Re: [MlMt] Mailmate and Omnifocus 2 beta
r4210 didn't change anything compared to r4206 Both leaves an empty quickentry dialog (screen dump attached), where buttons can be pressed, but nothing happens /Karl Erik Jessen Farum Denmark  On 2 May 2014, at 0:30, Benny Kjær Nielsen wrote: On 1 May 2014, at 14:31, Karl Erik Jessen wrote: As i have OF2 running pretty much all the time this is no big deal - this is 98% solved form me I spent some time analyzing this issue, but I did not find out exactly what goes wrong. I cannot reproduce it using MailMate, but I could do it by calling OmniFocus from the Terminal. Some times when the script triggers OmniFocus to be launched then it fails with a `-1` error code. I've attempted a workaround where OmniFocus is explicitly opened before executing the script. Seems to work from the Terminal for me, but the problem might be some kind of race condition and therefore it might not work for you. Try the latest test release and let me know. Thanks in advance. -- Benny ___ mailmate mailing list mailmate@lists.freron.com http://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate ___ mailmate mailing list mailmate@lists.freron.com http://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate
Re: [MlMt] Mailmate and Omnifocus 2 beta
On 2 May 2014, at 9:45, Karl Erik Jessen wrote: r4210 didn't change anything compared to r4206 Both leaves an empty quickentry dialog (screen dump attached), where buttons can be pressed, but nothing happens Ok, it was also a bad way to fix it. Last attempt to fix this is available now (r4213). The script now detects if OmniFocus is already running. If not then I don't call the AppleScript command which appears to be triggering a bug(?) in OmniFocus 2. (Technical rant: I also had to change the script from plain text to a compiled AppleScript since apparently using `osascript` to compile triggers any target applications to be launched before executing the script — making the use of `'is running'` pointless. Sigh... At least this is also faster.) -- Benny ___ mailmate mailing list mailmate@lists.freron.com http://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate
[MlMt] nested rule group?
I need to create a rule that looks like: ALL Condition 1 (From) Condition 2 (To) ANY Condition A (subject contains..X) Condition B (subject contains..Y) Condition C (subject contains..Z) Actually, this are email notifications from a monitoring system that have different subjects based on the content of the event. I am not operational per se, so I don't respond to these, but need to be able to review when I want to in a separate box (for many 1000s of systems I see hundreds per day). The problem: I cannot, for the life of me, figure out how to add the "ANY" condition! Is this possible? If not, what is the work around? Thanks, Mike ___ mailmate mailing list mailmate@lists.freron.com http://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate
Re: [MlMt] nested rule group?
It should be possible. Insert the ALL conditions and then hold down the ALT key while adding a new condition (this changes the plus button to three dots), click the three dots button to create the ANY conditions. Does that help? --Thomas On 2 May 2014, at 14:15, Michael Sale wrote: I need to create a rule that looks like: ALL Condition 1 (From) Condition 2 (To) ANY Condition A (subject contains..X) Condition B (subject contains..Y) Condition C (subject contains..Z) Actually, this are email notifications from a monitoring system that have different subjects based on the content of the event. I am not operational per se, so I don't respond to these, but need to be able to review when I want to in a separate box (for many 1000s of systems I see hundreds per day). The problem: I cannot, for the life of me, figure out how to add the "ANY" condition! Is this possible? If not, what is the work around? Thanks, Mike ___ mailmate mailing list mailmate@lists.freron.com http://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate ___ mailmate mailing list mailmate@lists.freron.com http://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate
Re: [MlMt] Mailmate and Omnifocus 2 beta
Everything works now with r4213 /Karl Erik Jessen Farum Denmark On 2 May 2014, at 10:52, Benny Kjær Nielsen wrote: On 2 May 2014, at 9:45, Karl Erik Jessen wrote: r4210 didn't change anything compared to r4206 Both leaves an empty quickentry dialog (screen dump attached), where buttons can be pressed, but nothing happens Ok, it was also a bad way to fix it. Last attempt to fix this is available now (r4213). The script now detects if OmniFocus is already running. If not then I don't call the AppleScript command which appears to be triggering a bug(?) in OmniFocus 2. (Technical rant: I also had to change the script from plain text to a compiled AppleScript since apparently using `osascript` to compile triggers any target applications to be launched before executing the script — making the use of `'is running'` pointless. Sigh... At least this is also faster.) -- Benny ___ mailmate mailing list mailmate@lists.freron.com http://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate ___ mailmate mailing list mailmate@lists.freron.com http://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate
Re: [MlMt] Mailmate and Omnifocus 2 beta
On 2 May 2014, at 15:50, Karl Erik Jessen wrote: Everything works now with r4213 Great. Especially since I just uploaded r4214 as an official beta (downloaded by anyone with the “Beta Builds” setting in the Software Update preferences). It's essentially the same as r4213 but with release notes cleaned up. -- Benny ___ mailmate mailing list mailmate@lists.freron.com http://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate
Re: [MlMt] nested rule group?
Perfect! Was that in the docs somewhere? On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 6:24 AM, Thomas Eckhold wrote: > It should be possible. Insert the ALL conditions and then hold down the > ALT key while adding a new condition (this changes the plus button to three > dots), click the three dots button to create the ANY conditions. Does that > help? > > --Thomas > > On 2 May 2014, at 14:15, Michael Sale wrote: > > I need to create a rule that looks like: > > ALL > Condition 1 (From) > Condition 2 (To) > ANY > Condition A (subject contains..X) > Condition B (subject contains..Y) > Condition C (subject contains..Z) > > Actually, this are email notifications from a monitoring system that have > different subjects based on the content of the event. I am not operational > per se, so I don't respond to these, but need to be able to review when I > want to in a separate box (for many 1000s of systems I see hundreds per > day). > > The problem: I cannot, for the life of me, figure out how to add the "ANY" > condition! > > Is this possible? If not, what is the work around? > > Thanks, > > Mike > -- > > mailmate mailing list > mailmate@lists.freron.com > http://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate > > > ___ > mailmate mailing list > mailmate@lists.freron.com > http://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate > > ___ mailmate mailing list mailmate@lists.freron.com http://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate
Re: [MlMt] nested rule group?
Don't know but I believe it is a standard OSX behavior because other applications working the same way (e.g. iTunes). --Thomas On 2 May 2014, at 16:17, Michael Sale wrote: Perfect! Was that in the docs somewhere? On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 6:24 AM, Thomas Eckhold wrote: It should be possible. Insert the ALL conditions and then hold down the ALT key while adding a new condition (this changes the plus button to three dots), click the three dots button to create the ANY conditions. Does that help? --Thomas On 2 May 2014, at 14:15, Michael Sale wrote: I need to create a rule that looks like: ALL Condition 1 (From) Condition 2 (To) ANY Condition A (subject contains..X) Condition B (subject contains..Y) Condition C (subject contains..Z) Actually, this are email notifications from a monitoring system that have different subjects based on the content of the event. I am not operational per se, so I don't respond to these, but need to be able to review when I want to in a separate box (for many 1000s of systems I see hundreds per day). The problem: I cannot, for the life of me, figure out how to add the "ANY" condition! Is this possible? If not, what is the work around? Thanks, Mike -- mailmate mailing list mailmate@lists.freron.com http://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate ___ mailmate mailing list mailmate@lists.freron.com http://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate ___ mailmate mailing list mailmate@lists.freron.com http://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate ___ mailmate mailing list mailmate@lists.freron.com http://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate
Re: [MlMt] nested rule group?
On 2 May 2014, at 16:17, Michael Sale wrote: Perfect! Was that in the docs somewhere? It's documented [here](http://manual.mailmate-app.com/organize#mailboxes_and_conditions), but in earlier versions of MailMate I also inserted a tip in the window about this. That disappeared when I made some other changes, but I'll make sure it returns since I'm sure this is a common issue. -- Benny ___ mailmate mailing list mailmate@lists.freron.com http://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate
[MlMt] Overwrites specifiers.plist when updating
This is the second time I've had to restore customizations to this file. Can I add a separate file outside the app contents? Relates to the customizations I described here: http://lists.freron.com/mailmate/2014-March/002252.html --jk ___ mailmate mailing list mailmate@lists.freron.com http://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate
[MlMt] Cheater HTML?
Anyone have a MailMate Cheater html they'd like to share before I plough into creating one for myself? Thanks, Mike ___ mailmate mailing list mailmate@lists.freron.com http://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate
[MlMt] Dock badge disabled by upgrade prompt?
So, I got no mail today. ... Only actually I got a lot of mail today. And it showed up, and the inbox was full of bold headings. But the dock icon for Mailmate didn't show a badge, because there was an "upgrade and install" prompt up. This seems like a bug. -s ___ mailmate mailing list mailmate@lists.freron.com http://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate
