[Lldb-commits] [lldb] e25e3d7 - [lldb] Silent random xpass on aarch64-linux buildbot

[Muhammad Omair Javaid via lldb-commits]

Author: Muhammad Omair Javaid
Date: 2019-12-27T17:01:58+05:00
New Revision: e25e3d75850113b90314606207b092c5bd707c4f

URL: 
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e25e3d75850113b90314606207b092c5bd707c4f
DIFF: 
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e25e3d75850113b90314606207b092c5bd707c4f.diff

LOG: [lldb] Silent random xpass on aarch64-linux buildbot

This patch adds skipif decorator to TestWatchLocationWithWatchSet.py.
Decorator will trigger for aarch64-linux as this test passes randomly
causing buildbot failure.

Added: 


Modified: 

lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/commands/watchpoints/watchpoint_set_command/TestWatchLocationWithWatchSet.py

Removed: 




diff  --git 
a/lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/commands/watchpoints/watchpoint_set_command/TestWatchLocationWithWatchSet.py
 
b/lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/commands/watchpoints/watchpoint_set_command/TestWatchLocationWithWatchSet.py
index b9b11e4b0c5b..25ad731d77c7 100644
--- 
a/lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/commands/watchpoints/watchpoint_set_command/TestWatchLocationWithWatchSet.py
+++ 
b/lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/commands/watchpoints/watchpoint_set_command/TestWatchLocationWithWatchSet.py
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ def setUp(self):
 # Build dictionary to have unique executable names for each test
 # method.
 
-@expectedFailureAll(
+@skipIf(
 oslist=["linux"],
 archs=[
 'aarch64',



___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Re: [Lldb-commits] [EXTERNAL] [PATCH] D69535: build: improve python check for Windows

[Stella Stamenova via lldb-commits]

We have some internal machines that had Python 3.7 or Python 3.8 installed and 
after the recent changes for Python detection, the LLDB build started using the 
newer versions of Python. This caused a couple of hundred tests to end up 
"unresolved". There's no official Buildbot that verifies this scenario, so I 
removed the newer versions of Python locally, but is this expected? More 
specifically, do we anticipate that LLDB + tests don't work correctly for 
Python 3.7+?

Thanks,
-Stella

-Original Message-
From: Saleem Abdulrasool via Phabricator  
Sent: Sunday, December 22, 2019 2:04 PM
To: compn...@compnerd.org; a...@fb.com; Stella Stamenova 
Cc: pa...@labath.sk; tedw...@quicinc.com; amcca...@google.com; 
aleksandr.ura...@jetbrains.com; mgo...@gentoo.org; jo...@devlieghere.com; 
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org; liburd1...@outlook.com; sani...@subpath.org; 
chi...@raincode.com; b.gia...@gmail.com; kkle...@redhat.com; 
l...@inglorion.net; ztur...@roblox.com
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [PATCH] D69535: build: improve python check for Windows

compnerd closed this revision.
compnerd added a comment.

GIT 2046d72e916 



Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  
https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Freviews.llvm.org%2FD69535%2Fnew%2F&data=02%7C01%7Cstilis%40microsoft.com%7Ca1aa23ad5ad24a2fb12208d7872ad23a%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637126490295423625&sdata=3v33RBiR5JeNnuNhnPa8%2FPlqr4BxG772u4U9Suh9ess%3D&reserved=0

https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Freviews.llvm.org%2FD69535&data=02%7C01%7Cstilis%40microsoft.com%7Ca1aa23ad5ad24a2fb12208d7872ad23a%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637126490295423625&sdata=CpC0mIf0LWmaVOR8vTV44fef6gBjqSqzSTMkgB5ParM%3D&reserved=0



___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits