnwd.broawing.net 0.0% 29.6 29.7 29.6 29.7 0.0 6. ??? 7. 216.140.15.158 0.0% 34.1 34.1 34.0 34.2 0.1 8. s0-3-3.core1.chi.foc.broadwing.net 0.0% 34.1 34.1 34.0 34.2 0.0 9. if-5-0.core1.CT8-Chicago.teleglobe.net 0.0% 33.7 33.6 33.4 33.7 0.1 10. 66.110.27.6 0.0% 68.9 68.8 68.8 68.9 0.0 11. if-9-0-0.mcore3.PDI-PaloAlto.teleglobe.net 0.0% 68.3 68.4 68.3 68.4 0.0 12. if-10-0-0.mcore4.PDI-PaloAlto.teleglobe.net 0.0% 68.5 68.6 68.4 70.0 0.5 13. if-4-0.mcore4.LAA-LosAngeles.teleglobe.net 0.0% 78.5 110.3 78.4 209.5 46.5 14. 10.icore1.LAA-LosAngeles.teleglobe.net 0.0% 78.0 81.5 77.6 88.0 4.1 15. 2.icore1.DTX-Dallas.teleglobe.net 0.0% 109.9 113.9 109.8 121.0 4.0 16. if-5-0-0-30.core2.DTX-Dallas.teleglobe.net 0.0% 109.9 109.9 109.9 109.9 0.0 17. ix-4-2.core2.DTX-Dallas.teleglobe.net 0.0% 82.5 82.5 82.4 82.8 0.1 18. ge-0-1-0-p101.msr1.mud.yahoo.com 0.0% 83.2 83.5 83.2 83.9 0.3 ge-1-1-0-p111.msr2.mud.yahoo.com ge-1-1-0-p101.msr1.mud.yahoo.com ge-0-1-0-p111.msr2.mud.yahoo.com 19. te-8-1.bas-c1.mud.yahoo.com 0.0% 83.7 83.8 83.4 84.8 0.4 te-9-1.bas-c2.mud.yahoo.com te-9-1.bas-c1.mud.yahoo.com te-8-1.bas-c2.mud.yahoo.com 20. f1.www.vip.mud.yahoo.com 0.0% 83.5 83.4 83.2 83.6 0.2
RE: Anyone seeing Level3 issues in Dallas ?
Yeah, this morning Broadwing/L3 had yet another failure, and it took them hours to figure out what the hell was wrong. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Francis Sent: Friday, July 20, 2007 11:39 AM To: W. Kevin Hunt Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Anyone seeing Level3 issues in Dallas ? panther reports issues between L3 and e.g. Savvis, GBLX, PCCW and others in the LAX/SFO area (we're having performance issues with some of their CDN nodes in those areas right now). Possibly more widespread than just California ... -- [EMAIL PROTECTED],darkuncle.net} || 0x5537F527 encrypted email to the latter address please http://darkuncle.net/pubkey.asc for public key On 7/19/07, W. Kevin Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > All my traces die one hop into Broadwing/L3 Dallas. > After noticing it, I killed my peer w/ them, and still had issues > getting to anyone I know prefers L3 for peering. > I turned it back up when I saw some L3 destinations working via TW [snip]
[NANOG] Looking for Yahoo-SOC contact
If anyone cluefull at Yahoo SOC regarding BGP peering on the West Coast is out there I'd appreciate an email. Normal escalation of a latency issue between you and one of your peers used for return traffic to my network simply isn't working. ___ NANOG mailing list NANOG@nanog.org http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog
