[Maria-discuss] New Question: Why two versions (10.0 and 10.1)?
Hello, A new question has been asked in "MariaDB Community" by HGP-IT. Please answer it at http://mariadb.com/kb/en/why-two-versions-100-and-101/ as the person asking the question may not be subscribed to the mailing list. Hello, We run a number of MariaDB v10.0.x installations for in-house projects, and I have only just realized that there's a v10.1.x version. I have begun reading about the differences, and that there's an upgrade procedure. Forgive the (likely) newb question, but was it totally necessary to create a new version of MariaDB for these changes? I mean, when 10.2 is released (and 10.3, 10.4 etc), is it going to be another whole new release with separate upgrade/versioning paths? Surely from a development management perspective this creates resource overheads for you? Will v10.0 cease development in the near future, to be replaced by v10.1? I am trying to decide whether I just should upgrade our systems to v10.1. Just wondering :) Thank you! Elliot To view or answer this question please visit: http://mariadb.com/kb/en/why-two-versions-100-and-101/ ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~maria-discuss Post to : maria-discuss@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~maria-discuss More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Maria-discuss] [Maria-developers] More contributors welcome to MariaDB packaging in Debian
Hello! 2015-12-31 5:10 GMT+02:00 Rishab Jaju : > Hi, > > I would like to know more about the packaging project-it's current state and > what exactly remains to be done. > > I was looking at the previous year's ideas page and there was no mention of > the difficulty of the project. Could I know which projects would be good for > someone with intermediate programming skills? > > Additionally, I am looking to participate in this year's GSoC program. So, > would MariaDB be applying? Colin already answered this well. GSoC is right now not active. If you have some minor contributions before the GSoC applications open, you'll have a better chance of getting chosen, so I recommend browsing the issue trackers and take on something that looks easy and you feel comfortable to start with. >From the Debian issues, I think this would be a good one to start with: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=809022 If you are more interested in programming (and less about packaging and systems engineering) take a look at the links Colin sent about MaraiDB tasks. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~maria-discuss Post to : maria-discuss@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~maria-discuss More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Maria-discuss] Syslog facility & IST receive address
Hi all, I was wondering how can I change both change Mariadb and Galera (wsrep) syslog facility then make syslog logging in a separate logfile ? I've got another question, I have 3 galera nodes and one has local ip so it use NAT for communicating with other nodes. SST is alright because I set "wsrep_sst_receive_address" to public IP. But for IST it seems there is no parameters for that and I have some issues when nodes are transfering incremental snapshots in one way. How could I manage to do it ? Thanks in advance, Regards, -- CHUNKZ.NET - script kiddie and computer technician Bertrand Caplet, Flers (FR) Feel free to send encrypted/signed messages Key ID: 37F70C30 GPG FP: 134A 4027 518B 5F4D D409 558D BA9B 7BF0 37F7 0C30 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~maria-discuss Post to : maria-discuss@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~maria-discuss More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
