routing problem
Hi, I have at work: TS Server : 10.100.1.100 his gateway is 10.100.1.254 (router for private network) Firewall : 10.100.1.250 (OpenBSD 4.9, ADSL : sis0, Lan (10.100.1.0/24) :sis2 On the firewall, i can ping 10.100.1.100 and telnet 10.100.1.100 3389 -> OK When i am at home, i connect to firewall using "thegreenbow" vpn is ok, i can ping 10.100.1.250, use ssh on the firewall, but i can't ping 10.100.1.100 and can't use rdp on this address. my pf rules: ... set skip on {lo,enc0} pass out on sis2 inet proto tcp from $remote to 10.100.1.100 port 3389 pass out inet proto icmp all icmp-type echoreq ... Any idea ? thank you very much. Wesley
Fw: MANPOWER SUPPLIER
IMDAD KHAN KATHMANDU , NEPAL MOBILE.009779721319713 - Forwarded Message - From: kisa zahra To: "sada...@sadafco.com" ; "sa...@mapsearch.com" ; "q...@mapsearch.com" ; "ki...@kipco.com" ; "ugb...@ugbbah.com" ; "jkb...@go.com.jo" ; "i...@burgan.com.kw" ; "i...@energycorporateafrica.com" ; "tib1@planet.in" ; "i...@kamconline.com" ; "i...@itins.com" ; "kcl...@kuwaitclearing.com" ; "tmsrepri...@permissionsgroup.com" ; "misc@openbsd.org" ; "recr...@eim.ae" ; "webmas...@neohapsis.com" ; "h...@neohapsis.com" ; "i...@jcdinfo.com" Sent: Thursday, 23 June 2011 8:44 PM Subject: Fw: MANPOWER SUPPLIER IMDAD KHAN KATHMANDU , NEPAL MOBILE.009779721319713 - Forwarded Message - From: kisa zahra To: sada...@sadafco.com; sa...@mapsearch.com; q...@mapsearch.com; ki...@kipco.com; ugb...@ugbbah.com; jkb...@go.com.jo; i...@burgan.com.kw; i...@energycorporateafrica.com; tib1@planet.in; i...@kamconline.com; i...@itins.com; kcl...@kuwaitclearing.com; tmsrepri...@permissionsgroup.com; misc@openbsd.org; recr...@eim.ae; webmas...@neohapsis.com; h...@neohapsis.com; i...@jcdinfo.com Sent: Saturday, 19 February 2011 3:36 PM Subject: MANPOWER SUPPLIER DEAR SIR BEST REGARDS WER THE LEADING MANPOWER SUPPLIER IN KATHMANDU , NEPAL . WE SUPPLY NEPALI SKILL N UNSKILLED WORKERS TO GULF N MIDDLEEAST CONTRIES. MUCH MORE DETAILS IF U PROVIDE US A CHANCE TO SERVE U BETTER. LOOKING FORWARD. THANX. IMDAD KHAN KATHMANDU , NEPAL
Re: routing problem
On 09/28/11 03:13, Wesley M. wrote: > Hi, > > I have at work: > TS Server : 10.100.1.100 his gateway is 10.100.1.254 (router for private > network) bzzt. Bad. (I'm guessing that's a windows terminal server) > Firewall : 10.100.1.250 (OpenBSD 4.9, ADSL : sis0, Lan (10.100.1.0/24) > :sis2 > > On the firewall, i can ping 10.100.1.100 and telnet 10.100.1.100 3389 -> > OK right. no gateway involved. > When i am at home, i connect to firewall using "thegreenbow" vpn is ok, i > can ping 10.100.1.250, use ssh on the firewall, but i can't ping > 10.100.1.100 and can't use rdp on this address. > > my pf rules: > ... > set skip on {lo,enc0} > pass out on sis2 inet proto tcp from $remote to 10.100.1.100 port 3389 > pass out inet proto icmp all icmp-type echoreq > ... because your packets come from your machine, through your firewall, to the "TS Server", but they are still "off-network" packets. When it responds to an off-network address, it routes them to the gateway machine...which is 10.100.1.254, not the firewall. Fixes: 1) fix the default gateway on the TS Server machine, add a custom route for whatever that "private network" thingie is. 2) instead of your VPN, use an SSH tunnel to your firewall, then redirect 3389 to the TS Server. This way, your remote desktop session is between the gateway and the firewall, which are both on the same subnet. Nick.
Re: routing problem
what settings on client/home side? B ipconfig /all, route print..etc 28 QP5P=QQP1QQ 2011, 11:18 P>Q "Wesley M." : Hi, I have at work: TS Server : 10.100.1.100 his gateway is 10.100.1.254 (router for private network) Firewall : 10.100.1.250 (OpenBSD 4.9, ADSL : sis0, Lan (10.100.1.0/24) :sis2 On the firewall, i can ping 10.100.1.100 and telnet 10.100.1.100 3389 -> OK When i am at home, i connect to firewall using "thegreenbow" vpn is ok, i can ping 10.100.1.250, use ssh on the firewall, but i can't ping 10.100.1.100 and can't use rdp on this address. my pf rules: ... set skip on {lo,enc0} pass out on sis2 inet proto tcp from $remote to 10.100.1.100 port 3389 pass out inet proto icmp all icmp-type echoreq ... Any idea ? thank you very much. Wesley
Re: routing problem
On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 06:49:59 -0400, Nick Holland wrote: > On 09/28/11 03:13, Wesley M. wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I have at work: >> TS Server : 10.100.1.100 his gateway is 10.100.1.254 (router for private >> network) > > bzzt. Bad. > (I'm guessing that's a windows terminal server) Yes, it is (RDS, Windows 2008 R2) >> Firewall : 10.100.1.250 (OpenBSD 4.9, ADSL : sis0, Lan (10.100.1.0/24) >> :sis2 >> >> On the firewall, i can ping 10.100.1.100 and telnet 10.100.1.100 3389 -> >> OK > > right. no gateway involved. Yes, it doesn't need the gateway : 10.100.1.254 > >> When i am at home, i connect to firewall using "thegreenbow" vpn is ok, i >> can ping 10.100.1.250, use ssh on the firewall, but i can't ping >> 10.100.1.100 and can't use rdp on this address. >> >> my pf rules: >> ... >> set skip on {lo,enc0} >> pass out on sis2 inet proto tcp from $remote to 10.100.1.100 port 3389 >> pass out inet proto icmp all icmp-type echoreq >> ... > To resume : INTERNET---sis0-sis1---LAN--- On the LAN side : There's the TS SERVER and the ISP ROUTER (need it to connect the 4 others locations) > > Fixes: 1) fix the default gateway on the TS Server machine, add a custom > route for whatever that "private network" thingie is. I can't change the gateway, because the others locations (there are 4) won't connect on TS. > 2) instead of your VPN, use an SSH tunnel to your firewall, then > redirect 3389 to the TS Server. This way, your remote desktop session > is between the gateway and the firewall, which are both on the same subnet. Seem's a good solution. But there's no other way to connect TS using VPN ? > > Nick.
Re: routing problem
The VPN is between a fictif ip address(gives by the_green_bow) to 10.100.1.0/24 Using VPN, i can ping 10.100.1.250 and use also ssh on the box but pings doesn't work for : 10.100.1.100, and 10.100.1.254. On the OpenBSD SIDE : ipsec.conf ike dynamic from 10.100.1.0/24 to any \ main auth hmac-sha1 enc aes-256 group modp1024 \ quick auth hmac-sha1 enc aes-256 psk demokey On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 15:05:52 +0400, pavel pocheptsov wrote: > what settings on client/home side? > B ipconfig /all, route print..etc > > > 28 QP5P=QQP1QQ 2011, 11:18 P>Q "Wesley M." : > > > > > Hi, > > I have at work: > TS Server : 10.100.1.100 his gateway is 10.100.1.254 (router for private > network) > Firewall : 10.100.1.250 (OpenBSD 4.9, ADSL : sis0, Lan (10.100.1.0/24) > :sis2 > > On the firewall, i can ping 10.100.1.100 and telnet 10.100.1.100 3389 -> > OK > > When i am at home, i connect to firewall using "thegreenbow" vpn is ok, i > can ping 10.100.1.250, use ssh on the firewall, but i can't ping > 10.100.1.100 and can't use rdp on this address. > > my pf rules: > ... > set skip on {lo,enc0} > pass out on sis2 inet proto tcp from $remote to 10.100.1.100 port 3389 > pass out inet proto icmp all icmp-type echoreq > ... > > Any idea ? > thank you very much. > Wesley
Re: routing problem
On 2011-09-28, Nick Holland wrote: > On 09/28/11 03:13, Wesley M. wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I have at work: >> TS Server : 10.100.1.100 his gateway is 10.100.1.254 (router for private >> network) > > bzzt. Bad. > (I'm guessing that's a windows terminal server) > >> Firewall : 10.100.1.250 (OpenBSD 4.9, ADSL : sis0, Lan (10.100.1.0/24) >> :sis2 >> >> On the firewall, i can ping 10.100.1.100 and telnet 10.100.1.100 3389 -> >> OK > > right. no gateway involved. > >> When i am at home, i connect to firewall using "thegreenbow" vpn is ok, i >> can ping 10.100.1.250, use ssh on the firewall, but i can't ping >> 10.100.1.100 and can't use rdp on this address. >> >> my pf rules: >> ... >> set skip on {lo,enc0} >> pass out on sis2 inet proto tcp from $remote to 10.100.1.100 port 3389 >> pass out inet proto icmp all icmp-type echoreq >> ... > > because your packets come from your machine, through your firewall, to > the "TS Server", but they are still "off-network" packets. When it > responds to an off-network address, it routes them to the gateway > machine...which is 10.100.1.254, not the firewall. > > Fixes: 1) fix the default gateway on the TS Server machine, add a custom > route for whatever that "private network" thingie is. > 2) instead of your VPN, use an SSH tunnel to your firewall, then > redirect 3389 to the TS Server. This way, your remote desktop session > is between the gateway and the firewall, which are both on the same subnet. or 3) nat the vpn traffic..
Re: routing problem
On 2011-09-28, Wesley M. wrote: >> Fixes: 1) fix the default gateway on the TS Server machine, add a custom >> route for whatever that "private network" thingie is. > > I can't change the gateway, because the others locations (there are 4) > won't connect on TS. You could add a custom static route for the private network behind the IPsec gateway, though.
ipsec: failure after upgrade
Hi, I have lan1 -- gw1 --- internet --- gw2 -- lan2 The setup has been working for years. Now I upgraded one side to 4.9, while the other - so far - is still at 4.6 (I know... :( ). After that, no connection gets established anymore: 1.2.3.4: OpenBSD 4.6 4.3.2.1: OpenBSD 4.9 13:18:25.029033 1.2.3.4.isakmp > 4.3.2.1.isakmp: [udp sum ok] isakmp v1.0 exchange ID_PROT cookie: 767f6d9ce0fa3890-> msgid: len: 184 payload: SA len: 56 DOI: 1(IPSEC) situation: IDENTITY_ONLY payload: PROPOSAL len: 44 proposal: 1 proto: ISAKMP spisz: 0 xforms: 1 payload: TRANSFORM len: 36 transform: 0 ID: ISAKMP attribute ENCRYPTION_ALGORITHM = AES_CBC attribute HASH_ALGORITHM = SHA attribute AUTHENTICATION_METHOD = RSA_SIG attribute GROUP_DESCRIPTION = MODP_1024 attribute LIFE_TYPE = SECONDS attribute LIFE_DURATION = 3600 attribute KEY_LENGTH = 128 payload: VENDOR len: 20 (supports OpenBSD-4.0) payload: VENDOR len: 20 (supports v2 NAT-T, draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02) payload: VENDOR len: 20 (supports v3 NAT-T, draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-03) payload: VENDOR len: 20 (supports NAT-T, RFC 3947) payload: VENDOR len: 20 (supports DPD v1.0) (ttl 63, id 42430, len 212) 13:18:25.035893 4.3.2.1.isakmp > 1.2.3.4.isakmp: [udp sum ok] isakmp v1.0 exchange ID_PROT cookie: 767f6d9ce0fa3890->7779887f9d620aeb msgid: len: 184 payload: SA len: 56 DOI: 1(IPSEC) situation: IDENTITY_ONLY payload: PROPOSAL len: 44 proposal: 1 proto: ISAKMP spisz: 0 xforms: 1 payload: TRANSFORM len: 36 transform: 0 ID: ISAKMP attribute ENCRYPTION_ALGORITHM = AES_CBC attribute HASH_ALGORITHM = SHA attribute AUTHENTICATION_METHOD = RSA_SIG attribute GROUP_DESCRIPTION = MODP_1024 attribute LIFE_TYPE = SECONDS attribute LIFE_DURATION = 3600 attribute KEY_LENGTH = 128 payload: VENDOR len: 20 (supports OpenBSD-4.0) payload: VENDOR len: 20 (supports v2 NAT-T, draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02) payload: VENDOR len: 20 (supports v3 NAT-T, draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-03) payload: VENDOR len: 20 (supports NAT-T, RFC 3947) payload: VENDOR len: 20 (supports DPD v1.0) (ttl 64, id 42377, len 212) 13:15:45.230823 1.2.3.4.isakmp > 4.3.2.1.isakmp: [udp sum ok] isakmp v1.0 exchange ID_PROT cookie: 8d07fcf0a2492be7->915168361b6b77c1 msgid: len: 228 payload: KEY_EXCH len: 132 payload: NONCE len: 20 payload: NAT-D len: 24 payload: NAT-D len: 24 (ttl 63, id 43396, len 256) 13:15:45.246177 4.3.2.1.isakmp > 1.2.3.4.isakmp: [udp sum ok] isakmp v1.0 exchange ID_PROT cookie: 8d07fcf0a2492be7->915168361b6b77c1 msgid: len: 228 payload: KEY_EXCH len: 132 payload: NONCE len: 20 payload: NAT-D len: 24 payload: NAT-D len: 24 (ttl 64, id 4863, len 256) 13:15:45.457272 1.2.3.4.isakmp > 4.3.2.1.isakmp: [udp sum ok] isakmp v1.0 exchange ID_PROT encrypted cookie: 8d07fcf0a2492be7->915168361b6b77c1 msgid: len: 1292 (ttl 63, id 44981, len 1320) 13:15:52.479525 1.2.3.4.isakmp > 4.3.2.1.isakmp: [udp sum ok] isakmp v1.0 exchange ID_PROT encrypted cookie: 8d07fcf0a2492be7->915168361b6b77c1 msgid: len: 1292 (ttl 63, id 43438, len 1320) 13:16:01.501279 1.2.3.4.isakmp > 4.3.2.1.isakmp: [udp sum ok] isakmp v1.0 exchange ID_PROT encrypted cookie: 8d07fcf0a2492be7->915168361b6b77c1 msgid: len: 1292 (ttl 63, id 54363, len 1320) 13:16:12.516937 1.2.3.4.isakmp > 4.3.2.1.isakmp: [udp sum ok] isakmp v1.0 exchange ID_PROT encrypted cookie: 8d07fcf0a2492be7->915168361b6b77c1 msgid: len: 1292 (ttl 63, id 19766, len 1320) 13:16:25.537550 1.2.3.4.isakmp > 4.3.2.1.isakmp: [udp sum ok] isakmp v1.0 exchange ID_PROT encrypted cookie: 8d07fcf0a2492be7->915168361b6b77c1 msgid: len: 1292 (ttl 63, id 36623, len 1320) As you can see, there is no SHA2 problem present (see 47.html). Switching the phase2 hash to ripemd didn't help. Any ideas about what to do? The reason for not yet upgrading everything is that road warriors (NCP) are stopped dead in much the same way like shown above, when running against 4.9 (but not if they work against lower versions of OpenBSD, including 4.8). If I could verify that they'll work, I'd uprade rather sooner than later. Kind regards, --Toni++
Re[2]: routing problem
28 QP5P=QQP1QQ 2011, 15:28 P>Q "Wesley M." : > The VPN is between a fictif ip address(gives by the_green_bow) to > 10.100.1.0/24 > > Using VPN, i can ping 10.100.1.250 and use also ssh on the box but pings > doesn't work for : 10.100.1.100, and 10.100.1.254. > > On the OpenBSD SIDE : ipsec.conf > > ike dynamic from 10.100.1.0/24 to any \ > main auth hmac-sha1 enc aes-256 group modp1024 \ > quick auth hmac-sha1 enc aes-256 psk demokey > maybe add to ipsec.conf "from any to 10.100.." on remote side "route add 10.100.1.0 mask 255.255.255.0 IP_addres_of_your_vpn_gateway(not real gateway)"
Re: no home no shell accounts
Hi Stefan. On 28/09/2011, Stefan Johnson wrote: > Please disregard my last... gmail sent the email before I was finished > composing it. I figured as much. > Using false for your shell is okay for ftp. It is not for ssh/sftp. I kind of expect that SSH (the shell) either passes commands directly to the sftp-server or the sftp-server is enough of a shell to take over (in the same way that ftpd has enough vocabulary) ... In that sense it wouldn't seem useful to have another shell in play. I'm not saying you're wrong but unless I get something definitive (e.g. a man page) I'll test it anyway. > Match User sftpuser >X11Forwarding no >AllowTcpForwarding no >ForceCommand internal-sftp >ChrootDirectory /home/sftpuser > > Where the user is named sftpuser and the home directory for the user is > /home/sftpuser. Yeah I got that bit worked out and I've got the forwarding commands globally. >> >> Hope this helped. > Stefan Johnson > Absolutely. Best wishes.
Re: routing problem
On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 15:42:05 +0400, pavel pocheptsov wrote: > 28 QP5P=QQP1QQ 2011, 15:28 P>Q "Wesley M." : >> The VPN is between a fictif ip address(gives by the_green_bow) to >> 10.100.1.0/24 >> >> Using VPN, i can ping 10.100.1.250 and use also ssh on the box but pings >> doesn't work for : 10.100.1.100, and 10.100.1.254. >> >> On the OpenBSD SIDE : ipsec.conf >> >> ike dynamic from 10.100.1.0/24 to any \ >> main auth hmac-sha1 enc aes-256 group modp1024 \ >> quick auth hmac-sha1 enc aes-256 psk demokey >> > maybe add to ipsec.conf "from any to 10.100.." I don't think that it will solve my mistake. Because VPN works, and ready to 10.100.1.0/24 The problem is that the server 10.100.1.100 has a different gateway (10.100.1.254) > on remote side "route add 10.100.1.0 mask 255.255.255.0 > IP_addres_of_your_vpn_gateway(not real gateway)" it doesn't work. :-(
Re: no home no shell accounts
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 7:10 AM, David Walker wrote: > Hi Stefan. > > On 28/09/2011, Stefan Johnson wrote: > > Please disregard my last... gmail sent the email before I was finished > > composing it. > > I figured as much. > > > Using false for your shell is okay for ftp. It is not for ssh/sftp. > > I kind of expect that SSH (the shell) either passes commands directly > to the sftp-server or the sftp-server is enough of a shell to take > over (in the same way that ftpd has enough vocabulary) ... > In that sense it wouldn't seem useful to have another shell in play. > SSH isn't a shell. It is a protocol. In much the same sense as FTP is not a shell but a protocol. FTP is designed with file transfers in mind, and therefore handles file I/O without the need of a shell process to set up an environment, etc. SSH (and by extension, SFTP) need a valid shell to do that for you. I've seen an implementation of SSH that allows for /bin/false for sftp, but unless something changed and I missed it, OpenSSH does not. > > I'm not saying you're wrong but unless I get something definitive > (e.g. a man page) I'll test it anyway. > > > Match User sftpuser > >X11Forwarding no > >AllowTcpForwarding no > >ForceCommand internal-sftp > >ChrootDirectory /home/sftpuser > > > > Where the user is named sftpuser and the home directory for the user is > > /home/sftpuser. > > Yeah I got that bit worked out and I've got the forwarding commands > globally. > If you intend to use logging, check the tail end of the man page for sftp-server as well. There is a blurb about needing to set something up for syslog in there. Good luck! Stefan Johnson
Re: kernel panic: inteldrm
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 01:24:36PM +0400, Alexei Malinin wrote: > Hello. > > Can anybody comment this kernel panic event? I will look into it. What were you doing at the time? This is pure 4.9 yes? -0- -- It is now pitch dark. If you proceed, you will likely fall into a pit.
Re: kernel panic: inteldrm
Owain Ainsworth wrote: > On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 01:24:36PM +0400, Alexei Malinin wrote: >> Hello. >> >> Can anybody comment this kernel panic event? > > I will look into it. > > What were you doing at the time? rdesktop was running, I moved cursor from rdesktop window to seamonkey window, after that all hung, I switched to other virtual console, then I switched back to X and after that computer rebooted > This is pure 4.9 yes? yes -- Alexei Malinin
Amerikan Kültür Derneği Dil Okullarının 1.5 Milyon Öğrencisi MyKelime.com'u Seçti
Bu maili MyKelime.com'un kayD1tlD1 bir kullanD1cD1sD1 olduDunuz iC'in almaktasD1nD1z. Maili okumakta sD1kD1ntD1 C'ekiyorsanD1z lC
Re: kernel panic: inteldrm
2011/9/28 Alexei Malinin : > Owain Ainsworth wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 01:24:36PM +0400, Alexei Malinin wrote: >>> Hello. >>> >>> Can anybody comment this kernel panic event? >> >> I will look into it. >> >> What were you doing at the time? > > rdesktop was running, I moved cursor from rdesktop window > to seamonkey window, after that all hung, I switched to other > virtual console, then I switched back to X and after > that computer rebooted My colleague has quite similar issues on about month old "current". 3533124.077] (WW) checkDevMem: failed to open /dev/xf86 and /dev/mem (Operation not permitted) Check that you have set 'machdep.allowaperture=1' in /etc/sysctl.conf and reboot your machine refer to xf86(4) for details [3533124.077] linear framebuffer access unavailable [3533124.098] (--) Using wscons driver on /dev/ttyC4 in pcvt compatibility mode (version 3.32) [3533125.109] Fatal server error: [3533125.109] xf86OpenConsole: VT_SETMODE VT_PROCESS failed [3533125.109] Please consult the The X.Org Foundation support at http://wiki.x.org for help. [3533125.109] Please also check the log file at "/var/log/Xorg.1.log" for additional information. [3533125.109] $ machdep.allowaperture is set to 2 and permissions looks fine. What's interesting is that there are messages in console about some issue in Seamonkey (sorry don't have them in hand right now). Before they start appearing in console cursor in X changes to "vertical line about 3cm in size" which is shaking and in couple of seconds whole machine just freeze. Sometimes it's possible to avoid that behaviour with quick switch to text console, but not always. There's Gnome2 and other packages installed. Right now I can't provide more. Probably I will be able next week when machine will be upgraded to real current and I will check if problem is still in place. > >> This is pure 4.9 yes? > > yes > > > -- > Alexei Malinin
Re: no home no shell accounts
I stand corrected. Here is the procedure for setting up sftp-only with /usr/bin/false as the shell: Create your user with the appropriate shell: useradd -m -s /usr/bin/false -d /home/anonsftp anonsftp (Note that you might want to set up your own login class for it instead, or add other details) Change the ownership of /home/anonsftp to root: chown root /home/anonsftp Modify the sshd_config for a Match User block that is appropriate: Match User anonsftp X11Forwarding no AllowTcpForwarding no ForceCommand internal-sftp ChrootDirectory /home/anonftp If you need logging, again review the section in the man page on that. Sorry for the bad information earlier. Stefan Johnson
dead link to damiens iwn0 package
Hello List I just installed OpenBSD 4.9 on my x61s. The iwn manpage refers to http://damien.bergamini.free.fr/packages/openbsd/iwn-firmware-5.6.tgz to get the firmware. Well, the Website seems in trouble. Is there another place where i can get those files? Thank you!
Re: dead link to damiens iwn0 package
On 09/28/11 17:52, Matthias Pfeifer wrote: > The iwn manpage refers to > http://damien.bergamini.free.fr/packages/openbsd/iwn-firmware-5.6.tgz > to get the firmware. > > Well, the Website seems in trouble. > > Is there another place where i can get those files? yepp, you can get the firmware from http://firmware.openbsd.org/firmware/ Cheers, Andreas
Re: -current userland not building
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Amit Kulkarni wrote: > Yes, it happens when you start out. Look Nick added this because of you :-) > http://www.openbsd.org/faq/current.html#20110919 Thank you Nick :) However, I just realized that: http://www.openbsd.org/faq/current.html#20110919 is not the same as: http://openbsd.org/faq/current.html#20110919 The site at http://openbsd.org is not in sync with http://www.openbsd.org/. Chris
Re: ipsec: failure after upgrade [SOLVED]
Hi, I solved the site-site part of it. It turned out to be a typo somewhere. :( But the mobile issue is still open. Kind regards, --Toni++
ANZ Bank Update ©
- This mail is in HTML. Some elements may be ommited in plain text. - Protection Alert Customers are reminded that User Maintenance personal information requires update. Please proceed to ANZ Online Banking below for your account maintenance: Proceed to ANZ Online Banking ANZ Online Banking Security ..
Re: -current userland not building
> The site at http://openbsd.org is not in sync with http://www.openbsd.org/. yes they are different. its addressed already in the archives multiple times.
Re: -current userland not building
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Amit Kulkarni wrote: >> The site at http://openbsd.org is not in sync with http://www.openbsd.org/. > > yes they are different. its addressed already in the archives multiple times. Found a thread from 2007 where Theo states "www.openbsd.org is a mirror on a good network connection" but is this still the case? Can one have a "mirror" that is more up-to-date than the source?
Re: -current userland not building
On 09/28/2011 03:42 PM, Chris Smith wrote: On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Amit Kulkarni wrote: The site at http://.openbsd.org is not in sync with http://www.openbsd.org/. yes they are different. its addressed already in the archives multiple times. Found a thread from 2007 where Theo states "www.openbsd.org is a mirror on a good network connection" but is this still the case? Can one have a "mirror" that is more up-to-date than the source? we like it that way. quit using the site without the www's. :) .openbsd.org is not the source and never was (at least in the ten years I've been on the project). It is hosted on the machine where OpenBSD development is stored, but the source is a CVS repository. All mirrors we want you to use are cvs checkouts of the CVS www/ repo. Most of them update automatically. That one you are worrying about is updated manually for various reasons. It helps discourage you from using it. :) Nick.
Re: -current userland not building
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Nick Holland wrote: > quit using the site without the www's. :) Yes, I've made a mental note to that effect and already edited my bookmarks. > .openbsd.org is not the source and never was (at least in the ten > years I've been on the project). That 'splains it :) Thanks.
www.pears-gallery.com : SAISON 2
www.pears-gallery.com SAISON 2 Nous venons de mettre en ligne la nouvelle version de notre site. Au programme : UN REFERENCEMENT DE QUALITE 12.000 visiteurs par mois 1er sur Google pour la recherche "galerie art contemporain" 3hme sur Google pour la recherche "galerie d'art contemporain" 6me sur Google pour la recherche "art gallery" UN SITE OPTIMISE POUR LES ARTISTES 1 seule image ` tilicharger par oeuvre une fonction ZOOM automatique sur vos oeuvres le descriptif de vos oeuvres traduit en 8 langues vos expositions sur Googlemap la possibiliti de vendre directement vos oeuvres sans commission UN ABONNEMENT SIMPLE 25% de riduction offert ` tous les Artistes professionnels (SIRET ou Maison des Artistes) Possibiliti de s'abonner sans engagement. Paiement annuel possible. Un code promo supplimentaire de 15% : DECOUVERTE VENEZ NOUS SUIVRE SUR FACEBOOK Si vous rencontrez des difficultis , merci de nous contacter : cont...@pears-gallery.com, nous serons riactifs comme durant la premihre annie. N'hisitez pas ` promouvoir notre site, plus nous aurons d'abonnis, plus nous pourrons amiliorer le site et organiser des ivinements. Cordialement, L'Equipe Pears Gallery Sophie, Romain et David. Unsubscribe
Problem with installing OpenBSD
Hey, We are experiencing problem with installing OpenBSD on our VPS servers. We'd hope you provided us some assistance how we could fix this. You can see our VPS details here at http://www.orangewebsite.com/docs/vps.php. Best greetings, - Henry K. Johannes Orangewebsite.com - 'Your solid business partner'
Re: Problem with installing OpenBSD
What is the problem? Can you share with us the detail of the problems you are facing? Did you install via network or CD? Which type of CD installation did you use? Regards, Stefan From: Sales - OrangeWebsite.com To: misc@openbsd.org Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2011 10:07 AM Subject: Problem with installing OpenBSD Hey, We are experiencing problem with installing OpenBSD on our VPS servers. We'd hope you provided us some assistance how we could fix this. You can see our VPS details here at http://www.orangewebsite.com/docs/vps.php. Best greetings, - Henry K. Johannes Orangewebsite.com - 'Your solid business partner'