Automatically pipe mails Thread by thread
Dear Mutt users, Everything is in the title. Do you have any idea how I could do such trick ? Is it possible ? Many thanks. -- Alexandre Delanoë
Re: Automatically pipe mails Thread by thread
Hi, It should be a macro like this: macro index,pager "~/.mutt/script.sh~T\n" But how I could write a loop for each thread such as it would avoid pressing key ? Many thanks for help, -- Alexandre Delanoë
[Mutt && Postfix] how to defer transport ?
Dear mutt users, I think the answer depends on postfix but a mutt configuration may be usefull. I have some trouble with "defer_transports = smtp" configuration in /etc/postfix/main.cf (Debian stable). If I 1) defer transport 2) send some mails with mutt 3) back to relayhost = smtp.whatever.com, 4) sudo postqueue -f => Some mails are not sent without any error messages (I have to test in /var/log/mails.log). How do you defer transport with mutt ? One precision: "defer transport" != "postponed mail" Cheers, -- Alexandre Delanoë
Attachment signal
Hello, using mutt every day with many mails, I sometimes do not see that some mails have attachment(s). In practice, do you have any tips to signal there is any attachment to emails ? Some "ergonomic" options: - adding tag in Index - adding tag in headers (to show in mutt) - others ? Many thanks for sharing your ideas. -- Alexandre Delanoë
Re: Attachment signal
Hello all,
many thanks for your replies/comments.
Année 2013, mardi 19 novembre, vers 10:23, Suvayu Ali écrivait:
> I use the following as my index_format:
> "%4C %Z %?X?@& ? %{%b %d} %-15.15n (%?M?»%3M&%4c?) %s"
This solution is fine for me.
> Hope this helps,
Sure!
Have a nice day.
--
Alexandre Delanoë
Re: Finding messages from one person replied to by another?
Hello, i am using mairix and would like to improve a mutt macro: # Mairix macro generic f "mairix " "search via mairix" # Load the results mailbox macro generic ,f "=xmairix" "load the search results mailbox" In fact, i would like to have only one macro which search via mairix and which load the search results after. Do you have any idea how i could do that? thank you. Alexandre -- ---()()()()()()()()()--)()()()()()()()()(--- -()()--()-()-()()--)()(-)(-)(--)()(- ()()()()()()()())()()()()()()()(
Re: Archiving
Le jeudi 12 février de l'année 2009, vers 18 heures et 07 minutes, Michael Pobega écrivait: > I use archive-mail in a Cronjob. It checks by date, so for high traffic > mailing lists I have it archiving mail 15 days old, and for low traffic > mailing lists 30 days, etc. Hi, i use archive-mail too. But how do you search in you archives? Sincerely, i have some problems with mairix... even if i can open folder.gz and search with mutt after. Then archive-mail i a good solution for me too but i am still looking for a better solution to search mails. -- ---()()()()()()()()()--)()()()()()()()()(--- -()()--()-()-()()--)()(-)(-)(--)()(- ()()()()()()()())()()()()()()()(
Re: Archiving
Le mercredi 18 février de l'année 2009, vers 10 heures et 46 minutes, Cameron Simpson écrivait: > Maybe you should detail your problems. I use mairix to search archived > email via a wrapper script that invoked mutt on the mairix result folder > after the search. Add a cron job to re-index the archives nightly or > whenever and it's fairly good. In fact, after mairix research if x messages match, links in my mairix box seem not to be updated (no message in the box). Then, i think, it could be a re-index problem indeed; as you mention it. And cron job must be a solution to avoid such mistake. Thank you for reply. If problem persists i'll come back with more precisions. If not, archive-mail and mairix could be a good solution for archieving. -- ---()()()()()()()()()--)()()()()()()()()(--- -()()--()-()-()()--)()(-)(-)(--)()(- ()()()()()()()())()()()()()()()(
Re: Scoring
Le vendredi 13 février de l'année 2009, vers 22 heures et 10 minutes, Chris
Willard écrivait:
> Hello All,
>
> Can someone please explain how scoring works for a beginner? I belong
> to a few mailing lists and some of them have quite a lot of messages.
>
> As I understand it I can use scoring to filter the messages but I am
> not sure of how to do this and how scoring works!
>
> Any help would be appreciated.
>
> Regards,
>
Hi,
i have that in ~/.muttrc, maybe you could try it:
# to sort mails according score
folder-hook . set sort_aux=score
# best score for my family...
score "~f fam...@family.org" 10
#more examples:
# Add a point to GPG signed messages
score "~g" 1
## Add a point to GPG encrypted messages
score "~G" 1
## Add a point to Flagged messages
score "~F" 1
## Add a point to messages from a known mailing list-
## * Use the, `subscribe' and `lists' command to tell mutt about lists
score "~l" 1
## Add a point to old (unread) messages
score "~O" 1
## Add a point to messages addressed to you-
score "~p" 1
## Add a point to messages from you
score "~P" 1
## Add a point to messages you replied to (using mutt)
score "~Q" 1
## Add a point to read messages
score "~R" 1
## Add a point to messages less than 80,000 bytes-
score "~z 0-8" 1
#If you want to see scoring in messages:
set index_format="%4C %2N %Z %{%b %d} %-15.15F %s"
Alexandre
--
---()()()()()()()()()--)()()()()()()()()(---
-()()--()-()-()()--)()(-)(-)(--)()(-
()()()()()()()())()()()()()()()(
Re: Archiving
Le jeudi 19 février de l'année 2009, vers 11 heures et 35 minutes, Michael Pobega écrivait: > I don't understand your problem exactly -- Mutt opens the archive.gz > files just fine, and I use Mutt to sort and search through the e-mails. I do the same in general but I have a mailbox with almost 200 000 mails (250 mo). Then I create one archive.gz with archive-mail. After that, I can search with mairix throw _different_ mails box (not only one). That's how I proceed. PS: my problem was due to a mairix update. This soft is efficient even if I would like more regular expressions in such search engine. -- ---()()()()()()()()()--)()()()()()()()()(--- -()()--()-()-()()--)()(-)(-)(--)()(- ()()()()()()()())()()()()()()()(
Re: open a browser
Le dimanche 01 mars de l'année 2009, vers 18 heures et 38 minutes, Andreas Kalex écrivait: > * Rado S wrote on 27.02.2009 at 16:15: > > Use a dispatcher script in mailcap which prompts you for your choice. Could you share your script please? Thank you. -- ---()()()()()()()()()--)()()()()()()()()(--- -()()--()-()-()()--)()(-)(-)(--)()(- ()()()()()()()())()()()()()()()(
How to delete...
Hi all! How to delete all mails that have same subject with mutt? In fact I have some rss feeds that are duplicated. Then, i could do such thing in bash but, I would like to know if there is any _existing_solution with mutt. Thank for advice. -- ---()()()()()()()()()--)()()()()()()()()(--- -()()--()-()-()()--)()(-)(-)(--)()(- ()()()()()()()())()()()()()()()(
Re: How to delete...
Thank you for your answers. In fact, i knew that with T or D, i could select or delete messages depending on the regex. But i have a lot of duplicate mails (because of feeds); regex change every time. Then, i would need a regex of regex. Precisely a bash script seems to be needed. Thank you for help again. -- ---()()()()()()()()()--)()()()()()()()()(--- -()()--()-()-()()--)()(-)(-)(--)()(- ()()()()()()()())()()()()()()()(
Re: How to delete...
Le vendredi 06 mars de l'année 2009, vers 12 heures et 59 minutes, Christian Ebert écrivait: > Have you actually tried the ~= pattern? > > It deletes not based on subject but messages with same id, iirc. > Might well be enought for your purpose. Id changes every time, i have already configured my procmailrc as this: :0 Whc: msgid.lock | formail -D 8192 msgid.cache :0 a: $HOME/mail/-duplicatas The Subject is the only one "id" that still is the same. -- ---()()()()()()()()()--)()()()()()()()()(--- -()()--()-()-()()--)()(-)(-)(--)()(- ()()()()()()()())()()()()()()()(
Re: How to delete...
Le lundi 09 mars de l'année 2009, vers 07 heures et 45 minutes, Mario Martínez écrivait: > I know there is another way using formail and procmail, but right now > I don't remember exactly how it works. Sorry :( Thank you for help. It will be useful. -- ---()()()()()()()()()--)()()()()()()()()(--- -()()--()-()-()()--)()(-)(-)(--)()(- ()()()()()()()())()()()()()()()(
mutt-users@mutt.org
Hello, I tag a mail with "t" and attach it to a thread with "&". After that i quit mutt saving changes. I open my mail box with mutt again but my thread is not saved. How to save this ? Thx -- Alexandre Delanoë
mutt-users@mutt.org
Le jeudi 18 juin de l'année 2009, vers 08 heures et 15 minutes, Alexandre Delanoë écrivait: > Hello, > > I tag a mail with "t" and attach it to a thread with "&". After that > i quit mutt saving changes. I open my mail box with mutt again but my > thread is not saved. How to save this ? I noticed that it only happen when I attach mails that are not supposed to be in the thread. In fact I make groupe of discussions. Is there any means with mutt for such issue ? Cheers. -- Alexandre Delanoë
mutt-users@mutt.org
Le jeudi 18 juin de l'année 2009, vers 14 heures et 53 minutes, Rocco Rutte écrivait: > Hi, > > * Alexandre wrote: > > > I tag a mail with "t" and attach it to a thread with "&". After that > > i quit mutt saving changes. I open my mail box with mutt again but my > > thread is not saved. How to save this ? > > With what type of folder? Header caching enabled? It is maildir folder. I have this mutt version 1.5.18-6+b1 on Debian (testing) system. I do not know if Header caching is enabled on this version. -- Alexandre Delanoë
mutt-users@mutt.org
Le vendredi 19 juin de l'année 2009, vers 14 heures et 45 minutes, Rocco Rutte écrivait: > * Alexandre wrote: > > I do not know if Header caching is enabled on this version. > > You can check that by issueing ':set ?header_cache' within mutt. The > problem is (for the latest version: was) that mutt only cached the > headers one time when it first sees a message. If you change headers > afterwards, mutt won't notice as it'll always pull the unedited cached > version. So you need to remove the header cache for that folder after > you edited threads. Yes! It does work. -- Alexandre Delanoë
Charset PB
Hi, "é" appear like : "\303^Hé^H\251" I notice this only happen with mails from apple mailer (I do not know if it depends on my own configuration). More information dealing the mail: Content-Type: text/enriched; charset=ISO-8859-1 My mutt version :1.5.18-6+b1 I have set utf8 charset in my muttrc. If I comment it, it is the same. I would like to know if I have to configure my muttrc or mailcap. And how? Thank you for help. -- Alexandre Delanoë
Re: Charset PB
Le mercredi 01 juillet de l'année 2009, vers 11 heures et 13 minutes, Rocco Rutte écrivait: > Hi, > > * Alexandre wrote: > > > "é" appear like : "\303^Hé^H\251" > > > > I notice this only happen with mails from apple mailer (I do not know if > > it depends on my own configuration). > > > > More information dealing the mail: > > Content-Type: text/enriched; > > charset=ISO-8859-1 > > Likely this is mutt's fault. It should be fixed in the latest version, > 1.5.20. Can you give that a try? > > text/enriched allows for some text attributes such as bold and > underline, the é in your example should be printed bold. Thank you Rocco for your answer. As I use debian testing system, this mutt version is not available yet. I will wait because this failure is not urgent. Cheers. -- Alexandre Delanoë
Re: Colors in quoted *replies*
Le jeudi 20 août de l'année 2009, vers 10 heures et 17 minutes, steve écrivait: > Well that's done since ages but doesn't help here, all quoted lines are > in the same color. Salut Steve, and with colorsheme option in vimrc ? -- Alexandre Delanoë
gdbm fatal: read error
Hello, I have installed mutt 1.5.18-6 on a 2.6.18-xenU kernel (Debian stableà with my ~/.mutt* configuration files that works on others boxes. But if I open ~/mail/inbox (maildir) which was created by procmail, I have a gdbm fatal: read error. Any idea(s) to solve this issue ? May be should I upgrade mutt ? Thank you for help. -- Alexandre Delanoë
Re: gdbm fatal: read error
Le jeudi 11 février de l'année 2010, vers 06 heures et 40 minutes, Michael Tatge écrivait: > * On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 12:24PM +0100 Alexandre (neonoe123...@gmail.com) > muttered: > > I have installed mutt 1.5.18-6 on a 2.6.18-xenU kernel (Debian stableà > > with my ~/.mutt* configuration files that works on others boxes. But if > > I open ~/mail/inbox (maildir) which was created by procmail, I have a > > gdbm fatal: read error. Any idea(s) to solve this issue ? > > Maybe deleting the header cache helps? > > HTH, Exactly! Thank you Michael, I did not think about it. YIH (Yes It Helped) -- Alexandre Delanoë
send-hook and forward_format
Hi, I want to set forward_format when I send mail to XXX. Then, my muttrc should be something like this: send-hook ^.*XXX.*$ 'set forward_format="[TAG] %s"' But my forward_format is still like this: set forward_format="[%a: %s]" (actually in results of my tests.) How do you customize this ? Thank you for advices. -- Alexandre Delanoë
Re: send-hook and forward_format
Le jeudi 11 mars de l'année 2010, vers 01 heures et 17 minutes, E. Prom écrivait: > > Have you found the solution? Not really, I found another way: macro index,pager z ":set mime_forward=no\n:set forward_format='[TAG]'\n:set mime_forward_decode=no\n" > Is it the regexp or the set that fails? I think that the set fails. -- Alexandre Delanoë
Re: send-hook and forward_format
Le jeudi 11 mars de l'année 2010, vers 11 heures et 08 minutes, Alexandre Delanoë écrivait: > Le jeudi 11 mars de l'année 2010, vers 01 heures et 17 minutes, E. Prom > écrivait: > > > > Have you found the solution? > > Not really, I found another way: > > macro index,pager z ":set mime_forward=no\n:set forward_format='[TAG]'\n:set > mime_forward_decode=no\n" New set seems to work: send-hook ^.*adresses.*$ "set forward_format='[TAG]'" > > Is it the regexp or the set that fails? > > I think that the set fails. Not really indeed. send-hook does not match aliases but only e-mail adress ? For example, be aliases: alias test TEST send-hook ^.*TEST.*$ "set forward_format='[TAG]'" does not match the alias... How to configure it ? Thank you for help. -- Alexandre Delanoë
Re: send-hook and forward_format
Le dimanche 14 mars de l'année 2010, vers 21 heures et 04 minutes, Michael Elkins écrivait: > send-hook's will not match the alias name, but it will match what the > alias expands to. Alias expansion occurs prior to send-hook's being > executed. ok > The problem here is that $forward_format is expanded *prior* to the > send-hook's executing, so it is not currently possible to change the > forward subject based on the recipients. Thank you for this explanation. Then I am coding a macro. -- Alexandre Delanoë
Macro: pipe message and forward it
Dear mutt-users, how could I pipe message, grep some patterns, and forward the results ? I have already written this macro: macro index,pager z ":set mime_forward=no\n:ignore *\n:unignore subject\ngrep -v SomePatterns\n" With ignore and unignore I can select headers I want to forward. But the message need to be cleaned with some bash scripts (like grep -v ^patterns). Do you have any idea how I could write this macro ? Thank you. -- Alexandre Delanoë
Scoring threads
Hi Scoring on Subjects and From headers is nice enough (man muttrc), but how to score this: - if you're really interested in what a person has to say only when she's talking about a particular subject - if you really don't want to read what person A has to say when she's following up to person B, but want to read what she says when she's following up to person C Indeed, there are solutions with emacs: http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/gnus/Advanced-Scoring.html#Advanced-Scoring But how to do this with mutt ? Many thanks for sharing your ideas on this issue. -- Alexandre Delanoë
Re: Scoring threads
Many thanks for your answer. One more question though: Le mercredi 13 avril de l'année 2011, vers 09 heures et 39 minutes, Michael Elkins écrivait: > >- if you really don't want to read what person A has to say when she's > >following up to person B, but want to read what she says when she's > >following up to person C > > This is tricky, at least with mailing lists. Mutt can't match on a > message that the current message *refers* to, but if the Alice is > following up to Eve, and Eve's email address appears in the recipient > list, you can do something like this: > > ~f alice ~C eve > > Or if you want all Alice's replies, except when responding to Bob: > > ~f alice !~f bob Suppose you want to score all threads with this form: A>B>A>B without any specifications about the name of authors. Is it possible ? -- Alexandre Delanoë
Howto save sent-replied-message in current mail-folder
Hello all, suppose these cases: 1) I am in my personal-inbox/ 2) I reply to a message from my personal network 3) then the message I wrote is saved in personal-inbox 4) I have my thread including my message Other case: 1) I am in my work-box/ 2) I reply to my colleagues 3) then the message I have written is saved in work-box/ 4) I have my thread including my message Finally the question is : howto to hack "set record=+sent" ? Many thanks for sharing your tricks/ideas. -- Alexandre Delanoë
Re: Howto save sent-replied-message in current mail-folder
Le mardi 14 juin de l'année 2011, vers 17 heures et 25 minutes, Stefan Wimmer écrivait: > set record="^" ^^ > should do the trick but.. It does not work with my configuration. Does it with yours ? -- Alexandre Delanoë
Re: Howto save sent-replied-message in current mail-folder
Le mardi 14 juin de l'année 2011, vers 17 heures et 54 minutes, Stefan Wimmer écrivait: > Certainly it does otherwise I'd not propose it ;-) Sure, > Though I use > > folder-hook . 'set record="^"' > > since my config is based on folders That is the complete trick which works with my configuration as well. Many thanks. -- Alexandre Delanoë
Re: automatically delete duplicate email ... is it possible ? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
Le vendredi 08 juillet de l'année 2011, vers 11 heures et 14 minutes, Wilkinson, Alex écrivait: > Hi all, > > I often find my self using "D ~= $" (manually) to delete duplicate email from > my > mailing lists mailboxes. Can anyone recommend a way to have this automagically > done for me ? If you use procmail, just add this in your ~/.procmailrc :0 Whc: msgid.lock | formail -D 8192 msgid.cache :0 a: $HOME/mail/-duplicatas Hope that helps -- Alexandre Delanoë
Subfolder with mutt ?
Dear Mutt Users, do you have any solutions for such issue : http://dev.mutt.org/trac/wiki/ExtendedMaildirFormat Indeed, I wonder how to display folder and subfolder view in my sidebar. Many thanks for your tricks, Alexandre
Highlit messages with specific type of attachments
Hello, one can color message in index according to its number of attachments: color index black red "~X1" How to color with specific (not HTML or not GPG signature) file only ? Thanks for help. Cheers, Alexandre
Re: Highlit messages with specific type of attachments
Le 01 août 16, vers 16:25, Andreas Doll ecrivait: > On 2016-08-01 at 15:20, Alexandre Delanoë wrote: > > one can color message in index according to its number of attachments: > > color index black red "~X1" > By the way, you can also use "~X 1-" to color mails with one or more > attachments. Indeed. > > How to color with specific (not HTML or not GPG signature) file only ? > > If your goal is not to color mails with specific attachment types, but rather > to exclude HTML and GPG attachments from coloring, have a look at [1] to > exclude those from attachment counting and use it in combination with the > above. > > > Best regards, > Andreas > > [1] http://www.mutt.org/doc/devel/manual/#attachments Yes, it works as expected. Thanks!
next-unread-mailbox but taking into account Old messages as well?
Good evening, Is there an equivalent to next-unread-mailbox but that goes to the next Mailbox with Old messages as well? My use case is the following: when listing my Maildirs via IMAP, E-Mail Clients like Evolution, Mail.app (OS X), ... mark by default messages as "Seen" and append the Maildir S flag. My guess is that the application actually reads the messages in order to generate a preview (first few words of the email on the iPhone for instance). The right fix would be to disable this behavior in these applications, so that when I read the Maildir locally, mutt doesn't interpret these messages as Old. That is not always possible unfortunately. As a workaround, I'd like to have a next-unread-or-old-mailbox function that allows me to go through all my (actually) unread emails. If it doesn't exist, would a patch implementing this function be acceptable? Thanks, -- Pierre-Alexandre Meyer
