Kirrily Robert wrote:
> WSDL should probably be under WWW::WSDL, I guess.
>
I'm not certain about that. What is the primary concern? If it's a
namespace collision, WSDL isn't likely be a common term for any other
technology. If it's a namespace conservation issue, I'd prefer XML::WSDL
in order to disentangle the XML processor aspect from the transport aspect.
> What's the difference between Template::PSP and Apache::PSP? Could
> you,or would you, ever use them separately?
>
Template::PSP does the actual transformation from HTML-like template
file to Perl code reference. Apache::PSP implements a handler()
subroutine that calls Template::PSP on a provided file and executes the
result.
There are many cases where Template::PSP would be used separately from
Apache::PSP, e.g. CGI-mode or command-line processing. Follow-on modules
and scripts for non-Apache Web servers are planned as well.
Cheers,
~chris