Re: FreeBSD LDFLAGS=-static ?
On Sun, Mar 03, 2013 at 02:29:46AM -0500, grarpamp wrote: > Why, when supplying 'LDFLAGS=-static' do these change > from yes, to no? > > < checking for idna_to_unicode_8z8z... yes > > checking for idna_to_unicode_8z8z... no > > < checking for idna_to_ascii_8z... yes > < checking for idna_to_ascii_lz... yes > > checking for idna_to_ascii_8z... no > > checking for idna_to_ascii_lz... no I can only guess, but my guess is there's no static version of those libraries to compile against. -- Derek D. Martinhttp://www.pizzashack.org/ GPG Key ID: 0xDFBEAD02 -=-=-=-=- This message is posted from an invalid address. Replying to it will result in undeliverable mail due to spam prevention. Sorry for the inconvenience. pgpceByhHO1hA.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: FreeBSD LDFLAGS=-static ?
Incoming from Derek Martin:
> On Sun, Mar 03, 2013 at 02:29:46AM -0500, grarpamp wrote:
> > Why, when supplying 'LDFLAGS=-static' do these change
> > from yes, to no?
> >
> > < checking for idna_to_unicode_8z8z... yes
> > > checking for idna_to_unicode_8z8z... no
> >
> > < checking for idna_to_ascii_8z... yes
> > < checking for idna_to_ascii_lz... yes
> > > checking for idna_to_ascii_8z... no
> > > checking for idna_to_ascii_lz... no
>
> I can only guess, but my guess is there's no static version of those
> libraries to compile against.
Or, they haven't yet been recognized by the system via ldconfig?
Edit /etc/ld.so.conf (or whatever) && ldconfig.
--
Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.
(*) :(){ :|:& };:
- -
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
