Re: [lxc-devel] [Lxc-users] Latest test results - Was: cgroups: support cgroups mounted in multiple places (v3)
where can i get that patched code? should i clone master? On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 1:47 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > On 07/02/2011 07:28 PM, Michael H. Warfield wrote: > > Hey all... > > > > So my testing has continued and I've now regression tested the v3 patch > > and extended my testing. Looks like, over all, everything came together > > nicely. I'd ack that... > > [ ... ] > > > IAC... The v3 patch does no harm to existing, working, cases and > > certainly covers the systemd case with F15 and that multipoint mount > > on /sys/fs/cgroup. The lxc stuff is broken on F15 without it. That's > > an important step forward and needs to be pushed. Not sure what the > > deal is here above with the libcgroup "cgconfig" service enabled on F14 > > (maybe I'm doing something wrong) but that should not be a show stopper > > as a mount point in fstab deals with that situation nicely. I'd like to > > see this applied ASAP and a turn cranked on the revision handle as this > > is needed for F15 and beyond. > > Great ! Thanks Michael for testing. > > Applied. > > -- Daniel > > > -- > All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. > Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security > threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes > sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2 > ___ > Lxc-users mailing list > lxc-us...@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-users > -- All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2___ Lxc-devel mailing list Lxc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-devel
[lxc-devel] [ lxc-Bugs-3357704 ] lxc-init fails with shared root fs on Fedora 15
Bugs item #3357704, was opened at 2011-07-07 15:42 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by moschny You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=826303&aid=3357704&group_id=163076 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Thomas Moschny (moschny) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: lxc-init fails with shared root fs on Fedora 15 Initial Comment: See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=694931: # lxc-create -n foo # lxc-execute -n foo /bin/bash lxc-init: failed to mount /dev/mqueue : Too many levels of symbolic links The direct reason is that /dev/mqueue is mounted with type autofs by systemd. In the end however it is unclear whether lxc_init should try to mount this at all, see later comments in the mentioned bug. -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=826303&aid=3357704&group_id=163076 -- All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2 ___ Lxc-devel mailing list Lxc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-devel
Re: [lxc-devel] cgroups: support cgroups mounted in multiple places (v3)
Built from git and still seeing the same problem: it appears to be down to incompatibility with libcgroup/libvirt as removing these from my system (and therefore mounting /cgroup with mount as opposed to the cgconfig service) seems to let me start a container OK. On 3 Jul 2011, at 19:24, jonathan essex wrote: > I seem to be having this same issue in a Scientific Linux 6.0 (RHEL 6 clone) > installation with lxc-0.7.4.1 > > lxc-checkconfig seems to think everything is OK, but when I try to lxc-start > a container I've created, I get this error message: > > lxc-start: no ns_cgroup option specified > lxc-start: failed to spawn 'centos-test' > lxc-start: No such file or directory - failed to remove cgroup > '/cgroup/cpuset/centos-test' > > Is this the problem under discussion? I'm new to lxc, so quite possible I'm > just misunderstanding something. > > Happy to test the patch if someone will outline how to get it/apply it. > (Aware that this is probably a tedious newbie type question, but asking > anyway) > > Cheers > Jon -- All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2 ___ Lxc-devel mailing list Lxc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-devel
Re: [lxc-devel] cgroups: support cgroups mounted in multiple places (v3)
On Mon, 2011-07-04 at 15:21 +0100, jonessex wrote: > Built from git and still seeing the same problem: it appears to be > down to incompatibility with libcgroup/libvirt as removing these from > my system (and therefore mounting /cgroup with mount as opposed to the > cgconfig service) seems to let me start a container OK. That's a known problem. You don't have to remove them, merely disable them, by running "chkconfig cgconfig off" and "ckconfig cgred off" and rebooting. Then mount your cgroup on a common mount point. I get the impression from Serge and Daniel that this problem can't be solved with that kernel because that kernel doesn't support clone_children so you don't have any recourse. > On 3 Jul 2011, at 19:24, jonathan essex wrote: > > > I seem to be having this same issue in a Scientific Linux 6.0 (RHEL 6 > > clone) installation with lxc-0.7.4.1 > > > > lxc-checkconfig seems to think everything is OK, but when I try to > > lxc-start a container I've created, I get this error message: > > > > lxc-start: no ns_cgroup option specified > > lxc-start: failed to spawn 'centos-test' > > lxc-start: No such file or directory - failed to remove cgroup > > '/cgroup/cpuset/centos-test' > > > > Is this the problem under discussion? I'm new to lxc, so quite possible I'm > > just misunderstanding something. > > > > Happy to test the patch if someone will outline how to get it/apply it. > > (Aware that this is probably a tedious newbie type question, but asking > > anyway) > > > > Cheers > > Jon Regards, Mike -- Michael H. Warfield (AI4NB) | (770) 985-6132 | m...@wittsend.com /\/\|=mhw=|\/\/ | (678) 463-0932 | http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/ NIC whois: MHW9 | An optimist believes we live in the best of all PGP Key: 0x674627FF| possible worlds. A pessimist is sure of it! signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2___ Lxc-devel mailing list Lxc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-devel
