Disabling dedicated GPU on Macbook Pro
I have tried to get an OpenBSD desktop running on my MacBookPro10,1 (the first Retina model). But I only get VESA working on a terrible res while the machine is running extremely hot. This is the case for most (all?) MacBook's with 2 GPUs. On linux (and osx recovery mode?) one can use this script to disable the dedicated gpu and only use the integrated, intel gpu: https://github.com/0xbb/gpu-switch Could something like this help start the intel driver on OpenBSD? Thanks!
Re: Disabling dedicated GPU on Macbook Pro
I ran the script on arch linux live cd, then rebooted into openbsd. X (still) doesn't start. Xorg.log : https://gist.github.com/aa816aa9745fad2ee72d dmesg: https://gist.github.com/ccd823c4db36cf949816 On Wed, 9 Dec 2015, at 10:45 PM, Joris Vanhecke wrote: > I have tried to get an OpenBSD desktop running on my MacBookPro10,1 (the > first Retina model). > But I only get VESA working on a terrible res while the machine is > running extremely hot. > This is the case for most (all?) MacBook's with 2 GPUs. > > On linux (and osx recovery mode?) one can use this script to disable the > dedicated gpu and only use the integrated, intel gpu: > https://github.com/0xbb/gpu-switch > > Could something like this help start the intel driver on OpenBSD? > > Thanks!
Running OpenSMTPD at home behind a cloud proxy
Hey all, I'd like to pull my emails out of the cloud and run them on a local server (pcengines APU2 looks good). My ISP blocks tcp ports below 1024 and sending email from a residential (dynamic) IP might mark my email as spam. Right now I'm thinking of renting a cheap VPS and using it as a proxy for my home server which would use a dynamic DNS. I don't really want a copy of the email on the VPS so I was planning to use relayd or socat to route incoming traffic to my local OpenSMTPD server. But I don't really see a way to proxy outgoing connections from smtpd... Any ideas? Thanks, Joris
Re: Running OpenSMTPD at home behind a cloud proxy
Using OpenSMTPD on the VPS actually sounds like a good idea. It could use a pf blacklist + spamd to block a large amount of spam and reduce strain on my home connection. I'm still waiting for hardware to arrive and I'll test this out. relay via sounds like a simple option, but I'll have to investigate what happens if my home server is unavailable. @Jiri - I have never heard of "paused remote delivery" ? > On 14 Nov 2016, at 13:28, ludovic coues wrote: > > Why not use opensmtpd on the VPS to relay your mail ? > > A rule like "accept for domain example.com relay via > secure://you.dynamic.dns" should do what you want if I read the man > correctly > > 2016-11-13 23:25 GMT+01:00 Jiri B : >> On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 10:51:22PM +0100, Joris Vanhecke wrote: >>> Hey all, >>> >>> I'd like to pull my emails out of the cloud and run them on a local >>> server (pcengines APU2 looks good). >>> My ISP blocks tcp ports below 1024 and sending email from a residential >>> (dynamic) IP might mark my email as spam. >>> >>> Right now I'm thinking of renting a cheap VPS and using it as a proxy >>> for my home server which would use a dynamic DNS. >>> I don't really want a copy of the email on the VPS so I was planning to >>> use relayd or socat to route incoming traffic to my local OpenSMTPD >>> server. >>> >>> But I don't really see a way to proxy outgoing connections from smtpd... >>> >>> Any ideas? >> >> What about to have paused remote delivery on cloud proxy (and deliver >> on request initiated from home server) and paused remote delivery on home >> mail server as well and unpause the queue when you do tcp port forwardning >> to cloud host as well. >> >> Or just run VPN between cloud host and home host. If either of them won't >> be available your mail will stay in queue. >> >> j. >> > > > > -- > > Cordialement, Coues Ludovic > +336 148 743 42
Re: Ruby on Rails and httpd
On Fri, 9 Dec 2016, at 04:57 PM, Murk Fletcher wrote: > Hi, > > Has anybody managed to come up with a working configuration of this? > > Thanks, > Murk > Hey, I tested/used the uWSGI tool as a proxy between httpd and rails in 5.7 with success. The uWSGI docs contain a section on both ruby/rails and obsd's httpd. I haven't used that setup in production but the developers behind uWSGI officially document this setup AND offer commercial support. Regards, Joris
Re: Is using dkim really worth?
On Sat, 10 Dec 2016, at 11:51 AM, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote: > I mentioned this in other thread, now I'll ask this question directly. > > I was running my own mail server for a while but not enough to make a > conclusion. I'd appreciate the opinion of the experienced. > > I'm noticing messages with no spf or dkim records reach my gmail inbox. > At the same time, messages with spf and dkim 'pass' state go to gmail > spam (among them messages sent to me from people in this list). > > So, in general and based on your experience, do you think using dkim > (that implies daemon, port redirections, etc.) is really worth? > Worth it for doing what? If your primary goal is to stay out of gmail/hotmail/... spam folders then I would say yes. Setting up DMARC isn't that hard but a wrong config might get your domain flagged for life.
Re: [httpd] Multiple HTPS servers & redirection
On Sun, 25 Dec 2016, at 12:24 PM, Olivier wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I would like to know, what is the best practice to manage multilple https
> servers with httpd. I installed 2 certificates for both hostname below:
>
> _ daenerys.burelli.fr
> _ cloud.burelli.fr
>
> I would like to redirect all request for:
>
> _ http://daenerys.burelli.frto https://cloud.burelli.fr → OK
> _ http://cloud.burelli.fr to https://cloud.burelli.fr:444 →
> KO - however the certificate is ok when I try to reach directly
> https://cloud.burelli.fr:444
>
> I would like to avoid to obtain the followings message for second https
> server: SSL_ERROR_BAD_CERT_DOMAIN (The certificate is only valid for the
> following names: daenerys.burelli.fr, www.daenerys.burelli.fr)
>
> Part of my httpd.conf:
>
> server "daenerys.burelli.fr" {
> listen on $ext_addr port 80
> block return 301 "https://$SERVER_NAME$REQUEST_URI";
> }
>
> server "daenerys.burelli.fr" {
> alias "www.burelli.fr"
> listen on $ext_addr tls port 443
> (…)
> }
>
> server "cloud.burelli.fr" {
> listen on $ext_addr port 80
> block return 301 "https://cloud.burelli.fr:444/$REQUEST_URI";
> }
>
> server "cloud.burelli.fr" {
> listen on $ext_addr tls port 444
> (…)
> }
>
> I tried also with: block return 301 https://$SERVER_NAME:444$REQUEST_URI
> or
> block return 301 https://cloud.burelli.fr:444$REQUEST_URI
>
> What is the right way to rewrite the URL?
>
> Thanks in advance for your help and support.
>
> Olivier.
>
Seems like httpd is using the first cert for both domains.
Are you using the "tls certificate *file*" option?
Re: Computer hangup : scsi_xfer pool exhausted!
I'm experiencing the same thing. OpenBSD5.8-STABLE on vmware. The message is repeatedly spammed to the console.
