Re: [Mjpeg-users] mjpegtools and libquicktime
On Fri, 8 Dec 2006, Stan Gammons wrote: The changes to use quicktime_t * were made and tested on my workstation at work (when the boss wasn't looking ;)) on a SuSE 10.0 system and no problems were encountered. Next test was to compile on OSX and that worked. At that point the changes were judged safe to commit. > Here is the trailing end of what I get: ... > Making all in lavtools > make[2]: Entering directory `/home/sg31002/dv/mjpeg_play/lavtools' ... > gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I.. -I/usr/local/include -I../utils > -march=k8 -mtune=k8 -g -O2 -pthread -Wall -Wunused -MT > liblavfile_la-editlist.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/liblavfile_la-editlist.Tpo > -c editlist.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/liblavfile_la-editlist.o > In file included from editlist.c:25: > lav_io.h:43: error: expected specifier-qualifier-list before 'quicktime_t' gcc error that's not been seen before. O cr*p - what have... > editlist.c: In function 'el_video_frame_data_format': > editlist.c:505: error: 'lav_file_t' has no member named 'dataformat' > make[2]: *** [liblavfile_la-editlist.lo] Error 1 > result. Since it's a FC6 machine, I run ldconfig after libquicktime was ... Redhat/Fedora/gcc f* up now? :( The message: lav_io.h:43: error: expected specifier-qualifier-list before 'quicktime_t' is new, weird, and something I have not seen with gcc 2.95.3 (old old BSD variant) 4.0.0 (OSX) 4.0.2 (SuSE 10.0) and I remembered I had one last system (hadn't been powered up this month yet): 4.1.0 (SuSE 10.1) What does "gcc -dumpversion" say on FC6? I think you're on the bleeding edge with FC6 and they or the gcc folks have introduced a change in the compiler's behaviour. NONE of the platforms I have available have had the problem. It is unknown at the present if there are FC6 users who have done the build of libquicktime and mjpegtools w/o problems. So far you're the first and it's not working. I'm not a FC so I can't give too much help at this point ;( Maybe after Leopard ships I'll have a different version of gcc to test with :) 'night. Steven Schultz - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV ___ Mjpeg-users mailing list Mjpeg-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mjpeg-users
Re: [Mjpeg-users] mjpegtools and libquicktime
On Sat, 2006-12-09 at 00:10 -0800, Steven M. Schultz wrote: > What does "gcc -dumpversion" say on FC6? 4.1.1 Looks like they changed/broke something in GCC then. :( I guess the video machine will have to be Suse 10.1 then. Thanks. Stan - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV ___ Mjpeg-users mailing list Mjpeg-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mjpeg-users
Re: [Mjpeg-users] problems when loading zr36067 driver
Hi Bernhard, On Sat, 2006-12-06, Bernhard Praschinger wrote: > (For some strange reason I didn't get Ronald E-Mail) I accidently sent it to him w/o CC'ing the list (since I'm on digests, I can't just hit reply, I have to re-do the reply-to subject line and things like that, sometimes I forget one of the steps). Anyway, my complete reply was in his reply back, so nothing got lost, I think. I just asked for the dmesg output so we could see why exactly the driver failed to load, which is apparently because he doesn't have a zr36067-based card, but one of those new Bendino's (which are sometimes sold as DC10+). That card is not supported by the driver. Anyway, that was all, so I'll pay better attention to my subject headers. :-). Cheers, Ronald - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV ___ Mjpeg-users mailing list Mjpeg-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mjpeg-users
Re: [Mjpeg-users] problems when loading zr36067 driver
On Sat, 09 Dec 2006 10:59:22 -0500 "Ronald S. Bultje" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > one of those new Bendino's (which are sometimes > sold as DC10+). Gah. I wish they wouldn't do that! /Sam - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV ___ Mjpeg-users mailing list Mjpeg-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mjpeg-users
Re: [Mjpeg-users] mjpegtools and libquicktime
On Sat, 9 Dec 2006, Stan Gammons wrote: > > What does "gcc -dumpversion" say on FC6? > 4.1.1 Ok. Thanks. > Looks like they changed/broke something in GCC then. :( Wouldn't be the first time. > I guess the video machine will have to be Suse 10.1 then. I know the build will be successful there because I did it last night ;) Maybe there's a slightly older version of gcc that could be installed on your system? Probably not worth the trouble though. I've nothing else to do so I started a download of the X64_64 (DVD) ISO image for FC6 - maybe tonight I'll replace/update the FC4 disk that's sitting around. Steve - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV ___ Mjpeg-users mailing list Mjpeg-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mjpeg-users
Re: [Mjpeg-users] mjpegtools and libquicktime
On Sat, 2006-12-09 at 12:03 -0800, Steven M. Schultz wrote: > > I guess the video machine will have to be Suse 10.1 then. > > I know the build will be successful there because I did it last night ;) > Ok. What all tools in mjpegtools use lav_file_t ? Just lavtools? If lav_file_t isn't used in the Y tools, y4mdenoise, yuvdenoise, yuvmedianfilter, and so forth. And mjpegtools builds Ok on GCC 4.1.1 using the old way. What effect will it have if the other tools compiled Ok with GCC 4.1.1? Wonder what they changed/broke from 4.1.0 to 4.1.1 that causing the error? > Maybe there's a slightly older version of gcc that could be installed > on your system? Probably not worth the trouble though. > 4.1.1 is what shipped with FC6. FC5 shipped with 4.1.0 I have the FC5 install media, but I don't know how much trouble it would be to try an go back to 4.1.0 Probably a real pain. > I've nothing else to do so I started a download of the X64_64 (DVD) > ISO image for FC6 - maybe tonight I'll replace/update the FC4 disk > that's sitting around. I'm still staying away from the 64 bit stuff. Too much of a pain in the rear getting everything from the 32 bit world to work on 64 bit. IF you mess with the 64 bit version of FC6, I'd like to know if you get the same or similar compile error. Stan - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV ___ Mjpeg-users mailing list Mjpeg-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mjpeg-users
Re: [Mjpeg-users] mjpegtools and libquicktime
On Sat, 9 Dec 2006, Stan Gammons wrote: > What all tools in mjpegtools use lav_file_t ? Just lavtools? That would seem to be the case. find . -name '*.c' | xargs grep lav_file_t only shows files in lavtools/ > using the old way. What effect will it have if the other tools compiled > Ok with GCC 4.1.1? SHould work OK. AND you can, if you want, simply change that one structure member back to 'void *'. Nothing'll break and it will show up as 'M' when you do a cvs update later but that just means the file's been modified locally. > Wonder what they changed/broke from 4.1.0 to 4.1.1 that causing the error? No idea. FC6 didn't ship with an older libquicktime that might be conflicing some how, did it? > I'm still staying away from the 64 bit stuff. Too much of a pain in the > rear getting everything from the 32 bit world to work on 64 bit. Really? It "all just worked" for me - no trouble at all for the last couple years on the dual Opteron system. Ine or two minor shared library build issues with programs but that's all. > IF you mess with the 64 bit version of FC6, I'd like to know if you get > the same or similar compile error. I'm backing up a couple files off the FC4 disc and get the base FC6 installed tonight. Not sure how much more will get done this weekend. Steven Schultz - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV ___ Mjpeg-users mailing list Mjpeg-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mjpeg-users
Re: [Mjpeg-users] mjpegtools and libquicktime
On Sat, 2006-12-09 at 19:55 -0800, Steven M. Schultz wrote: > FC6 didn't ship with an older libquicktime that might be conflicing > some how, did it? I don't see libquicktime on the FC6 DVD. If it's called libquicktime-someversion.rpm Could be one of the "extras" I haven't looked on the Fedora site to see howver. I fetched the CVS of libquicktime and installed that version. > > > I'm still staying away from the 64 bit stuff. Too much of a pain in the > > rear getting everything from the 32 bit world to work on 64 bit. > > Really? It "all just worked" for me - no trouble at all for the > last couple years on the dual Opteron system. Ine or two > minor shared library build issues with programs but that's all. Everything just worked? What about 64 bit plugins for browsers? Are those available now? I got so frustrated with having both 32 bit and 64 bit libraries and things that wouldn't work on 64 bit, like Kino, but worked fine on 32 bit. I said the heck with it and have never even considered trying 64 bit again. > > IF you mess with the 64 bit version of FC6, I'd like to know if you get > > the same or similar compile error. > > I'm backing up a couple files off the FC4 disc and get the > base FC6 installed tonight. Not sure how much more will get done > this weekend. Ok. I'm downloading the Suse 10.2 DVD iso now. It's about half way done. Not sure what version of GCC it has or if I'll get a chance to install it on anything this weekend to see what happens with it. Will let you know how things work out when I do. Stan - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV ___ Mjpeg-users mailing list Mjpeg-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mjpeg-users
