Re: Mutt 0.95.6i

1999-08-14 Thread Frederic L. W. Meunier

Fairlight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>...This affected exim 1.62 (slightly old), but may affect other versions.
You should patch Exim (upgrade to 3.03), not Mutt. Works fine with
the 3.X series (never used 2.X nor 1.X).



Essa mensagem foi enviada pelo Webmail Urbi Network
http://www.urbi.com.br/




Coloring part of a header

1999-08-14 Thread Roberto Suarez Soto


Is it possible to color just one part of a header? For example: I
want my From header to be brightwhite, except the <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
part, which I want to be red. I supposed that just matching a regexp would
do, but I don't know if all the line that matches the regexp is hilited, or
just the regexp'd part itself :-m

I know that in some cases, like addresses in the body of the
message, this works by default. In my case, addresses are hilited red, and
URLs are hilited brightblue. I'd want to achieve that, but in the headers.

Any hint?

-- 
Roberto Suarez Soto  |  I feel like my notes
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]|   are little bullets of creamy universe soup.
* Corgo - Lugo - Galicia - Spain |  (Steve Vai)



Re: possible imap bug?

1999-08-14 Thread Brendan Cully

On Friday, 13 August 1999 at 15:03, Brendan Cully wrote:
> I'll take a look at this this weekend. My understanding of the problem: you
> cannot create message attachments from an IMAP folder. I'm sorry I didn't
> catch the original post - I've been on vacation.
> 
> -Brendan

Alright, I found the bug (line 653 in compose.c, at least in CVS). The
fix will be somewhat along the lines of the postponed-messages folder
hack: close the current folder without expunge, open the new folder to
select the messages, when done close it and open the original folder
read-only.

I'd really like to support a user-configurable number of concurrent
connections to the same IMAP server, but that's for a later version. I
want to get IMAP support reasonably complete and stable first.


> - Original Message -
> From: Robert Chien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: mutt users <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, August 13, 1999 2:53 PM
> Subject: Re: possible imap bug?
> 
> 
> > I haven't heard from anyone yet, so I'm resending this:
> >
> > -
> > On Sat, Aug 07, 1999 at 12:00:12AM +0200, Gero Treuner wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > On Fri, Aug 06, 1999 at 02:50:11PM -0700, Robert Chien wrote:
> > > > If I save it to a file, then attach that file, it sort of
> > > > works but takes a lot of time, esp. if I'm attaching 3+
> > > > emails. Would be nice if I can presss , and choose files
> > > > or emails to attach. This is my wish list item.
> > >
> > > Almost your wish, just add the shift key to press "A".
> > > It's in the online help as well as in the manual.
> >
> > You guys are awesome! I did looked at help, but searched for the wrong
> > keyword "forward" and of course didn't see the "A" option.
> >
> > However, now I've found an interesting "bug": if I type "A", it asks
> > for "Open mailbox to attach message from ('?' for list):". But it won't
> > open my IMAP inbox. If I enter {imapserver}inbox, it returns an error:
> >
> > {imapserver}inbox: No such file or directory (errno = 2)
> >
> > Normal folders work just fine. Can other IMAP users verify this please?
> >
> > --
> > Robert
> >
> > Mutt 0.96.3i (1999-06-03)
> > Copyright (C) 1996-9 Michael R. Elkins and others.
> > Mutt comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; for details type `mutt -vv'.
> > Mutt is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute it
> > under certain conditions; type `mutt -vv' for details.
> >
> > System: SunOS 5.8
> > Compile options:
> > -DOMAIN
> > -HOMESPOOL  -USE_SETGID  +USE_DOTLOCK  +USE_FCNTL  -USE_FLOCK
> > +USE_IMAP  -USE_POP  +HAVE_REGCOMP  -USE_GNU_REGEX
> +HAVE_COLOR  -BUFFY_SIZE
> > -EXACT_ADDRESS  +ENABLE_NLS
> > SENDMAIL="/usr/lib/sendmail"
> > MAILPATH="/var/mail"
> > SHAREDIR="/usr/local/share/mutt"
> > SYSCONFDIR="/usr/local/etc"
> > -ISPELL
> > To contact the developers, please mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
> >

-- 
Brendan Cully <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | OLD SKOOL ROOLZ
"I hope I don't win|  .-_|\ 
 The rules say to bring a friend   | / \
 I don't have any" | Perth ->*.--._/



Re: possible imap bug?

1999-08-14 Thread Mikko Hänninen

Brendan Cully <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Sat, 14 Aug 1999:
> Alright, I found the bug (line 653 in compose.c, at least in CVS). The
> fix will be somewhat along the lines of the postponed-messages folder
> hack: close the current folder without expunge, open the new folder to
> select the messages, when done close it and open the original folder
> read-only.

I'm curious, what happens if the current folder has messages marked as
to be deleted?  Since you say "close without expunge" I assume they
aren't deleted, but will the delete-flag be saved or cleared?  It sounds
like it will be cleared, at least from what I know of Mutt's internals
(not that much, admittedly).

If I'm composing a message, I wouldn't expect anything I do from within
the compose-menu to affect how I left things in the folder I was in.


Mikko
-- 
// Mikko Hänninen, aka. Wizzu  //  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  //  http://www.iki.fi/wiz/
// The Corrs list maintainer  //   net.freak  //   DALnet IRC operator /
// Interests: roleplaying, Linux, the Net, fantasy & scifi, the Corrs /
"I am a veritable epitome of eloquence and -- umm, other stuff." -Anirion



Re: possible imap bug?

1999-08-14 Thread Brendan Cully

On Saturday, 14 August 1999 at 21:18, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
> Brendan Cully <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Sat, 14 Aug 1999:
> > Alright, I found the bug (line 653 in compose.c, at least in CVS). The
> > fix will be somewhat along the lines of the postponed-messages folder
> > hack: close the current folder without expunge, open the new folder to
> > select the messages, when done close it and open the original folder
> > read-only.
> 
> I'm curious, what happens if the current folder has messages marked as
> to be deleted?  Since you say "close without expunge" I assume they
> aren't deleted, but will the delete-flag be saved or cleared?  It sounds
> like it will be cleared, at least from what I know of Mutt's internals
> (not that much, admittedly).
> 
> If I'm composing a message, I wouldn't expect anything I do from within
> the compose-menu to affect how I left things in the folder I was in.

Right. Actually the delete flags will be saved like you would
expect, without deleting the messages. The IMAP postpone code does
this already. Maybe later I can generalise this as a config option,
something like an "imap_closeexpunge" quadopt, so you can leave
deleted messages between sessions.

> 
> Mikko
> -- 
> // Mikko Hänninen, aka. Wizzu  //  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  //  http://www.iki.fi/wiz/
> // The Corrs list maintainer  //   net.freak  //   DALnet IRC operator /
> // Interests: roleplaying, Linux, the Net, fantasy & scifi, the Corrs /
> "I am a veritable epitome of eloquence and -- umm, other stuff." -Anirion

-- 
Brendan Cully <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | OLD SKOOL ROOLZ
"I hope I don't win|  .-_|\ 
 The rules say to bring a friend   | / \
 I don't have any" | Perth ->*.--._/



Re: Index character used for Old messages

1999-08-14 Thread Byrial Jensen

On Fri, Aug 13, 1999 at 21:47:38 +, Tom Gilbert wrote:
> Hi guys,
> 
> Is there any way I can change the character used to indicate an Old
> message (unread but not new) when mark_old is set?
> 
> It currently uses O, but I would prefer n or U or something more
> appropriate...
> 
> Any options?

Yes, change the source and rebuild. The used character are
hardcoded into this expression in hdrline.c:

  (THREAD_NEW ? 'n' : (THREAD_OLD ? 'o' :
  ((hdr->read && (ctx && ctx->msgnotreadyet != hdr->msgno))
  ? (hdr->replied ? 'r' : ' ') : (hdr->old ? 'O' : 'N'

Just change the 'O' to 'U' or some other character.

-- 
Byrial



rxvt xterm and thread characters and colors

1999-08-14 Thread Eric Smith

Hi

With xterm I get:
no color, the real line drawn arrows for threading

With rxvt I get:
color and those horrible characters for threading.

How do I get the best of both worlds?

Thanx

--
Eric Smith
021 4236111

If Bill Gates had a dime for every time a Windows box crashed...
...Oh, wait a minute, he already does.



Deja vu (all over again...:^)

1999-08-14 Thread Alex Lane

Is it my imagination, or are messages beginning to repeat, verbatim?
Cheers...
-- 
Alex Lane * Seabrook, Texas, USA  *  [EMAIL PROTECTED] * www.galexi.com/alex
*Never* tell me the odds!  --Han Solo, 'Star Wars'



Re: rxvt xterm and thread characters and colors

1999-08-14 Thread Eugene Lee

On Sat, Aug 14, 1999 at 10:17:31PM +0200, Eric Smith wrote:
:
:With xterm I get:
:no color, the real line drawn arrows for threading
:
:With rxvt I get:
:color and those horrible characters for threading.
:
:How do I get the best of both worlds?

Make sure your xterm supports ANSI colors.  If so, make sure that your
X resources have color enabled:

http://www.clark.net/pub/dickey/xterm/xterm.faq.html#my_xdefaults

If your xterm is too old, download the latest and greatest version:

http://www.clark.net/pub/dickey/xterm/xterm.html


-- 
Eugene Lee
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Deja vu (all over again...:^)

1999-08-14 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt

On Sat, Aug 14, 1999 at 04:33:21PM -0500, Alex Lane wrote:
> Is it my imagination, or are messages beginning to repeat, verbatim?

Nope. They're repeating! I'm not sure but I think that *.atlas.cz machine is guilty.

-- 
Ralf Hildebrandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> www.stahl.bau.tu-bs.de/~hildeb


 PGP signature


Re: Deja vu (all over again...:^)

1999-08-14 Thread David Thorburn-Gundlach

Alex --

...and then Alex Lane said...
% Is it my imagination, or are messages beginning to repeat, verbatim?

No, I think you're right.  And their Message-Id: contents must be
different (or *really* delayed, I suppose, like the repost from 08/02
that I saw go by), since my procmail dupe filter isn't catching
them...


% Cheers...

HAND


% -- 
% Alex Lane * Seabrook, Texas, USA  *  [EMAIL PROTECTED] * www.galexi.com/alex
% *Never* tell me the odds!  --Han Solo, 'Star Wars'
% 


:-D
-- 
David Thorburn-Gundlach * It's easier to fight for one's principles
(play) [EMAIL PROTECTED]  * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie
(work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Helping out at Pfizer
http://www.bigfoot.com/~davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg!
"Why2k?  Well, I didn't think at the time that I could charge any more!"
Note: If bigfoot.com gives you fits, try sector13.org in its place. *sigh*


 PGP signature


Re: Deja vu (all over again...:^)

1999-08-14 Thread Frederic L. W. Meunier

Alex Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Is it my imagination, or are messages beginning to repeat, verbatim?
Yes, I have received like 10 repeat messages one hour ago.



Essa mensagem foi enviada pelo Webmail Urbi Network
http://www.urbi.com.br/




Re: Index character used for Old messages

1999-08-14 Thread Tom Gilbert

* Byrial Jensen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [990814 21:57]:
> On Fri, Aug 13, 1999 at 21:47:38 +, Tom Gilbert wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> > 
> > Is there any way I can change the character used to indicate an Old
> > message (unread but not new) when mark_old is set?
> > 
> > It currently uses O, but I would prefer n or U or something more
> > appropriate...
> > 
> > Any options?
> 
> Yes, change the source and rebuild. The used character are
> hardcoded into this expression in hdrline.c:
> 
>   (THREAD_NEW ? 'n' : (THREAD_OLD ? 'o' :
>   ((hdr->read && (ctx && ctx->msgnotreadyet != hdr->msgno))
>   ? (hdr->replied ? 'r' : ' ') : (hdr->old ? 'O' : 'N'
> 
> Just change the 'O' to 'U' or some other character.
> 
> -- 
> Byrial

Ok, well I knew a source edit and rebuild would do it, I was just
wandering about a config-level change, as in to_chars = " +CF" (IIRC).

Any plans to un-hardcode this?

Tom.
-- 
.---.
.^. | Tom Gilbert, England | [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
/V\ |--| www.tomgilbert.freeserve.co.uk |
   // \\| Sites I recommend:   `|
  /(   )\   | www.freshmeat.net www.enlightenment.org www.gnome.org |
   ^^-^^`---'



Re: Deja vu (all over again...:^)

1999-08-14 Thread Kim DeVaughn

On Sat, Aug 14, 1999, David Thorburn-Gundlach ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
|
| No, I think you're right.  And their Message-Id: contents must be
| different (or *really* delayed, I suppose, like the repost from 08/02
| that I saw go by), since my procmail dupe filter isn't catching
| them...

Perhaps you should increase the size of your message-id cache ... mine
is set to 8192 (actual size is 8250), and it just caught nine dups.

That size cache keeps ~190 message-ids around, and since I usually get
~100 messages/day, that only looks back for 2 days or so (which seems
to be sufficient for myself).

Fortunately, I don't get too many messages from pine users, else I'd
have to up the cache size (take a look at the asinine message-id's pine
generates, if you don't know what I mean) ... :-) ...

/kim