Marvell 88SE9230 AHCI SATA controller
Hello list, I am the unfortunate owner of a few Supermicro servers that contain Marvell 88SE9230 chips. OpenBSD does detect them, however they get stuck in a softreset loop. "ahci0: failed to stop port, cannot softreset" A quick search reveals that the problem has been reported before and that other operating systems had to put in some sort of delay workaround because the chips don't follow the AHCI specs perfectly. Reference: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.misc/208667 I was wondering if someone has some sort of unofficial kernel patch or could point me in the correct direction (other than "don't buy these servers" -- too late). Thank you.
LibreSSL and code signing
Hey, Are there any plans to signify the new tarball, or PGP sign it? I'd like to be sure that I don't get smacked by the quantum hand (if you know what I mean). Thanks.
Re: sshfs as non-root: fuse_mount: Permission denied
This is probably why... % ls -lao /dev/fuse0 crw--- 1 root wheel - 92, 0 Jul 5 05:38 /dev/fuse0 Carsten Kunze: > Hello, > > I am using OpenBSD as guest on a Linux host. > For accessing the host filesystems I've tried to use > sshfs(1) as a non-root user. I've created a directory > and typed: > > $ sshfs :/ > > The output is: > > fuse_mount: Permission denied > > But login via ssh(1) on that IP works. sshfs from > other OSes to that host also work. Why is it not > possible for a user to use sshfs? > > It does work as root (I'd like to avoid that) but > then every file created on the host gets owner > root. (NetBSD mount_psshfs also seems to > require root but there the file owner is set as > expected.) > > --Carsten
Re: Donations to OpenBSD
I just donated money to pay for the developer's time in responding to this useless thread. =P Theo de Raadt: >> Suggestion: Package the release notes, FAQ and some other documentation >> into a PDF and sell that at the same price as the CD, from the same >> place. I'd buy that. It would be better quality than the (often) crap >> O'Reilly sell, and I buy that. > > We should do more... Then you'll give us more
nginx gzip crippled?
Hey all, Can someone tell me why nginx's "gzip on" option doesn't work in 5.5 release? Thanks.