Re: List problems?

[Pascal Brugier]

On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 01:23:27AM +0200, D. J. Bolderman wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Sep 2002, John Iverson wrote:
> 
> > I am recently only seeing list messages that are (mis)addressed to
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.  And there is an error message at
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mutt-users/messages that says:
> 
> > Warning! Your group has exceeded its message storage limits of 64 MB
> > by 0.0 MB.  If you don't remove messages, older messages will be
> > deleted to make room for new ones.
> 
> yeah i not getting any messages from the list since saterday...

Yes i sent a message to mutt.org last Friday and i never seen it
on the list..

Pascal



msg31299/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: List problems?

[D. J. Bolderman]

> > > I am recently only seeing list messages that are (mis)addressed to
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.  And there is an error message at
> > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mutt-users/messages that says:

> > > Warning! Your group has exceeded its message storage limits of 64 MB
> > > by 0.0 MB.  If you don't remove messages, older messages will be
> > > deleted to make room for new ones.

> > yeah i not getting any messages from the list since saterday...

> Yes i sent a message to mutt.org last Friday and i never seen it
> on the list..

I also sent a reply to Sven's mail of last night about these problems.
He sent it to the mutt.org list, so i replied to it, but never saw it
back again...




msg31300/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: List problems?

[René Clerc]

* D. J. Bolderman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [30-09-2002 10:08]:

> > > yeah i not getting any messages from the list since saterday...
> 
> > Yes i sent a message to mutt.org last Friday and i never seen it
> > on the list..
> 
> I also sent a reply to Sven's mail of last night about these problems.
> He sent it to the mutt.org list, so i replied to it, but never saw it
> back again...

Which makes things real nice 'n quiet :)

-- 
René Clerc  - ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

Ik ben niet droknen.
-Rachel Pieterse



msg31301/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: List problems?

[D. J. Bolderman]

On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, Ren?? Clerc wrote:

> > > > yeah i not getting any messages from the list since saterday...

> > > Yes i sent a message to mutt.org last Friday and i never seen it
> > > on the list..

> > I also sent a reply to Sven's mail of last night about these
> > problems.  He sent it to the mutt.org list, so i replied to it, but
> > never saw it back again...

> Which makes things real nice 'n quiet :)

Just what mailinglists are for ? :)



msg31302/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: List problems?

[PeterKorman]

Who is the kind person responsible for the mutt.org
server? 

Is it possible they lost a disk, or ran out of space,
or their firewall went kabluey now blocking everything?

Is is it now ok to post to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
since thats the only thing that works?

[JPK]

-- 

[]+ Wisdom is vindicated by all her children.  +[]
[]  []
[]+ GnuPG  +[]




msg31303/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Mutt-User List Servers

[PeterKorman]

I'm wondering how the servers that manage the list
are set up. Is there 1 server that receives all
messages and many that send the messages to the 
subscribers?


-- 

[]+ Wisdom is vindicated by all her children.  +[]
[]  []
[]+ GnuPG  +[]




msg31304/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: List problems?

[Steve Kennedy]

On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 07:26:40AM -0400, PeterKorman wrote:

> Who is the kind person responsible for the mutt.org
> server? 
> Is it possible they lost a disk, or ran out of space,
> or their firewall went kabluey now blocking everything?
> Is is it now ok to post to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> since thats the only thing that works?

I host the list ... I believe a colleague may have done some
mail reconfiguration on Friday, I'll check nothing's changed, and
put things back to normal if they have !!!

Sorry if things have broken ... unfortunately I've been away from
access since Thurs ...

Steve


-- 
NetTek Ltd Flat 2, 43 Howitt Road, Belsize Park, London NW3 4LU, UK
tel +44-(0)20 7483 1169  fax +44-(0)20 7483 2455   mob 07775 755503
SMS steve-pager (at) gbnet.net [body] gpg 1024D/468952DB 2001-09-19

Two minor configuration questions

[Kurt Lieber]

Two minor configuration questions that I haven't found answers for in the
manual, list archives or google:

1.  By default, when you delete a message in a mailbox index, mutt moves
one message *down* by default.  Can I change this to move one message *up*?

2.  Once a message is deleted, but not actually purged, using the arrow
keys to navigate messages will skip over deleted messages.  I can "jump" to
a specific deleted message by number, but is there a way to not have the
deleted messages ignored when navigating by arrow keys?

Finally, I'm new to mutt and may have missed a configuration option or
three, so if something in this message is formatted wrong, a header is
missing or I've committed some other egregious breach of netiquette, please
let me know so I can fix it. :)

Thanks.

--kurt

Re: Two minor configuration questions

[darren chamberlain]

* Kurt Lieber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-30 09:22]:
> 1.  By default, when you delete a message in a mailbox index, mutt
> moves one message *down* by default.  Can I change this to move one
> message *up*?

You can setup a macro:

  macro pager d ""

Basically, delete - up - up.

> 2.  Once a message is deleted, but not actually purged, using the
> arrow keys to navigate messages will skip over deleted messages.  I
> can "jump" to a specific deleted message by number, but is there a way
> to not have the deleted messages ignored when navigating by arrow
> keys?

By default  is bound to next-undeleted; rebind it to next-entry:

  bind index  next-entry

I personally use 'j' for next-undeleted and 'J' for next-entry, and 'k'
for previous-undeleted and 'K' for previous-entry.

(darren)

-- 
It is impossible to travel faster than the speed of light, and
certainly not desirable, as one's hat keeps blowing off.
-- Woody Allen

Re: Tagging mail by date

[Justin Gombos]

* Chris Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-26 08:38]:
[...]
> Or even better does anyone have any sample scripts using mutt as the
> 'source' for archiving mail?  I've been looking at archmbox but it
> doesn't quite fit my requirements and I suspect that using mutt to
> actually extract the messages I want to archive may be easier than
> bodging archmbox.  I particularly want to preserve the directory
> hierarchy, i.e. what I want to do ultimately is extract all messages
> older than xxx days from my current mail and append them to mailboxes
> in an identical archive hierarchy (which will be on a different
> machine with no serious disk quota limits).

Procmail is probably the best tool for the job.  Just yesterday I
wrote the following procmail recipe file for this.  It will parse out
the year from each message and determine a quarter from the month,
then move it to a mailbox of the format 2002-qtr3.

MONTH="(Jan|Feb|Mar|Apr|May|Jun|Jul|Aug|Sep|Oct|Nov|Dec)"

FIRST_QTR="(Jan|Feb|Mar)"
SECOND_QTR="(Apr|May|Jun)"
THIRD_QTR="(Jul|Aug|Sep)"
FOURTH_QTR="(Oct|Nov|Dec)"

:0 :
*$ ^Date:.*$FIRST_QTR
*$ ^Date:.*$MONTH +\/[0-9]*
$MATCH-qtr1

:0 :
*$ ^Date:.*$SECOND_QTR
*$ ^Date:.*$MONTH +\/[0-9]*
$MATCH-qtr2

:0 :
*$ ^Date:.*$THIRD_QTR
*$ ^Date:.*$MONTH +\/[0-9]*
$MATCH-qtr3

:0 :
*$ ^Date:.*$FOURTH_QTR
*$ ^Date:.*$MONTH +\/[0-9]*
$MATCH-qtr4

Colour problem on Solaris

[Chris Green]

As Sven just pointed out I have been using rather old versions of mutt
I have upgraded all my mutts (four of them) to version 1.4i.  All of
the Linux ones were no problem, just ./configure with the required
options, make and install and it worked like clockwork.

However the Solaris 2.6 one is proving a bit more difficult.

First it didn't add '-liconv' to the Makefile line for linking, I fixed
that by adding it manually to the Makefile.

Secondly, and more significant, is that colours are not working
correctly any more.  When mutt loads it complains:-

Error in /home/chris/.mutt/muttrc, line 27: default: no such color
Error in /home/chris/.mutt/muttrc, line 28: default: no such color
...
...
etc.

I'm using ncurses 5.0 on both the Solaris version and the Linux
versions and the 'default' colour works fine on the Linux versions.
I have a sneaking feeling that I remember having this problem before
but unfortunately I can't remember how to fix it.

-- 
Chris Green ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

Re: List problems? - gbnet.net problem?

[Sven Guckes]

* D. J. Bolderman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-29 23:24]:
> On Sun, 29 Sep 2002, John Iverson wrote:
> > I am recently only seeing list messages that are (mis)addressed to
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.  And there is an error message at
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mutt-users/messages that says:
> > Warning! Your group has exceeded its message storage limits of 64 MB
> > by 0.0 MB.  If you don't remove messages, older messages will be
> > deleted to make room for new ones.
>
> yeah i not getting any messages from the list since saterday...

  Mutt 1.4i: =IN/MUTT (threads) [69/47071] [NEW=40058] [~d 26/9/2002-]

so - 69 messages since 26th September...

> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Mail-Followup-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

i won't fall for this... no no...

perhaps the problem is only with addresses
who subscribed to  the gbnet.net addresses?

Sven

.procmailrc

[savanna]

A slightly offtopic question - I'm using procmail for my mail filtering,
just wondering what people are using to catch all of the mutt-users
email. I'm currently using:

:0 :
* ^To:.*(mutt-.*)
mutt-users

:0 :
* ^Cc:.*(mutt-.*)
mutt-users

:0 :
* ^From:.*(mutt-.*)
mutt-users

An better recipe out there? (procmail recipes aren't my strength).

-- 
Savanna |  Free as in 'free speech',
GnuPG Pub Key E40FAE08  |  not 'free beer'.



msg31311/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: List problems? - gbnet.net problem?

[Steve Kennedy]

On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 02:42:54AM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote:

> * D. J. Bolderman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-29 23:24]:
> > On Sun, 29 Sep 2002, John Iverson wrote:
> > > I am recently only seeing list messages that are (mis)addressed to
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.  And there is an error message at
> > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mutt-users/messages that says:
> > > Warning! Your group has exceeded its message storage limits of 64 MB
> > > by 0.0 MB.  If you don't remove messages, older messages will be
> > > deleted to make room for new ones.
> > yeah i not getting any messages from the list since saterday...
>   Mutt 1.4i: =IN/MUTT (threads) [69/47071] [NEW=40058] [~d 26/9/2002-]
> so - 69 messages since 26th September...
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Mail-Followup-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> i won't fall for this... no no...
> perhaps the problem is only with addresses
> who subscribed to  the gbnet.net addresses?

Sorry there was a problem this end, trouble is I dont control the
mutt.org domain, and we made a mail change on Friday to investigate
a TCP problem.

Forgot the mutt mail would get stuck, so currently clearing about
600 queued messages, but unfortunately I'd guess most of them will
be SPAM.

Things should be returning to normal ...

Steve

-- 
NetTek Ltd Flat 2, 43 Howitt Road, Belsize Park, London NW3 4LU, UK
tel +44-(0)20 7483 1169  fax +44-(0)20 7483 2455   mob 07775 755503
SMS steve-pager (at) gbnet.net [body] gpg 1024D/468952DB 2001-09-19

Re: download pgpwrap from where?

[Elimar Riesebieter]

On Thu, 26 Sep 2002 the mental interface of 
savanna told:

> Where do I download pgpewrap from? It's referred to in the sample
> muttrc files, for encrypting mail with gpg, however I can't find it
> anywhere on the web (though I've found hundreds of references to using
> it in my .muttrc ;-) ).
> 
> I've searched debian.org, rpmfind, and the archives of mutt-users.

pgpewrap is part of mutt. At debian distri you can find in
/usr/lib/mutt. Or try /usr/local/lib/mutt.

> 
> Here's one of the offending lines from my .muttrc:
> 
> set pgp_encrypt_sign_command="pgpewrap gpg --passphrase-fd 0 -v --batch
> --output - --encrypt --sign %?a?-u %a? --armor --always-trust -- -r %r
> -- %f"

$PATH doesn't include /usr/lib/mutt so you must change your muttrc
to /usr/lib/mutt/pgpewrap gpg ...


HTH

-- 
  Alles was viel bedacht wird ist bedenklich!;-)
 Friedrich Nietzsche

reply-to alternatives

[Hanspeter Roth]

Hello,

are there alternative headers to Reply-To: and Mail-Followup-To:
used by other MUAs?

-Hanspeter

signatures - name+address is *minimum* (was: fast conversion of html mail to text)

[Sven Guckes]

* Laurabelle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-26 18:03]:
> Just my 2p - I use procmail recipes (and a couple of scripts) to strip
> HTML formatting from all legitimate email.  The same scripts add a note
> to the effect that HTML has been removed; if I want to exchange email
> with that person again, I generally ask for text-only email.  People
> tend to cooperate, since after all they probably just don't realize it.

i have met quite some people who do undrestand the problem -
but keep ignoring that the keep offending people by sending
them all text as html, too.  the list is in my killfile...

> >Sven  [usually attaching sigs which fit the content of the message]
> I find that my current .sig is often quite relevant when answering
> questions but even more so when asking them.  It reminds me that the
> answer is only as good as the question.  Besides, it's short.
>
> Laurabelle
> --
> ASCII silly question, get a silly ANSI.

this is a quote after sigdashes - but not a signature.
signatures contain at least a name and an address, too.

signatures contains a name *and* an address.  at least.
quotes are just quotes and may be added to signatures.

but i have to admit that the quote is nice, indeed! :-)

Sven

Re: redefining mailboxes while running mutt

[Nicolas Rachinsky]

* Robert Lillack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-26 17:11 +0200]:
> since I have  a lot of mailboxes i wanted  to see only those
> containing new mail while in the browser view. Because I use
> MH folders all needed is just a really simple shell script:
> 
> for i in `flist -all -recurse -noshowzero -fast`
> do
> echo -n "\"+$i\" "
> done
> 
> But  I have  trouble using  it. If  I change  my .muttrc  to
> contain:
> 
> mailboxes `getnewboxes.sh`
> 
> everything is great,  but to do that while  Mutt is running.
> Something like entering:
> 
> :mailboxes `getnewboxes.sh`
> 
> doesn't work. Any Ideas?

I think new mailboxes are added to the list, but old ones are never
removed. You need the unmaliboxes command. There is a patch for it on
my homepage and the latest cvs version should include this command.

Nicolas

From: header wrong w/ multiple IMAP accounts

[Kurt Lieber]

I'm setting up mutt for the first time and have been able to answer most
of my questions through the docs and list archives.  However, I've hit a
wall on one issue.

I have two accounts on the same IMAP server.  I can successfully navigate
between accounts using account-hooks.  However, in both accounts, the
From: header defaults to my username followed by the @ sign.  (i.e.
kurtl@)

I've set both the $envelope_from and $from variables, but that doesn't
help.  If I set up mutt with just one IMAP account (and no account-hooks),
it works fine.  Here are the relevant portions from my .muttrc.  Any help
is appreciated.  Also, I'm new to mutt, so if I'm doing something the hard
way, please let me know.


account-hook . 'unset imap_pass; unset spoolfile; unset folder; \
unset record; unset postponed; unset from; unset realname; \
unset hostname; unset sort; unset sort_aux'

account-hook imap:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ \
   'set spoolfile=imap:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/INBOX; \
set folder=imap:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/; \
set record=imap:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/INBOX.Sent; \
set postponed=imap:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/INBOX.Drafts; \
set use_from; \
set envelope_from; \
set [EMAIL PROTECTED]; \
set hostname=my.server.com'

account-hook imap:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ \
   'set spoolfile=imap:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/INBOX; \
set folder=imap:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/; \
set record=imap:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/INBOX.Sent; \
set postponed=imap:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/INBOX.Drafts; \
set use_from; \
set envelope_from; \
set [EMAIL PROTECTED]; \
set hostname=my.server.com'

folder-hook . 'unset sort; unset sort_aux; unset from; unset hostname'

folder-hook imap:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ 'set sort=threads; set
sort_aux=reverse-date-received'

folder-hook imap:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ 'set sort=reverse-date-received'


--kurt

Re: Tagging mail by date

[MindFuq]

* Chris Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-26 08:38]:
[...]
> Or even better does anyone have any sample scripts using mutt as the
> 'source' for archiving mail?  I've been looking at archmbox but it
> doesn't quite fit my requirements and I suspect that using mutt to
> actually extract the messages I want to archive may be easier than
> bodging archmbox.  I particularly want to preserve the directory
> hierarchy, i.e. what I want to do ultimately is extract all messages
> older than xxx days from my current mail and append them to mailboxes
> in an identical archive hierarchy (which will be on a different
> machine with no serious disk quota limits).

Procmail is probably the best tool for the job.  Just yesterday I
wrote the following procmail recipe file for this.  It will parse out
the year from each message and determine a quarter from the month,
then move it to a mailbox of the format 2002-qtr3.

MONTH="(Jan|Feb|Mar|Apr|May|Jun|Jul|Aug|Sep|Oct|Nov|Dec)"

FIRST_QTR="(Jan|Feb|Mar)"
SECOND_QTR="(Apr|May|Jun)"
THIRD_QTR="(Jul|Aug|Sep)"
FOURTH_QTR="(Oct|Nov|Dec)"

:0 :
*$ ^Date:.*$FIRST_QTR
*$ ^Date:.*$MONTH +\/[0-9]*
$MATCH-qtr1

:0 :
*$ ^Date:.*$SECOND_QTR
*$ ^Date:.*$MONTH +\/[0-9]*
$MATCH-qtr2

:0 :
*$ ^Date:.*$THIRD_QTR
*$ ^Date:.*$MONTH +\/[0-9]*
$MATCH-qtr3

:0 :
*$ ^Date:.*$FOURTH_QTR
*$ ^Date:.*$MONTH +\/[0-9]*
$MATCH-qtr4

Re: download pgpwrap from where?

[Nicolas Rachinsky]

* savanna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-27 03:15 +1000]:
> Where do I download pgpewrap from? It's referred to in the sample
> muttrc files, for encrypting mail with gpg, however I can't find it
> anywhere on the web (though I've found hundreds of references to using
> it in my .muttrc ;-) ).
> 
> I've searched debian.org, rpmfind, and the archives of mutt-users.
> 
> Here's one of the offending lines from my .muttrc:
> 
> set pgp_encrypt_sign_command="pgpewrap gpg --passphrase-fd 0 -v --batch
> --output - --encrypt --sign %?a?-u %a? --armor --always-trust -- -r %r
> -- %f"

It should be in your mutt package.

Nicolas

Re: my_hdr not working with multiple IMAP accounts

[Michael Herman]

On Sun, Sep 29, 2002 at 01:46:28PM -0400, Kurt Lieber wrote:
>I'm setting up mutt for the first time.  I have two separate accounts,
>both on the same IMAP server -- I want to set default From: addresses for
>each of those accounts.  My first question is; do I use account-hook or
>folder-hook?

I use folder-hook as my sending is generally related to what I'm
reading or doing.

>
>My next question; I've tried it using both, and while I can *check* mail
>just fine, the From header is not displayed correctly in either account. 
>My relevant portions of .muttrc:
>
>#set some default locations
>set spoolfile=imap:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/INBOX
>set folder=imap:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
>set record=imap:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/INBOX.Sent
>set postponed=imap:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/INBOX.Drafts
>my_hdr From: Kurt Lieber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>

Try 'set from="[EMAIL PROTECTED]'


>account-hook . 'unset spoolfile folder record postponed hostname
>pgp_autosign; unmy_hdr From:'
>
>account-hook imap:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ \
>   'set spoolfile=imap:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/INBOX; \
>set folder=imap:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/; \
>set record=imap:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/INBOX.Sent; \
>set postponed=imap:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/INBOX.Drafts; \
>my_hdr From: Kurt Lieber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; \

same thing here- 'set from="[EMAIL PROTECTED]"'

>

HTH.

-- 
Michael Herman



msg31320/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: Problem with folder-hook - command must be *one* parameter

[Gary Johnson]

On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 05:42:27AM +0200, D. J. Bolderman wrote:

> You are right, I also tested it with the subject, and then the
> folder-hook works. Now, is there any way to work around this problem ? I
> tried removing the send-hook . lines, but to no avail. I would really
> like to have this feature. I'm downloading my hotmail account with
> gotmail, and when I'm in my hotmail IMAP folder, I want to sent mails
> with the from: address of my hotmail account.

One approach to this is to use folder-hooks to set the send-hooks.  I
haven't tried this with your particular hooks, but I think these, or
something close, will do what you want:

folder-hook . unhook send-hook
folder-hook . send-hook . my_hdr From: 
folder-hook . send-hook mutt-users my_hdr From: 
folder-hook '!'INBOX.MailingLists.Mutt send-hook . my_hdr From: 

HTH,
Gary

-- 
Gary Johnson   | Agilent Technologies
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   | Spokane, Washington, USA
http://www.spocom.com/users/gjohnson/mutt/ |

Re: Problem with folder-hook - command must be *one* parameter

[Gary Johnson]

[My first reply apparently didn't reach the list, so I'm going to try
again.  My apologies if this reaches the list twice.]

On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 05:42:27AM +0200, D. J. Bolderman wrote:

> You are right, I also tested it with the subject, and then the
> folder-hook works. Now, is there any way to work around this problem ? I
> tried removing the send-hook . lines, but to no avail. I would really
> like to have this feature. I'm downloading my hotmail account with
> gotmail, and when I'm in my hotmail IMAP folder, I want to sent mails
> with the from: address of my hotmail account.

One approach to this is to use folder-hooks to set the send-hooks.  I
haven't tried this with your particular hooks, but I think these, or
something close, will do what you want:

folder-hook . unhook send-hook
folder-hook . send-hook . my_hdr From: 
folder-hook . send-hook mutt-users my_hdr From: 
folder-hook '!'INBOX.MailingLists.Mutt send-hook . my_hdr From: 

HTH,
Gary

-- 
Gary Johnson   | Agilent Technologies
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   | Spokane, Washington, USA
http://www.spocom.com/users/gjohnson/mutt/ |

Re: .procmailrc

[darren chamberlain]

* savanna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-30 15:51]:
> A slightly offtopic question - I'm using procmail for my mail
> filtering, just wondering what people are using to catch all of the
> mutt-users email. I'm currently using:

[-- snip --]

> An better recipe out there? 

I've been using:

  # Mutt users
  :0:
  * ^TO_mutt-users
  lists/mutt-users

And haven't seen any messages pass through.

> (procmail recipes aren't my strength).

They aren't anyone's strength.

(darren)

-- 
Although I can accept talking scarecrows, lions, and great
wizards of emerald cities, I find it hard to believe there
is no paperwork involved when your house lands on a witch.

Re: .procmailrc

[Bernard Massot]

On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 01:19:54PM +1000, savanna wrote:
> A slightly offtopic question - I'm using procmail for my mail filtering,
> just wondering what people are using to catch all of the mutt-users
> email. I'm currently using:
> 
> :0 :
> * ^To:.*(mutt-.*)
> mutt-users
> 
> :0 :
> * ^Cc:.*(mutt-.*)
> mutt-users
> 
> :0 :
> * ^From:.*(mutt-.*)
> mutt-users
> 
> An better recipe out there? (procmail recipes aren't my strength).
I'm using this one :
:0: 
* ^TO.*mutt-users@(mutt.org|.*gbnet.net)
ML/mutt-users

search "^TO" in procmailrc's man page
-- 
Bernard Massot



msg31324/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: List problems? - gbnet.net problem?

[John Iverson]

* On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, Sven Guckes wrote:

>   Mutt 1.4i: =IN/MUTT (threads) [69/47071] [NEW=40058] [~d 26/9/2002-]
> 
> so - 69 messages since 26th September...

I only see about 9 messages *after* Sep 26 and they're all
addressed to gbnet.  Do the online archives look okay to you?

I got the message I'm replying to in my inbox, and not my mutt
folder.  I don't see the Sender: field.  Maybe you bcc'ed me or
something?

> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Mail-Followup-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> i won't fall for this... no no...
> 
> perhaps the problem is only with addresses
> who subscribed to  the gbnet.net addresses?

I normally always use the mutt.org address and subscribed with
it.  I only used gbnet that time because I wanted it to make it
to the list.

I don't expect to get my copy of this message either, until the
problem is fixed.

-- 
John

Re: List problems? - gbnet.net problem?

[D. J. Bolderman]

On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, Sven Guckes wrote:


> > yeah i not getting any messages from the list since saterday...

>   Mutt 1.4i: =IN/MUTT (threads) [69/47071] [NEW=40058] [~d 26/9/2002-]

> so - 69 messages since 26th September...

> perhaps the problem is only with addresses
> who subscribed to  the gbnet.net addresses?

i'm subscribed to the mutt.org address... this is the only new message I
got since saturday...





msg31326/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: .procmailrc

[Elimar Riesebieter]

On Mon, 30 Sep 2002 the mental interface of 
savanna told:

> A slightly offtopic question - I'm using procmail for my mail filtering,
> just wondering what people are using to catch all of the mutt-users
> email. I'm currently using:
> 
> :0 :
> * ^To:.*(mutt-.*)
> mutt-users
> 
> :0 :
> * ^Cc:.*(mutt-.*)
> mutt-users
> 
> :0 :
> * ^From:.*(mutt-.*)
> mutt-users
man procmailrc. search for TO.

HTH

-- 
.~.
/V\   L   I   N   U   X
   /( )\ >Phear the Penguin<
   ^^-^^



msg31327/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: .procmailrc

[Michael Raab]

* at 30. Sep. 2002 wrote savanna:
> An better recipe out there? (procmail recipes aren't my strength).

Yes, i use

:0 H
* Sender:.*[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| rcvstore +Foren/Mutt-Users


Bye Michael

-- 
Bash ist zwar nur trocken Brot und Wasser,
aber Tcl ist Nutella mit Maggi ;)  -- Christian Perle in d.c.o.u.l.m
___
Registered Linux User #228306http://counter.li.org   ICQ #151172379

Re: Colour problem on Solaris

[Chris Green]

On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 11:28:55AM +0100, Chris Green wrote:
> As Sven just pointed out I have been using rather old versions of mutt
> I have upgraded all my mutts (four of them) to version 1.4i.  All of
> the Linux ones were no problem, just ./configure with the required
> options, make and install and it worked like clockwork.
> 
> However the Solaris 2.6 one is proving a bit more difficult.
> 
> First it didn't add '-liconv' to the Makefile line for linking, I fixed
> that by adding it manually to the Makefile.
> 
> Secondly, and more significant, is that colours are not working
> correctly any more.  When mutt loads it complains:-
> 
> Error in /home/chris/.mutt/muttrc, line 27: default: no such color
> Error in /home/chris/.mutt/muttrc, line 28: default: no such color
> ...
> ...
> etc.
> 
> I'm using ncurses 5.0 on both the Solaris version and the Linux
> versions and the 'default' colour works fine on the Linux versions.
> I have a sneaking feeling that I remember having this problem before
> but unfortunately I can't remember how to fix it.
> 
It's OK, I've found the problem, it's to do with the (rather broken)
way that ./configure and LD_LIBRARY_PATH interact with each other.

I have installed ncurses and iconv on my desktop Sun sparc myself, I
have a directory I can use on a local disk called /proj/chris for this
sort of stuff.  Thus the ncurses and iconv libraries are in
/proj/chris/lib.  I have the LD_LIBRARY_PATH environment variable set
to point to /proj/chris/lib.


My original ./configure was:-
./configure --prefix=/proj/chris --enable-pop --enable-imap

This worked OK except that the link line in the makefile didn't have
an explicit -liconv line (though configure had found iconv OK!), on
adding this it linked OK and mutt reported it had ncurses 5, but it
didn't know about default colors.


I then tried:-
./configure --prefix=/proj/chris --enable-pop --enable-imap 
--with-curses=/proj/chris --with-iconv=/proj/chris

This produced a compile error! :-
In file included from ../mutt.h:51,
 from auth.c:23:
../charset.h:39: parse error before `ICONV_CONST'


So I then tried:-
./configure --prefix=/proj/chris --enable-pop --enable-imap 
--with-curses=/proj/chris

and this finally worked OK producing a mutt that knows about ncurses
default colours.

Sorry if this should really be in the developers' list.


-- 
Chris Green ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

Re: Tagging mail by date

[MindFuq]

* Chris Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-26 08:38]:
[...]
> Or even better does anyone have any sample scripts using mutt as the
> 'source' for archiving mail?  I've been looking at archmbox but it
> doesn't quite fit my requirements and I suspect that using mutt to
> actually extract the messages I want to archive may be easier than
> bodging archmbox.  I particularly want to preserve the directory
> hierarchy, i.e. what I want to do ultimately is extract all messages
> older than xxx days from my current mail and append them to mailboxes
> in an identical archive hierarchy (which will be on a different
> machine with no serious disk quota limits).

Procmail is probably the best tool for the job.  Just yesterday I
wrote the following procmail recipe file for this.  It will parse out
the year from each message and determine a quarter from the month,
then move it to a mailbox of the format 2002-qtr3.

MONTH="(Jan|Feb|Mar|Apr|May|Jun|Jul|Aug|Sep|Oct|Nov|Dec)"

FIRST_QTR="(Jan|Feb|Mar)"
SECOND_QTR="(Apr|May|Jun)"
THIRD_QTR="(Jul|Aug|Sep)"
FOURTH_QTR="(Oct|Nov|Dec)"

:0 :
*$ ^Date:.*$FIRST_QTR
*$ ^Date:.*$MONTH +\/[0-9]*
$MATCH-qtr1

:0 :
*$ ^Date:.*$SECOND_QTR
*$ ^Date:.*$MONTH +\/[0-9]*
$MATCH-qtr2

:0 :
*$ ^Date:.*$THIRD_QTR
*$ ^Date:.*$MONTH +\/[0-9]*
$MATCH-qtr3

:0 :
*$ ^Date:.*$FOURTH_QTR
*$ ^Date:.*$MONTH +\/[0-9]*
$MATCH-qtr4

Re: download pgpwrap from where?

[Sven Guckes]

* savanna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-26 19:08]:
> Where do I download pgpewrap from?

http://cvs.gnupg.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/mutt/pgpewrap.c?cvsroot=Mutt
"Include C version of pgpewrap, by Wessel Dankers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>."

maybe that's a hint?

http://fruit.eu.org/.?word=wessel
interesting.

Sven

Re: The browser

[Sven Guckes]

* Johan Svedberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-26 16:44]:
> Anyone experinced mutt going to the wrong mailbox
> when you're in the browsers mailbox view and place
> the indicator on some mailbox and press enter?

no.  tell us about it!  fat finger syndrome, maybe?  ;-)

Sven  ["re-pro-du-ci-ble ex-am-ple?"]

Re: redefining mailboxes while running mutt -> unmailboxes does not exist

[Sven Guckes]

* Robert Lillack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-26 15:46]:
> since I have  a lot of mailboxes i wanted  to see only
> those containing new mail while in the browser view.
> Because I use MH folders all needed is
> just a really simple shell script: [..]
> But  I have  trouble using  it. If
> I change  my .muttrc  to contain:
> mailboxes `getnewboxes.sh`
> everything is great, but to do that while
> Mutt is running.  Something like entering:
> :mailboxes `getnewboxes.sh`
> doesn't work. Any Ideas?

i suppose you expect that this will overwrite
the existing list of mailboxes.  you're wrong.
and there is no such command as "unmailboxes".
tough luck.

workaround:  quit and restart.
in which case you do not really
need to update anything, right?  ;-)

Sven

-- 
"wn, ung zna qraa va qre oj qvrfra whatra
 fpuabrfrya hroreunhcg avpugf orvtroenpug?"

Re: .procmailrc

[Will Yardley]

savanna wrote:

> A slightly offtopic question - I'm using procmail for my mail filtering,
> just wondering what people are using to catch all of the mutt-users
> email. I'm currently using:
> 
> :0 :
> * ^To:.*(mutt-.*)
> mutt-users
> 
> :0 :
> * ^Cc:.*(mutt-.*)
> mutt-users
> 
> :0 :
> * ^From:.*(mutt-.*)
> mutt-users

Trailing .*'s are always redundant, and the parantheses also seem
unnecessary. Also, consider that ^TO or ^TO_ will match To, Cc, and a
bunch of other stuff.

you could try something like:
#mutt
:0:
* ^Return-Path: 

Re: download pgpwrap from where?

[Elimar Riesebieter]

Hello Savanna,

On Fri, 27 Sep 2002 the mental interface of 
savanna told:

> Where do I download pgpewrap from? It's referred to in the sample
> muttrc files, for encrypting mail with gpg, however I can't find it
> anywhere on the web (though I've found hundreds of references to using
> it in my .muttrc ;-) ).

pgpewrap is part of mutt distribution.

> I've searched debian.org, rpmfind, and the archives of mutt-users.
> 
> Here's one of the offending lines from my .muttrc:
> 
> set pgp_encrypt_sign_command="pgpewrap gpg --passphrase-fd 0 -v --batch
> --output - --encrypt --sign %?a?-u %a? --armor --always-trust -- -r %r
> -- %f"

On debian you can find it at /usr/lib/mutt/pgpewrap. Try
/usr/local/lib/mutt as well. /usr/lib/mutt isn't a part of $PATH so
you have to set:
set pgp_encrypt_sign_command="/usr/lib/mutt/pgpewrap gpg --passphrase-fd \
0 -v --batch --output - --encrypt --sign %?a?-u %a? --armor --always-trust \
-- -r %r -- %f"
in your muttrc.

HTH

-- 
  Do you smell something burning or ist it me?



msg31335/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: The browser

[David Britton]

On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 06:26:25PM +0200, Johan Svedberg wrote:
> Anyone experinced mutt going to the wrong mailbox when you're in the
> browsers mailbox view and place the indicator on some mailbox and press
> enter?

Sometimes... like when new mail comes in the mailbox I was just in, I
sometimes get taken back to said mailbox.  It happens so infrequently
that I have never worried about looking into it.

/db

Re: download pgpwrap from where?

[Bruno Lustosa]

savanna [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> Where do I download pgpewrap from? It's referred to in the sample
> muttrc files, for encrypting mail with gpg, however I can't find it
> anywhere on the web (though I've found hundreds of references to using
> it in my .muttrc ;-) ).
> 
> I've searched debian.org, rpmfind, and the archives of mutt-users.
> 
> Here's one of the offending lines from my .muttrc:
> 
> set pgp_encrypt_sign_command="pgpewrap gpg --passphrase-fd 0 -v --batch
> --output - --encrypt --sign %?a?-u %a? --armor --always-trust -- -r %r
> -- %f"

I use it here, I can send it to you if you want.
Email me if you still need.
I only have the binary though (about 23k).

-- 
Bruno Lustosa, aka Lofofora  | Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Network Administrator/Web Programmer | ICQ UIN: 1406477
Rio de Janeiro - Brazil  |



msg31337/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: Coloring full line in header

[Thomas Dickey]

On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 06:34:33PM -0700, John Iverson wrote:
> * On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 03:34:58PM -0700, John Iverson wrote:
> > > * On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, D. J. Bolderman wrote:
> > > 
> > > > I want to color my headers, but something goes wrong here. For
> > > > example: I have the subject colored white, with a blue
> > > > background, but the rest of the line stays black... I've
> > > > searched the archives but didn't find a proper solution.
> > > > 
> > > > I'm using 'color index white blue "^Subject:"
> > > 
> > > I think the consensus is that this is an ncurses issue.  I fixed
> > > it for myself by compiling with s-lang instead of ncurses.
> > 
> > uh no - it's a mutt issue.
> 
> I stand corrected.  However, I did experience the same problem of
> the coloring not extending to the end of the line, and the
> problem (or behavior or whatever) definitely went away when I
> switched to s-lang.

I spent a few hours looking at it tonight, and saw that (for the case I
examined), slang treats the use of colors incompatibly with curses.

X/Open curses (e.g., ncurses) essentially stores the information for blanks in
what is denoted the background character.  Slang doesn't distinguish text and
blanks.  Mutt makes some calls to set the background character (and sometimes
only sets the window attribute, which affects only nonblank text), but the
effect of these doesn't match the behavior between slang and curses.

-- 
Thomas E. Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://invisible-island.net
ftp://invisible-island.net

Updating screen when new mail arrives on samba share

[Joel Hammer]

I run mutt (Mutt 1.2.5i (2000-07-28)) on machine A but my mailbox is on
machine B.  I share the mail directory on machine B
via samba to machine A.  (I know, using samba to talk between two linux
boxes seems odd, but, samba is necessary for the windows boxes so I use
it for everyone.)  Sitting at machine B, when a letter arrives in the
mailbox, mutt automatically updates the screen so you can see the new
mail. However, this update doesn't work when I am using machine A. I have to
restart mutt to get the update.

I suppose this is some awkward interaction between mutt and samba. I am not
sure where to start.  Is there some simple command in mutt to reread the
mailbox?

Any insight appreciated.

Joel

[OT] LDAP lookups (Was: Re: mutt and exchange)

[David Britton]

On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 08:29:52AM -0400, Gregory Seidman wrote:
>
> In particular, it is my understanding that there is some
> way to use the global (and personal?) address book(s) on the server. Maybe
> it's LDAP? 

If so than you may be in luck.

> Perhaps it has something to do with the query functions? Do I need an
> external program to help? 

Absolutely you will.  Thus, the rest of this mail is a bit "Off-Topic"
for this list.

> Is there a HOWTO somewhere (Google did not find anything useful for
> "mutt exchange howto")?

Mutt would have nothing to do with this...  So your search probably
wouldn't be that useful...  Furthermore, I don't know of a way (outside
of maybe Ximian's "Exchange Connector" program) to interface with
Exchange address books from non-M$ platforms.  If you have an LDAP
server at your office, you might want to try a google search for "mutt
LDAP".  This seems to be a more logical choice (And returned a couple
interesting hits when I ran it).

But there is nothing in mutt (other than it's ability to read data from
external programs), that can interface with an Exchange server.

/db

Re: download pgpwrap from where?

[Andre Berger]

--5I6of5zJg18YgZEa
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

* savanna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2002-09-26 19:13 -0400:
> Where do I download pgpewrap from? It's referred to in the sample
> muttrc files, for encrypting mail with gpg, however I can't find it
> anywhere on the web (though I've found hundreds of references to using
> it in my .muttrc ;-) ).
>=20
> I've searched debian.org, rpmfind, and the archives of mutt-users.

It's problably there but not in your path. Try "locate pgpewrap",
you'll probably find it in "/usr/lib/mutt/" or some other place.=20
Then add a symlink like "ln -s /usr/lib/mutt/pgpewrap
/usr/local/bin/pgpewrap" or the like.

-Andre

--5I6of5zJg18YgZEa
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE9lzc/mlbrvn+0waMRAucqAKCgNTf534+siLUGaF3K5gLbr1rPGQCgkX2G
JbgVivRSKE3NFpMPw/2kkM0=
=wwQF
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--5I6of5zJg18YgZEa--

Re: .procmailrc

[Oliver Fuchs]

On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, savanna wrote:

> A slightly offtopic question - I'm using procmail for my mail filtering,
> just wondering what people are using to catch all of the mutt-users
> email. I'm currently using:
> 
> :0 :
> * ^To:.*(mutt-.*)
> mutt-users
> 
> :0 :
> * ^Cc:.*(mutt-.*)
> mutt-users
> 
> :0 :
> * ^From:.*(mutt-.*)
> mutt-users
> 
> An better recipe out there? (procmail recipes aren't my strength).

An erlier mail by Sven Guckes shows this alternatives:


 * From: Sven Guckes
 * Subject: Re: procmail filerting for mutt lists
 * Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2002 13:22:39 -0700

[...]

  :0:
  * ^TO_mutt-(announce|users)@(mutt\.org|gbnet\.net)
  mutt

[...]

Oliver
-- 
... don't touch the bang-bang fruit

Re: Two minor configuration questions

[Michael Elkins]

darren chamberlain wrote:
> * Kurt Lieber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-30 09:22]:
> > 1.  By default, when you delete a message in a mailbox index, mutt
> > moves one message *down* by default.  Can I change this to move one
> > message *up*?
> 
> You can setup a macro:
> 
>   macro pager d ""
> 
> Basically, delete - up - up.

You can also shorten the macro if you use:

set noresolve
macro pager d ""

noresolve makes Mutt not automatically advance when doing some
operations such as delete, tag, etc.

Re: Problem with folder-hook - solved

[D. J. Bolderman]

On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, Gary Johnson wrote:

> > You are right, I also tested it with the subject, and then the
> > folder-hook works. Now, is there any way to work around this problem
> > ? I tried removing the send-hook . lines, but to no avail. I would
> > really like to have this feature. I'm downloading my hotmail account
> > with gotmail, and when I'm in my hotmail IMAP folder, I want to sent
> > mails with the from: address of my hotmail account.

> One approach to this is to use folder-hooks to set the send-hooks.  I
> haven't tried this with your particular hooks, but I think these, or
> something close, will do what you want:

> folder-hook . unhook send-hook
> folder-hook . send-hook . my_hdr From: 
> folder-hook . send-hook mutt-users my_hdr From: 
> folder-hook '!'INBOX.MailingLists.Mutt send-hook . my_hdr From: 

Gary,
Thanks, it's working great ! Solved at last :)

-- 

D.J. Bolderman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



msg31344/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Where config mutt to use lynx and *not* Galeon?

[seberino]

Default Red Hat 7.3 uses Galeon to read html email in mutt.

Where do I change this to lynx???

Chris
-- 
___

Dr. Christian Seberino
SPAWAR Systems Center San Diego
Code 2363
49590 Lassing Rd. Rm. A339
San Diego, CA 92152-6147
U.S.A.

Phone: (619) 553-7940
Fax:   (619) 553-1269
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___

What Country is Mutt developed

[Tim Johnson]

Hi Mutts:
I'm writing an article that makes mention of Mutt and Vim.
I believe Bram Moolenar is from Holland... correct me if I
am wrong. 

And where is the author of Mutt from? Trivia, I know,
but wanted to include it in the article. 
Thanks
-- 
Tim Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  http://www.alaska-internet-solutions.com
  http://www.johnsons-web.com

Re: Problem with folder-hook - command must be *one* parameter

[D. J. Bolderman]

On Thu, 26 Sep 2002, Sven Guckes wrote:

> how about using hooks on different folder sets
> and using unmy_hdr to throw away already set ones?

>   folder-hook  ! +empty  "unmy_hdr *; my_hdr From: me "
>   folder-hook+empty  "unmy_hdr *; my_hdr From: me "

> this should work.  no time for testing now.

Haven't tried this combination, because it's already solved; the whole
problem seemed to be that I defined a "send-hook . my_hdr". I removed
these lines, set my alternates correctly, and everything seems to work
now. Strange, because I've tested a lot with different send-hooks,
folder hooks, etc, etc... Well, maybe it's because I had some
sleep...spending hours of configuring this makes you blurry :)

Thanks for helping!

-- 

D.J. Bolderman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Creating Aliases from sent messages?

[John P Verel]

I've searched the manual high and low on this and come up blank.  I want
to create a file of aliases based upon messages I've sent, rather than
receive.  They are all in one folder for ease of access.  While creating
an alias from a received message is a snap, it appears that, short of
typing in long hand, there's no quick way to do this.

Perhaps there's a macro around that will do this?

TIA.

John

Re: Colour problem on Solaris

[Thomas Dickey]

On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 11:28:55AM +0100, Chris Green wrote:
> As Sven just pointed out I have been using rather old versions of mutt
> I have upgraded all my mutts (four of them) to version 1.4i.  All of
> the Linux ones were no problem, just ./configure with the required
> options, make and install and it worked like clockwork.
> 
> However the Solaris 2.6 one is proving a bit more difficult.

perhaps a library conflict between libncurses and /usr/lib/curses (or
the corresponding header files).  That's easily spotted in config.log
 
> First it didn't add '-liconv' to the Makefile line for linking, I fixed
> that by adding it manually to the Makefile.
> 
> Secondly, and more significant, is that colours are not working
> correctly any more.  When mutt loads it complains:-
> 
> Error in /home/chris/.mutt/muttrc, line 27: default: no such color
> Error in /home/chris/.mutt/muttrc, line 28: default: no such color
> ...
> ...
> etc.
> 
> I'm using ncurses 5.0 on both the Solaris version and the Linux
> versions and the 'default' colour works fine on the Linux versions.
> I have a sneaking feeling that I remember having this problem before
> but unfortunately I can't remember how to fix it.
> 
> -- 
> Chris Green ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

-- 
Thomas E. Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://invisible-island.net
ftp://invisible-island.net

send-hook and copy

[Michael P. Soulier]

Hey people,

Whenever I send an email with a particular subject line, I'd like to not
only save a copy to =outbox like always, but I'd like to save an additional
copy to another folder. How would I specify the send-hook for that?

Thanks,
Mike

-- 
Michael P. Soulier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, GnuPG pub key: 5BC8BE08
"...the word HACK is used as a verb to indicate a massive amount
of nerd-like effort."  -Harley Hahn, A Student's Guide to Unix
HTML Email Considered Harmful: http://expita.com/nomime.html



msg31350/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: .procmailrc

[Oliver Fuchs]

On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, savanna wrote:

> A slightly offtopic question - I'm using procmail for my mail filtering,
> just wondering what people are using to catch all of the mutt-users
> email. I'm currently using:
> 
> :0 :
> * ^To:.*(mutt-.*)
> mutt-users
> 
> :0 :
> * ^Cc:.*(mutt-.*)
> mutt-users
> 
> :0 :
> * ^From:.*(mutt-.*)
> mutt-users
> 
> An better recipe out there? (procmail recipes aren't my strength).

An erlier mail by Sven Guckes shows this alternatives:


 * From: Sven Guckes
 * Subject: Re: procmail filerting for mutt lists
 * Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2002 13:22:39 -0700

[...]

  :0:
  * ^TO_mutt-(announce|users)@(mutt\.org|gbnet\.net)
  mutt

[...]

Oliver
-- 
... don't touch the bang-bang fruit

Re: fast conversion of html mail to text

[Sven Guckes]

* Sven Guckes said:
> well, if you subscribe to a HTML-only newsletter
> then you were asking for it - so it's your problem.

* Michael Leone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-26 17:27]:
> It's *not* a problem, for me, anyway.

so you are ignoring the extra but superfluous data - fine.

> I know about the possible security implications of HTML email,
> and know how to get around them. (most of them, anyway).

kewl!

> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> X-Mailer: SquirrelMail (version 1.2.7)

but you are obviously are also ignoring the fact that i am
subscribed to the list and therefore do *not* need any CCs.

webmailers *suck*.  and if it is not the mailer
then it must be the people using them.  *hrmpf*

Sven

Re: download pgpwrap from where?

[Keith R. John Warno]

  - On Thu, 26.Sep.2002, 13:15EDT, savanna uttered:
> Where do I download pgpewrap from? It's referred to in the sample
> muttrc files, for encrypting mail with gpg, however I can't find it
> anywhere on the web (though I've found hundreds of references to using
> it in my .muttrc ;-) ).

One place it lives is in the mutt-1.4i source distribution.

-- 
"Isn't it time we care and lose the hate
 Understand our fears"
 -- Dream Theater, "Blind Faith"

Mutt question: sending attachments from command line

[Paul Seniuk]

I am attempting to send an html page as an attachment 
with following Mutt command:

mutt -n -F /dev/null [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
< /test/test.html

The message is sent, however the page attachment is within 
the messaage body and only appearing as plain text. I 
~~think~ this is because the message is not being send as 
MIME?

I have read through the Mutt Documentation (newbie here),
and cannot get the right configuration in Muttrc to send the 
message as attachment instead of inline. 

Any help would be appreciated :)

Re: redefining mailboxes while running mutt

[Robert Lillack]

Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:

> I think new mailboxes are added  to the list, but old ones
> are never removed.

Exactly.

> You need the unmaliboxes command. There  is a patch for it
> on my homepage  and the latest cvs  version should include
> this command.

Thanks. I will try it tonight.

Rob.
-- 
r o b e r t | l i l l a c k
www.lillaxsitedesign.de/rob
secure mail key: 0xE7FFDF77

Re: The browser

[Sascha Huedepohl]

Hi,

* Johan Svedberg ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Anyone experinced mutt going to the wrong mailbox when you're in the
> browsers mailbox view and place the indicator on some mailbox and press
> enter?

i have seen such behavior, when the last box i was in was not synced.
Then mutt goes back to that box.
But it seems not to happen every time.

HTH
sascha
--
Fuer einen neuen Monitor bitte hier ==>[X]<== einen Nagel einschlagen.




msg31356/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: download pgpwrap from where?

[Elimar Riesebieter]

Hello Savanna,

On Fri, 27 Sep 2002 the mental interface of 
savanna told:

> Where do I download pgpewrap from? It's referred to in the sample
> muttrc files, for encrypting mail with gpg, however I can't find it
> anywhere on the web (though I've found hundreds of references to using
> it in my .muttrc ;-) ).

pgpewrap is part of mutt distribution.

> I've searched debian.org, rpmfind, and the archives of mutt-users.
> 
> Here's one of the offending lines from my .muttrc:
> 
> set pgp_encrypt_sign_command="pgpewrap gpg --passphrase-fd 0 -v --batch
> --output - --encrypt --sign %?a?-u %a? --armor --always-trust -- -r %r
> -- %f"

On debian you can find it at /usr/lib/mutt/pgpewrap. Try
/usr/local/lib/mutt as well. /usr/lib/mutt isn't a part of $PATH so
you have to set:
set pgp_encrypt_sign_command="/usr/lib/mutt/pgpewrap gpg --passphrase-fd \
0 -v --batch --output - --encrypt --sign %?a?-u %a? --armor --always-trust \
-- -r %r -- %f"
in your muttrc.

HTH

-- 
  Do you smell something burning or ist it me?



msg31357/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: download pgpwrap from where?

[Elimar Riesebieter]

On Thu, 26 Sep 2002 the mental interface of 
savanna told:

> Where do I download pgpewrap from? It's referred to in the sample
> muttrc files, for encrypting mail with gpg, however I can't find it
> anywhere on the web (though I've found hundreds of references to using
> it in my .muttrc ;-) ).
> 
> I've searched debian.org, rpmfind, and the archives of mutt-users.

pgpewrap is part of mutt. At debian distri you can find in
/usr/lib/mutt. Or try /usr/local/lib/mutt.

> 
> Here's one of the offending lines from my .muttrc:
> 
> set pgp_encrypt_sign_command="pgpewrap gpg --passphrase-fd 0 -v --batch
> --output - --encrypt --sign %?a?-u %a? --armor --always-trust -- -r %r
> -- %f"

$PATH doesn't include /usr/lib/mutt so you must change your muttrc
to /usr/lib/mutt/pgpewrap gpg ...


HTH

-- 
  Alles was viel bedacht wird ist bedenklich!;-)
 Friedrich Nietzsche

replying to unwrapped messages with vi

[Mike Jackson]

Hello,
 I use mutt for reading messages and vi for composing/replying. I guess
this is more related to vi, but since somebody here most likely has
encountered the same problem here goes.

 If I receive a message from an outlook luser, or similar, and the
message is completely unwrapped, how do I "fix" that part which I quote?
I would like to be able to do this automatically.

Thanks in advance,
-- 
Mike

Re: The browser

[John Iverson]

* On Thu, 26 Sep 2002, Johan Svedberg wrote:

> Anyone experinced mutt going to the wrong mailbox when you're
> in the browsers mailbox view and place the indicator on some
> mailbox and press enter?

This happens when you get new mail in the last mailbox you
visited after going to the browser.  Mutt thinks you should see
the new mail in your 'current' mailbox instead of what you told
it to do.

Another problem is that the new mail indicator for that mailbox
doesn't work in the browser.  It's been discussed a couple of
times, but I guess it's a side effect of Mutt's design.

What I've done is create a macro to go to the browser, which
first visits a mailbox that doesn't receive mail.  This seems to
be at least a work around for this behavior:

macro index  "=postponed?" "Browse folders"

-- 
John

Mail-Followup-To/Reply-To alternatives

[Hanspeter Roth]

Hello,

Are there headers used by other MUAs that have similar function like
Mail-Followup-To and Reply-To?

(Probably some users configure their mailers to ignore such
headers.)

-Hanspeter

Re: charset input trouble

[Alain Bench]

Hello Robert,

 On Friday, September 20, 2002 at 11:03:48 PM +0200, Robert Lillack wrote:

> LANG=de_DE.ISO8859-1

What gives:

| $ locale -a | grep ^de_DE
| de_DE

...and the output of the little locales checking program at
http://www.uni-ulm.de/~s_smasch/Locale/checklocale.c>


> set send_charset="us-ascii:iso-8859-15:utf-8"

Not related to your problem, but better use:

| set send_charset="us-ascii:iso-8859-1:iso-8859-15:windows-1252:utf-8"


> set locale=de

And this works? You get German dates in Mutt?


 On Monday, September 23, 2002 at 4:31:21 PM +0200, Robert Lillack wrote:

> I am *unable* to enter non ASCII characters like the german umlauts or
> the euro sign into Mutt's *internal* editor.

What means ®ÿunableÿ¯ here: You get a bell, no char, and cursor
doesn't move?


> I do see all ISO-8859-15 symbols flawlessly, but I cannot enter them.

When there is a LC_CTYPE problem, one gets bells at input and "\374"
octals or "?" at display. So perhaps you have also an iconv setup
problem, so no "\374" but no conversion.

What do you see here, it's a CP-850 129 u umlaut: "".

And here, it's a CP-850 207 monetary sign: "Ï".


Bye!Alain.

Re: reply-to alternatives

[Sven Guckes]

* Hanspeter Roth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-30 20:12]:
> are there alternative headers to Reply-To:
> and Mail-Followup-To: used by other MUAs?

"we could tell you - but then we'd have to kill you."

of course there are more headers - and all of them
are probably only supported by this one mailer.
use whatever you like - but please do
not expect mutt to support any of these.

Sven

Re: .procmailrc

[John Iverson]

* On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, savanna wrote:

> A slightly offtopic question - I'm using procmail for my mail filtering,
> just wondering what people are using to catch all of the mutt-users
> email. I'm currently using:
> 
> :0 :
> * ^To:.*(mutt-.*)
> mutt-users
> 
> :0 :
> * ^Cc:.*(mutt-.*)
> mutt-users
> 
> :0 :
> * ^From:.*(mutt-.*)
> mutt-users
> 
> An better recipe out there? (procmail recipes aren't my strength).

:0:
* ^Sender: owner-mutt-users@mutt
mutt-users

Or, to catch both copies if someone CCs you as well as sending to
the list:

:0:
* ^TO_mutt-users@
mutt-users

-- 
John

Re: redefining mailboxes while running mutt -> unmailboxes does not exist

[Robert Lillack]

Sven Guckes wrote:

> workaround: quit  and restart.  in which  case you  do not
> really need to update anything, right? ;-)

...or using Nicolas' patch. It works like a charm.

Rob.
-- 
Nöö, vpu jne wn nhpu Mviv. :-)

Re: The browser

[René Clerc]

* Johan Svedberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [26-09-2002 18:46]:

> Anyone experinced mutt going to the wrong mailbox when you're in the
> browsers mailbox view and place the indicator on some mailbox and press
> enter?

Err... no?

Try refreshing the screen (^L) before pressing enter. See if that
solves it.

-- 
René Clerc  - ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

Birthdays are good for you. Statistics show that the people who
have the most live the longest.
-Rev. Larry Lorenzoni



msg31366/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: mutt and exchange

[David Rock]

* Michael Leone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-26 13:17]:
> Gregory Seidman said:
> > Happily, I have mutt playing nice with the Exchange server at work over
> > IMAP. This pleases me. Now I am looking for further interaction with the
> > Exchange server. In particular, it is my understanding that there is
> > some way to use the global (and personal?) address book(s) on the
> > server. Maybe it's LDAP?
> 
> By default, Exchange turns on POP and IMAP, and also LDAP. You can browse
> the GAL (Global Address List) via LDAP, but not personal address books.
> 
> > Perhaps it has something to do with the query
> > functions? Do I need an external program to help? Is there a HOWTO
> > somewhere (Google did not find anything useful for "mutt exchange
> > howto")?
> 
> Good question. Dunno how mutt integrates with LDAP, but I know I have used
> Outlook Express to query a GAL via LDAP. If you need to configure a
> firewall or anything, LDAP access is port 389, I believe.

Look for muttldapquery.pl in the contribs. It does a good job connecting
to the LDAP on the Exchange server.

-- 
David Rock
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



msg31367/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Help on forward

[Pascal Brugier]

Hi

I have many folders managed by Procmail and Mutt, I've a
particular one in which i received mails with always the same
subject: 
Eepdate: "FQDN machine name"

When i forward this mail i want to always forward it to the same
recipient and if possible always have the same body in the
forwarded mail. example:

Forwarded body

added body

I tried with send-hook but i cant obtain what i want, perhaps
it my fault.

Excuse for my bad English and thank you

Pascal



msg31368/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: .procmailrc

[Will Yardley]

Bernard Massot wrote:

> I'm using this one :
> :0: 
> * ^TO.*mutt-users@(mutt.org|.*gbnet.net)
> ML/mutt-users

I believe that TO.* is redundant, since there's already a ".*" built in
to ^TO and ^TO_

-- 
Will Yardley
input: william < @ hq . newdream . net . >

Re: Colour problem on Solaris

[Hanspeter Roth]

  On Sep 27 at 11:28, Chris Green spoke:

> Error in /home/chris/.mutt/muttrc, line 28: default: no such color

Mutt (ncurses?) on NetBsd doesn't like this either.

If you have a light background you might choose `brightwhite'
instead. Then you might get bright gray.

-Hanspeter

Re: Updating screen when new mail arrives on samba share

[Kurt Lieber]

On Sun, Sep 29, 2002 at 07:50:23PM -0400 or thereabouts, Joel Hammer wrote:
> I suppose this is some awkward interaction between mutt and samba. I am not
> sure where to start.  Is there some simple command in mutt to reread the
> mailbox?

Have you tried synchronizing the mailbox? ($ is the default binding)  

--kurt



msg31371/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: download pgpwrap from where?

[darren chamberlain]

* savanna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-26 15:07]:
> Where do I download pgpewrap from?

  

Get the source from
,
or just grab a binary from


(darren)

-- 
The road to Hell is paved with Bibles.

Re: .procmailrc

[Bernard Massot]

On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 11:53:10PM +0200, Oliver Fuchs wrote:
> An erlier mail by Sven Guckes shows this alternatives:
> 
> 
>  * From: Sven Guckes
>  * Subject: Re: procmail filerting for mutt lists
>  * Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2002 13:22:39 -0700
> 
> [...]
> 
>   :0:
>   * ^TO_mutt-(announce|users)@(mutt\.org|gbnet\.net)
doesn't always works, see message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- 
Bernard Massot



msg31373/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: .procmailrc

[Patrick]

* Oliver Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [09-30-02 18:56]:
> On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, savanna wrote:
> 
> > A slightly offtopic question - I'm using procmail for my mail filtering,
> > just wondering what people are using to catch all of the mutt-users
> > email. I'm currently using:
> > 
> > :0 :
> > * ^To:.*(mutt-.*)
> > mutt-users
> > 
> > :0 :
> > * ^Cc:.*(mutt-.*)
> > mutt-users
> > 
> > :0 :
> > * ^From:.*(mutt-.*)
> > mutt-users
> > 
> > An better recipe out there? (procmail recipes aren't my strength).
> 
> An erlier mail by Sven Guckes shows this alternatives:
> 
> 
>  * From: Sven Guckes
>  * Subject: Re: procmail filerting for mutt lists
>  * Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2002 13:22:39 -0700
> 
> [...]
> 
>   :0:
>   * ^TO_mutt-(announce|users)@(mutt\.org|gbnet\.net)
>   mutt
> 
> [...]
> 

You might find this easier/simpler:

:0:
* ^Sender:.*owner\-mutt\-
mutt


-- 
Patrick Shanahan
Registered Linux User #207535 
  @ http://counter.li.org

Bad Encoding?

[PeterKorman]

My mutt viewer shows:

N^X¬µìm\212Ç^Z­¹^u¼¦ºÛÿ²ø\236ÁêÿZ^\ÿÿÿ_^Aô^M;^D@u^LPúì^N¶^WÝE

for the attached distribution. I think there was a
thread for a problem like this not so long ago.

The distribution was encoded by a Mozilla 4.76 mailer.
There are 2 attachments. The second 1 was an html copy.
Ximian Evolution reads it ok if the second attachment
is present, but he garbles the text as well if I remove
the html attachment. I guess Evolution just goes straight
for the html rendering.

Maybe the iso-8859-1 is just encoded improperly. Or maybe
I have my linux character set stuff set up wrong.

Thanks.

JPK

-- 

[]+ Wisdom is vindicated by all her children.  +[]
[]  []
[]+ GnuPG  +[]



Received: (qmail 16630 invoked by uid 2508); 27 Sep 2002 13:26:14 -
Received: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] by fourier by uid 2505 with qmail-scanner-1.12 
(uvscan: v4.1.60/v4210. hbedv: 6.12.0.0. inocucmd: 37.00/02.66. . Clear:. Processed in 
0.100137 secs); 27 Sep 2002 13:26:14 -
X-Qmail-Scanner-Mail-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] via fourier
X-Qmail-Scanner: 1.12 (Clear:. Processed in 0.100137 secs)
Received: from tesla.eigenvision.com (HELO eigenvision.com) (192.168.0.3)
  by 0 with SMTP; 27 Sep 2002 13:26:14 -
Received: (qmail 6543 invoked by uid 1500); 27 Sep 2002 13:26:13 -
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 6539 invoked from network); 27 Sep 2002 13:26:13 -
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 09:26:06 -0400
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Why can't I read this?
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="18B9A07BEB1DFD67A62F91F3"


--18B9A07BEB1DFD67A62F91F3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64

This this text is garbled in my mutt viewer. Why?

http://www.nationalreview.com/kurtz/kurtz092602.asp




--18B9A07BEB1DFD67A62F91F3
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit



 
This this text is garbled 
in my mutt 
viewer. Why?
http://www.nationalreview.com/kurtz/kurtz092602.asp"; 
class="moz-txt-link-freetext">http://www.nationalreview.com/kurtz/kurtz092602.asp
 
 
 

--18B9A07BEB1DFD67A62F91F3--



msg31375/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: Where config mutt to use lynx and *not* Galeon?

[Thomas Dickey]

On Sat, Sep 28, 2002 at 09:13:27AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Default Red Hat 7.3 uses Galeon to read html email in mutt.
> 
> Where do I change this to lynx???

in your $HOME/.mailcap, a line like this for instance:

text/html; lynx-cs -force_html -stdin

(there are several ways to do it)

-- 
Thomas E. Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://invisible-island.net
ftp://invisible-island.net

Re: Problem with folder-hook - command must be *one* parameter

[Gary Johnson]

On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 05:42:27AM +0200, D. J. Bolderman wrote:

> You are right, I also tested it with the subject, and then the
> folder-hook works. Now, is there any way to work around this problem ? I
> tried removing the send-hook . lines, but to no avail. I would really
> like to have this feature. I'm downloading my hotmail account with
> gotmail, and when I'm in my hotmail IMAP folder, I want to sent mails
> with the from: address of my hotmail account.

One approach to this is to use folder-hooks to set the send-hooks.  I
haven't tried this with your particular hooks, but I think these, or
something close, will do what you want:

folder-hook . unhook send-hook
folder-hook . send-hook . my_hdr From: 
folder-hook . send-hook mutt-users my_hdr From: 
folder-hook '!'INBOX.MailingLists.Mutt send-hook . my_hdr From: 

HTH,
Gary

-- 
Gary Johnson   | Agilent Technologies
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   | Spokane, Washington, USA
http://www.spocom.com/users/gjohnson/mutt/ |

advfas

[Dhadhank]

asdfasd
-- 
wassalam,
dhadhank

a folder-hook question

[Isaac Claymore]

Hi, mutters.

It seems that folder-hook is executed whenever a folder is entered,
but is there a 'leave-folder-hook'? I need to reset something back to
normal upon leaving a folder, after setting it to folder-specific
value in a folder-hook.

I cant seem to find such a hook, did I missed anything? or is there
some other trick to do that?

Thanks.

Clay

-- 

Isaac Claymore  /"\ASCII Ribbon Campaign
Dawning Inc.\ /Respect for open standards
Beijing, China   X No HTML/RTF in email
http://www.dawning.com.cn   / \No M$ Word docs in email

Re: download pgpwrap from where?

[Jussi Ekholm]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

savanna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Where do I download pgpewrap from? It's referred to in the sample
> muttrc files, for encrypting mail with gpg, however I can't find it
> anywhere on the web (though I've found hundreds of references to
> using it in my .muttrc ;-) ).

I don't know about older Mutts (you have as old as 1.3.28 -- what
about upgrading to 1.4?), but in 1.5.1i (CVS) this program comes with
Mutt itself:

[23:46:27] ekhowl@erpland:~$ ll `which pgpewrap`
lrwxrwxrwx1 ekhowl   ekhowl 25 Sep 26 06:50 \
/usr/local/bin/pgpewrap -> ../stow/mutt/bin/pgpewrap

Whether you got something missing from your Mutt or this executable
was added in version later than 1.3.28i. I leave that to the more
educated persons than myself.

- -- 
Jussi Ekholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |  | <0x1410081E>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE9k3QCAtEARxQQCB4RAm0eAKCP7ftykr5C8Ah8wpLt+oFOYLhHVgCePcLk
QF64Z9PaFp/7rOeNChLJpRM=
=Kl5v
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: download pgpwrap from where?

[Michael Elkins]

savanna wrote:
> Where do I download pgpewrap from? It's referred to in the sample
> muttrc files, for encrypting mail with gpg, however I can't find it
> anywhere on the web (though I've found hundreds of references to using
> it in my .muttrc ;-) ).

It should be included with the Mutt package for your OS/distribution.
It's part of the mutt source code.

Re: fast conversion of html mail to text

[Mike Leone]

* Sven Guckes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote this on 09 30, 02 at 20:56: 
> * Sven Guckes said:
> > well, if you subscribe to a HTML-only newsletter
> > then you were asking for it - so it's your problem.
> 
> * Michael Leone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-26 17:27]:
> > It's *not* a problem, for me, anyway.
> 
> so you are ignoring the extra but superfluous data - fine.

Not ignoring it. And it's not (always) superflous - some people *want* their
email to be read in the way they present it - links, colors, etc. So I have
mutt call out w3m to see HTML-only email. Or I ignore it, if I feel like.
Like anything else, it's my choice. As ignoring it is your choice.

> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > X-Mailer: SquirrelMail (version 1.2.7)
> 
> but you are obviously are also ignoring the fact that i am
> subscribed to the list and therefore do *not* need any CCs.

Usually, I edit that out, and have the list as the only email address in the
TO:, but I didn't bother that time.
 
> webmailers *suck*.  and if it is not the mailer
> then it must be the people using them.  *hrmpf*

Go have a beer or something, Sven - people will like you better if you're
less grumpy over things that are really not all that world-shattering.





msg31382/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: [OT] LDAP lookups (Was: Re: mutt and exchange)

[Mike Leone]

* David Britton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote this on 09 30, 02 at 19:46: 
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 08:29:52AM -0400, Gregory Seidman wrote:
> >
> > In particular, it is my understanding that there is some
> > way to use the global (and personal?) address book(s) on the server. Maybe
> > it's LDAP? 
> 
> If so than you may be in luck.
> 
> > Perhaps it has something to do with the query functions? Do I need an
> > external program to help? 
> 
> Absolutely you will.  Thus, the rest of this mail is a bit "Off-Topic"
> for this list.
> 
> > Is there a HOWTO somewhere (Google did not find anything useful for
> > "mutt exchange howto")?
> 
> Mutt would have nothing to do with this...  So your search probably
> wouldn't be that useful...  Furthermore, I don't know of a way (outside
> of maybe Ximian's "Exchange Connector" program) to interface with
> Exchange address books from non-M$ platforms.  If you have an LDAP

Exchange, by default, makes it's Global Address Books available via LDAP, so
anything that reads LDAP can read it off of Exchange that way. Not so for
personal address books.



msg31383/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Mutt can't find new gpg location

[mjbjr]

Last night, I installed the just released gnupg-1.2.0.

The default location for the new gpg version is /usr/bin opposed to the old
/usr/local/bin.  After deleting the old, mutt could no longer find gpg.
Both dirs are in my PATH.  

I've put a link from the old to the new, and now mutt works with the new gpg.

I checked the master Muttrc, /usr/local/etc/Muttrc, but didn't see any place
to specify the location of pgp, though there are tons of pgp config stuff in it.

Is there a place to tell mutt where gpg is?  

Shouldn't/couldn't mutt use my PATH to find apps it needs?

Thank you.

-- 
- Martin J. Brown, Jr. -
- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -

  Public PGP Key ID: 0xDB184F7B keyserver: http://certserver.pgp.com/



msg31384/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: replying to unwrapped messages with vi

[Gary Johnson]

On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 09:55:08PM +0300, Mike Jackson wrote:
> Hello,
>  I use mutt for reading messages and vi for composing/replying. I guess
> this is more related to vi, but since somebody here most likely has
> encountered the same problem here goes.
> 
>  If I receive a message from an outlook luser, or similar, and the
> message is completely unwrapped, how do I "fix" that part which I quote?
> I would like to be able to do this automatically.

I usually just do this manually with 'gqq' on each unwrapped line.  But
the idea of doing this automatically intrigued me, so I came up with the
following:

au BufRead  /tmp/mutt-*  exec 'g/^.\{' . &textwidth . ',}/normal gqq'

It seems to work OK in limited testing.  It has the problem that it
applies the 'gqq' command to lines are are 'textwidth' in length and
longer rather than just to lines that are longer than 'textwidth'.

Note that this solution requires vim and won't work with ordinary vi.

HTH,
Gary

-- 
Gary Johnson   | Agilent Technologies
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   | Spokane, Washington, USA
http://www.spocom.com/users/gjohnson/mutt/ |

Re: charset input trouble

[Robert Lillack]

[I don't  know why, but  this mail  reached me just  about 5
days too late.]

Alain Bench wrote:

> > I am  *unable* to  enter non  ASCII characters  like the
> > german umlauts  or the euro sign  into Mutt's *internal*
> > editor.
>
> What means «unable» here: You get a bell, no char, and
> cursor doesn't move?

The problem I described was not related to any of the locale
settings.   I just  had to  "unset meta_key"  to be  able to
input 8bit characters.

I found  that solution "by accident"---maybe  one should add
a  sentence  like  "Be  careful: This option  will  make  it
impossible for you to enter 8bit chars" to the manual page.

Thanks again, Rob.
-- 
r o b e r t | l i l l a c k
www.lillaxsitedesign.de/rob
secure mail key: 0xE7FFDF77

Re: replying to unwrapped messages with vi

[Robert Lillack]

Mike Jackson wrote:

> If I receive a message  from an outlook luser, or similar,
> and the  message is completely  unwrapped, how do  I "fix"
> that part  which I quote?  I  would like to be  able to do
> this automatically.

I don't  use vi but nearly  every editor allows you  to call
external programs or filters. So  the problem is more filter
related.  I use  par¹ for formatting purposes  and I'm quite
happy with  it. But be careful: It  will take a week  to get
through all command line options

Rob.

[1] http://www.nicemice.net/par/
-- 
r o b e r t | l i l l a c k
www.lillaxsitedesign.de/rob
secure mail key: 0xE7FFDF77

Re: replying to unwrapped messages with vi

[Ken Weingold]

On Thu, Sep 26, 2002, Mike Jackson wrote:
>  If I receive a message from an outlook luser, or similar, and the
> message is completely unwrapped, how do I "fix" that part which I quote?
> I would like to be able to do this automatically.

Not sure about vi, but vim has a wonderful method of wrapping text.  A
simple Q} will wrap the whole paragraph.  Or Q will do for
Outhouse since it seems to make each paragraph all one long line.


-Ken

Re: Mutt question: sending attachments from command line

[Gary Johnson]

On Sun, Sep 29, 2002 at 08:53:24AM -0700, Paul Seniuk wrote:
> I am attempting to send an html page as an attachment 
> with following Mutt command:
> 
> mutt -n -F /dev/null [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> < /test/test.html
> 
> The message is sent, however the page attachment is within 
> the messaage body and only appearing as plain text. I 
> ~~think~ this is because the message is not being send as 
> MIME?
> 
> I have read through the Mutt Documentation (newbie here),
> and cannot get the right configuration in Muttrc to send the 
> message as attachment instead of inline. 

>From the mutt man page:

OPTIONS
  -a file
  Attach a file to your message using MIME.

So in your case,

mutt -n -F /dev/null -a /test/test.html [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null

HTH,
Gary

-- 
Gary Johnson   | Agilent Technologies
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   | Spokane, Washington, USA
http://www.spocom.com/users/gjohnson/mutt/ |