[Bug 553971] installers created with makensis don't show bitmaps
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553971 Erik van Pienbroek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fedora-mi...@lists.fedorapr ||oject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ mingw mailing list mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
[Bug 553971] installers created with makensis don't show bitmaps
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553971 --- Comment #5 from amori...@users.sourceforge.net 2010-01-12 14:12:37 EST --- Ok, I will report this upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ mingw mailing list mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
[Bug 553971] installers created with makensis don't show bitmaps
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553971 --- Comment #6 from amori...@users.sourceforge.net 2010-01-12 14:29:46 EST --- For reference, here's the upstream bug report: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2930854&group_id=22049&atid=373087 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ mingw mailing list mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
[Bug 553971] installers created with makensis don't show bitmaps
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553971 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-12 18:37:34 EST --- mingw32-nsis-2.45-3.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update mingw32-nsis'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2010-0397 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ mingw mailing list mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
[Bug 548965] nsiswrapper should ignore dnsapi.dll dependencies
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548965 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|5-1.fc12|5-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ mingw mailing list mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
[Bug 548965] nsiswrapper should ignore dnsapi.dll dependencies
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548965 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-18 18:22:34 EST --- mingw32-nsiswrapper-5-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ mingw mailing list mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
[Bug 553971] installers created with makensis don't show bitmaps
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553971 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-20 19:03:01 EST --- mingw32-nsis-2.45-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ mingw mailing list mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
[Bug 553971] installers created with makensis don't show bitmaps
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553971 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-20 19:10:38 EST --- mingw32-nsis-2.45-3.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ mingw mailing list mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
[Bug 553971] installers created with makensis don't show bitmaps
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553971 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version|2.45-3 |2.45-3.fc12 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ mingw mailing list mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
[Bug 529548] Review Request: mingw32-libogg - MinGW build of the libogg bitstream library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529548 --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-01-21 00:46:50 EST --- Needinfo has been set for over a month now; if there's no response in a week, this and the other submitted review tickets will be closed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ mingw mailing list mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
[Bug 529423] Review Request: mingw32-OpenSceneGraph - Fedora mingw high performance real-time graphics toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529423 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-22 17:37:43 EST --- mingw32-OpenSceneGraph-2.8.2-2.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ mingw mailing list mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
[Bug 529423] Review Request: mingw32-OpenSceneGraph - Fedora mingw high performance real-time graphics toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529423 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||2.8.2-2.fc12 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ mingw mailing list mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
[Bug 543147] Review Request: mingw32-SDL_image - MinGW Windows port of the Image loading library for SDL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543147 Jason Woofenden changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason...@herkamire.com --- Comment #4 from Jason Woofenden 2010-01-24 23:51:45 EST --- What is the status of getting this package into Fedora? I assume most programs that use SDL also use SDL_image. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ mingw mailing list mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
[Bug 543154] Review Request: mingw32-SDL_mixer - Simple DirectMedia Layer's Sample Mixer Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543154 Jason Woofenden changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason...@herkamire.com --- Comment #4 from Jason Woofenden 2010-01-24 23:52:37 EST --- What is the status of getting this package into Fedora? The SDL game I hack on uses SDL_mixer, so this package would make cross-compiling easy. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ mingw mailing list mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
[Bug 543154] Review Request: mingw32-SDL_mixer - Simple DirectMedia Layer's Sample Mixer Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543154 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rjo...@redhat.com --- Comment #5 from Stefan Riemens 2010-01-25 05:07:35 EST --- well, it's a matter of waiting on someone who wants to review it... Anyone? --- Comment #6 from Richard W.M. Jones 2010-01-25 05:07:35 EST --- Jason, we're waiting for someone to do a review. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Create_Your_Review_Request -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ mingw mailing list mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
[Bug 543154] Review Request: mingw32-SDL_mixer - Simple DirectMedia Layer's Sample Mixer Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543154 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rjo...@redhat.com --- Comment #5 from Stefan Riemens 2010-01-25 05:07:35 EST --- well, it's a matter of waiting on someone who wants to review it... Anyone? --- Comment #6 from Richard W.M. Jones 2010-01-25 05:07:35 EST --- Jason, we're waiting for someone to do a review. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Create_Your_Review_Request -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ mingw mailing list mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
[Bug 529548] Review Request: mingw32-libogg - MinGW build of the libogg bitstream library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529548 Josh Matthews changed: What|Removed |Added CC||j...@joshmatthews.net --- Comment #11 from Josh Matthews 2010-02-02 07:05:39 EST --- I'm really interested in getting the mingw32 versions of libogg and libvorbis packaged up. What can I do to help this process, seeing as Mihai's apparently AWOL? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ mingw mailing list mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
[Bug 529548] Review Request: mingw32-libogg - MinGW build of the libogg bitstream library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529548 --- Comment #12 from Richard W.M. Jones 2010-02-02 07:28:59 EST --- See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ mingw mailing list mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
[Bug 529548] Review Request: mingw32-libogg - MinGW build of the libogg bitstream library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529548 Stefan Riemens changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fgfs.ste...@gmail.com --- Comment #13 from Stefan Riemens 2010-02-02 08:16:42 EST --- Alternatively, I'd be happy to maintain this package as well. I don't have a clue how that works though. Should I just post a cvs admin request, with my name as the maintainer? Or should I open a new review request? Thanks, Stefan -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ mingw mailing list mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
[Bug 529548] Review Request: mingw32-libogg - MinGW build of the libogg bitstream library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529548 --- Comment #14 from Richard W.M. Jones 2010-02-02 08:23:23 EST --- (In reply to comment #13) > Alternatively, I'd be happy to maintain this package as well. I don't have a > clue how that works though. Should I just post a cvs admin request, with my > name as the maintainer? Or should I open a new review request? Well the review isn't finished yet. Peter had some questions in comment 8 which require you to post a fixed package, and for Peter (once he is happy with it) to approve it. I assume you have a FAS account and are a packager? If not you'll also need sponsorship. This is all explained in the link I posted in comment 12. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ mingw mailing list mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
[Bug 529548] Review Request: mingw32-libogg - MinGW build of the libogg bitstream library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529548 Stefan Riemens changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(mi...@limbasan.ro | |) | --- Comment #15 from Stefan Riemens 2010-02-02 09:07:16 EST --- Alright, please find an updated package here: http://www.riemens.org/fs/temp/mingw32-libogg.spec http://www.riemens.org/fs/temp/mingw32-libogg-1.1.4-4.fc12.src.rpm rpmlint output: rpmlint /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/SRPMS/mingw32-libogg-1.1.4-4.fc12.src.rpm /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/mingw32-libogg-1.1.4-4.fc12.noarch.rpm /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/mingw32-libogg-debuginfo-1.1.4-4.fc12.noarch.rpm mingw32-libogg-debuginfo.noarch: E: empty-debuginfo-package 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. Koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1958859 Thanks, Stefan PS, I'm already sponsored by Peter. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ mingw mailing list mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
[Bug 529548] Review Request: mingw32-libogg - MinGW build of the libogg bitstream library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529548 --- Comment #16 from Stefan Riemens 2010-02-02 09:08:06 EST --- Changelog entry: (forgot to add it, sorry) * Tue Feb 2 2010 Stefan Riemens - 1.1.4-4 - Fix %%defattr line - Automatically create a debuginfo package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ mingw mailing list mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
[Bug 529548] Review Request: mingw32-libogg - MinGW build of the libogg bitstream library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529548 Peter Lemenkov changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #17 from Peter Lemenkov 2010-02-04 07:20:42 EST --- Great! I don't see other issues with Stefan's srpm, so this package is APPROVED. Stefan, will you continue with packaging the rest of the Xiph's stack? If not, then, I believe, Josh could step in. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ mingw mailing list mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
[Bug 529548] Review Request: mingw32-libogg - MinGW build of the libogg bitstream library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529548
Kalev Lember changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ka...@smartlink.ee
--- Comment #18 from Kalev Lember 2010-02-04 07:55:40 EST
---
I have a few late comments.
The -debuginfo subpackage is empty. This is caused by a missing define:
%define __debug_install_post %{_mingw32_debug_install_post}
You have this:
# Automatically create a debuginfo package
%{_mingw32_debug_package}
Instead of using %{_mingw32_debug_package}, it's better to use
%{?_mingw32_debug_package} (notice the question mark) to work around a problem
with macros showing up unexpanded in description in Koji. See [1] for an
explanation of this issue.
Can you do a new Koji scratch build to be sure that debuginfo issues are fixed?
Now that the binaries are stripped automatically, you can kill those two lines:
# Uncomment and unescape to strip the debug symbols from the resulting
artifacts
#%%{_mingw32_strip} --strip-unneeded
%%{buildroot}%%{_mingw32_bindir}/libogg-0.dll
Requires: pkgconfig is unneccessary in Fedora (but needed if you plan to build
for EPEL). RPM in current Fedora releases is capable of extracting pkgconfig
deps automatically. See [2] for updated guidlines. You don't neccessarily have
to change anything here, just pointing it out.
[1] http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2010-February/130357.html
[2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Pkgconfig_Files
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
mingw mailing list
mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
[Bug 567847] New: Cross-compilation of Crypto++ with i686-pc-mingw32-g++ fails
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Cross-compilation of Crypto++ with i686-pc-mingw32-g++ fails https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567847 Summary: Cross-compilation of Crypto++ with i686-pc-mingw32-g++ fails Product: Fedora Version: 11 Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: high Priority: low Component: mingw32-gcc AssignedTo: rjo...@redhat.com ReportedBy: ian.culli...@nicta.com.au QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: berra...@redhat.com, rjo...@redhat.com, ka...@smartlink.ee, fedora-mi...@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Trying to build cryptopp-5.6.0 (from http://www.cryptopp.com/) fails with an error message asking you to submit a bug report. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): mingw32-gcc-4.4.0-0.7.fc11.x86_64 mingw32-gcc-c++-4.4.0-0.7.fc11.x86_64 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Download and unpack the cryptopp-5.6.0 source from http://www.cryptopp.com/ 2. Download and apply this patch: http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/cryptopp/F-11/cryptopp-5.6.1-autotools.patch?revision=1.1&view=co 3. rm GNUmakefile 4. autoreconf --verbose --force --install 5. mingw32-configure 6. sed -i -e '1 i #define CRYPTOPP_DISABLE_SSE2' config.h (to disable SSE2, which apparently doesn't build in x86_64) 7. make Actual results: *** buffer overflow detected ***: /usr/lib64/gcc/i686-pc-mingw32/4.4.0/../../../../i686-pc-mingw32/bin/as terminated === Backtrace: = /lib64/libc.so.6(__fortify_fail+0x37)[0x7fc762127507] /lib64/libc.so.6[0x7fc762125560] /lib64/libc.so.6[0x7fc7621249b9] /lib64/libc.so.6(_IO_default_xsputn+0x98)[0x7fc7620a3b88] /lib64/libc.so.6(_IO_vfprintf+0x18a9)[0x7fc762076389] /lib64/libc.so.6(__vsprintf_chk+0x9d)[0x7fc762124a5d] /lib64/libc.so.6(__sprintf_chk+0x7f)[0x7fc76212499f] /usr/lib64/gcc/i686-pc-mingw32/4.4.0/../../../../i686-pc-mingw32/bin/as[0x44a58d] /usr/lib64/gcc/i686-pc-mingw32/4.4.0/../../../../i686-pc-mingw32/bin/as[0x43ad5f] /usr/lib64/gcc/i686-pc-mingw32/4.4.0/../../../../i686-pc-mingw32/bin/as[0x413fc5] /usr/lib64/gcc/i686-pc-mingw32/4.4.0/../../../../i686-pc-mingw32/bin/as[0x49b9a7] /usr/lib64/gcc/i686-pc-mingw32/4.4.0/../../../../i686-pc-mingw32/bin/as[0x49ba66] /usr/lib64/gcc/i686-pc-mingw32/4.4.0/../../../../i686-pc-mingw32/bin/as[0x4045c5] /lib64/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xfd)[0x7fc76204ea4d] /usr/lib64/gcc/i686-pc-mingw32/4.4.0/../../../../i686-pc-mingw32/bin/as[0x401ec9] === Memory map: 0040-00506000 r-xp 08:05 194639 /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/bin/as 00706000-00708000 rw-p 00106000 08:05 194639 /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/bin/as 00708000-00716000 rw-p 00:00 0 01ec8000-084ae000 rw-p 00:00 0 [heap] 7fc761b25000-7fc761b3e000 r-xp 08:05 14563 /lib64/libgcc_s-4.4.1-20090729.so.1 7fc761b3e000-7fc761d3e000 ---p 00019000 08:05 14563 /lib64/libgcc_s-4.4.1-20090729.so.1 7fc761d3e000-7fc761d3f000 rw-p 00019000 08:05 14563 /lib64/libgcc_s-4.4.1-20090729.so.1 7fc761d5d000-7fc76203 rw-p 00:00 0 7fc76203-7fc762194000 r-xp 08:05 11813 /lib64/libc-2.10.2.so 7fc762194000-7fc762394000 ---p 00164000 08:05 11813 /lib64/libc-2.10.2.so 7fc762394000-7fc762398000 r--p 00164000 08:05 11813 /lib64/libc-2.10.2.so 7fc762398000-7fc762399000 rw-p 00168000 08:05 11813 /lib64/libc-2.10.2.so 7fc762399000-7fc76239e000 rw-p 00:00 0 7fc76239e000-7fc7623bd000 r-xp 08:05 140 /lib64/ld-2.10.2.so 7fc7623d7000-7fc76259c000 rw-p 00:00 0 7fc7625ba000-7fc7625bc000 rw-p 00:00 0 7fc7625bc000-7fc7625bd000 r--p 0001e000 08:05 140 /lib64/ld-2.10.2.so 7fc7625bd000-7fc7625be000 rw-p 0001f000 08:05 140 /lib64/ld-2.10.2.so 7fff78d8b000-7fff78da rw-p 00:00 0 [stack] 7fff78dff000-7fff78e0 r-xp 00:00 0 [vdso] ff60-ff601000 r-xp 00:00 0 [vsyscall] i686-pc-mingw32-g++: Internal error: Aborted (program as) Please submit a full bug report. See <http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla> for instructions. make[1]: *** [regtest.o] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/icullinan/Download/cryptopp-5.6.0' make: *** [all] Error 2 Expected results: The library builds without error. Additional info: If you want to skip straight to the crashing, just run: i686-pc-mingw32-
[Bug 567847] Cross-compilation of Crypto++ with i686-pc-mingw32-g++ fails
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567847 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Richard W.M. Jones 2010-02-24 08:51:21 EST --- Retesting with mingw32-gcc-c++-4.4.2-2.fc13 from Koji ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ mingw mailing list mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
[Bug 567847] Cross-compilation of Crypto++ with i686-pc-mingw32-g++ fails
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567847 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #2 from Richard W.M. Jones 2010-02-24 09:04:47 EST --- -rw-rw-r--. 1 rjones rjones6287 2009-03-15 02:48 regtest.cpp -rw-rw-r--. 1 rjones rjones 8907290 2010-02-24 14:00 regtest.o This works with the latest mingw32-gcc-c++. Since Fedora 11 is nearly out of support, I suggest the reporter updates just the mingw32-* packages with ones from Fedora 12 or Koji to fix the problem. Create a file /etc/yum.repos.d/koji.repo containing: -- [koji] name=Koji baseurl=http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-f13-build-current/$basearch/ enabled=0 gpgcheck=0 keepcache=0 [koji-i686] name=Koji baseurl=http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-f13-build-current/i386/ enabled=0 gpgcheck=0 keepcache=0 -- Then do: yum --enablerepo=koji install mingw32-gcc-c++ (but _carefully_ check what packages yum is going to upgrade before proceeding, to avoid upgrading your whole system to Rawhide by accident). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ mingw mailing list mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
[Bug 567847] Cross-compilation of Crypto++ with i686-pc-mingw32-g++ fails
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567847 --- Comment #3 from Ian Cullinan 2010-02-24 22:24:03 EST --- When I try that, I get: Setting up Install Process Resolving Dependencies --> Running transaction check ---> Package mingw32-gcc-c++.x86_64 0:4.4.2-2.fc13 set to be updated --> Processing Dependency: mingw32-gcc = 4.4.2-2.fc13 for package: mingw32-gcc-c++-4.4.2-2.fc13.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.11)(64bit) for package: mingw32-gcc-c++-4.4.2-2.fc13.x86_64 --> Running transaction check ---> Package glibc.x86_64 0:2.11.90-12 set to be updated --> Processing Dependency: glibc-common = 2.11.90-12 for package: glibc-2.11.90-12.x86_64 ---> Package mingw32-gcc.x86_64 0:4.4.2-2.fc13 set to be updated --> Processing Dependency: mingw32-binutils >= 2.19.51.0.14 for package: mingw32-gcc-4.4.2-2.fc13.x86_64 --> Running transaction check --> Processing Dependency: glibc-common = 2.10.2-1 for package: glibc-2.10.2-1.i686 ---> Package glibc-common.x86_64 0:2.11.90-12 set to be updated ---> Package mingw32-binutils.x86_64 0:2.19.51.0.14-1.fc12 set to be updated --> Finished Dependency Resolution glibc-2.10.2-1.i686 from installed has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: glibc-common = 2.10.2-1 is needed by package glibc-2.10.2-1.i686 (installed) Error: Missing Dependency: glibc-common = 2.10.2-1 is needed by package glibc-2.10.2-1.i686 (installed) You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem You could try running: package-cleanup --problems package-cleanup --dupes rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest Looks like the newer mingw32 packages want a newer libc, which I can't install without updating essentially everything. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ mingw mailing list mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
[Bug 567847] Cross-compilation of Crypto++ with i686-pc-mingw32-g++ fails
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567847 --- Comment #4 from Kevin Kofler 2010-02-24 23:34:49 EST --- I don't see why mingw32-gcc can't be updated in F11, the current version even lags behind the native gcc in F11 updates, which is at 4.4.1. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ mingw mailing list mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
[Bug 467324] Review Request: mingw32-portablexdr - MinGW Windows PortableXDR XDR / RPC library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467324 Peter Robinson changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(rjo...@redhat.com ||) --- Comment #22 from Peter Robinson 2010-03-07 08:08:41 EST --- Richard. Is this going to be dropped? Is the review still relevant? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ mingw mailing list mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
[Bug 467324] Review Request: mingw32-portablexdr - MinGW Windows PortableXDR XDR / RPC library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467324 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(rjo...@redhat.com | |) | --- Comment #23 from Richard W.M. Jones 2010-03-08 04:52:37 EST --- Yes, I suspect this package will be dropped .. However that still leaves us with no XDR capability which is necessary for a few things, notably libvirt support on Windows. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ mingw mailing list mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
[Bug 571686] New: mingw32 produced DLL's are not stripped
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: mingw32 produced DLL's are not stripped
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571686
Summary: mingw32 produced DLL's are not stripped
Product: Fedora
Version: 10
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: mingw32-filesystem
AssignedTo: rjo...@redhat.com
ReportedBy: waana...@nbi.dk
QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: berra...@redhat.com, rjo...@redhat.com,
erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl,
fedora-mi...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
Even if the specfile includes:
%define __strip %{_mingw32_strip}
mingw32 cross-compiled packages does not get their DLL's or binaries
stripped.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Checked with:
mingw32-filesystem-56-1
How reproducible:
Very easy to reproduce by building a mingw32 package. Also official Fedora
mingw32 packages are not stripped either - I tested the package:
mingw32-pixman-0.14.0-1.fc11.
Steps to Reproduce:
1. cp -p /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/bin/libpixman-1-0.dll /tmp
2. i686-pc-mingw32-strip /tmp/libpixman-1-0.dll
Actual results:
# ls -1s /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/bin/libpixman-1-0.dll
/tmp/libpixman-1-0.dll
252 /tmp/libpixman-1-0.dll
1252 /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/bin/libpixman-1-0.dll
Expected results:
# ls -1s /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/bin/libpixman-1-0.dll
/tmp/libpixman-1-0.dll
252 /tmp/libpixman-1-0.dll
252 /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/bin/libpixman-1-0.dll
Additional info:
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
mingw mailing list
mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
[Bug 571686] mingw32 produced DLL's are not stripped
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571686 Erik van Pienbroek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Erik van Pienbroek 2010-03-09 11:52:27 EST --- Hi, Stripping debug symbols and collecting them in -debuginfo subpackages was introduced in Fedora 12. I noticed that you're still using the Fedora 11 mingw packages, so chances are that your problem is already solved in Fedora 12. Could you please try again with the Fedora 12 packages ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ mingw mailing list mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
[Bug 571686] mingw32 produced DLL's are not stripped
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571686
--- Comment #2 from Mattias Ellert 2010-03-09
13:36:03 EST ---
None of the packages I build on Fedora 12 gets stripped, even though I follow
the guidelines on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/MinGW
Looking at the mingw32 packages in Fedora 12 some are stripped and some are
not. Looking at the specfiles of some of the packages that are stripped reveals
that they contain:
%define __debug_install_post %{_mingw32_debug_install_post}
and later
%{?_mingw32_debug_package}
Which seems to be the undocumented additions needed to get it to work.
Neither of these are mentioned in the guidelines, and searching for them in the
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ gives no hits.
As the guidelines are written, they say that if you follow the guidelines you
get stripped binaries:
> Libraries and executables should be stripped. This is done correctly and
> automatically if the spec file includes these lines:
>
> %global __strip %{_mingw32_strip}
> %global __objdump %{_mingw32_objdump}
Which doesn't happen. To get stripped binaries you need to add two lines to
your specfile that are neither mentioned in the guidelines nor anywhere else.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
mingw mailing list
mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
[Bug 571686] mingw32 information on generating debuginfo in the guidelines is incorrect, and they need to be updated
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571686 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|mingw32 produced DLL's are |mingw32 information on |not stripped|generating debuginfo in the ||guidelines is incorrect, ||and they need to be updated --- Comment #3 from Richard W.M. Jones 2010-03-09 14:05:02 EST --- The currently approved packaging guidelines have a number of problems. We have been collecting the list of problems here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW/Packaging_issues so that when we come to update and seek approval for the guidelines again, we know what needs to change. It sounds like this issue (and the whole issue of generating debuginfo) needs to be added to the above page. Updated the summary line to reflect this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ mingw mailing list mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
[Bug 571686] mingw32 information on generating debuginfo in the guidelines is incorrect, and they need to be updated
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571686 --- Comment #4 from Erik van Pienbroek 2010-03-09 14:07:38 EST --- You're right that the usage of the debuginfo macro's isn't documented in the guidelines. The topic (debuginfo support) has been discussed on the fedora-mingw mailing list though. This can be read at http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/mingw/2009-June/001613.html (+ follow ups) and http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/mingw/2009-July/001811.html (+ follow ups). Unfortunately the Fedora MinGW SIG has had a lack of leadership and interest these days. One year ago I spent a lot of time on the Fedora MinGW SIG to get new packages and features in, but a few months ago I started on a new full-time job leaving me with very little spare time to work on the Fedora MinGW SIG. The %global __strip override is only used for static libraries, so that's why you're not seeing any effects when used on libraries or executables. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ mingw mailing list mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
[Bug 571686] mingw32 information on generating debuginfo in the guidelines is incorrect, and they need to be updated
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571686 John Poelstra changed: What|Removed |Added Version|10 |12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ mingw mailing list mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
[Bug 499987] Review Request: mingw32-curl - MinGW Windows port of curl and libcurl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499987 --- Comment #5 from Kalev Lember 2010-03-29 01:41:54 EDT --- Erik, any update on this? I'd be happy to approve the package if you remove curl.exe. I don't really believe in packages improving out of tree; libcurl can always be switched to use NSS at a later date. IMHO it's better to have an openssl-linked libcurl in official Fedora repos than no libcurl at all. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ mingw mailing list mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
[Bug 499987] Review Request: mingw32-curl - MinGW Windows port of curl and libcurl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499987 --- Comment #6 from Kalev Lember 2010-03-29 01:49:46 EDT --- Oh, and regarding concerns about libvirt: according to Fedora spec file, libvirt is LGPLv2+. Unlike GPL, as far as I know LGPL-licensed code does not need the openssl linking exception to legally link against openssl. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ mingw mailing list mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
[Bug 577951] Review Request: mingw32-wine-gecko - MinGW Gecko library required for Wine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577951 Erik van Pienbroek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl ||, ||fedora-mi...@lists.fedorapr ||oject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ mingw mailing list mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
[Bug 577951] Review Request: mingw32-wine-gecko - MinGW Gecko library required for Wine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577951 --- Comment #2 from Erik van Pienbroek 2010-03-29 16:44:39 EDT --- Hi, I'll leave the review up to somebody else as this package was initially created by me, but I was wondering if you already have patches ready for wine itself to use this package (as wine expects a .CAB file while this package provides a folder containing the gecko files) ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ mingw mailing list mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
[Bug 577951] Review Request: mingw32-wine-gecko - MinGW Gecko library required for Wine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577951 --- Comment #3 from Richard W.M. Jones 2010-03-29 16:58:21 EDT --- I might have a look at this tomorrow, but I'm interested to know why wine needs a Win32-cross-compiled library? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ mingw mailing list mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
[Bug 577951] Review Request: mingw32-wine-gecko - MinGW Gecko library required for Wine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577951 --- Comment #4 from Erik van Pienbroek 2010-03-29 17:10:22 EDT --- See the discussion on the fedora-mingw mailing list from november last year: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/mingw/2009-November/002267.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ mingw mailing list mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
[Bug 577951] Review Request: mingw32-wine-gecko - MinGW Gecko library required for Wine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577951 --- Comment #5 from Andreas Bierfert 2010-03-30 01:08:21 EDT --- Also take a look here: http://wiki.winehq.org/Gecko (In reply to comment #2) > by me, but I was wondering if you already have patches ready for wine itself > to > use this package (as wine expects a .CAB file while this package provides a > folder containing the gecko files) ? Yes, I have a patch sitting here which adds this to latest wine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ mingw mailing list mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
[Bug 577951] Review Request: mingw32-wine-gecko - MinGW Gecko library required for Wine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577951 Andreas Bierfert changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||573530 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ mingw mailing list mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
[Bug 529756] Review Request: mingw32-libtheora - MinGW build of the Theora Video Compression Codec library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529756 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Version|11 |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ mingw mailing list mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
[Bug 529560] Review Request: mingw32-libvorbis - MinGW build of the libvorbis Vorbis General Audio Compression Codec library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529560 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Version|11 |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ mingw mailing list mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
[Bug 529569] Review Request: mingw32-speex - MinGW build of the Speex voice compression codec library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529569 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Version|11 |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ mingw mailing list mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
[Bug 468993] *.def files in MinGW packages report "script-without-shebang"
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468993 --- Comment #5 from Bug Zapper 2010-04-27 08:18:10 EDT --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 11 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 11. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '11'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 11's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 11 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ mingw mailing list mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
[Bug 481433] w32api 3.13 dropped libglut32.a, we should package glut
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481433 --- Comment #2 from Bug Zapper 2010-04-27 08:48:00 EDT --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 11 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 11. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '11'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 11's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 11 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ mingw mailing list mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
[Bug 509940] Cmake can't build sdl program with mingw32
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509940 --- Comment #9 from Bug Zapper 2010-04-27 11:31:12 EDT --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 11 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 11. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '11'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 11's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 11 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ mingw mailing list mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
[Bug 510368] MinGW: Cannot compile with debug versions of Qt libs with qmake
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510368 --- Comment #4 from Bug Zapper 2010-04-27 11:33:45 EDT --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 11 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 11. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '11'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 11's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 11 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ mingw mailing list mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
[Bug 529548] Review Request: mingw32-libogg - MinGW build of the libogg bitstream library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529548 --- Comment #19 from Mihai Limbășan 2010-04-27 15:15:03 EDT --- Sorry for the MIA - real life issues prevented me from being able to focus on anything Fedora- or personal life related. I'll try to get back on this after F13 is released, targeting F12, F13 and Rawhide. Apologies for any waste of time I may have caused. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ mingw mailing list mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
[Bug 513824] mingw glib rejected when Wine is installed
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513824 --- Comment #2 from Bug Zapper 2010-04-28 05:20:57 EDT --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 11 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 11. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '11'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 11's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 11 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ mingw mailing list mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
[Bug 587818] missing %{__strip} corrupts mingw binaries during rpmbuild
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=587818 Erik van Pienbroek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fedora-mi...@lists.fedorapr ||oject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ mingw mailing list mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
[Bug 587818] missing %{__strip} corrupts mingw binaries during rpmbuild
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=587818 Panu Matilainen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Comment #1 from Panu Matilainen 2010-05-06 04:33:24 EDT --- FWIW, the redhat-rpm-config way of passing strip + objdump as arguments to the brp-strip* went to rpm.org upstream some time ago already, it's just a matter of getting it into Fedora too. Marking this as MODIFIED for easy spotting when preparing the next rpm update... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ mingw mailing list mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
[Bug 508746] noarch MinGW debuginfo packages don't get placed in the debuginfo repository
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508746 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2010-05-07 13:53:02 EDT --- mash-0.5.16-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mash-0.5.16-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ mingw mailing list mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
[Bug 499987] Review Request: mingw32-curl - MinGW Windows port of curl and libcurl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499987 --- Comment #8 from Erik van Pienbroek 2010-05-13 07:43:50 EDT --- Spec URL: http://www.ftd4linux.nl/contrib/mingw32-curl.spec SRPM URL: http://www.ftd4linux.nl/contrib/mingw32-curl-7.20.1-1.fc13.src.rpm * Thu May 13 2010 Erik van Pienbroek - 7.20.1-1 - Update to 7.20.1 - Merged the patches of the native .spec file (7.20.1-5) - Dropped the curl.exe - Use the Win32 threads API instead of mingw32-pthreads - Dropped BR: pkgconfig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ mingw mailing list mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
[Bug 499987] Review Request: mingw32-curl - MinGW Windows port of curl and libcurl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499987 --- Comment #9 from Erik van Pienbroek 2010-05-13 08:42:18 EDT --- Forgot to mention this: the scratch build is done at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2185045 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ mingw mailing list mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
[Bug 499987] Review Request: mingw32-curl - MinGW Windows port of curl and libcurl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499987 Kalev Lember changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Kalev Lember 2010-05-13 08:45:18 EDT --- Looks good. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ mingw mailing list mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
[Bug 499987] Review Request: mingw32-curl - MinGW Windows port of curl and libcurl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499987 Erik van Pienbroek changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Erik van Pienbroek 2010-05-13 12:43:35 EDT --- Thanks for the review! New Package CVS Request === Package Name: mingw32-curl Short Description: MinGW Windows port of libcurl Owners: epienbro Branches: F-12 F-13 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ mingw mailing list mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
[Bug 499987] Review Request: mingw32-curl - MinGW Windows port of curl and libcurl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499987 Dennis Gilmore changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Dennis Gilmore 2010-05-13 18:35:47 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ mingw mailing list mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
[Bug 499987] Review Request: mingw32-curl - MinGW Windows port of curl and libcurl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499987 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2010-05-16 10:34:01 EDT --- mingw32-curl-7.20.1-2.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw32-curl-7.20.1-2.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ mingw mailing list mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
[Bug 499987] Review Request: mingw32-curl - MinGW Windows port of curl and libcurl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499987 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2010-05-16 10:34:43 EDT --- mingw32-curl-7.20.1-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw32-curl-7.20.1-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ mingw mailing list mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
[Bug 499987] Review Request: mingw32-curl - MinGW Windows port of curl and libcurl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499987 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2010-05-16 10:35:18 EDT --- mingw32-curl-7.20.1-1.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw32-curl-7.20.1-1.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ mingw mailing list mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
[Bug 499987] Review Request: mingw32-curl - MinGW Windows port of curl and libcurl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499987 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||mingw32-curl-7.20.1-1.fc12 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ mingw mailing list mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
[Bug 499987] Review Request: mingw32-curl - MinGW Windows port of curl and libcurl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499987 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2010-05-17 14:54:03 EDT --- mingw32-curl-7.20.1-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ mingw mailing list mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
[Bug 499987] Review Request: mingw32-curl - MinGW Windows port of curl and libcurl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499987 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2010-05-17 15:08:46 EDT --- mingw32-curl-7.20.1-1.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ mingw mailing list mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
[Bug 499987] Review Request: mingw32-curl - MinGW Windows port of curl and libcurl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499987 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|mingw32-curl-7.20.1-1.fc12 |mingw32-curl-7.20.1-1.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ mingw mailing list mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
[Bug 594575] Review Request: mingw32-wxWidgets - MinGW Windows wxWidgets library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=594575 Scott Tsai changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fedora-mi...@lists.fedorapr ||oject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ mingw mailing list mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
[Bug 594575] Review Request: mingw32-wxWidgets - MinGW Windows wxWidgets library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=594575 --- Comment #1 from Scott Tsai 2010-05-21 00:12:40 EDT --- 1. spec file based on one found in the Fedora MinGW mailing list archives 2. Two of the three patches linked to above lack detailed comments on the build errors they fix. I plan on fixing that. Any help reviewing the patches or forwarding upstream greatly appreciated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ mingw mailing list mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
[Bug 594581] New: Add mingw32(rpcrt4.dll) in mingw32-filesystem provides for wxWidgets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Add mingw32(rpcrt4.dll) in mingw32-filesystem provides for wxWidgets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=594581 Summary: Add mingw32(rpcrt4.dll) in mingw32-filesystem provides for wxWidgets Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: mingw32-filesystem AssignedTo: rjo...@redhat.com ReportedBy: scottt...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: berra...@redhat.com, rjo...@redhat.com, erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl, fedora-mi...@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Description of problem: mingw32's auto find requires script wants 'mingw32(rpcrt4.dll)' for https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=594575 Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): mingw32-filesystem-56-1.fc12.noarch How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Download http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=2200465&name=mingw32-wxWidgets-2.8.11-1.fc13.noarch.rpm 2. rpm -i mingw32-wxWidgets-2.8.11-1.fc13.noarch.rpm Actual results: error: Failed dependencies: mingw32(rpcrt4.dll) is needed by mingw32-wxWidgets-2.8.11-1.fc13.noarch Expected results: Successful rpm install -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ mingw mailing list mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
[Bug 594581] Add mingw32(rpcrt4.dll) in mingw32-filesystem provides for wxWidgets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=594581 Scott Tsai changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||594575 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ mingw mailing list mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
[Bug 594575] Review Request: mingw32-wxWidgets - MinGW Windows wxWidgets library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=594575 Scott Tsai changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||594581 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ mingw mailing list mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
[Bug 577951] Review Request: mingw32-wine-gecko - MinGW Gecko library required for Wine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577951 Orion Poplawski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||or...@cora.nwra.com --- Comment #6 from Orion Poplawski 2010-05-21 18:42:43 EDT --- I'm seeing a build failure on F-13 now, though F-14 (rawhide) seem okay. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2202453 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ mingw mailing list mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
[Bug 595006] New: mingw32-dlfcn-static libdl.a has no index
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: mingw32-dlfcn-static libdl.a has no index https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595006 Summary: mingw32-dlfcn-static libdl.a has no index Product: Fedora Version: 12 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: mingw32-dlfcn AssignedTo: rjo...@redhat.com ReportedBy: stebb...@jetheaddev.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: lfar...@lfarkas.org, berra...@redhat.com, rjo...@redhat.com, erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl, fedora-mi...@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Description of problem: When attempting to link with libdl.a this error occurs: /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libdl.a: could not read symbols: Archive has no index; run ranlib to add one Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Release: 0.7.r11.fc12 Steps to Reproduce: 1. gcc -static somefile.c -o some.exe -ldl Additional info: running ranlib fixes the problem: # i686-pc-mingw32-ranlib libdl.a -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ mingw mailing list mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
[Bug 510949] upgrade to gcc 4.4.0 proper and mingw upstream
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510949 --- Comment #13 from Kevin Kofler 2010-05-24 00:17:43 EDT --- I thought it was decided to ship F13 with a MinGW toolchain binary-compatible with upstream MinGW? So why are we still shipping a GCC with SJLJ expections and without MinGW patches in F13 and even F14 Rawhide? :-( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ mingw mailing list mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
[Bug 509940] Cmake can't build sdl program with mingw32
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509940 du...@identicalsoftware.com changed: What|Removed |Added Version|11 |12 --- Comment #10 from du...@identicalsoftware.com 2010-05-25 21:59:25 EDT --- The problem exists in Fedora 12. Haven't had a chance to test Fedora 13 yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ mingw mailing list mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
[Bug 599227] New: mingw is broken
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: mingw is broken https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599227 Summary: mingw is broken Product: Fedora Version: 13 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: mingw32-pthreads AssignedTo: rjo...@redhat.com ReportedBy: ebl...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: lfar...@lfarkas.org, berra...@redhat.com, rjo...@redhat.com, erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl, fedora-mi...@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: The cross-compilation header /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/pthread.h, installed as part of the mingw32-pthreads package, has several coding bugs. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): mingw32-pthreads-2.8.0-10.fc13.noarch How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Try cross-compiling any code that uses localtime_r with a second argument with side effects, or try calling (localtime_r)(arg1,arg2). 2. Try cross-compiling any project that uses gnulib's replacement header (libvirt is an example project; it includes a ./autobuild.sh script that will automatically try a mingw cross-compilation, if you have installed a mingw portablexdr library, although that library is not yet part of fedora). Actual results: The definition of localtime_r is broken, because it evaluates the second argument twice. And, since POSIX allows one to #undef localtime_r, but there is no localtime_r function in the library, you get a link failure if you bypass the function-like macro. Finally, the pthreads-win32 library made the mistake of installing , which is asking for namespace collision with most other autotooled packages. Expected results: should not define any *_r functions, nor should it interfere with a proper . Also, the library should not install , but should instead modify its installed headers to be self-contained. Additional info: See this thread on bug-gnulib for more details: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2010-06/msg7.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ mingw mailing list mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
[Bug 599567] mingw32-gcc should not drag in mingw32-pthreads
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599567 --- Comment #1 from Eric Blake 2010-06-03 10:09:57 EDT --- See also this thread in the libvirt list: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2010-June/msg00075.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ mingw mailing list mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
[Bug 599567] mingw32-gcc should not drag in mingw32-pthreads
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599567 Eric Blake changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugzilla.redhat.com ||/show_bug.cgi?id=599227 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ mingw mailing list mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
[Bug 599567] New: mingw32-gcc should not drag in mingw32-pthreads
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: mingw32-gcc should not drag in mingw32-pthreads https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599567 Summary: mingw32-gcc should not drag in mingw32-pthreads Product: Fedora Version: 13 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: mingw32-gcc AssignedTo: rjo...@redhat.com ReportedBy: ebl...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: berra...@redhat.com, rjo...@redhat.com, ka...@smartlink.ee, fedora-mi...@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: mingw32-gcc currently drags in a dependency on mingw32-pthreads, which in turn forces some namespace pollution due to its buggy header. It would be much nicer if the mingw32-pthreads package remained optional, since it can interfere with cross-compilation efforts to mingw. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): mingw32-gcc-4.4.2-2.fc13.x86_64 mingw32-pthreads-2.8.0-10.fc13.noarch How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Install mingw32-gcc Actual results: mingw32-pthreads gets sucked in as a required dependency to the cross-compiler. Expected results: Mere presence of the cross-compiler shouldn't force the existence of a broken . Either the compiler needs to be built without mingw32-pthreads, or mingw32-pthreads needs to be split into two packages (runtime dependency of the compiler, vs. development library that installs for situations that actually want to use this library in spite of its current upstream flaws). Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ mingw mailing list mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
[Bug 467324] Review Request: mingw32-portablexdr - MinGW Windows PortableXDR XDR / RPC library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467324 --- Comment #24 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2010-06-03 10:11:03 EDT --- Hello? This bug has outlived SUN. Please do something here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ mingw mailing list mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
[Bug 467324] Review Request: mingw32-portablexdr - MinGW Windows PortableXDR XDR / RPC library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467324 --- Comment #25 from Richard W.M. Jones 2010-06-03 10:18:35 EDT --- Don't worry, if Bugzilla runs out of bits keeping this bug open, I'll buy us a few more. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ mingw mailing list mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
[Bug 467324] Review Request: mingw32-portablexdr - MinGW Windows PortableXDR XDR / RPC library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467324 --- Comment #26 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2010-06-03 10:45:04 EDT --- Well, I would like to get this off the FE-Legal blocker ticket. Can you at least post a SRPM with the relicensing changes applied. Change any references to the SUN RPC license to this: /* * Copyright (c) 2009, Sun Microsystems, Inc. * All rights reserved. * * Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without * modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met: * - Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright notice, * this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. * - Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright notice, * this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the documentation * and/or other materials provided with the distribution. * - Neither the name of Sun Microsystems, Inc. nor the names of its * contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived * from this software without specific prior written permission. * * THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS "AS IS" * AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE * IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE * ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT HOLDER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE * LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR * CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF * SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS * INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN * CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) * ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE * POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. */ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ mingw mailing list mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
[Bug 467324] Review Request: mingw32-portablexdr - MinGW Windows PortableXDR XDR / RPC library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467324 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|182235(FE-Legal)| --- Comment #27 from Richard W.M. Jones 2010-06-03 11:12:36 EDT --- There's no Sun code in PortableXDR, because I replaced it. I've removed the blocker on FE-LEGAL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ mingw mailing list mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
[Bug 467324] Review Request: mingw32-portablexdr - MinGW Windows PortableXDR XDR / RPC library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467324 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What|Removed |Added CC|tcall...@redhat.com | --- Comment #28 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2010-06-03 12:36:30 EDT --- That works for me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ mingw mailing list mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
[Bug 497492] mingw32-libjpeg crash on windows, typedef
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497492 Adam Goode changed: What|Removed |Added CC||a...@spicenitz.org --- Comment #16 from Adam Goode 2010-06-03 15:27:42 EDT --- This is a pretty big problem, this does change the API of libjpeg such that I cannot build my code both natively on Fedora and with mingw32. I am using my own src manager, so the function I define has to either return boolean (on all libjpeg except this one) or jpeg_boolean (on the Fedora patched mingw32-libjpeg). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ mingw mailing list mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
[Bug 497492] mingw32-libjpeg crash on windows, typedef
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497492 --- Comment #17 from Adam Goode 2010-06-03 15:50:23 EDT --- Also, why is this necessary just for the mingw32 package? The native package has no such patch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ mingw mailing list mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
[Bug 594581] Add mingw32(rpcrt4.dll) in mingw32-filesystem provides for wxWidgets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=594581 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ mingw mailing list mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
[Bug 594575] Review Request: mingw32-wxWidgets - MinGW Windows wxWidgets library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=594575 Bug 594575 depends on bug 594581, which changed state. Bug 594581 Summary: Add mingw32(rpcrt4.dll) in mingw32-filesystem provides for wxWidgets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=594581 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ mingw mailing list mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
[Bug 513824] mingw glib rejected when Wine is installed
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513824 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||DEFERRED --- Comment #3 from Richard W.M. Jones 2010-06-08 09:20:02 EDT --- Closing because this bug was filed against F11. If it still happens in Rawhide, please reopen. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ mingw mailing list mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
[Bug 594581] Add mingw32(rpcrt4.dll) in mingw32-filesystem provides for wxWidgets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=594581 --- Comment #1 from Richard W.M. Jones 2010-06-08 09:17:49 EDT --- Added in mingw32-filesystem version 57-1. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ mingw mailing list mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
[Bug 513824] mingw glib rejected when Wine is installed
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513824 Paolo Bonzini changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|DEFERRED|UPSTREAM --- Comment #4 from Paolo Bonzini 2010-06-08 09:36:17 EDT --- It was fixed upstream, that's fair enough. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ mingw mailing list mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
[Bug 499987] Review Request: mingw32-curl - MinGW Windows port of curl and libcurl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499987 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|mingw32-curl-7.20.1-1.fc13 |mingw32-curl-7.20.1-2.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ mingw mailing list mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
[Bug 499987] Review Request: mingw32-curl - MinGW Windows port of curl and libcurl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499987 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2010-06-09 11:48:56 EDT --- mingw32-curl-7.20.1-2.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ mingw mailing list mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
[Bug 604702] Custom Fedora patch to mingw32-libjpeg breaks API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=604702 --- Comment #1 from Adam Goode 2010-06-16 10:38:51 EDT --- In fact, here is the code from libtiff that works around the problem without breaking libjpeg: /* The windows RPCNDR.H file defines boolean, but defines it with the unsigned char size. You should compile JPEG library using appropriate definitions in jconfig.h header, but many users compile library in wrong way. That causes errors of the following type: "JPEGLib: JPEG parameter struct mismatch: library thinks size is 432, caller expects 464" For such users we wil fix the problem here. See install.doc file from the JPEG library distribution for details. */ /* Define "boolean" as unsigned char, not int, per Windows custom. */ #if defined(__WIN32__) && !defined(__MINGW32__) # ifndef __RPCNDR_H__/* don't conflict if rpcndr.h already read */ typedef unsigned char boolean; # endif # define HAVE_BOOLEAN/* prevent jmorecfg.h from redefining it */ #endif #include "jpeglib.h" #include "jerror.h" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ mingw mailing list mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
[Bug 604702] New: Custom Fedora patch to mingw32-libjpeg breaks API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Custom Fedora patch to mingw32-libjpeg breaks API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=604702 Summary: Custom Fedora patch to mingw32-libjpeg breaks API Product: Fedora Version: 13 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: mingw32-libjpeg AssignedTo: rjo...@redhat.com ReportedBy: a...@spicenitz.org QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: lfar...@lfarkas.org, berra...@redhat.com, rjo...@redhat.com, erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl, fedora-mi...@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Description of problem: The resolution of bug #497492 creates a source incompatible fork of libjpeg that is not even compatible with the native libjpeg! Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): mingw32-libjpeg-7-2.fc12.noarch Steps to Reproduce: 1. Try to compile libtiff with standard Fedora configure, make. 2. Now try to compile libtiff with mingw32-configure, mingw32-make. Actual results: tif_jpeg.c:289: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...' before 'boolean' etc. I don't think we should fork libjpeg in Fedora. Bug #497492 should be reopened and the programs that crash should be fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ mingw mailing list mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
[Bug 468993] *.def files in MinGW packages report "script-without-shebang"
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468993 Bug Zapper changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||WONTFIX --- Comment #6 from Bug Zapper 2010-06-28 06:47:08 EDT --- Fedora 11 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2010-06-25. Fedora 11 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ mingw mailing list mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
[Bug 481433] w32api 3.13 dropped libglut32.a, we should package glut
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481433 Bug Zapper changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||WONTFIX --- Comment #3 from Bug Zapper 2010-06-28 07:08:53 EDT --- Fedora 11 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2010-06-25. Fedora 11 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ mingw mailing list mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
