Re: [PATCH] Add support for changing X-Label
On 12Mar2013 16:05, Jiri Denemark wrote: | Sure, but that's for composing new emails. This patch is targeted at | changing the header for emails already present in one's mailbox. Of | course, once could edit that email and change the header but that's far | from convenient and creating a mutt macro to, e.g., set X-Label to "foo" | or clear X-Label would need a lot of typing. Write a script that prompts for a label, then patches a message file with the new label. Extra points for offering any existing label as a default. Then write a macro to set editor to that script, then edit-message, then restore the old editor. Cumbersome, but feasible. -- Cameron Simpson library, n., a place with a large number of people, a slightly larger number of books, and a very small number of photocopiers, of which at any given time at least 50% will be out of order.
Re: [PATCH] Add support for changing X-Label
* On 13 Mar 2013, Cameron Simpson wrote: > > Write a script that prompts for a label, then patches a message > file with the new label. Extra points for offering any existing > label as a default. But of course, the patches already exist and work, so doing this is not necessary. My patch even lets you tab-complete against any existing label. -- David Champion • d...@bikeshed.us
Re: [PATCH] Add support for changing X-Label
On 13Mar2013 21:55, David Champion wrote: | * On 13 Mar 2013, Cameron Simpson wrote: | > Write a script that prompts for a label, then patches a message | > file with the new label. Extra points for offering any existing | > label as a default. | | But of course, the patches already exist and work, so doing this is not | necessary. My patch even lets you tab-complete against any existing | label. Sounds nice. -- Cameron Simpson I must really get a thinner pencil. I can't manage this one a bit. It writes all manner of things I don't intend. - rhe...@csugrad.cs.vt.edu (Bolo Mk XXXIX)
