Re: octave does not build

2018-07-24 Thread Jan Stary
On Jul 23 15:51:49, michae...@macports.org wrote:
> Looks like the link command is missing LAPACK or the equivalent (e.g. maybe: 
> Atlas, OpenBLAS, Eigen), but since the log doesn't include the actual link 
> command I can't say for certain. Maybe add some verbosity to the build stage 
> to show the actual link command? - MLD

How do I do that on port(1) level?
Or do I need to tweak the actual Portfile with
something like --disable-silent-rules?

Thanks,

Jan

> On Mon, Jul 23, 2018, at 3:26 PM, Jan Stary wrote:
> > Attached please find a full log of
> > 
> > sudo port -vs install octave -app -docs +gfortran -graphicsmagick -java 
> > -qt5 +sound -universal
> > 
> > It eventually fails with undefined symbols.
> > Am I missing something obvious?
> > 
> > Jan
> > 
> > Email had 1 attachment:
> > + main.log.gz
> >   60k (application/x-gunzip)


Re: vnc

2018-07-24 Thread Rainer Müller
On 2018-07-24 07:55, James wrote:
> For ages I have used Chicken but High Sierra warns me of it being a 32bit app.
> macports has cotvnc and also vnc
> Any opinions sage words or other

Usually I use the builtin VNC client of macOS. You can launch it by
opening a vnc:// URL from Finder's "Connect to Server" dialog or with
open(1) from a terminal window, for example:

  open vnc://hostname:5190

Hope that helps,
Rainer

PS: Please use the new @lists.macports.org addresses as we are no longer
on macOS Forge.


Re: vnc

2018-07-24 Thread James


> On 24 Jul 2018, at 8:00 pm, macports-users-requ...@lists.macports.org wrote:
> 
>> For ages I have used Chicken but High Sierra warns me of it being a 32bit 
>> app.
>> macports has cotvnc and also vnc
>> Any opinio,ns sage words or other
> 
> Usually I use the builtin VNC client of macOS. You can launch it by
> opening a vnc:// URL from Finder's "Connect to Server" dialog or with
> open(1) from a terminal window, for example:
> ,
>  open vnc://hostname:5190 
> 
Alas the built-in server does not play nicely with the other kids


Conmection failed to ‘sandypit.home'
Make sure Screen Sharing or Remote Management (in the Sharing section of System 
Preferences) is enabled on the remote computer.


One of my linux boxes running xvnc

Chicken DOES connect

James

Re: vnc

2018-07-24 Thread Christopher Jones

What exactly is your question ? The macPorts build of cotvnc is 64-bit and no 
warnings are offered running it. 

Presumably you get the warnings running some other build ?

 If you like this app just bin the one you are using and install the MacPorts 
one.

Chris

> On 24 Jul 2018, at 6:55 am, James  wrote:
> 
> For ages I have used Chicken but High Sierra warns me of it being a 32bit app.
> macports has cotvnc and also vnc
> Any opinions sage words or other
> Thanks
> James
> 
> PS Chicken means ‘Chicken of the VNC’ and cotvnc is a port of it. I assume 
> one can build it in 64bit mode



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


Re: octave does not build

2018-07-24 Thread Michael Dickens
This would be a Portfile change, adding in the flag you mention. Here's my 
recommendation:
{{{
diff --git a/math/octave/Portfile b/math/octave/Portfile
index b20fb7b622..032ea2dce6 100644
--- a/math/octave/Portfile
+++ b/math/octave/Portfile
@@ -273,7 +273,8 @@ configure.args-append   \
 configure.args-append   \
 --with-framework-carbon \
 --without-x \
---enable-static
+--enable-static \
+--disable-silent-rules
 
 configure.args-append   \
 --disable-openmp

}}}

On Tue, Jul 24, 2018, at 3:26 AM, Jan Stary wrote:
> On Jul 23 15:51:49, michae...@macports.org wrote:
> > Looks like the link command is missing LAPACK or the equivalent (e.g. 
> > maybe: Atlas, OpenBLAS, Eigen), but since the log doesn't include the 
> > actual link command I can't say for certain. Maybe add some verbosity to 
> > the build stage to show the actual link command? - MLD
> 
> How do I do that on port(1) level?
> Or do I need to tweak the actual Portfile with
> something like --disable-silent-rules?
> 
>   Thanks,
> 
>   Jan


Re: vnc

2018-07-24 Thread Ryan Schmidt



On Jul 24, 2018, at 08:48, Christopher Jones wrote:

> What exactly is your question ? The macPorts build of cotvnc is 64-bit and no 
> warnings are offered running it. 

Agreed. I use cotvnc all the time and I've seen no problems with it on High 
Sierra so far. Actually I use the cotvnc-devel port, to get the latest 
development version.



build error on Snow Leopard trying to fetch a patch file for clang-6.0

2018-07-24 Thread Richard L. Hamilton
--->  Fetching distfiles for clang-6.0
--->  Attempting to fetch 
2001-xray-Define-O_CLOEXEC-for-older-SDKs-that-don-t-have.patch from 
https://distfiles.macports.org/llvm
--->  Attempting to fetch 
2001-xray-Define-O_CLOEXEC-for-older-SDKs-that-don-t-have.patch from 
http://lil.fr.distfiles.macports.org/llvm
--->  Attempting to fetch 
2001-xray-Define-O_CLOEXEC-for-older-SDKs-that-don-t-have.patch from 
http://mse.uk.distfiles.macports.org/sites/distfiles.macports.org/llvm
--->  Attempting to fetch 
2001-xray-Define-O_CLOEXEC-for-older-SDKs-that-don-t-have.patch from 
http://nue.de.distfiles.macports.org/llvm
--->  Attempting to fetch 
2001-xray-Define-O_CLOEXEC-for-older-SDKs-that-don-t-have.patch from 
http://fco.it.distfiles.macports.org/mirrors/macports-distfiles/llvm
--->  Attempting to fetch 
2001-xray-Define-O_CLOEXEC-for-older-SDKs-that-don-t-have.patch from 
http://kmq.jp.distfiles.macports.org/llvm
--->  Attempting to fetch 
2001-xray-Define-O_CLOEXEC-for-older-SDKs-that-don-t-have.patch from 
http://cjj.kr.distfiles.macports.org/llvm
--->  Attempting to fetch 
2001-xray-Define-O_CLOEXEC-for-older-SDKs-that-don-t-have.patch from 
http://aarnet.au.distfiles.macports.org/pub/macports/distfiles/llvm
--->  Attempting to fetch 
2001-xray-Define-O_CLOEXEC-for-older-SDKs-that-don-t-have.patch from 
http://jnb.za.distfiles.macports.org/distfiles/llvm
--->  Attempting to fetch 
2001-xray-Define-O_CLOEXEC-for-older-SDKs-that-don-t-have.patch from 
http://jog.id.distfiles.macports.org/macports/distfiles/llvm
--->  Attempting to fetch 
2001-xray-Define-O_CLOEXEC-for-older-SDKs-that-don-t-have.patch from 
http://llvm.org/releases/6.0.1
--->  Attempting to fetch 
2001-xray-Define-O_CLOEXEC-for-older-SDKs-that-don-t-have.patch from 
http://nou.nc.distfiles.macports.org/pub/macports/distfiles.macports.org/llvm
--->  Attempting to fetch 
2001-xray-Define-O_CLOEXEC-for-older-SDKs-that-don-t-have.patch from 
https://pek.cn.distfiles.macports.org/macports/distfiles/llvm
--->  Attempting to fetch 
2001-xray-Define-O_CLOEXEC-for-older-SDKs-that-don-t-have.patch from 
https://sha.cn.distfiles.macports.org/macports/distfiles/llvm
--->  Attempting to fetch 
2001-xray-Define-O_CLOEXEC-for-older-SDKs-that-don-t-have.patch from 
http://sea.us.distfiles.macports.org/macports/distfiles/llvm
--->  Attempting to fetch 
2001-xray-Define-O_CLOEXEC-for-older-SDKs-that-don-t-have.patch from 
http://ykf.ca.distfiles.macports.org/MacPorts/mpdistfiles/llvm
--->  Attempting to fetch 
2001-xray-Define-O_CLOEXEC-for-older-SDKs-that-don-t-have.patch from 
http://ywg.ca.distfiles.macports.org/mirror/macports/distfiles/llvm
Error: Failed to fetch clang-6.0: The requested URL returned error: 404


Plausible insofar as Snow Leopard would likely need that patch...so where is 
the file?


signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP


Re: octave does not build

2018-07-24 Thread Jan Stary
On Jul 24 09:26:18, h...@stare.cz wrote:
> On Jul 23 15:51:49, michae...@macports.org wrote:
> > Looks like the link command is missing LAPACK or the equivalent (e.g. 
> > maybe: Atlas, OpenBLAS, Eigen), but since the log doesn't include the 
> > actual link command I can't say for certain. Maybe add some verbosity to 
> > the build stage to show the actual link command? - MLD

New log attached, with full commands.

Jan

> 
> > On Mon, Jul 23, 2018, at 3:26 PM, Jan Stary wrote:
> > > Attached please find a full log of
> > > 
> > > sudo port -vs install octave -app -docs +gfortran -graphicsmagick -java 
> > > -qt5 +sound -universal
> > > 
> > > It eventually fails with undefined symbols.
> > > Am I missing something obvious?


verbose builds

2018-07-24 Thread Jan Stary
In a recent thread, I came over the folowing:

On Jul 24 09:26:18, h...@stare.cz wrote:
> On Jul 23 15:51:49, michae...@macports.org wrote:
> > Looks like the link command is missing LAPACK or the equivalent (e.g. 
> > maybe: Atlas, OpenBLAS, Eigen), but since the log doesn't include the 
> > actual link command I can't say for certain. Maybe add some verbosity to 
> > the build stage to show the actual link command? - MLD
> 
> How do I do that on port(1) level?
> Or do I need to tweak the actual Portfile with
> something like --disable-silent-rules?

On Jul 24 11:17:18, michae...@macports.org wrote:
> This would be a Portfile change, adding in the flag you mention.
> ---enable-static
> +--enable-static \
> +--disable-silent-rules

Would it be useful if port(1) had --disable-silent-rules
among configure.args by default? Or at least with port -vs?
Not having the actual commands renders the main.log a bit useless.

Jan