Re: [tor-talk] William was raided for running a Tor exit node. Please help if you can.
am Freitag, 30. November 2012 um 22:30 schrieb NANOG list: > WAIT A SECOND HERE!?!? > I just read below that this guy runs a large ISP in Austria. The info from tor-talk was somewhat misleading. William Weber is not the owner of the ISP. He works there as an administrator. So he runs it (maybe) technically, not economically. See eg: http://www.lowendtalk.com/discussion/2641/we-colo-your-rpi-for-free where his boss "ExPl0ReR" weighs in. And "large" is quite relative. This info http://edis.businesscard.at/ says they have 13 employees. It may be outdated though. Regards, Jutta
Re: William was raided for running a Tor exit node. Please help if you can.
> The BBC has an article about a similar issue on a Tor exit node in Austria: > Austrian police raid privacy network over child porn > http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-20554788 actually it is not a "similar case" but the case of William W. that BBC reported. Though with some mistakes: the servers were not seized, the hardware (drives etc) at his home was seized, William was not charged (he says), police is just investigating. http://www.lowendtalk.com/discussion/6283/raided-for-running-a-tor-exit-accepting-donations-for-legal-expenses/p5 And so far only the police know if "images showing child sex abuse" were actually "found passing through them" as BBC writes. The warrent posted at arstechnica.net http://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/Beschluss.png mentions section 207a, para 2, 2nd case, and para 4 no 2, lit b of Austrian Criminal Code, which would be possession of a a pornographic depiction of a minor person over 14, showing their genitals in an obscene manner. (the text of the relevant section in German: http://www.ris.bka.gv.at/Dokumente/Bundesnormen/NOR40105143/NOR40105143.html) The warrent does not mention anything that refers to distribution or transport of pornographic images. So, either police and judge were not aware that it was a TOR server or they have/had a suspicion that's not related to running a TOR server. Or the made a mistake and quoted the wrong section. We simply don't know at present. regards, jutta am Samstag, 01. Dezember 2012 um 17:10 schrieb nanog@nanog.org: > The BBC has an article about a similar issue on a Tor exit node in Austria: > Austrian police raid privacy network over child porn > http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-20554788 > ## > Austrian police have seized servers that were part of a global anonymous > browsing system, after images showing child sex abuse were found passing > through them. <...>
Re: Tech Laptop with DB9
On 2014-11-10 21:55, Justin M. Streiner wrote: > On Mon, 10 Nov 2014, Max Clark wrote: > >> DB9 ports seem to be a nearly extinct feature on laptops. Any >> suggestions on a cheap laptop for use in field support (with an >> onboard DB9)? My HP EliteBook 8570p has a DB9 port. (I bought it last year, so it may still be available.) When I searched for notebooks with DB9 port last year, I also found 2 models by fujitsu-siemens and some in the "rugged"/outdoor sector. (Depends on what you call cheap, though). Sorry, the links are in German, mostly. HTH, jutta http://de.fujitsu.com/ps2/aktionsmodelle/g/notebooks/e782.html http://business.panasonic.de/computerloesungen/panasonic-computer-product-solutions-produktsortiment/unser-produktsortiment-panasonic-toughbook/semi-ruggedized-notebooks http://www.durabook.com/en/compare2.php?no=88&return_link=product.php%3Fno%3D88
Re: Uptick in spam
Am 27.10.2015 13:09, schrieb Ian Smith: > On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 9:40 PM, Octavio Alvarez > wrote: > >> On 26/10/15 11:38, Jürgen Jaritsch wrote: >> >> > But it is originating all from different IP addresses. Who knows if this >> is an attack to get *@jdlabs.fr blocked from NANOG and is just getting >> its goal accomplished. > > > > This is the part that's been bugging me. Doesn't the NANOG server > implement SPF checking on inbound list mail? jdlabs.fr doesn't appear to > have an SPF record published. It seems to me that these messages should > have been dropped during the connection. If it does (which I don't know), it will probably check the SPF record of the delivering mailserver, which was not *.jdlabs.fr as far as I can see from the mailheaders. Jutta Zalud
Re: [NANOG] support.microsoft.com?
Marshall Eubanks wrote on 24. April 2008 at 15:07: > It looks to me like they are doing file compression on the site. > (E.g., there seems to be an index.html.gz file there.) > This practice is described in "High Performance Web Sites" and other > fine publications. I > would be curious to know if this is a problem with Lynx or with their > site setup. Looks more like a problem with Microsoft's site setup. Lynx has no problems with html.gz my own testsite http://www1.netzwerklabor.at/forum/ (you may use it for testing, but it is *not* on a high performance server ;) Regards, Jutta ___ NANOG mailing list NANOG@nanog.org http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog
