Re: FYI Netflix is down

2012-06-29 Thread Bjorn Leffler
On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 3:38 PM, jamie rishaw  wrote:
> ...
> Down: Instagram, Pinterest, Netflix, Heroku, Woot. Pocket(Read It Later),
> and on and on.  A bunch of openID sites.  A bunch of DNS sites (think
> zoneedit et al).  Infact, probably nearly a /12 if not more of space..
> ...

Zoneedit doesn't seem to be down . I can both use the website and
resolve my domains.



Re: IPv4 address length technical design

2012-10-04 Thread Bjorn Leffler
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Chris Campbell  wrote:
>
> Is anyone aware of any historical documentation relating to the choice of 32 
> bits for an IPv4 address?

I've heard Vint Cerf say this himself, but here's a written reference
for you. They had just finished building arpanet, which was expensive
to build. Hence why they estimated two networks per country.

http://www.domainpulse.com/2012/06/06/world-ipv6-day/

When developing IPv4, Cerf said that he and Bob Kahn “estimated that
there might be two national-scale packet networks per country and
perhaps 128 countries able to build them, so 8 bits sufficed for 256
network identifiers. Twenty-four bits allowed for up to 16 million
hosts. At that time, hosts were big, expensive time-sharing systems,
so 16 million seemed like a lot. We did consider variable length and
128-bit addressing in 1977 but decided that this would be too much
overhead for the relatively low-speed lines (50 kilobits per second).
I thought this was still an experiment and that if it worked we would
then design a production version.



Re: google mail problems?

2013-06-26 Thread Bjorn Leffler
This was resolved 8 min after the initial email.

http://www.google.com/appsstatus#hl=en&v=issue&ts=1372341599000&sid=1&iid=3ec67925039e152c4ab58a809c97ee24


On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 8:35 AM, Matt Palmer  wrote:

> On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 01:57:10PM -0500, Blair Trosper wrote:
> > But, as usual, everything is "totally fine" according to the GApps status
> > page:
> > http://www.google.com/appsstatus#hl=en&v=status&ts=1372272841152
>
> Status pages, at least for any service big enough to matter, are nothing
> more than a barometer for how scathing the news reports are about the
> outage.  I'm convinced they're managed by the PR department.
>
> - Matt
>
> --
> (And don't even mention the Army Of Cultists that pop up every time you
> claim that it might be less than absolutely perfect for every purpose ever
> conceived.)
> -- Dave Brown, ASR, on MacOS X
>
>
>