Re: Adoption of Sort::Naturally

2022-08-17 Thread Neil Bowers
Hi Robbie,

I’m one of the PAUSE admins.

> I'm interested in adopting [Sort::Naturally]

The package has first-come assigned to ADOPTME, which generally means it’s 
immediately available for adoption. But sometimes someone is given co-maint on 
a package and then ADOPTME isn’t removed.

If you look on MetaCPAN (https://metacpan.org/pod/Sort::Naturally), you’ll see 
that there are 151 distributions dependent on Sort-Naturally. In situations 
like this, the PAUSE admins do a bit more due diligence before transferring 
permissions.

BINGOS, OALDERS, and PERIGRIN have co-maint on Sort::Naturally, but it has a 
limited release history:

 1.03 2012-04-11 BINGOS
 1.02 2004-12-30 SBURKE
 1.01 2001-05-26 SBURKE

I’m guessing that Chris (BINGOS) transferred first-come to ADOPTME – is that 
right Chris?

Olaf and other Chris, did you get co-maint sometime after BINGOS’s one release 
in 2012, and if so had you intended to do any releases?

The key question for the two Chris's and Olaf – are you happy with Robbie 
getting first-come?

Robbie, if you do get first-come are you happy with the following expectations:

1. You won’t change the API in any way that could break downstream code.
2. If you make any non-trivial code changes, you should first do a developer 
release and wait for a few days to see whether any breakages are reported by 
CPAN Testers.

If everyone is happy with the above, I can transfer first-come.

Cheers,
Neil


Re: Adoption of Sort::Naturally

2022-08-17 Thread Chris Prather
I have no objections.

-Other Chris 

> On Aug 17, 2022, at 7:58 AM, Neil Bowers  wrote:
> 
> 
> Hi Robbie,
> 
> I’m one of the PAUSE admins.
> 
> > I'm interested in adopting [Sort::Naturally]
> 
> The package has first-come assigned to ADOPTME, which generally means it’s 
> immediately available for adoption. But sometimes someone is given co-maint 
> on a package and then ADOPTME isn’t removed.
> 
> If you look on MetaCPAN (https://metacpan.org/pod/Sort::Naturally), you’ll 
> see that there are 151 distributions dependent on Sort-Naturally. In 
> situations like this, the PAUSE admins do a bit more due diligence before 
> transferring permissions.
> 
> BINGOS, OALDERS, and PERIGRIN have co-maint on Sort::Naturally, but it has a 
> limited release history:
> 
>  1.03 2012-04-11 BINGOS
>  1.02 2004-12-30 SBURKE
>  1.01 2001-05-26 SBURKE
> 
> I’m guessing that Chris (BINGOS) transferred first-come to ADOPTME – is that 
> right Chris?
> 
> Olaf and other Chris, did you get co-maint sometime after BINGOS’s one 
> release in 2012, and if so had you intended to do any releases?
> 
> The key question for the two Chris's and Olaf – are you happy with Robbie 
> getting first-come?
> 
> Robbie, if you do get first-come are you happy with the following 
> expectations:
> You won’t change the API in any way that could break downstream code.
> If you make any non-trivial code changes, you should first do a developer 
> release and wait for a few days to see whether any breakages are reported by 
> CPAN Testers.
> If everyone is happy with the above, I can transfer first-come.
> 
> Cheers,
> Neil


Re: Adoption of Sort::Naturally

2022-08-17 Thread Robbie Bow
Hi Neil


> Robbie, if you do get first-come are you happy with the following
> expectations:
>
>1. You won’t change the API in any way that could break downstream
>code.
>2. If you make any non-trivial code changes, you should first do a
>developer release and wait for a few days to see whether any breakages are
>reported by CPAN Testers.
>
> Works for me. I'm happy to work within those constraints.

Cheers


Robbie