[lubuntu-users] Lubuntu PPC 16.04 Clamav is outdated

2016-02-04 Thread Peter Golis

 
Hello Gentleman,
During check of my logs I had found outdated ClamAV binaries (reported by 
freshclam). Is there any continuous plan for making antivirus up to date?
 
I know, this is only warning. But why to not have periodically updated 
antivirus on the same way like web browser firefox which is allways up to date 
on all *buntu derrivates?
 
According to http://www.clamav.net/downloads the latest stable version of 
ClamAV is 0.99.0 from 2015-12-01 18:15:38 UTC and pervious version in Lubuntu 
is 0.98.7 from 2015-10-12 19:49:40 UTC which is allmost 5 months old.
 
Clamav and freshclam actual versions:
 
clamav-freshclam/xenial,now 0.98.7+dfsg-0ubuntu5 powerpc [installed,automatic]
  anti-virus utility for Unix - virus database update utility
 
clamav/xenial,now 0.98.7+dfsg-0ubuntu5 powerpc [installed,automatic]
  anti-virus utility for Unix - command-line interface


Log with complaint:
$ tail -17 /var/log/clamav/freshclam.log
Thu Feb  4 14:06:13 2016 -> --
Thu Feb  4 14:06:13 2016 -> ERROR: Can't save PID to file 
/var/run/clamav/freshclam.pid: No such file or directory
Thu Feb  4 14:06:13 2016 -> freshclam daemon 0.98.7 (OS: linux-gnu, ARCH: ppc, 
CPU: powerpc)
Thu Feb  4 14:06:13 2016 -> ClamAV update process started at Thu Feb  4 
14:06:13 2016
Thu Feb  4 14:06:13 2016 -> WARNING: Can't query current.cvd.clamav.net
Thu Feb  4 14:06:13 2016 -> WARNING: Invalid DNS reply. Falling back to HTTP 
mode.
Thu Feb  4 14:06:13 2016 -> Reading CVD header (main.cvd): Thu Feb  4 14:06:13 
2016 -> WARNING: Can't get information about db.local.clamav.net: Temporary 
failure in name resolution
Thu Feb  4 14:06:13 2016 -> WARNING: Can't read main.cvd header from 
db.local.clamav.net (IP: )
Thu Feb  4 14:06:15 2016 -> Trying again in 5 secs...
Thu Feb  4 14:06:20 2016 -> ClamAV update process started at Thu Feb  4 
14:06:20 2016
Thu Feb  4 14:06:20 2016 -> WARNING: Your ClamAV installation is OUTDATED!
Thu Feb  4 14:06:20 2016 -> WARNING: Local version: 0.98.7 Recommended version: 
0.99
Thu Feb  4 14:06:20 2016 -> DON'T PANIC! Read http://www.clamav.net/support/faq
Thu Feb  4 14:06:20 2016 -> main.cvd is up to date (version: 55, sigs: 2424225, 
f-level: 60, builder: neo)
Thu Feb  4 14:06:20 2016 -> daily.cld is up to date (version: 21341, sigs: 
1827592, f-level: 63, builder: neo)
Thu Feb  4 14:06:20 2016 -> bytecode.cld is up to date (version: 271, sigs: 47, 
f-level: 63, builder: anvilleg)
Thu Feb  4 14:07:31 2016 -> --
 
Have a nice day,
Peter.

-- 
Lubuntu-users mailing list
Lubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/lubuntu-users


Re: [lubuntu-users] Lubuntu PPC 16.04 Clamav is outdated

2016-02-04 Thread Walter Lapchynski
As you may know, Lubuntu is an Ubuntu project, which is to say that some
things affecting Lubuntu actually affect the entire project. In these
cases, it's best to reach out to the wider community. This is one such
case.

Ubuntu is, more or less, Debian unstable (except it's stable). Things in
the Debian repos [autosync][1] to the Ubuntu repos. By that logic, we
should have the [latest clamav][2] considering we are [before the
freeze][3]. If you read about [sync requests][4], you'll find they are
applicable only to packages where the Ubuntu patches are no longer relevant
but this package may need them as the Ubuntu version has five (that's the
meaning of the "ubuntu5" at the end of the version string), so you need to
look into a [merge][5].

Interestingly, clamav is not on the merge list, so I'm not sure what's
going on there. You may wish to check with the [Ubuntu Developers Team][6]
to figure out what the situation is.

[1]: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebianImportFreeze
[2]: https://packages.debian.org/unstable/clamav
[3]: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/XenialXerus/ReleaseSchedule
[4]: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SyncRequestProcess
[5]: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/Merging
[6]: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment#Communication

p.s. Don't forget the females in your greetings! Ubuntu means, roughly,
humanness— and that means all genders. http://women.ubuntu.com/

@wxl | http://polka.bike
Lubuntu Release Manager & Head of QA
Ubuntu PPC Point of Contact
Ubuntu Oregon Team Leader
Ubuntu Membership Board & LoCo Council Member
Eugene Unix & GNU/Linux User Group Co-organizer
On Feb 4, 2016 5:48 AM, "Peter Golis"  wrote:

>
>
> Hello Gentleman,
>
> During check of my logs I had found outdated ClamAV binaries (reported by
> freshclam). Is there any continuous plan for making antivirus up to date?
>
>
>
> I know, this is only warning. But why to not have periodically updated
> antivirus on the same way like web browser firefox which is allways up to
> date on all *buntu derrivates?
>
>
>
> According to http://www.clamav.net/downloads the latest stable version of
> ClamAV is 0.99.0 from 2015-12-01 18:15:38 UTC and pervious version in
> Lubuntu is 0.98.7 from 2015-10-12 19:49:40 UTC which is *allmost 5 months
> old*.
>
>
>
> Clamav and freshclam actual versions:
>
>
>
> clamav-freshclam/xenial,now 0.98.7+dfsg-0ubuntu5 powerpc
> [installed,automatic]
>   anti-virus utility for Unix - virus database update utility
>
>
>
> clamav/xenial,now 0.98.7+dfsg-0ubuntu5 powerpc [installed,automatic]
>   anti-virus utility for Unix - command-line interface
>
> Log with complaint:
>
> $ tail -17 /var/log/clamav/freshclam.log
> Thu Feb  4 14:06:13 2016 -> --
> Thu Feb  4 14:06:13 2016 -> ERROR: Can't save PID to file
> /var/run/clamav/freshclam.pid: No such file or directory
> Thu Feb  4 14:06:13 2016 -> freshclam daemon 0.98.7 (OS: linux-gnu, ARCH:
> ppc, CPU: powerpc)
> Thu Feb  4 14:06:13 2016 -> ClamAV update process started at Thu Feb  4
> 14:06:13 2016
> Thu Feb  4 14:06:13 2016 -> WARNING: Can't query current.cvd.clamav.net
> Thu Feb  4 14:06:13 2016 -> WARNING: Invalid DNS reply. Falling back to
> HTTP mode.
> Thu Feb  4 14:06:13 2016 -> Reading CVD header (main.cvd): Thu Feb  4
> 14:06:13 2016 -> WARNING: Can't get information about db.local.clamav.net:
> Temporary failure in name resolution
> Thu Feb  4 14:06:13 2016 -> WARNING: Can't read main.cvd header from
> db.local.clamav.net (IP: )
> Thu Feb  4 14:06:15 2016 -> Trying again in 5 secs...
> Thu Feb  4 14:06:20 2016 -> ClamAV update process started at Thu Feb  4
> 14:06:20 2016
> Thu Feb  4 14:06:20 2016 -> WARNING: Your ClamAV installation is OUTDATED!
> Thu Feb  4 14:06:20 2016 -> WARNING: *Local version: 0.98.7 Recommended
> version: 0.99*
> Thu Feb  4 14:06:20 2016 -> DON'T PANIC! Read
> http://www.clamav.net/support/faq
> Thu Feb  4 14:06:20 2016 -> main.cvd is up to date (version: 55, sigs:
> 2424225, f-level: 60, builder: neo)
> Thu Feb  4 14:06:20 2016 -> daily.cld is up to date (version: 21341, sigs:
> 1827592, f-level: 63, builder: neo)
> Thu Feb  4 14:06:20 2016 -> bytecode.cld is up to date (version: 271,
> sigs: 47, f-level: 63, builder: anvilleg)
> Thu Feb  4 14:07:31 2016 -> --
>
>
>
> Have a nice day,
>
> Peter.
>
> --
> Lubuntu-users mailing list
> Lubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/lubuntu-users
>
>
-- 
Lubuntu-users mailing list
Lubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/lubuntu-users


Re: [lubuntu-users] Lubuntu PPC 16.04 Clamav is outdated

2016-02-04 Thread Peter Golis

Hello Walter,
So, there is no continuous plan for making antivirus up to date by automatic 
updates like is for example on firefox which is allways up to date. Thanks for 
feedback.
 
Best Regards,
Peter.
 
PS: This can exclude clean *buntu based distros from file servers which cover 
security for users.
 
__

Od: Walter Lapchynski 
Komu: Peter Golis 
Dátum: 04.02.2016 15:43
Predmet: Re: [lubuntu-users] Lubuntu PPC 16.04 Clamav is outdated

CC: "lubuntu user list"

As you may know, Lubuntu is an Ubuntu project, which is to say that some things 
affecting Lubuntu actually affect the entire project. In these cases, it's best 
to reach out to the wider community. This is one such case.
Ubuntu is, more or less, Debian unstable (except it's stable). Things in the Debian repos 
[autosync][1] to the Ubuntu repos. By that logic, we should have the [latest clamav][2] 
considering we are [before the freeze][3]. If you read about [sync requests][4], you'll 
find they are applicable only to packages where the Ubuntu patches are no longer relevant 
but this package may need them as the Ubuntu version has five (that's the meaning of the 
"ubuntu5" at the end of the version string), so you need to look into a 
[merge][5].
Interestingly, clamav is not on the merge list, so I'm not sure what's going on 
there. You may wish to check with the [Ubuntu Developers Team][6] to figure out 
what the situation is.
[1]: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebianImportFreeze 

[2]: https://packages.debian.org/unstable/clamav 

[3]: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/XenialXerus/ReleaseSchedule 

[4]: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SyncRequestProcess 

[5]: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/Merging 

[6]: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment#Communication 

p.s. Don't forget the females in your greetings! Ubuntu means, roughly, humanness— 
and that means all genders. http://women.ubuntu.com/ 
@wxl | http://polka.bike 
Lubuntu Release Manager & Head of QA
Ubuntu PPC Point of Contact
Ubuntu Oregon Team Leader
Ubuntu Membership Board & LoCo Council Member
Eugene Unix & GNU/Linux User Group Co-organizer
On Feb 4, 2016 5:48 AM, "Peter Golis" > 
wrote:
 
Hello Gentleman,
During check of my logs I had found outdated ClamAV binaries (reported by 
freshclam). Is there any continuous plan for making antivirus up to date?
 
I know, this is only warning. But why to not have periodically updated 
antivirus on the same way like web browser firefox which is allways up to date 
on all *buntu derrivates?
 
According to http://www.clamav.net/downloads  
the latest stable version of ClamAV is 0.99.0 from 2015-12-01 18:15:38 UTC and 
pervious version in Lubuntu is 0.98.7 from 2015-10-12 19:49:40 UTC which is allmost 5 
months old.
 
Clamav and freshclam actual versions:
 
clamav-freshclam/xenial,now 0.98.7+dfsg-0ubuntu5 powerpc [installed,automatic]
  anti-virus utility for Unix - virus database update utility
 
clamav/xenial,now 0.98.7+dfsg-0ubuntu5 powerpc [installed,automatic]
  anti-virus utility for Unix - command-line interface


Log with complaint:
$ tail -17 /var/log/clamav/freshclam.log
Thu Feb  4 14:06:13 2016 -> --
Thu Feb  4 14:06:13 2016 -> ERROR: Can't save PID to file 
/var/run/clamav/freshclam.pid: No such file or directory
Thu Feb  4 14:06:13 2016 -> freshclam daemon 0.98.7 (OS: linux-gnu, ARCH: ppc, 
CPU: powerpc)
Thu Feb  4 14:06:13 2016 -> ClamAV update process started at Thu Feb  4 
14:06:13 2016
Thu Feb  4 14:06:13 2016 -> WARNING: Can't query current.cvd.clamav.net 

Thu Feb  4 14:06:13 2016 -> WARNING: Invalid DNS reply. Falling back to HTTP 
mode.
Thu Feb  4 14:06:13 2016 -> Reading CVD header (main.cvd): Thu Feb  4 14:06:13 2016 
-> WARNING: Can't get information about db.local.clamav.net 
: Temporary failure in name resolution
Thu Feb  4 14:06:13 2016 -> WARNING: Can't read main.cvd header from 
db.local.clamav.net  (IP: )
Thu Feb  4 14:06:15 2016 -> Trying again in 5 secs...
Thu Feb  4 14:06:20 2016 -> ClamAV update process started at Thu Feb  4 
14:06:20 2016
Thu Feb  4 14:06:20 2016 -> WARNING: Your ClamAV installation is OUTDATED!
Thu Feb  4 14:06:20 2016 -> WARNING: Local version: 0.98.7 Recommended version: 
0.99
Thu Feb  4 14:06:20 2016 -> DON'T PANIC! Read http://www.clamav.net/support/faq 

Thu Feb  4 14:06:20 2016 -> main.cvd is up to date (version: 55, sigs: 2424225, 
f-level: 60, builder: neo)
Thu Feb  4 14:06:20 2016 -> daily.cld is up to date (version

Re: [lubuntu-users] Lubuntu PPC 16.04 Clamav is outdated

2016-02-04 Thread Walter Lapchynski
I'm pretty sure that's not what I said. To summarize, tools are in place to
ensure all packages upstream in Debian are updated, but this one doesn't
seem to behaving. It requires further investigation.

@wxl | http://polka.bike
Lubuntu Release Manager & Head of QA
Ubuntu PPC Point of Contact
Ubuntu Oregon Team Leader
Ubuntu Membership Board & LoCo Council Member
Eugene Unix & GNU/Linux User Group Co-organizer
On Feb 4, 2016 6:53 AM, "Peter Golis"  wrote:

> Hello Walter,
>
> So, there is no continuous plan for making antivirus up to date by
> automatic updates like is for example on firefox which is allways up to
> date. Thanks for feedback.
>
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Peter.
>
>
>
> PS: This can exclude clean *buntu based distros from file servers which
> cover security for users.
>
>
>
> __
> > Od: Walter Lapchynski 
> > Komu: Peter Golis 
> > Dátum: 04.02.2016 15:43
> > Predmet: Re: [lubuntu-users] Lubuntu PPC 16.04 Clamav is outdated
> >
>
> > CC: "lubuntu user list"
>
> As you may know, Lubuntu is an Ubuntu project, which is to say that some
> things affecting Lubuntu actually affect the entire project. In these
> cases, it's best to reach out to the wider community. This is one such case.
>
> Ubuntu is, more or less, Debian unstable (except it's stable). Things in
> the Debian repos [autosync][1] to the Ubuntu repos. By that logic, we
> should have the [latest clamav][2] considering we are [before the
> freeze][3]. If you read about [sync requests][4], you'll find they are
> applicable only to packages where the Ubuntu patches are no longer relevant
> but this package may need them as the Ubuntu version has five (that's the
> meaning of the "ubuntu5" at the end of the version string), so you need to
> look into a [merge][5].
>
> Interestingly, clamav is not on the merge list, so I'm not sure what's
> going on there. You may wish to check with the [Ubuntu Developers Team][6]
> to figure out what the situation is.
>
> [1]: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebianImportFreeze
> [2]: https://packages.debian.org/unstable/clamav
> [3]: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/XenialXerus/ReleaseSchedule
> [4]: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SyncRequestProcess
> [5]: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/Merging
> [6]: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment#Communication
>
> p.s. Don't forget the females in your greetings! Ubuntu means, roughly,
> humanness— and that means all genders. http://women.ubuntu.com/
>
> @wxl | http://polka.bike
> Lubuntu Release Manager & Head of QA
> Ubuntu PPC Point of Contact
> Ubuntu Oregon Team Leader
> Ubuntu Membership Board & LoCo Council Member
> Eugene Unix & GNU/Linux User Group Co-organizer
> On Feb 4, 2016 5:48 AM, "Peter Golis"  wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Hello Gentleman,
>>
>> During check of my logs I had found outdated ClamAV binaries (reported by
>> freshclam). Is there any continuous plan for making antivirus up to date?
>>
>>
>>
>> I know, this is only warning. But why to not have periodically updated
>> antivirus on the same way like web browser firefox which is allways up to
>> date on all *buntu derrivates?
>>
>>
>>
>> According to http://www.clamav.net/downloads the latest stable version
>> of ClamAV is 0.99.0 from 2015-12-01 18:15:38 UTC and pervious version in
>> Lubuntu is 0.98.7 from 2015-10-12 19:49:40 UTC which is *allmost 5
>> months old*.
>>
>>
>>
>> Clamav and freshclam actual versions:
>>
>>
>>
>> clamav-freshclam/xenial,now 0.98.7+dfsg-0ubuntu5 powerpc
>> [installed,automatic]
>>   anti-virus utility for Unix - virus database update utility
>>
>>
>>
>> clamav/xenial,now 0.98.7+dfsg-0ubuntu5 powerpc [installed,automatic]
>>   anti-virus utility for Unix - command-line interface
>>
>> Log with complaint:
>>
>> $ tail -17 /var/log/clamav/freshclam.log
>> Thu Feb  4 14:06:13 2016 -> --
>> Thu Feb  4 14:06:13 2016 -> ERROR: Can't save PID to file
>> /var/run/clamav/freshclam.pid: No such file or directory
>> Thu Feb  4 14:06:13 2016 -> freshclam daemon 0.98.7 (OS: linux-gnu, ARCH:
>> ppc, CPU: powerpc)
>> Thu Feb  4 14:06:13 2016 -> ClamAV update process started at Thu Feb  4
>> 14:06:13 2016
>> Thu Feb  4 14:06:13 2016 -> WARNING: Can't query current.cvd.clamav.net
>> Thu Feb  4 14:06:13 2016 -> WARNING: Invalid DNS reply. Falling back to
>> HTTP mode.
>> Thu Feb  4 14:06:13 2016 -> Reading CVD header (main.cvd): Thu Feb  4
>> 14:06:13 2016 -> WARNING: Can't get information about db.local.clamav.net:
>> Temporary failure in name resolution
>> Thu Feb  4 14:06:13 2016 -> WARNING: Can't read main.cvd header from
>> db.local.clamav.net (IP: )
>> Thu Feb  4 14:06:15 2016 -> Trying again in 5 secs...
>> Thu Feb  4 14:06:20 2016 -> ClamAV update process started at Thu Feb  4
>> 14:06:20 2016
>> Thu Feb  4 14:06:20 2016 -> WARNING: Your ClamAV installation is OUTDATED!
>> Thu Feb  4 14:06:20 2016 -> WARNING: *Local version: 0.98.7 Recommended
>> version: 0.99*
>> Thu Feb  4 14:06:20 2016 -> DON'T PA

Re: [lubuntu-users] Lubuntu PPC 16.04 Clamav is outdated

2016-02-04 Thread Walter Lapchynski
To assume that everything will be updated all the time is an unsafe
assumption, even when systems are in place to try to keep everything
updated. The most stable OSes out there are, at times, out of date. For
example, when a vulnerability is found but no solution exists. Or when
there are issues with licensing. Or when the maintainers within the OSes
are unable, for whatever reason, to keep maintaining. Murphy's Law is the
rule of life. Even your example of Firefox has, at times, not been the
current version.

While we're on the subject of browsers, let's consider Chromium:

Ubuntu: [48.0.2564.82-0ubuntu1.1222][1]
Debian: [48.0.2564.82-2][2]
Upstream: [48.0.2564.103][3]

So it's actually not up to date. Note that upstream is on version
50-something in their development release, too.

These kind of things happen. If you're really concerned about your own
particular system, I would urge you to always download and compile upstream
versions yourself, directly from upstream. No OS can promise you to be 100%
up to date all the time, not Ubuntu, Debian, Arch, Red Hat, Fedora,
FreeBSD, or any other UNIX-like distro. For that matter, the fact that you
are more updated than the likes of Windows or OS X, especially for more
serious vulnerabilities is pretty remarkable. Beyond that, you have the
choice to update anything on your own.

[1]: http://packages.ubuntu.com/xenial/chromium-browser
[2]: https://packages.debian.org/unstable/chromium
[3]: https://www.chromium.org/developers/calendar

On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Peter Golis  wrote:

> Hello Walter,
>
> If there will be continuous plan for having updated antivirus at all as is
> for example on web browser firefox, then there will not be outdated
> antivirus. That missed periodical updates on provided antivirus decrease
> possibility of reaching *buntu based systems also enterprise segment. As
> example, File or Email server based on Ubuntu Server Edition. But this is
> for me only minor issue.
>
>
>
> I had a question, and that question was cleanly answered. So, we can leave
> it closed if there are no future plans.
>
>
>
> Have a nice day,
>
> Peter.
>
>
>
> __
> > Od: Walter Lapchynski 
> > Komu: Peter Golis 
> > Dátum: 04.02.2016 17:09
> > Predmet: Re: [lubuntu-users] Lubuntu PPC 16.04 Clamav is outdated
> >
>
> I'm pretty sure that's not what I said. To summarize, tools are in place
> to ensure all packages upstream in Debian are updated, but this one doesn't
> seem to behaving. It requires further investigation.
>
> @wxl | http://polka.bike
> Lubuntu Release Manager & Head of QA
> Ubuntu PPC Point of Contact
> Ubuntu Oregon Team Leader
> Ubuntu Membership Board & LoCo Council Member
> Eugene Unix & GNU/Linux User Group Co-organizer
> On Feb 4, 2016 6:53 AM, "Peter Golis"  wrote:
>
>> Hello Walter,
>>
>> So, there is no continuous plan for making antivirus up to date by
>> automatic updates like is for example on firefox which is allways up to
>> date. Thanks for feedback.
>>
>>
>>
>> Best Regards,
>>
>> Peter.
>>
>>
>>
>> PS: This can exclude clean *buntu based distros from file servers which
>> cover security for users.
>>
>>
>>
>> __
>> > Od: Walter Lapchynski 
>> > Komu: Peter Golis 
>> > Dátum: 04.02.2016 15:43
>> > Predmet: Re: [lubuntu-users] Lubuntu PPC 16.04 Clamav is outdated
>> >
>>
>> > CC: "lubuntu user list"
>>
>> As you may know, Lubuntu is an Ubuntu project, which is to say that some
>> things affecting Lubuntu actually affect the entire project. In these
>> cases, it's best to reach out to the wider community. This is one such case.
>>
>> Ubuntu is, more or less, Debian unstable (except it's stable). Things in
>> the Debian repos [autosync][1] to the Ubuntu repos. By that logic, we
>> should have the [latest clamav][2] considering we are [before the
>> freeze][3]. If you read about [sync requests][4], you'll find they are
>> applicable only to packages where the Ubuntu patches are no longer relevant
>> but this package may need them as the Ubuntu version has five (that's the
>> meaning of the "ubuntu5" at the end of the version string), so you need to
>> look into a [merge][5].
>>
>> Interestingly, clamav is not on the merge list, so I'm not sure what's
>> going on there. You may wish to check with the [Ubuntu Developers Team][6]
>> to figure out what the situation is.
>>
>> [1]: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebianImportFreeze
>> [2]: https://packages.debian.org/unstable/clamav
>> [3]: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/XenialXerus/ReleaseSchedule
>> [4]: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SyncRequestProcess
>> [5]: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/Merging
>> [6]: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment#Communication
>>
>> p.s. Don't forget the females in your greetings! Ubuntu means, roughly,
>> humanness— and that means all genders. http://women.ubuntu.com/
>>
>> @wxl | http://polka.bike
>> Lubuntu Release Manager & Head of QA
>> Ubunt