Re: How can I create root disk in Redhat 6.0

2001-01-05 Thread Richard Torkar

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Mike wrote:

> Hi !!
>
> When i boot linux from rescue disk, i get following message:
>
> VFS: Insert root floppy disk to be loaded in RAM disk and press ENTER
>
> Now how can i create a root disk... I am trying to boot Redhat 6.0
>
>
> Regards,
> Mike
>


man mkbootdisk

Basically you do
mkbootdisk version-number-of-your-kernel

Sometimes with the addition of --device /dev/fd0 as this:
mkbootdisk --device /dev/fd0 version-number-of-your-kernel

The kernel version you are running can be seen by doing:
uname -a




/Richard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE6VbI8USLExYo23RsRAiW4AKCo7Bg+TpLth1a2OOWFV0VvWyClHwCfUp3f
HEnQVOnAJYu1N0D2ZWJBLsg=
=nYhZ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Re: real talk cards in 2.2.18.

2001-01-08 Thread Richard Torkar

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Timothy A. DeWees wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I am trying to compile the rtl8139 driver for my SMC
> 10/100 NIC.  I have turned on all 10/100 devices (i.e. 3Com
> cards -n- such); however, I can not get the rtl driver to show
> up as an option in my menuconfig.  What to I need to do to
> compile this driver as a module.  Am I missing something
> else perhaps not in Network Devices.  I do see the rtl8139.c file in my drivers/net 
>source tree.
>

Have you turned on:
[EISA, VLB, PCI and on board controllers] in
[Ethernet (10 or 100Mbit)  --->] which is in
[Network device support  --->] ???


/Richard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE6WiZkUSLExYo23RsRAqA6AJ9y4MXPORujp4vBO2zt2YWW2jWmKQCfR1/X
y6JuvkONI4D/h3UytXoToAU=
=qNK8
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Re: bugreporting script - second try

2001-01-10 Thread Richard Torkar

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Matthias Juchem wrote:

> Hi there.
>
> I rewrote my previous bugreport.pl in bash. I would appreciate it if you
> had a look on this one. Run it once and give me feedback if you like.
>

Well it certantly works here. Almost everything is extracted correctly. I
could not btw test the ksymoops "feature" unfortunately.

What I did notice was the following.
This was checking "b) software" in the output file.

 GNU C  2.96
 Modutils   2.4.1
 GNU make   3.79.1,
 Binutils   2.10.90
 Linux libc5 C Library  not found
 Linux libc6 C Library  2.2,
 Linux C++ library  2.7.2.8
 Dynamic linker 2.2
 Procps 2.0.7
 Procinfo
 Psmisc 19
 Net-tools  1.56
 PPPcommand
 Kdb
 Sh-utils   2.0
 Util-linux 2.10m
 E2fsprogs  1.19,
 Bash   2.04.11(1)-release


I do not have any PPP, and no kdb installed on that machine, neither do I
have procinfo. Shouldn't it say N/A or not found instead of the above? The
ppp part is not true ;-).

Other thing I thought about was the Ctrl-D thingy when entering text.
What if ppl don't have any text to enter? Shouldn't is say on each line
that if you don't have anything to write then just write N/A and press
Ctrl-D? Because pressing Ctrl-D directly doesn't do any good.

Sorry to just be a pain in the ass, and *very* sorry for not having the
time to make a patch for you :)

But you did a good job. I think this is really good for new kernel ppl.
This could be very appreciated!


/Richard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE6XNHAUSLExYo23RsRAlMtAJ9Mo8B0LmaelPoG3zNU0NJccysZ/gCgiQDe
uaL2e9JaBbU3XCX5dLANsnQ=
=GKCp
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Re: bugreporting script - second try

2001-01-10 Thread Richard Torkar

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Richard Torkar wrote:

> Matthias Juchem wrote:
>
> > Hi there.
> >
> > I rewrote my previous bugreport.pl in bash. I would appreciate it if you
> > had a look on this one. Run it once and give me feedback if you like.
> >
>
> Well it certantly works here. Almost everything is extracted correctly. I
> could not btw test the ksymoops "feature" unfortunately.
>
> What I did notice was the following.
> This was checking "b) software" in the output file.
>
>  GNU C  2.96
>  Modutils   2.4.1
>  GNU make   3.79.1,
>  Binutils   2.10.90
>  Linux libc5 C Library  not found
>  Linux libc6 C Library  2.2,
>  Linux C++ library  2.7.2.8
>  Dynamic linker 2.2
>  Procps 2.0.7
>  Procinfo
>  Psmisc 19
>  Net-tools  1.56
>  PPPcommand
>  Kdb
>  Sh-utils   2.0
>  Util-linux 2.10m
>  E2fsprogs  1.19,
>  Bash   2.04.11(1)-release
>
>
> I do not have any PPP, and no kdb installed on that machine, neither do I
> have procinfo. Shouldn't it say N/A or not found instead of the above? The
> ppp part is not true ;-).
>


Oohh btw when doing a pppd --version on my system I get.
[@~]$ pppd --version
bash: pppd: command not found



/Richard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD4DBQE6XNOKUSLExYo23RsRApaPAJdFPBwbJ3cjbPEeSe9sF4bv95P1AJsElLpE
sCnH3COXAqy2B4XzcML+FQ==
=U2Yp
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Re: Problems in 2.4 kernel

2001-01-17 Thread Richard Torkar

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Sajeev wrote:

> Hi.
> I am not able to mount my floppy drive. When I try to mount it gives me the
> following error
> 'mount: /dev/fd0 has wrong major or minor number'
> I am running the latest kernel release i.e. 2.4 .
> I tried recreating the node but it has been of no use.
> Can anyone please help me.
> Thanks
> Sajeev
>


Are you having everything else updated according to Documentation/Changes?



/Richard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE6ZWPUUSLExYo23RsRApkfAKCZkAfjDrnuM8cjSoI8/9v2G/Mb5ACgtRHy
Vx/a5DhhULhjAXLwYX+TTiw=
=+cqx
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Re: 2.2.16 does not compile

2000-11-20 Thread Richard Torkar

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Andrei Smirnov wrote:

>
> I have a newly installed RH-7.0 distribution on a Celeron Pentium 400.
> When I tried to compile the kernel I got the following:
>
> 1. I ran make xconfig (or make menuconfig) and saved without changing any
>options - completed OK
>
> 2. make dep: OK.
>
> 3. make zImage: produced the following output:
>
*** LOTS SNIPPED ***
>
>



Did you edit the Makefile in /usr/src/linux and changed the line that
reads:
HOSTCC  = gcc
to
HOSTCC  = kgcc


?

/Richard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE6GVa9USLExYo23RsRAtvCAKCYU2cpI+uKLfcksk44pIZWVlrYcgCgm5Fp
9XiqohikNCcCVwb3IL8X6G8=
=Nv18
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Re: Defective Red Hat Distribution poorly represents Linux

2000-11-21 Thread Richard Torkar

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

David Riley wrote:

> Jeff Epler wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 21, 2000 at 04:08:26PM -0500, David Riley wrote:
> > > Windoze is not the only OS to handle bad hardware better than Linux.  On
> > > my Mac, I had a bad DIMM that worked fine on the MacOS side, but kept
> > > causing random bus-type errors in Linux.  Same as when I accidentally
> > > (long story) overclocked the bus on the CPU.  I think that more
> > > tolerance for faulty hardware (more than just poorly programmed BIOS or
> > > chipsets with known bugs) is something that might be worth looking into.
> >
> > And how do you propose to do that?
> >
> > For instance, in some other operating systems having the top bit flip
> > in a pointer will cause silent use of incorrect data.  On Linux, this
> > will cause a signal 11.  Which do you prefer, bad results or an error
> > message?
> >
> > Can you suggest a specific way in which Linux can react correctly to
> > e.g. flipped bits in RAM or cache which cannot be detected at the hardware
> > level?  Or maybe tell me how Linux can react correctly when an overclocked
> > CPU starts producing incorrect results for right shifts once every few
> > thousand instructions?
>
> Hmm... Good point.  That would be hard to do.  On that note, there
> should be some prominent note on things like user manuals (though Linux
> users shouldn't need *manuals* :-) that notes that common crashes like
> signal 11 or "cc: internal failure" messages are generally caused by
> hardware problems.

Well David, there is such a "manual".

http://ftp.sunet.se/LDP/FAQ/faqs/GCC-SIG11-FAQ



/Richard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE6Gve8USLExYo23RsRAtrQAJ4glySTwLB+e02mlYX0L42pf3+8BACdEssx
L2fhmp7uY+xa3wpWYt6cb+M=
=aP6d
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Re: Defective Red Hat Distribution poorly represents Linux

2000-11-22 Thread Richard Torkar

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

David Riley wrote:

> Richard Torkar wrote:
> >
> > Well David, there is such a "manual".
> >
> > http://ftp.sunet.se/LDP/FAQ/faqs/GCC-SIG11-FAQ
>
> Yes.  And if you ask the average new Linux user if they've read it, I
> doubt you'll get a "yes".  My question boils down to this, and this I
> suppose is a personal/informational request for comments, so don't
> clutter the list with responses directed at me:  What (in your opinion)
> is the most commonly read Linux user-land document?

I would say the manual that comes with the distribution whether it is
RedHat, Debian, Slackware etc...

So yes it would be a good idea to contact the distributions-people and
tell them to point it out "clearly" in their manual.


/Richard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE6G6fQUSLExYo23RsRAofAAKCKvLzgDTHs/lYu6Bx0PA/F9Z7nYACgl9qs
PgbaC8JGvJalG1Sh+6KUhRU=
=UvUj
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Re: test11: lockup when reading /proc/ide/hde/identify

2000-11-23 Thread Richard Torkar

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

ARND BERGMANN wrote:

> Hi!
>
> I think I found a bug in the IDE subsystem. When I do 'cat
> /proc/ide/hde/identify', the system locks up completely, not
> even Alt+RysRq+B helps. Everything else under /proc/ide works.
> hdparm can cause the same symptoms, but I have not checked
> when exactly it does so.
>
> I have an Asus A7V mainboard with VIA 82C686A as first IDE
> controller and an onboard Promise PDC20265 as second IDE
> controller.
> Both have a Fujitsu MPF3204AT as their primary master drive,
> but the problem occurs only on the Promise adapter.
>
> I have tried kernel 2.4.0-test11-pre6, test11-ac2 and
> ide.2.4.0-t11.1120, all with the same result, but I did not
> try any older kernels, because I installed the machine
> just two days ago.
>
> Arnd <><


I have an IBM HD on hde which is a HPT366.
It is not reproducable here.

Probably som VIA thingy?


/Richard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE6HSVDUSLExYo23RsRAuZWAJ9+3bGOcdiqIK6tzfhApHFSUWtB2ACaAzPp
wZLDcVJpZAyt5ecnET3MLMQ=
=Y8tG
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Re: HPT366 + SMP = slight corruption in 2.3.99 - 2.4.0-11

2000-12-04 Thread Richard Torkar

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Dan Hollis wrote:

> On Tue, 5 Dec 2000, Gerard Sharp wrote:
> > Gnea wrote:
> > > >  [1.] One line summary of the problem:
> > > >  Intermittent corruption of 4 bytes in SMP kernels using HPT366
> > > [snip]
> > > Have you tried updating the bios on the bp6? This solved a LOT of
> > > problems for me, and afaik, ru is the latest...
> > RU seems the latest. Flashed bios as per your nicely detailed
> > instructions.
> > No improvement in condition, alas.
>
> HPT366 on BP6 is just broken. Corruption and lockups happen under
> microsoft-windoze as well.
>

Not my experience Dan.

I've used my BP6 + HPT366 for a while now and I haven't had on lockup.
No corruption either.

Presently I use 2.4.0-test11-p4 and I have been following the 2.3.* kernel
since the day I got the BP6.

I have two Celeron 500 which are *not* o/c.
I have seti@home running on this box 24/7.
I use the latest BIOS.

I guess I'm lucky *grin*



/Richard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE6LAwsUSLExYo23RsRAtY+AKCOuqpfcSa73zzpHQfddSY/7JG8IACffPRe
UzfNUJ7t3y2jdsS4jmS4Ggg=
=FdqO
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Re: www.crucial.com won't talk to 2.4.0-test7 system

2000-08-29 Thread Richard Torkar

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Tue, 29 Aug 2000, Bob_Tracy wrote:

> I *thought* I wanted to buy some memory from Crucial :-).  Can't
> get there from here with my 2.4.0-test7 machine, but Win95 seems
> to be ok, and 2.4.0-test5 worked ok from a different location
> yesterday.  Has anyone else seen this kind of thing that might shed
> some light on the matter?  Here's what tcpdump saw:
> 
> 2.4.0-test7 trial
> 
> 08:16:50.800511 gherkin.sa.wlk.com.3337 > www.crucial.com.www: S 
>3556516453:3556516453(0) win 5840  (DF)
>  4500 003c  4000 4006 010f c09e fe31
>  89c9 f113 0d09 0050 d3fc 2265  
>  a0c2 16d0 1a35  0204 05b4 0402 080a
>  01d5 d704 
> 08:16:50.970196 www.crucial.com.www > gherkin.sa.wlk.com.3337: R 0:0(0) ack 
>3556516454 win 5840  (DF)
>  4500 003c  4000 2906 180f 89c9 f113
>  c09e fe31 0050 0d09   d3fc 2266
>  a0d4 16d0 1a22  0204 05b4 0402 080a
>  01d5 d704 


[*lots* snipped away]


With 2.4.0-test6 I don't experience this problem. I can't reproduce it
whatsoever :)


Richard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.75

iD8DBQE5q8qaUSLExYo23RsRAg3rAKDTCw+6nEajhTZ/b0etLyj8uuxeuwCfbjCu
WaepckWuuAI1raiCPsV5fsw=
=H3vp
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Re: test8-pre2 fs corruption?

2000-09-03 Thread Richard Torkar

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Sun, 3 Sep 2000, Mohammad A. Haque wrote:

> Ok, looking better. I havent been able to forcibly corrupt my mailboxes
> like I did before. Yet anyways. I left my machine for about 10 mins and
> came back and noticed this...
> 
> Sep  3 16:46:29 viper kernel: attempt to access beyond end of device 
> Sep  3 16:46:29 viper kernel: 21:01: rw=0, want=1070936764,
> limit=30015184 
> Sep  3 16:46:29 viper kernel: attempt to access beyond end of device 
> Sep  3 16:46:29 viper kernel: 21:01: rw=0, want=1422438616,
> limit=30015184 
> 



Talk to Jens Axboe regarding this. He gave me a patch when I experienced
the same problems with a DVD the other day.

Attached is the patch if you would like to try. It is against test8-pre1



/Richard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.75

iD8DBQE5sr5MUSLExYo23RsRAqqLAJ9UF+dav+R3jkIL5ykzTXDRidPtPgCgvFt/
ggV9L3Vh5yeddF36QfUrMzU=
=1MFr
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



diff -ur --exclude-from /home/axboe/cdrom/exclude 
/opt/kernel/linux-2.4.0-test8-pre1/MAINTAINERS linux/MAINTAINERS
--- /opt/kernel/linux-2.4.0-test8-pre1/MAINTAINERS  Thu Aug 24 05:12:54 2000
+++ linux/MAINTAINERS   Thu Aug 31 01:04:34 2000
@@ -540,7 +540,7 @@
 
 IDE/ATAPI CDROM DRIVER
 P: Jens Axboe
-M: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+M: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 L: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 W: http://www.kernel.dk
 S: Maintained
@@ -986,7 +986,7 @@
 
 SCSI CDROM DRIVER
 P: Jens Axboe
-M: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+M: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 L: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 W: http://www.kernel.dk
 S: Maintained
@@ -1174,7 +1174,7 @@
 
 UNIFORM CDROM DRIVER
 P: Jens Axboe
-M: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+M: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 L: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 W: http://www.kernel.dk
 S: Maintained
diff -ur --exclude-from /home/axboe/cdrom/exclude 
/opt/kernel/linux-2.4.0-test8-pre1/drivers/cdrom/cdrom.c linux/drivers/cdrom/cdrom.c
--- /opt/kernel/linux-2.4.0-test8-pre1/drivers/cdrom/cdrom.cFri Jun 30 03:25:50 
2000
+++ linux/drivers/cdrom/cdrom.c Sun Aug 27 03:26:40 2000
@@ -784,6 +784,8 @@
if (!CDROM_CAN(CDC_SELECT_DISC))
return -EDRIVE_CANT_DO_THIS;
 
+   (void) cdi->ops->media_changed(cdi, slot);
+
if (slot == CDSL_NONE) {
/* set media changed bits, on both queues */
cdi->mc_flags = 0x3;
@@ -851,8 +853,8 @@
if (cdi == NULL || cdi->ops->media_changed == NULL)
return 0;
if (!CDROM_CAN(CDC_MEDIA_CHANGED))
-   return 0;
-   return (media_changed(cdi, 0));
+   return 0;
+   return media_changed(cdi, 0);
 }
 
 /* badly broken, I know. Is due for a fixup anytime. */
@@ -872,8 +874,7 @@
 return;
 }
/* Grab the TOC header so we can see how many tracks there are */
-   ret = cdi->ops->audio_ioctl(cdi, CDROMREADTOCHDR, &header);
-   if (ret) {
+   if ((ret = cdi->ops->audio_ioctl(cdi, CDROMREADTOCHDR, &header))) {
if (ret == -ENOMEDIUM)
tracks->error = CDS_NO_DISC;
else
@@ -1516,12 +1517,13 @@
cdinfo(CD_DO_IOCTL, "entering CDROM_MEDIA_CHANGED\n"); 
if (!CDROM_CAN(CDC_MEDIA_CHANGED))
return -ENOSYS;
+
+   /* cannot select disc or select current disc */
if (!CDROM_CAN(CDC_SELECT_DISC) || arg == CDSL_CURRENT)
-   /* cannot select disc or select current disc */
return media_changed(cdi, 1);
-   if ((unsigned int)arg >= cdi->capacity) {
+
+   if ((unsigned int)arg >= cdi->capacity)
return -EINVAL;
-   }
 
if ((ret = cdrom_read_mech_status(cdi, &info)))
return ret;
@@ -1570,10 +1572,10 @@
if (!CDROM_CAN(CDC_SELECT_DISC))
return -ENOSYS;
 
-if ((arg != CDSL_CURRENT) && (arg != CDSL_NONE)) {
-   if ((int)arg >= cdi->capacity)
-   return -EINVAL;
-   }
+if ((arg != CDSL_CURRENT) && (arg != CDSL_NONE))
+   if ((int)arg >= cdi->capacity)
+   return -EINVAL;
+
/* cdo->select_disc is a hook to allow a driver-specific
 * way of seleting disc.  However, since there is no
 * equiv hook for cdrom_slot_status this may not 
@@ -1834,7 +1836,6 @@
struct cdrom_device_ops *cdo = cdi->ops;
struct cdrom_generic_command cgc;
struct modesel_head mh;
-   int ret;
 
memset(&mh, 0, sizeof(mh));
mh.block_desc_length = 0x08;
@@ -1852,14 +1853,7 @@
mh.block_length_med = (size >> 8) & 0xff;
mh.block_length

kernel BUG at vmscan.c:102!

2000-10-22 Thread Richard Torkar

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1


Doing some heavy i/o on my 2.4.0-test10 (rar) while downloading at
10Mb/s at the same time resulted in this:

Oct 22 20:03:38 toor kernel: kernel BUG at vmscan.c:102!
Oct 22 20:03:38 toor kernel: invalid operand: 
Oct 22 20:03:38 toor kernel: CPU:1
Oct 22 20:03:38 toor kernel: EIP:0010:[try_to_swap_out+250/768]
Oct 22 20:03:38 toor kernel: EFLAGS: 00010286
Oct 22 20:03:38 toor kernel: eax: 001c   ebx: 4f00   ecx: c12e6000 edx: 
0021
Oct 22 20:03:38 toor kernel: esi: c11d96a0   edi: 06f64045   ebp: 4f00 esp: 
c12e7e88
Oct 22 20:03:38 toor kernel: ds: 0018   es: 0018   ss: 0018
Oct 22 20:03:38 toor kernel: Process kswapd (pid: 2, stackpage=c12e7000)
Oct 22 20:03:38 toor kernel: Stack: c0219ae5 c0219ce4 0066 0001  
40081000 c7424200 4007f000
Oct 22 20:03:38 toor kernel:40081000 c012cdaf c784c3e0 c7833a60 4008 
c7424200 0004 c78ce400
Oct 22 20:03:38 toor kernel:40081000 40081000 c78ce400 0011 c010c430 
0001 c02a1050 000b
Oct 22 20:03:38 toor kernel: Call Trace: [tvecs+7101/66488] 
[swap_out_vma+287/432] [handle_IRQ_event+96/144] [do_softirq+109/160] [do_IRQ+231/256] 
[swap_out_mm+76/128]

ver_linux output:

[toor@/usr/src/linux/scripts]$ sh ver_linux
- -- Versions installed: (if some fields are empty or look
- -- unusual then possibly you have very old versions)
Linux toor 2.4.0-test10 #2 SMP Thu Oct 19 10:30:23 CEST 2000 i686 unknown
Kernel modules 2.3.14
Gnu C  2.96
Gnu Make   3.79.1
Binutils   2.10.0.18
Linux C Library2.1.94
Dynamic linker ldd (GNU libc) 2.1.94
Procps 2.0.7
Mount  2.10m
Net-tools  1.56
Console-tools  0.3.3
Sh-utils   2.0
Modules Loaded mga 3c59x opl3 sb sb_lib uart401 sound soundcore

Standard RH 7.0 with all updates applied.


Any more info needed? If so just ask :) 

I don't have the right modutils but on the other hand some how I don't
think that's the problem.



/Richard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.75-6

iD8DBQE58y1pUSLExYo23RsRAmVGAKDK/Whq3a9VHbfysdA8b0KSS1lFLACgxTUx
u9NQzrFESfIk5BKgKeBNhM0=
=vRyy
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Re: oopsen in 2.4.0-pre9

2000-10-31 Thread Richard Torkar

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

John R Lenton wrote:

> Several oops come up when using a lot of memory (using
> imagemagick on PIA1.tif from photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/tiff,
> on a 64MB machine, for example)
> 
> The weird thing is the oops happen *after* I've finished with
> imagemagick (or the gimp, or ...). In this particular situation
> netscape suddenly died, together with wmtime, and then the whole
> of X hung. I entered via the network, to find that xfs had died
> (explaining X's hanging), and as soon as I restarted X the whole
> box was gone. It still responded to pings, but even the active
> ssh session was dead and I couldn't get a new one.

I can only confirm your problem, but I use 128MB RAM.

When using "display PIA1.tif" my computer starts swapping furiously
and then locks *hard*. Not even sysrq works and unfortunately in my case
no oops in messages...


H, serious? Dunno...


/Richard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE5/tcrUSLExYo23RsRAticAKDV+Id7DrSVq8soFQVgtXj5X7mFRACfcgCs
OgH+ITA+oafSn8QHuH9E43w=
=cEAp
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Re: oopsen in 2.4.0-pre9

2000-10-31 Thread Richard Torkar

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

John R Lenton wrote:

> Several oops come up when using a lot of memory (using
> imagemagick on PIA1.tif from photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/tiff,
> on a 64MB machine, for example)
> 
> The weird thing is the oops happen *after* I've finished with
> imagemagick (or the gimp, or ...). In this particular situation
> netscape suddenly died, together with wmtime, and then the whole
> of X hung. I entered via the network, to find that xfs had died
> (explaining X's hanging), and as soon as I restarted X the whole
> box was gone. It still responded to pings, but even the active
> ssh session was dead and I couldn't get a new one.
> 
> Please email me if you need anything else (other than the
> attached ksymoops output, that is).


Well some more info.

I see kswapd starting to run @ ~7% CPU.

But my swap starts getting eaten up with approx 5 MB/sec.

Any ideas anyone?

RvR something for you?


/Richard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE5/tgvUSLExYo23RsRArxbAKCg6ADFyb6G2oKDMZT9m3mKqMF8awCggEBY
2RnARjaRDxqI7BCxaAGjr5M=
=tfT6
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Re: sb.o support in 2.4-broken?

2000-11-08 Thread Richard Torkar

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Jim Bonnet wrote:

> I am using the 2.4.0-test10 kernel. I have a sound blaster 16 which
> works fine under 2.2.17.
> 
> I see that a while back someone posted on this problem previously but
> there were no answers I can find..
> 
> Is support for soundblaster16 ISA broken in the 2.4 kernel? Compiled in
> or used as a module I can not get it to work. I have passed sb=220,5,1,5
> during boot when compiled in and also sent those during insmod.
> 
> When I boot to 2.2.17 these are the correct values and sound is happy :)
> 
> I am subbed to this group so you may answer here so this is on record.
> 
> Thanks much...


What does 2.4.* say Jim?
You have the right modutils installed?
Any error msg?

I have an old SB16 ISA and it works without a problem on 2.4.0-test10.
And it hasn't caused me any problems for a very long time :)

I have sound compiled as modules.
My lilo.conf (sound part) looks like this.

path[sound]=/lib/modules/`uname -r`/kernel/drivers/sound
alias sound-service-0-0 opl3
alias sound-slot-0 sb
options sound dmabuf=1
alias midi opl3
options opl3 io=0x388
options sb io=0x220 irq=7 dma=1 dma16=5 mpu_io=0x330

I have no idea if the  sound-service-0-0 and sound-slot-0 part is right
but it works and dosn't give any errors. I haven't had time to check what
service and slot really affects...

Do you get any errors while inserting the modules?



/Richard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE6CbxjUSLExYo23RsRAtceAKCfB+8rU1vpBp8GaF2rL7LzUjVB7wCg6yGE
6p0NWko/dIB7/X36nILXGFc=
=gal1
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Re: sb.o support in 2.4-broken?

2000-11-08 Thread Richard Torkar

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Richard Torkar wrote:

> Jim Bonnet wrote:
> 
> > I am using the 2.4.0-test10 kernel. I have a sound blaster 16 which
> > works fine under 2.2.17.
> >
> > I see that a while back someone posted on this problem previously but
> > there were no answers I can find..
> >
> > Is support for soundblaster16 ISA broken in the 2.4 kernel? Compiled in
> > or used as a module I can not get it to work. I have passed sb=220,5,1,5
> > during boot when compiled in and also sent those during insmod.
> >
> > When I boot to 2.2.17 these are the correct values and sound is happy :)
> >
> > I am subbed to this group so you may answer here so this is on record.
> >
> > Thanks much...
> 
> 
> What does 2.4.* say Jim?
> You have the right modutils installed?
> Any error msg?
> 
> I have an old SB16 ISA and it works without a problem on 2.4.0-test10.
> And it hasn't caused me any problems for a very long time :)
> 
> I have sound compiled as modules.
> My lilo.conf (sound part) looks like this.
 ^
Correction modules.conf I mean *duuuh*


> 
> path[sound]=/lib/modules/`uname -r`/kernel/drivers/sound
> alias sound-service-0-0 opl3
> alias sound-slot-0 sb
> options sound dmabuf=1
> alias midi opl3
> options opl3 io=0x388
> options sb io=0x220 irq=7 dma=1 dma16=5 mpu_io=0x330
> 
> I have no idea if the  sound-service-0-0 and sound-slot-0 part is right
> but it works and dosn't give any errors. I haven't had time to check what
> service and slot really affects...
> 
> Do you get any errors while inserting the modules?
> 
> 
> 
> /Richard
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>  Output from gpg 
> gpg: Signature made Wed 08 Nov 2000 09:49:39 PM CET using DSA key ID 8A36DD1B
> gpg: Good signature from "Richard Torkar (Linux) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
> 
> 

/Richard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE6Cb5IUSLExYo23RsRAhWPAKC2seiMwCKfQaDhs0/eYrUhorciXQCg4bwh
VMBEDzjthtT6bjEn69mtAcM=
=83jY
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Error compiling 2.4.0t13p1/p2

2000-12-16 Thread Richard Torkar

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1


I use redHat 7.0 and the much discussed kgcc :)
I edited the Makefile and changed to kgcc as usual.
This didn't happen with 2.4.0-test12.

This is what I get during a make bzImage (make dep && make clean already
done). Last in this mail is my config.

gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2
- -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe
- -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -march=i686-c -o ip_nat_proto_icmp.o
ip_nat_proto_icmp.c
ld -m elf_i386 -r -o ip_nf_compat.o ipfwadm_core.o ip_fw_compat.o
ip_fw_compat_redir.o ip_fw_compat_masq.o ip_conntrack_standalone.o
ip_conntrack_core.o ip_conntrack_proto_generic.o ip_conntrack_proto_tcp.o
ip_conntrack_proto_udp.o ip_conntrack_proto_icmp.o ip_nat_standalone.o
ip_nat_rule.o ip_nat_core.o ip_nat_proto_unknown.o ip_nat_proto_tcp.o
ip_nat_proto_udp.o ip_nat_proto_icmp.o
rm -f netfilter.o
ld -m elf_i386  -r -o netfilter.o ipchains.o ip_nf_compat.o
ip_nf_compat.o: In function `ip_fw_ctl':
ip_nf_compat.o(.text+0xdf0): multiple definition of `ip_fw_ctl'
ipchains.o(.text+0x11c0): first defined here
ld: Warning: size of symbol `ip_fw_ctl' changed from 1151 to 474 in
ip_nf_compat.o
ip_nf_compat.o: In function `ipfw_input_check':
ip_nf_compat.o(.text+0x12d0): multiple definition of `ipfw_input_check'
ipchains.o(.text+0x1a10): first defined here
ld: Warning: size of symbol `ipfw_input_check' changed from 79 to 57 in
ip_nf_compat.o
ip_nf_compat.o: In function `ipfw_forward_check':
ip_nf_compat.o(.text+0x1350): multiple definition of `ipfw_forward_check'
ipchains.o(.text+0x1ae0): first defined here
ld: Warning: size of symbol `ipfw_forward_check' changed from 82 to 57 in
ip_nf_compat.o
ip_nf_compat.o(.data+0x2c): multiple definition of `ipfw_ops'
ipchains.o(.data+0x4): first defined here
ip_nf_compat.o: In function `ipfw_output_check':
ip_nf_compat.o(.text+0x1310): multiple definition of `ipfw_output_check'
ipchains.o(.text+0x1a60): first defined here
ld: Warning: size of symbol `ipfw_output_check' changed from 125 to 57 in
ip_nf_compat.o
ip_nf_compat.o: In function `ipfw_init_or_cleanup':
ip_nf_compat.o(.text+0x1540): multiple definition of
`ipfw_init_or_cleanup'
ipchains.o(.text+0x1b40): first defined here
ld: Warning: size of symbol `ipfw_init_or_cleanup' changed from 337 to 364
in ip_nf_compat.o
make[3]: *** [netfilter.o] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory
`/usr/src/linux-2.4.0-test12/net/ipv4/netfilter'
make[2]: *** [first_rule] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory
`/usr/src/linux-2.4.0-test12/net/ipv4/netfilter'
make[1]: *** [_subdir_ipv4/netfilter] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.0-test12/net'
make: *** [_dir_net] Error 2


Regards,

/Richard

CONFIG_X86=y
CONFIG_ISA=y
CONFIG_UID16=y
CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL=y
CONFIG_MODULES=y
CONFIG_KMOD=y
CONFIG_M686=y
CONFIG_X86_WP_WORKS_OK=y
CONFIG_X86_INVLPG=y
CONFIG_X86_CMPXCHG=y
CONFIG_X86_BSWAP=y
CONFIG_X86_POPAD_OK=y
CONFIG_X86_L1_CACHE_SHIFT=5
CONFIG_X86_TSC=y
CONFIG_X86_GOOD_APIC=y
CONFIG_X86_PGE=y
CONFIG_X86_USE_PPRO_CHECKSUM=y
CONFIG_NOHIGHMEM=y
CONFIG_MTRR=y
CONFIG_SMP=y
CONFIG_HAVE_DEC_LOCK=y
CONFIG_NET=y
CONFIG_X86_IO_APIC=y
CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC=y
CONFIG_PCI=y
CONFIG_PCI_GOANY=y
CONFIG_PCI_BIOS=y
CONFIG_PCI_DIRECT=y
CONFIG_PCI_NAMES=y
CONFIG_SYSVIPC=y
CONFIG_SYSCTL=y
CONFIG_KCORE_ELF=y
CONFIG_BINFMT_ELF=y
CONFIG_PNP=y
CONFIG_ISAPNP=y
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_FD=y
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_LOOP=m
CONFIG_PACKET=y
CONFIG_NETFILTER=y
CONFIG_UNIX=y
CONFIG_INET=y
CONFIG_SYN_COOKIES=y
CONFIG_IP_NF_COMPAT_IPCHAINS=y
CONFIG_IP_NF_NAT_NEEDED=y
CONFIG_IDE=y
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDE=y
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDEDISK=y
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDECD=y
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDEPCI=y
CONFIG_IDEPCI_SHARE_IRQ=y
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDEDMA_PCI=y
CONFIG_IDEDMA_PCI_AUTO=y
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDEDMA=y
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_HPT366=y
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_PIIX=y
CONFIG_PIIX_TUNING=y
CONFIG_IDEDMA_AUTO=y
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDE_MODES=y
CONFIG_SCSI=y
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_SR=y
CONFIG_SR_EXTRA_DEVS=2
CONFIG_CHR_DEV_SG=y
CONFIG_SCSI_AIC7XXX=y
CONFIG_AIC7XXX_CMDS_PER_DEVICE=8
CONFIG_AIC7XXX_RESET_DELAY=5
CONFIG_DUMMY=m
CONFIG_NET_ETHERNET=y
CONFIG_NET_VENDOR_3COM=y
CONFIG_VORTEX=m
CONFIG_VT=y
CONFIG_VT_CONSOLE=y
CONFIG_SERIAL=y
CONFIG_UNIX98_PTYS=y
CONFIG_UNIX98_PTY_COUNT=256
CONFIG_MOUSE=y
CONFIG_PSMOUSE=y
CONFIG_RTC=y
CONFIG_AGP=y
CONFIG_AGP_INTEL=y
CONFIG_FAT_FS=m
CONFIG_MSDOS_FS=m
CONFIG_VFAT_FS=m
CONFIG_ISO9660_FS=m
CONFIG_JOLIET=y
CONFIG_PROC_FS=y
CONFIG_DEVPTS_FS=y
CONFIG_EXT2_FS=y
CONFIG_MSDOS_PARTITION=y
CONFIG_NLS=y
CONFIG_NLS_DEFAULT="iso8859-1"
CONFIG_NLS_CODEPAGE_437=m
CONFIG_NLS_CODEPAGE_850=m
CONFIG_NLS_ISO8859_1=m
CONFIG_VGA_CONSOLE=y
CONFIG_SOUND=m
CONFIG_SOUND_OSS=m
CONFIG_SOUND_TRACEINIT=y
CONFIG_SOUND_DMAP=y
CONFIG_SOUND_VMIDI=m
CONFIG_SOUND_SB=m
CONFIG_SOUND_YM3812=m
CONFIG_MAGIC_SYSRQ=y

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE6O2MTUSLExYo23RsRAu8JAJ9RF6nUSddOTpr9GE5h23jUA5YeVACg1I27
uxQvIEf7JE94zYydczpG3yc=
=NCuV
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-

Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0?

2000-09-29 Thread Richard Torkar

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Fri, 29 Sep 2000, David M. Rector wrote:

> 
> Has anyone tried Redhat 7.0 yet? What a mess.
> 
> 1) It would not compile stock kernels out of the box. (ends at
> compress.S) with a fatal error.

Unable to reproduce.

 
> 2) Trying to compile the kernel source for 2.2.16 that comes with the
> redhat disk (which is very different than the stock 2.2.16) causes my
> system come to a screeching halt, no messages, no errors, crashed solid.

Unable to reproduce


> I have a Supermicro PIIIDME motherboard with a GeForce2 graphics card,
> adaptec 2940UW scsi and seagate UW 9 gig scsi drive.


Have none of the above hardware.
Wonder what gcc you use?



Richard
- ---
"We have a problem, and as is customary in such
situations we will throw so much technology at it that it will make
monkeys all over the world jump up in delight."
Federico Mena-Quintero, Eye Of Gnome 0.5 announcement

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.75

iD8DBQE51Q44USLExYo23RsRAneCAKDpwb/zuBgirNBesF8vq5qjZZzQ+wCeNyTv
rsegZjlMTZSebRdRogcq7Mk=
=gUaF
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Re: Weird device out-of-space error

2000-10-14 Thread Richard Torkar

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Sat, 14 Oct 2000, safemode wrote:

> cvs server: cannot rewrite CVS/Entries.Backup: No space left on device
> 
> These are the sort of errors i'm getting from cvs but this is what df -m
> tells me on the partition i'm downloading on
> /dev/hda4 6865  4899  1610  76% /
> 
> I'm not sure how to test this on a diff program from cvs since it might
> have to do something with how cvs goes about creating the files.  Is anyone
> aware of a cvs bug?   
> cvs version is Concurrent Versions System (CVS) 1.10.8 (client/server)
> (packaged in debian woody)
> By the way, this is Linux version 2.4.0-test9-vm-OOM  (rik's vm-oom patch
> from oct. 6).  This has been up for 6 days 14 hours.  
> I dont seem to be getting any out of space errors by any other programs but
> considering the uptime of this kernel version, i'm not so sure if it's
> entirely a cvs problem since i've cvs'd bigger stuff than star-office and
> never got this error.  


Hmm let me guess. OpenOffice cvs?

I got that to but I'm thinking the error is on OpenOffice's side and not
mine but who knows...


/Richard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.75-6

iD8DBQE56EySUSLExYo23RsRAszCAJ9yWXvnWITqXlmvBAW+6upIrivm+ACggcyA
7wDOqV1ZA6OdIf1xNOI3X9w=
=4GHo
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Re: Is HP Colorado 8Gb supported by Linux?

2001-01-29 Thread Richard Torkar

On 29 Jan 2001 14:33:39 +, Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
> Can anyone tell me whether there is support for the HP Colorado 8Gb (IDE 
> version) tape drive in the Linux kernel and/or user space?
> 
> If there is kernel support which of the kernel options do I have to enable 
> / where do I get user space utilities from? Any pointers?
> 
> Thanks a lot for the help in advance.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
>  Anton



I have found this forum, when it comes to tape backup and Linux, to be
very good.
http://www.mailgate.org/linux/linux.dev.tape/

Especially this one might help you if you have a problem.
http://www.mailgate.org/linux/linux.dev.tape/msg00206.html

Here is some more info I found:
"I don't have the 8 GB, but I do have the 5 GB drive working.  You need
to make sure that support for the IDE/ATAPI tape drive is compiled
into your kernel.  Once your kernel supports IDE/ATAPI tape drives,
you should be able to access your drive via /dev/ht0 or /dev/nht0
(no rewind)."



-- 

/Richard

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/