Re: Mutt 1.5.18 (2008-12-10) and folder_format
* Dave Wood [12-13-08 23:23]: > Just testing 1.5.18 and noticed that now %s is showing in KBytes > instead of bytes. Is there a new format for bytes? No, I'm still on 1.5.13 and KBytes are shown, but it is %c, not %s. %s represents the message subject in $index_format. -- Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USAHOG # US1244711 http://wahoo.no-ip.org Photo Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2 Registered Linux User #207535@ http://counter.li.org
Re: bind doesn't work even though it's listed with ?
On (13:52 14/12/08), Joost Kremers put forth the proposition: > On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 10:09:24PM +, Dave Wood wrote: > > I'm using to read next-undeleted which works fine, but when I set > > to read previous-undeleted it says key not bound. I have it > > set for index and pager: > > > > bindindex next-undeleted > > bindpager next-undeleted > > bindindex previous-undeleted > > bindpager previous-undeleted > > > > Any ideas why this isn't working? > > Try the following: open up a terminal, execute the command 'xev' and then > hit shift-tab. That'll show you how the keys are actually known to X. > > in my case (slackware linux 12.1, X 7.1), hitting just the tab key yields > 'Tab', but hitting shift-tab tells me that in combination with shift, the > tab key is suddenly known as ISO_Left_Tab. Yes I'm also using Slack and I found the same thing. Mutt doesn't recognise any varient of that name though, but after some RTFM'ing I found that mutt calls backtab so I have fixed it eventually. Cheers > > In Emacs, I couldn't bind S-Tab unless I used ISO_Left_Tab as keysym. > (Well, actually, I needed to use 'iso_lefttab'. So much for > standardisation... ;-) > > Perhaps if you try or variations thereof in .muttrc > you may be able to bind shift-tab. > > > -- > Joost Kremers, PhD > University of Frankfurt > Institute for Cognitive Linguistics > Grüneburgplatz 1 > 60629 Frankfurt am Main, Germany -- Important letters which contain no errors will develop errors in the mail. Corresponding errors will show up in the duplicate while the Boss is reading it.
Re: bind doesn't work even though it's listed with ?
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 10:09:24PM +, Dave Wood wrote: > I'm using to read next-undeleted which works fine, but when I set > to read previous-undeleted it says key not bound. I have it > set for index and pager: > > bindindex next-undeleted > bindpager next-undeleted > bindindex previous-undeleted > bindpager previous-undeleted > > Any ideas why this isn't working? Try the following: open up a terminal, execute the command 'xev' and then hit shift-tab. That'll show you how the keys are actually known to X. in my case (slackware linux 12.1, X 7.1), hitting just the tab key yields 'Tab', but hitting shift-tab tells me that in combination with shift, the tab key is suddenly known as ISO_Left_Tab. In Emacs, I couldn't bind S-Tab unless I used ISO_Left_Tab as keysym. (Well, actually, I needed to use 'iso_lefttab'. So much for standardisation... ;-) Perhaps if you try or variations thereof in .muttrc you may be able to bind shift-tab. -- Joost Kremers, PhD University of Frankfurt Institute for Cognitive Linguistics Grüneburgplatz 1 60629 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
Re: Mutt 1.5.18 (2008-12-10) and folder_format
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 07:35:51AM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote: > * Dave Wood [12-13-08 23:23]: > > Just testing 1.5.18 and noticed that now %s is showing in KBytes > > instead of bytes. Is there a new format for bytes? > > No, I'm still on 1.5.13 and KBytes are shown, but it is %c, not %s. > %s represents the message subject in $index_format. > from TFM, 3.59. folder_format Type: string Default: "%2C %t %N %F %2l %-8.8u %-8.8g %8s %d %f" ... %s size in bytes festus -- It is not unusual for those at the wrong end of the club to have a clearer picture of reality than those who wield it. Noam Chomsky pgpSOWTwZriKx.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Mutt 1.5.18 (2008-12-10) and folder_format
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 04:21:07AM +, Dave Wood wrote: > Just testing 1.5.18 and noticed that now %s is showing in KBytes > instead of bytes. Is there a new format for bytes? You'll get K only if the mailbox is smaller than a megabyte, otherwise you'll get M. I brought up the issue 6 months ago, and the lack of response suggests that it's not a widespread problem. -- George
Re: Mutt 1.5.18 (2008-12-10) and folder_format
On (08:49 14/12/08), George Davidovich put forth the proposition: On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 04:21:07AM +, Dave Wood wrote: Just testing 1.5.18 and noticed that now %s is showing in KBytes instead of bytes. Is there a new format for bytes? You'll get K only if the mailbox is smaller than a megabyte, otherwise you'll get M. I brought up the issue 6 months ago, and the lack of response suggests that it's not a widespread problem. Well it's not a huge problem for me I guess, but it would be nice to some extra formatting options like display in bytes or K/M. -- George -- The Roman Rule The one who says it cannot be done should never interrupt the one who is doing it.
Re: Mutt 1.5.18 (2008-12-10) and folder_format
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 06:09:18PM +, Dave Wood wrote:
> On (08:49 14/12/08), George Davidovich put forth
> the proposition:
> > On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 04:21:07AM +, Dave Wood wrote:
> > > Just testing 1.5.18 and noticed that now %s is showing in KBytes
> > > instead of bytes. Is there a new format for bytes?
> >
> > You'll get K only if the mailbox is smaller than a megabyte,
> > otherwise you'll get M.
> >
> > I brought up the issue 6 months ago, and the lack of response
> > suggests that it's not a widespread problem.
>
> Well it's not a huge problem for me I guess, but it would be nice to
> some extra formatting options like display in bytes or K/M.
Agreed, but the recognition of a problem and a possible fix generally
precede discussions of workarounds and their relative merits, let alone
new feature requests.
Me, I've removed %s from folder_format entirely. I expect to get bitten
one day, but for day to day maildir browsing (where everything is
"0.5K"), file size information isn't that important. Similarly, I've
removed %b from index_format for IMAP browsing, choosing instead to rely
on the clunky but reliably correct information provided by using the
toggle-mailboxes ('y') command.
Not entirely unlike real solutions, but who's counting?
--
George
certificate for gmail
I have already setup gmail certificate files for mutt and msmtp. However I wondered why other email clients such as outlook in m$ windows or even thunderbird under linux do not ask for them. Are those gmail certificates bundled with email clients or are they already located in some well known directories? -- regards, GPG key 1024D/4434BAB3 2008-08-24 gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 4434BAB3 唐詩104 李白 夜泊牛渚懷古 牛渚西江夜 青天無片雲 登舟望秋月 空憶謝將軍 余亦能高詠 斯人不可聞 明朝挂帆席 楓葉落紛紛
