Re: Ddos mitigation service
Hi Pierre, Thank you for your interesting note. On 01/02/2013 09:57, Pierre Lamy wrote: > The 3 major scrubbing vendors: > > Prolexic > Verisign > Akamai IIRC, CloudFlare claims to the same capcity of DDOS mitigation as Prolexic (500gb) and also has a free option with fewer scrubbing features. Do you have experience with it, or is there some other reason to have excluded it from your list? I apologize for my noobish question. Cheers, James
RE: Spam from Telx
He has spammed by responding to posts that people have made in the past, he is still trolling I guess. James -Original Message- From: Nick Hilliard [mailto:n...@foobar.org] Sent: Friday, February 17, 2012 9:01 AM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Spam from Telx So, anyone else get spammed by Telx after posting to nanog? This is massively unprofessional. Nick Original Message Subject: RE: telx Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 13:47:25 + From: George Fitzpatrick To: Hi , We have some exciting things happening here at Telx that can help your network connectivity. Can we chat for 5 minutes? Thanks, George 917.371.7257
RE: unsubscribe
nanog-requ...@merit.edu?body=unsubscribe To Unsubscribe. James Thomas -Original Message- From: Murphy, Jay, DOH [mailto:jay.mur...@state.nm.us] Sent: Monday, December 29, 2008 5:31 PM To: Springer, Dennis D; nanog@nanog.org Subject: RE: unsubscribe Jay Murphy IP Network Specialist NM Department of Health ITSD - IP Network Operations Santa Fe, New Mexico 87502 Bus. Ph.: 505.827.2851 "We move the information that moves your world." -Original Message- From: Springer, Dennis D [mailto:dennis.sprin...@chartercom.com] Sent: Monday, December 29, 2008 3:07 PM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: unsubscribe Dennis Springer Network Engineer III Charter Communications 12405 Powerscourt Dr. 2nd floor St. Louis, MO 63131 Phone: (314) 288-3425 Cell: (314) 607-9824 -Original Message- From: Murphy, Jay, DOH [mailto:jay.mur...@state.nm.us] Sent: Monday, December 29, 2008 12:26 PM To: marco; nanog@nanog.org Subject: RE: Level 3 issues Duly meditated upon. Jay Murphy IP Network Specialist NM Department of Health ITSD - IP Network Operations Santa Fe, New Mexico 87502 "We move the information that moves your world." -Original Message- From: marco [mailto:ma...@zero11.com] Sent: Monday, December 29, 2008 11:20 AM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Level 3 issues I think that most of the anger was directed at the wanna-be reporters/journalists that visit this list. Todd Vierling wrote: > On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 11:33 AM, Murphy, Jay, DOH > wrote: > >> You know, it gets pretty thick through here, when all you people slam >> on someone, to justify pent up angst or whatever the cause may be. I >> worked for Level 3 as a NOC engr, and they follow standards as other >> companies do, and for that matter a standard that I AM SURE all of >> you follow in some form, degree, or another within the employ you are >> with, so shut up already won't you. Give me a 10-minute break >> already. Half of the crap that you guys serve up is crap, just that, >> CRAP! Get to talking real 'net stuff, not filler, fodder, just facts >> man. Oh yeah the other thing, quit your whining. >> > > > > __ This inbound email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. __ Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail, including all attachments is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited unless specifically provided under the New Mexico Inspection of Public Records Act. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy all copies of this message. -- This email has been scanned by the Sybari - Antigen Email System. E-MAIL CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The contents of this e-mail message and any attachments are intended solely for the addressee(s) and may contain confidential and/or legally privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or if this message has been addressed to you in error, please immediately alert the sender by reply e-mail and then delete this message and any attachments. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any use, dissemination, distribution, copying, or storage of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. __ This inbound email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. __
RE: Test
Yes :) James -Original Message- From: Dennis Dayman [mailto:den...@thenose.net] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 5:30 PM To: Nanog Subject: Test this still working?
RE: List Help
Final-Recipient: rfc822;den...@thenose.net Action: failed Status: 5.5.0 Diagnostic-Code: smtp;550 failed to meet SPF requirements I wish I could help :) -Original Message- From: Dennis Dayman [mailto:den...@thenose.net] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 5:48 PM To: Nanog Subject: List Help So I apologize for that test, but I can no longer see posts to the list. I can send to the list, but I don't get a copy of my posts or anyone else's. My MTA is not blocking anything nor does it ever get a connection from MERIT mail servers to send me a copy of the posts. I also don't receive PSWD reset emails. Anyone know who I can talk to? -Dennis
Atrivo/Intercage: NO Upstream depeered at 2:25am est
Hmmm Seems Pacific bit the bullett around 2:25 est all annoucements were dropped. http://cidr-report.org/cgi-bin/as-report?as=AS27595&v=4&view=2.0 I would ask for comment by Intercage staff but they don't have email. Emil is unresponsive via phone, James
RE: Atrivo/Intercage: NO Upstream depeer
Emil, You have a lot of loyal legit customers. What's your plans? Seems like your taking action against the bad clients which is great. Where does this leave Intercage? You seeking alternative routes currently? Offering refunds to those loyal clients? James -Original Message- From: Emil Kacperski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, September 21, 2008 3:20 PM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Atrivo/Intercage: NO Upstream depeer Hello, It's true that David from PIE disconnected our link approx 9pm or so yesterday. Things were going perfect, no complaints for a few weeks now. The only thing I believe is that NTT gave lots of pressure to PIE. For some unknown reason when I tried to reach out to the security guy at NTT he basically said our contract is with PIE. So in a time like this you really get to know who your friends are and who should be avoided. Onward and upward! What doesn't kill you only makes you stronger ;-). Just feel bad for the customers for which I am truly sorry for right now ;-(. Thanks! Contact: Emil Kacperski Company: Intercage Inc. - Atrivo Dedicated Servers San Francisco Datacenter E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: 925-550-3947 ICQ: 23531098
RE: Atrivo/Intercage: NO Upstream depeer
Russell, I really think Atrivo/Intercage has been doing great after reports and community public action. I'm still puzzled as to the why they are still targetting you? I have a few friends who have machines with you so and they run legitimate companies with over 4 machines. Emil has done everything in his power to bring his network back to normal operations. Looks great the past 2 weeks, I wish both of you the best of luck its hard to determine who is a solid friend and who is not. Like emil said... It only will make you stronger. James -Original Message- From: Russell Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, September 21, 2008 5:54 PM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Atrivo/Intercage: NO Upstream depeer Hello all, Andrew: It is truly enlightening, to say the least, that you want to talk about all of the SBL Listings, all of the DNSBL Listings, and all of the abuse on our network has never had action taken. - In Spamhaus' article, they did a history of more then ?350? SBL Listings for our company. Today, we have 6 ACTIVE Listings in the SBL. If we haven't acted on abuse claims, why do those numbers not match up? So, sometime over the weekend, Spamhaus listed our ONLY Upstream's /22 IP Block.. There's NO Evidence of any abuse from PIE for the listing. How can they be labeled as a SPAM or Abuse Supporter after routing us for such a short time? That's ethical, legitimate, and reasonable to you? We have ALL of our IP Space listed with Spamhaus because we have a Reseller named Esthost. While their customer track record may not be a straight arrow, they've ALWAYS taken action on abuse we've received for machines leased to them (Just like every other customer we have!). We enacted a zero tolerance policy in light of the community delivering false information and giving false reports to news media. What did that do? It gave us the opportunity to cancel service on EVERY Machine that an abuse was reported on. What happened shortly after? No more reports, no more abuse. Esthost's Registrar entity, EstDomains launched a great campaign to work with the public and take in reports against Malware Customers, as that is what the news media was reporting was the issue. Over 20,000 Domains get suspended by EstDomains in a period of about a week. Your going to come back and say, "Well Directi did it in about 2 days!". Yeah? Directi had it placed right on their desk! They didn't have to launch any campaign or go out and ask the COMMUNITY for it. The people behind those false reports on our company gave them a set of Data to allow them to act that fast. So, we see Esthost turning a corner and going out to the community with an outreach program. Community is giving support for it. We enact a zero tolerance policy for our entire network, this isn't made public aside to a GOOD and TRUTHFUL Editor from TheRegister, Dan Goodin. We gave ourselves 1 month to see what is going to happen between the community, and Esthost. In the final stretch of that 1 month, we get blind-sided by Spamhaus. So now, an apparently level-headed James Thomas brings the happenings from last night into the light, and here we are. All of the claims about us being the RBN, Emil being some Russian named "Igor", and "Atrivo" being the epicenter with such partners like InterCage. Did you forget? Emil has a split-personality, that's how they got their claim of InterCage being partnered with Atrivo. As though they're 2 seperate entities! Good Research Matt, Jart, Garth, and all the others who've written about us recently! Thank you all for your time and responses. Good or bad, we're reading them. Have a great day. --- Russell Mitchell InterCage, Inc. - An un-orgranized eCrime ring based out of San Francisco, CA. We would only be so lucky!
RE: YAY! Re: Atrivo/Intercage: NO Upstream depeer
Very well said. James -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2008 5:23 AM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: RE: YAY! Re: Atrivo/Intercage: NO Upstream depeer > It is clear to me -- at least -- that this entire criminal > operation is being operated out of Eastern Europe, and their > foothold in the U.S. is the major issue here. If you believe that this is a criminal operation then you should keep this discussion OFF THE LIST and discourage anyone from taking any action against the bad guys that might disrupt evidence gathering. If this is a criminal matter, then it is best to keep quiet, collect good evidence, and go to court. Better to get a court injunction ordering them to stop sending malware, and then collect evidence showing that they violated the injunction. To do this, they need to have functioning upstream connections to your network. NANOG is not the place to discuss these things. None of this is network operational. The whole discussion amounts to a shouting match between vigilantes and their victims. Some of those victims might also be bad guys, but a shouting match on NANOG does not prove this one way or the other. --Michael Dillon
