Re: voices on os x

2009-08-19 Thread David Niemeijer

Hi,

On Aug 19, 2009, at 7:52 PM, Krister Ekstrom wrote:
> Yeah, but the acapela voices currently don't work with the next big
> cat, and there's an Ivox in beta. Let's hope they don't take long to
> release new Ivox voices that work with Snow leopard.

Rest assured we are working hard on having iVox 2.0 ready for Snow  
Leopard in time. However, it required a complete overhaul of the core  
engine to make the voices 64 bit compatible (a requirement for Snow  
Leopard). Work started on this long ago but it is a far from easy job.  
We are currently working with a team of VoiceOver users on beta  
testing the new version to assure it works well under heavy duty use.

Before anyone asks, we do not currently need additional testers. There  
are already a number of additional people who have requested to be  
included in further tests and adding even more testers will slow down  
testing (and thus release).

If you rely on the iVox voices (because you need another language than  
English) you should not upgrade to Snow Leopard before installing iVox  
2.0 as iVox 1.3 (which it is 32 bit only) will not work with Snow  
Leopard.

Cheers,

david

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MacVisionaries" group.
To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: voices on os x

2009-08-19 Thread David Niemeijer

James,

On Aug 19, 2009, at 8:41 PM, James & Nash wrote:
> That's great to hear that you are continuing to develop such as great
> product. Will there be a cost involved in upgrading to 2.0 for those  
> of us
> who bought 1.0+ release?

I have recommended there should be no upgrade fee, but I cannot  
guarantee. In the end it is Acapela Group's decision.

david.

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MacVisionaries" group.
To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: voices on os x

2009-08-20 Thread David Niemeijer
Hank,

On Aug 20, 2009, at 9:59 AM, hank smith wrote:
>
> if I purchase the us voices will I get uk voices?

no.

> if so what ones?
> if I purchase uk voices what us one will I get?

you will get all UK voices plus Heather.

david.


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MacVisionaries" group.
To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: voices on os x

2009-08-24 Thread David Niemeijer


On Aug 21, 2009, at 2:31 AM, hank smith wrote:

> will the latest voices work on the 32 bit mac
> meaning the new voices that you are working on for snow leapard are  
> they backwards conpatible with 10.5?

Yes, most are. Only the older HD voices had to be dropped.

david.

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MacVisionaries" group.
To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Infovox iVox voices and Snow Leopard

2009-08-24 Thread David Niemeijer

Hi,

Infovox iVox 1.3 will not work on Snow Leopard. Infovox  iVox 2.0 will  
be required. This will be a free update. As iVox 2.0 required a major  
rewrite for compatibility with Snow Leopard and Apple has released  
Snow Leopard earlier than they had said previously we do not have a  
final release for iVox 2.0 ready yet. Instead, if our current tests  
are positive we will make iVox 2.0 available as a public beta by  
Friday, 28 August. If you rely on Infovox iVox do not upgrade to Snow  
Leopard until you have upgraded to iVox 2.0.

Note that if you rely on the older HD voices (which do not sound as  
good as the more recent HQ voices) you should not upgrade to Snow  
Leopard as the change to support 64 bit technology made it impossible  
to retain the HD voices in Infovox iVox 2.0. For most languages HQ  
voices are available (several new ones are included in Infovox iVox  
2.0). Only Icelandic had to be completely dropped in Infovox iVox 2.0  
because there are no HQ voices for that language.

With best wishes,

david.


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MacVisionaries" group.
To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: voices on os x

2009-08-24 Thread David Niemeijer

Hi,

On Aug 24, 2009, at 6:52 PM, Koumanova Rostislava wrote:

>
> hellow david ,
> i am using the italian voice ,  can i upgrade to snow ?

not yet. Wait for iVox 2.0. see my other message today for more info.

david.

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MacVisionaries" group.
To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: Infovox iVox voices and Snow Leopard

2009-08-24 Thread David Niemeijer

Will,

On Aug 24, 2009, at 7:02 PM, william lomas wrote:
> which new voices are included?
> just curious?

Just wait a few more days and you will see what new languages and  
voices are available...

Patience is supposed to be a virtue :-)

david.

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MacVisionaries" group.
To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: voices on os x

2009-08-24 Thread David Niemeijer

Hi,

I notice a lot people are complaining that Apple did not include the  
voices they now include with the iPhone 3Gs also in Snow Leopard.  
There may be a lot of reasons why they have not done that. I am not  
sure it is fair to say it is ridiculous of Apple without knowing the  
reasons behind it. Maybe the company they are licensing those voice  
from for the iPhone 3Gs is asking a ridiculously high amount per copy  
of Snow Leopard Apple will sell. Snow Leopard is sold much cheaper  
than most updates yet has been worked on for two years by a large team  
of engineers. I think that is nothing to sneeze at. Also, while people  
accept the lower quality of those voices for a mobile device, would  
the majority of Mac users accept it for Mac OS X on a desktop machine?  
Furthermore, do those voices support all the features needed for  
Speech Manager compatibility, or would that first require years of  
work? And, what about the third party voices? For Mac OS X there are  
multiple third party voices available for a wide range of languages.  
Should Apple just kill that business and possibly stifle innovation on  
the Mac platform in the voice area because voices in multiple  
languages already come free with the OS. For third parties it is hard  
to compete with free stuff, even if the third party stuff is of better  
quality. I know it would be bad for our business, but in the long run,  
it might actually also be bad for end-users. Things are not simply  
black or white.

Anyway, I think there may be plenty of reasons for Apple's decision  
that we as outsiders do not know about. Some of those reasons you and  
I might consider good others we might consider bad, but I personally  
do not think we know enough about the issues involved to call it  
ridiculous, especially after all Apple has been doing these last  
couple of years in the accessibility area.

Cheers,

david.

On Aug 24, 2009, at 9:04 PM, James & Nash wrote:
> The voices from Acapella are great but it's rediculous that Apple keep
> avoiding the answer on whether or not they will ever include other  
> language
> voices as they do in the IPhone. If they can do it in the IPhone  
> they can do
> so in Mac OS X 10.6 +. This is especiallly true considering that  
> they are
> based in California whre are large percentage of the population are  
> Spanish
> speaking. The same is true for Braille.


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MacVisionaries" group.
To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: voices on os x

2009-08-25 Thread David Niemeijer


On Aug 25, 2009, at 12:39 AM, James & Nash wrote:
> use those than the voices I've heard on the IPhone. However, the  
> reason I
> mention the IPhone voices is that if Voice Over continues as it has in
> Leopard - only speaking in English - then non-native English  
> speakers who do
> not feel comfortable enough with English to install or work with  
> their OS in
> may not be able to afford the superb quality of DAvid's voices for  
> some
> time. That was my only point, although I did not express it clearly  
> enough

Ok, I think we agree. Yes, I agree that for non-English speakers it  
would be practical if Mac OS X included voices for their own language  
by default. However, as Scott pointed out, space on the DVD alone  
would already preclude all such voices to be high quality. All Infovox  
iVox voices together already pretty much fill up a dual layer DVD so  
there would be little space left for the OS :-)

I also want to take this opportunity to point out that Apple does work  
with us and Acapela to ensure good compatibility of VoiceOver with the  
Infovox iVox voices (and visa versa) and foreign languages so Apple  
certainly cares about giving non-English users access to a good VO  
experience.

david.

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MacVisionaries" group.
To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: voices on os x

2009-08-25 Thread David Niemeijer

Will,

On Aug 25, 2009, at 8:36 AM, william lomas wrote:
> hi all i just hope then that voices from i vox are now available for
> previously unsupported languages like japanese, chinese, etc

Making a new voice is many months of work, making a voice for a new  
language easily takes a year. So before someone says that it is  
ridiculous that there are no Infovox iVox yet for Asian languages  
(yes, I know, you did not say that), I thought I would make you aware  
of the fact that new voices and new languages take a lot of time.  
While iVox 2.0 will include new languages and voices it does not  
include Asian languages yet.

david

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MacVisionaries" group.
To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: voices on os x

2009-08-25 Thread David Niemeijer

Will,

On Aug 25, 2009, at 9:38 AM, william lomas wrote:
> are chinese voices do you know beeing worked on? i am learning chinese
> so would like a voice to help me read articles etc

Is there any language you are not learning :-)

I cannot provide information on Acapela Group's unannounced voices or  
products. Most company consider the future products they are working  
on as confidential business information.

david.

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MacVisionaries" group.
To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Seeking VoiceOver users to test Infovox iVox voices in foreign languages

2009-08-26 Thread David Niemeijer

Hi,

As you may have read we will release Infovox iVox 2.0 for Snow Leopard  
compatibility as public beta later this week. Not all languages will  
be available at once as we do want to make sure that each language  
receives basic testing before it is made available as part of the  
public beta. If there are major issues with a particular language we  
would like those issues to be discovered before the language is put in  
public beta so that it will not affect a large number of users.

If you are interested in contributing to these "private" tests please  
contact me off-list. We need at most 2 testers per language (on first  
come-first serve basis). There is no remuneration for this testing. We  
expect you to do serious stress testing of the voices with VoiceOver.  
We are looking for people who already own an Infovox iVox license  
(i.e. know the product well), who know the Mac and VoiceOver well, who  
read and write English well and who enjoy testing new things. Only for  
Arabic, which is a completely new language with iVox 2.0 you do not  
need to already own an iVox license. Finally, we need feedback within  
24-48 hours of you receiving access to the voices.

Testing should take place on Leopard and if you have access to it also  
on Snow Leopard.

To express your interest send an email to supp...@assistiveware.com  
with the subject "iVox 2 testing" and in the contents mention at the  
very least the language(s) you want to test, your current Infovox iVox  
activation code(s), your mother tongue, the Mac OS X versions you plan  
to test on and your computer model.

We are looking for two testers for each of the following languages:
American Spanish
Canadian French
French
German
Italian
Dutch
Flemish
Spanish
Portuguese
Brazilian Portuguese
Danish
Norwegian
Finnish
Swedish
Arabic
Turkish
Czech
Greek
Russian
Polish

Final note, I may not be able to get back to you immediately as we  
will first focus on the most used languages and then move to the less  
common languages.

Thanks,

david.

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MacVisionaries" group.
To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Snow Leopard compatible Infovox iVox voices now in public beta

2009-08-28 Thread David Niemeijer

Hi Everyone,

Acapela Group and AssistiveWare today announced a public beta of  
Infovox iVox 2.0. Infovox iVox 2.0 brings Snow Leopard compatibility,  
significantly improves performance and responsiveness and adds a  
number of new voices for the following languages: Arabic, French,  
German, Flemish, Spanish, Brazilian Portuguese and Turkish. These  
voices work with virtually any Speech Manager compliant Mac OS X  
application, including VoiceOver, Preview, TextEdit, AssistiveWare  
VisioVoice, ConvenienceWare GhostReader, and Adobe Acrobat.

Today's press release:
http://www.assistiveware.com/pr.php#PR280809

Infovox iVox 1.3, the currently shipping version, is not compatible  
with Mac OS X 10.6 "Snow Leopard". A complete rewrite of the core iVox  
speech engine was necessary to make Infovox iVox 64-bit compatible and  
ready for Snow Leopard. Despite the major engineering efforts, Infovox  
iVox 2.0 is offered as a free update in order to facilitate the  
migration to Snow Leopard for those people who rely on these natural  
sounding voices to use their computer.

Because of the large number of languages available in Infovox iVox,  
not all languages will be available immediately as part of the public  
beta. The first languages to be released will be American English,  
British English, French, German, Italian, Canadian French, Spanish,  
American Spanish, Swedish and Norwegian. This was done about an hour  
ago. More languages will follow in the coming weeks. Languages are  
made available in public beta step by step to allow for basic internal  
tests before a language is made available as part of the public beta.

We want to take this occasion to thank the beta testers for their  
excellent feedback. We are currently seeking testers (max 2 per  
language) for the following languages that are not yet in public beta:  
Portuguese, Brazilian Portuguese, Dutch, Flemish, Danish, Russian,  
Finnish, Czech, Polish, Turkish, Arabic. In order to be accepted as a  
tester (first come first serve basis) you need to be an experienced  
VoiceOver users and native speaker of the language and also be able to  
read and write in English. You also need to be familiar with Infovox  
iVox (have at least used the demo in the past) but do not necessarily  
need to own a license. There is no remuneration for testing, but if  
you  provide good feedback we may provide you with a free license for  
a language of choice.

Cheers,

david.

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MacVisionaries" group.
To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Infovox iVox voices in foreign languages testers needed

2009-09-06 Thread David Niemeijer

Hi,

We now have quite a number of voices in the Infovox iVox 2 public  
beta. In addition to the languages made available when the public beta  
was announced we have now also added Dutch, Flemish/Belgian Dutch and  
Danish. We could still use some pre-pubic beta testers for the  
following languages:

Portuguese
Brazilian Portuguese
Finnish
Arabic
Turkish
Czech
Greek
Russian
Polish

If you are interested in contributing to these "private" tests ahead  
of the public beta for the above languages please contact me off-list.  
We need at most 2 testers per language (on first come-first serve  
basis). There is no remuneration for this testing. We expect you to do  
serious stress testing of the voices with VoiceOver.

To express your interest send an email to supp...@assistiveware.com  
with the subject "iVox 2 testing" and in the contents mention at the  
very least the language(s) you want to test, your current Infovox iVox  
activation code(s) if any, your mother tongue, the Mac OS X versions  
you plan to test on and your computer model.

Thanks,

david.

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MacVisionaries" group.
To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---