Re: OpenPGP and Subject encryption

2011-11-07 Thread Patrick Shanahan
* P. Mazart  [11-06-11 17:16]:
> are there any implementations or thoughts on subject encryption
> for PGP/MIME, yet?

an encrypted Subject would only be visible to the intended recipient
holdiong the correct key and only after he decrypted the post, so what
would be the point?  Why would you send an encrypted post (?Subject) to
anyone but the intended recipient?

-- 
(paka)Patrick Shanahan   Plainfield, Indiana, USA  HOG # US1244711
http://wahoo.no-ip.orgPhoto Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2
http://en.opensuse.org   openSUSE Community Member
Registered Linux User #207535@ http://linuxcounter.net


Re: OpenPGP and Subject encryption

2011-11-07 Thread P. Mazart
Hi Patrick,

thank you for your answer!

Patrick Shanahan schrieb am 07.11.2011 13:21:37:
> an encrypted Subject would only be visible to the intended recipient
> holdiong the correct key and only after he decrypted the post, so what
> would be the point?

Avoiding inference about the email’s content…
That’s why we use pgp, don’t we‽

> Why would you send an encrypted post (?Subject) to
> anyone but the intended recipient?

I guess we got each other wrong here,
I was indeed talking about encrypting AND sending
to the keyholder.

None the less I stick to the policy of choosing a
proper, content describing, subject which in return
does reveal information about the content while traveling
over the net.
So a dummy subject which might be overridden after the first
decryption might fit the purpose of “hiding” information about the mail…

I wonder if there’s some ideas on that yet.

Thank you.
P.M.


Re: Named tags/lables?

2011-11-07 Thread Tim Gray

On Nov 04, 2011 at 05:25 PM +0100, Jostein Berntsen wrote:

If you use mu search you can easily save your search to a new search folder by
just changing the folder path. Standard mu search:

mu find --clearlinks --format=links --linksdir=~/mail/search 


Good idea.  I never thought of changing the results folder on the fly.


Re: OpenPGP and Subject encryption

2011-11-07 Thread Patrick Morris
If you were to somehow encrypt the subject and send the email, how would 
you propose the recipient decrypts it?


Email subject line encryption just isn't a feature of PGP, per RFC 
4880.  Even if Mutt could do it, chances are very slim the client on the 
other end would be able to decrypt it (I'm not aware of any that do 
this, though some may exist using proprietary solutions), and then 
there's the problem of multiple recipients, which could result in a very 
large subject field, which in itself could break delivery agents and 
mail clients.


On 11/7/2011 4:44 AM, P. Mazart wrote:

Hi Patrick,

thank you for your answer!

Patrick Shanahan schrieb am 07.11.2011 13:21:37:

an encrypted Subject would only be visible to the intended recipient
holdiong the correct key and only after he decrypted the post, so what
would be the point?

Avoiding inference about the email’s content…
That’s why we use pgp, don’t we‽


Why would you send an encrypted post (?Subject) to
anyone but the intended recipient?

I guess we got each other wrong here,
I was indeed talking about encrypting AND sending
to the keyholder.

None the less I stick to the policy of choosing a
proper, content describing, subject which in return
does reveal information about the content while traveling
over the net.
So a dummy subject which might be overridden after the first
decryption might fit the purpose of “hiding” information about the mail…

I wonder if there’s some ideas on that yet.

Thank you.
P.M.




set different index_format for mails

2011-11-07 Thread stardiviner

I try to set different *index_format* for maials. like this:

message-hook "~g" "set index_format = ' A %H %C| +%N [%4Z] %-13L >> %s %> 
%4c' " # signed
message-hook "~g" "set index_format = ' B %H %C| %N [%4Z] %-13L > %s %> 
%4c' " # replied

This does not work. But folder-hook can set different *index_format*. like this:

folder-hook .   set index_format = '" %H %C| [%4Z] %-13L » %s  %>  %4c"'
folder-hook =INBOX  set index_format = '" %H %C| %N [%4Z] %-13L >> %s  %>  
%4c"' # for macro "gi"

Is there other way to set different *index_format* for mails ?
If you have good idea, please tell me, thanks very much.

-- 
stardiviner GPG: 5D9F64D8 Twitter: @numbchild
http://stardiviner.dyndns-blog.com/author.html


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature