GPG and Windows PGP
Hello, sorry if this was answered before. I use Mutt/GPG with success and I like it, I have run to a problem. My mother uses Windows+Outlook+PGP and she can't (easily) read my mail. I found, that simply piping it through gpg -sea -r "Mother" makes it work (i.e. I don't use the OpenPGP/MIME stuff and use the old and ugly plain text version). In PGP-Notes.txt I have read I can send all my mails this way. This is not what I want -> I want to use OpenPGP/MIME where possible and only send this old way to certain users, like my mother. I would like to use Mutt's standard PGP signing and enciphering interface. Is this possible to configure? I know it's not in default version, is there a patch or a configuration value or just an URL, that would forward me to the correct direction? Thanks and have a nice day, Juraj.
Re: RegExp
I use this
"\( \|^\)\(\>\=\)\([;:8]\{1}\)\([-^]\=\)\([)(><}{|/DPb#@&*\*]\{1}\)"
Overall I like it, but it does catch a very few strays, and it does
catch the leading space if it is there. It won't catch smiles not
separated by words like this:) Not sure if I want to keep it that
way, but to catch those too, I would use this:
"\(\>\=\)\([;:8]\{1}\)\([-^]\=\)\([)(><}{|/DPb#@&*\*]\{1}\)"
BTW, I use this with vim as my pager, not sure how it will work in the
mutt builtin reader.
HTH
Lou
On 06/22/01 05:55 AM, Ross Davis sat at the `puter and typed:
> Can anyone tell me how I can force the following regexp match *only* concatenated
> substrings *not* the individual substrings as well as the concatenated ones!?
> From my understanding, once the whole regexp is in parentheses it should match each
> individual substring together as a concatenated string - any ideas?
> For example, this regexp matches a bunch of smileys fine but it also highlights
> strings like ':', ';', 'D', 'P', etc. on their own.
>
>
> color body brightyellow black "([:;]+[-^~]?((\)\))|(\(\()|[][)(><}{|/DP]){1})"
>
>
> -Ross
>
--
Louis LeBlanc
Fully Funded Hobbyist, KeySlapper Extrordinaire :)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://acadia.ne.mediaone.netԿԬ
PageUp and PageDown not working with CVS Eterm
Hello, I have been using mutt with Eterm (from CVS) for some time now without problems. But recently I am finding a problem with the keys PageUp and PageDown from the keypad: they are not been accepted by mutt, which gives the message "Key is not bound" when they are used. Other applications does not complain about these keys. My computer is a Red Hat Linux 7.1 box. Any clues? Romildo -- Prof. José Romildo Malaquias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Departamento de Computação Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto Brasil
no signature on reply
Does anyone know of a way to tell mutt not to append a signature when replying to a message? Thanks, Troy -- ___ _/ Troy Heber _/Software Engineer _/_/_/_/_/_/ Technical Consulting Lab _/ _/_/ _/Hewlett-Packard Company _/ _/_/_/_/ _/ Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _/ Phone: 970.898.3240 i n v e n t ___
Re: From headers
you probably want to use a send-hook, something like: send-hook mutt-users my_hdr From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] send-hook debian-user my_hdr From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] see http://www.mutt.org/doc/manual/manual-3.html, section 3.17. Vittorio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > I'm using mutt with emacs as my pet composer. Now, I've subscribed to > many lists using different e-mails from various ISP. Thanks to the > powerful mutt I can send e-mail to the lists changing the default > from: to the one for which I'm known to the list, for instance: > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [for Mutt] > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [for debian-user], and so on. > > How is possible to configure mutt to have these from headers set to > the right address according to the list I'm writing to? > > Ciao > Vittorio
Re: GPG and Windows PGP
I may be wrong, but I think you need to add the "text mode" option to GPG when sending to a PGP client. I use PGP Freeware with mutt so I don't have those problems. man gpg: -t, --textmode Use canonical text mode. If -t (but not --textmode) is used together with armoring and signing, this enables clearsigned messages. This kludge is needed for PGP compatibility; normally you would use --sign or --clearsign to selected the type of the signature. On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 10:40:48PM +0200, Juraj Bednar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > > sorry if this was answered before. I use Mutt/GPG with success and I > like it, I have run to a problem. My mother uses Windows+Outlook+PGP and > she can't (easily) read my mail. I found, that simply piping it through > gpg -sea -r "Mother" makes it work (i.e. I don't use the OpenPGP/MIME > stuff and use the old and ugly plain text version). In PGP-Notes.txt I > have read I can send all my mails this way. This is not what I want -> I > want to use OpenPGP/MIME where possible and only send this old way to > certain users, like my mother. I would like to use Mutt's standard PGP > signing and enciphering interface. Is this possible to configure? > >I know it's not in default version, is there a patch or a > configuration value or just an URL, that would forward me to the correct > direction? > > > > Thanks and have a nice day, > > Juraj. -- Chris S. PGP 0x519E3777 PGP signature
Mutt failes to use cram5 password from .muttrc properly
Hi, i have changed my password, now it containe some SHIFT-key characters and mutt cant use the .muttrc file anymore, each time i am being asked for CRAM key to be put in, i put exactly same cram as i have set in imap_cramkey (actually even pasting it) and everything works fine. it authenticates through CRAM and loads mailbox. but no matter what i set it in .muttrc - it doesnt go through I use Mutt 1.2.5i (2000-07-28) on FreeBSD with Cyrus IMAP
Re: Mutt failes to use cram5 password from .muttrc properly
thats it, it worked. i only tried " " ;( - Original Message - From: "Brendan Cully" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Mutt Users' List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 4:19 PM Subject: Re: Mutt failes to use cram5 password from .muttrc properly > On Friday, 22 June 2001 at 16:17, Ilya wrote: > > Hi, i have changed my password, now it containe some SHIFT-key characters > > and mutt cant use the .muttrc file anymore, each time i am being asked for > > CRAM key to be put in, i put exactly same cram as i have set in > > imap_cramkey > > (actually even pasting it) and everything works fine. it authenticates > > through CRAM and loads mailbox. but no matter what i set it in .muttrc - it > > doesnt go through > > I use Mutt 1.2.5i (2000-07-28) on FreeBSD with Cyrus IMAP > > Sounds like a quoting problem. Try putting it in ''s. >
How do I do this?
Hi! I've got this huge file with about 500+ email address in it. How can I put them all in the Bcc: field? I've tried adding `cat address.txt` but that dosen't work and I tried to put them into an alias file, no luck either. They are comma seperated address. Thanks alot -- Chris S. PGP 0x519E3777 PGP signature
Re: How do I do this?
Chris S. [mutt-users] <22/06/01 17:24 -0700>: > I've got this huge file with about 500+ email address in it. How can I put > them all in the Bcc: field? Create a /etc/aliases entry, and include this file. -suresh -- Suresh Ramasubramanian + Wallopus Malletus Indigenensis mallet @ cluestick.org + Lumber Cartel of India, tinlcI EMail Sturmbannfuhrer, Lower Middle Class Unix Sysadmin
From headers
I'm using mutt with emacs as my pet composer. Now, I've subscribed to many lists using different e-mails from various ISP. Thanks to the powerful mutt I can send e-mail to the lists changing the default from: to the one for which I'm known to the list, for instance: From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [for Mutt] From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [for debian-user], and so on. How is possible to configure mutt to have these from headers set to the right address according to the list I'm writing to? Ciao Vittorio
