Re: lilo and removable media
Have a look to the lilo.conf man page at the keyword "disk=". On Mon, 22 Jan 2001, J . A . Magallon wrote: > Hi, everyone. > > I have recently added an IDE ZIP drive to the system, and when I run lilo > I get the following messages: > Jan 22 16:01:05 werewolf kernel: ide-floppy: hda: I/O error, pc = 0, key = 2, > asc = 3a, ascq = 0 > Jan 22 16:01:05 werewolf kernel: ide-floppy: hda: I/O error, pc = 1b, key = 2, > asc = 3a, ascq = 0 > Jan 22 16:01:05 werewolf kernel: ide-floppy: hda: I/O error, pc = 5a, key = 5, > asc = 24, ascq = 0 > > Also, if I run lilo with the zip (/dev/hda) mounted, or unmounted but > still inserted, I get: > > Warning: /dev/sda is not on the first disk > > and the box does not boot, get stuck at 'LI'. If I run lilo without a > zip in the drive, I get the above messages but al works allright. > > Is there any way to say lilo to ignore hda ? > > My /etc/fstab: > > /dev/sda1 / ext2defaults 1 1 > /dev/sda8 swapswapdefaults 0 0 > proc /proc procdefaults 0 0 > swapfs/dev/shmswapfs defaults 0 0 > devpts/dev/ptsdevpts mode=0620 0 0 > /dev/sda5 /usrext2defaults 1 2 > /dev/sda6 /usr/local ext2defaults 1 2 > /dev/sda7 /home ext2defaults 1 2 > /dev/hda /mnt/zipautouser,noauto,nosuid,noexec,nodev 0 0 > /dev/hdc /mnt/cdrom autouser,noauto,nosuid,noexec,nodev,ro > 0 0 > /dev/fd0 /mnt/floppy autouser,noauto,nosuid,noexec,nodev 0 > 0 > > -- > J.A. Magallon $> cd pub > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] $> more beer > > Linux werewolf 2.4.0-ac10 #1 SMP Sat Jan 20 10:43:18 CET 2001 i686 > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > - Patrizio Bruno DADA spa / Ed-IT Development Staff Borgo degli Albizi 37/r 50122 Firenze Italy tel +39 05520351 fax +39 0552478143 PGP PublicKey available at: http://www.keyserver.net/en/ - - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: Total loss with 2.4.0 (release)
I think that your linux's partition has not been overwritten, but only the MBR of your disk, so you probably just need to reinstall lilo. Insert your installation bootdisk into your pc, then skip all the setup stuff, but the choose of the partition where you want to install and the source from where you want to install, then select just the lilo configuration (bootconfiguration I mean), complete that step and reboot your machine, lilo will'be there again. P. On Tue, 23 Jan 2001, Trever L. Adams wrote: > Mike A. Harris wrote: > > > On Mon, 15 Jan 2001, Trever Adams wrote: > > > > I don't see how Windows 9x can be at fault in any way shape or > > form, if you can boot between 2.2.x kernel and 9x no problem, but > > lose your disk if you boot Win98 and then 2.3.x/2.4.x and lose > > everything. Windows does not touch your Linux fs's, so if there > > is a problem, it most likely is a kernel bug of some kind that > > doesn't initialize something properly. > > Well, I boot into Linux, all is fine, rebooted into a different version > of Linux for some testing, all is fine (this was an older version, I > believe it was 2.2.14 or .15) Try to install ME and run it, seems ok. > Go back to Linux, and my drive was fried with Windows files all over it, > etc. > > I know Windows shouldn't touch a Linux partition. But, apparently it > did. Or else Linux and/or Fdisk are fried and made a bad partition table. > > > Windows sucks, and I hate it as much (probably more) than the > > next guy. It's not fair to blame every computer problem on it > > though unless you KNOW that Windows directly caused the problem. > > I said what I did, because it seems the evidence said Windows did do it. > If it didn't, oops. I have talked with others and they had a similar > experience, so I am not alone. > > > Pick one of the 10 good reasons to say Windows sucks > > instead... > > > > For what it is worth, I have a similar problem where if I boot > > Windows (to show people what "multicrashing" is), if I boot back > > into Linux, my network card no longer works (via-rhine). Most > > definitely a Linux bug. In this case, "via-rhine.o" sucks. > > > > ;o) > > Well, this is actually the second time I have had Windows write all over > my Linux partition. The first time I think it was not a bug in either, > but a bug in hardware. However, I no longer have that hardware as my > desktop. > > Trever > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > - Patrizio Bruno DADA spa / Ed-IT Development Staff Borgo degli Albizi 37/r 50122 Firenze Italy tel +39 05520351 fax +39 0552478143 PGP PublicKey available at: http://www.keyserver.net/en/ - - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
system freeze on 2.4.0-test10 or greater
My machine randomly freeze, apparently without a reason and i cannot reproduce the problem. P. - Patrizio Bruno DADA spa / Ed-IT Development Staff Borgo degli Albizi 37/r 50122 Firenze Italy tel +39 05520351 fax +39 0552478143 PGP PublicKey available at: http://www.keyserver.net/en/ - - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: system freeze on 2.4.0-test10 or greater
> My machine randomly freeze, apparently without a reason and i cannot > reproduce the problem. > > P. In my previous mail I forgot my machine specs ----- Patrizio Bruno DADA spa / Ed-IT Development Staff Borgo degli Albizi 37/r 50122 Firenze Italy tel +39 05520351 fax +39 0552478143 PGP PublicKey available at: http://www.keyserver.net/en/ - Linux version 2.4.0-test12 (root@dadafly) (gcc version 2.95.2 19991024 (release)) #23 Thu Dec 14 20:04:12 CET 2000 BIOS-provided physical RAM map: BIOS-e820: 0009fc00 @ (usable) BIOS-e820: 0400 @ 0009fc00 (reserved) BIOS-e820: 0001 @ 000f (reserved) BIOS-e820: 0001 @ (reserved) BIOS-e820: 0ff0 @ 0010 (usable) On node 0 totalpages: 65536 zone(0): 4096 pages. zone(1): 61440 pages. zone(2): 0 pages. Kernel command line: BOOT_IMAGE=linuz ro root=303 ramdisk=0 devfs=mount Initializing CPU#0 Detected 467.183 MHz processor. Console: colour VGA+ 80x60 Calibrating delay loop... 930.61 BogoMIPS Memory: 256092k/262144k available (881k kernel code, 5664k reserved, 52k data, 164k init, 0k highmem) Dentry-cache hash table entries: 32768 (order: 6, 262144 bytes) Buffer-cache hash table entries: 16384 (order: 4, 65536 bytes) Page-cache hash table entries: 65536 (order: 6, 262144 bytes) Inode-cache hash table entries: 16384 (order: 5, 131072 bytes) CPU: Before vendor init, caps: 0183f9ff , vendor = 0 CPU: L1 I cache: 16K, L1 D cache: 16K CPU: L2 cache: 128K Intel machine check architecture supported. Intel machine check reporting enabled on CPU#0. CPU: After vendor init, caps: 0183f9ff CPU: After generic, caps: 0183f9ff CPU: Common caps: 0183f9ff CPU: Intel Celeron (Mendocino) stepping 05 Checking 'hlt' instruction... OK. POSIX conformance testing by UNIFIX mtrr: v1.37 (20001109) Richard Gooch ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) mtrr: detected mtrr type: Intel PCI: PCI BIOS revision 2.10 entry at 0xfb2c0, last bus=1 PCI: Using configuration type 1 PCI: Probing PCI hardware PCI: Using IRQ router VIA [1106/0596] at 00:07.0 Activating ISA DMA hang workarounds. Linux NET4.0 for Linux 2.4 Based upon Swansea University Computer Society NET3.039 Starting kswapd v1.8 pty: 256 Unix98 ptys configured Uniform Multi-Platform E-IDE driver Revision: 6.31 ide: Assuming 33MHz system bus speed for PIO modes; override with idebus=xx VP_IDE: IDE controller on PCI bus 00 dev 39 VP_IDE: chipset revision 6 VP_IDE: not 100% native mode: will probe irqs later VP_IDE: VIA vt82c596a IDE UDMA33 controller on pci0:7.1 ide0: BM-DMA at 0xd000-0xd007, BIOS settings: hda:DMA, hdb:pio ide1: BM-DMA at 0xd008-0xd00f, BIOS settings: hdc:DMA, hdd:pio hda: ST38421A, ATA DISK drive ide: Assuming 33MHz system bus speed for PIO modes; override with idebus=xx hdc: Pioneer DVD-ROM ATAPIModel DVD-113 0113, ATAPI CDROM drive ide0 at 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6 on irq 14 ide1 at 0x170-0x177,0x376 on irq 15 hda: 16498944 sectors (8447 MB) w/256KiB Cache, CHS=1027/255/63, UDMA(33) Partition check: /dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0: p1 < p5 > p2 p3 p4 KBDLOCK: initializing Keyboard locking NET4: Linux TCP/IP 1.0 for NET4.0 IP Protocols: ICMP, UDP, TCP IP: routing cache hash table of 2048 buckets, 16Kbytes TCP: Hash tables configured (established 16384 bind 16384) NET4: Unix domain sockets 1.0/SMP for Linux NET4.0. devfs: v0.102 (2622) Richard Gooch ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) devfs: boot_options: 0x0 VFS: Mounted root (ext2 filesystem) readonly. Mounted devfs on /dev Freeing unused kernel memory: 164k freed Adding Swap: 130748k swap-space (priority -1) au88xx: Loading... PCI: Found IRQ 5 for device 00:0b.0 au88xx: Found vortex PCI device: au88xx: id=0x0002 au88xx: bar0=0xef00 au88xx: irq=5 au88xx: Add device, audio=3, mixer=0, midi=2 Serial driver version 5.02 (2000-08-09) with MANY_PORTS SHARE_IRQ SERIAL_PCI enabled ttyS00 at 0x03f8 (irq = 4) is a 16550A ttyS01 at 0x02f8 (irq = 3) is a 16550A IA-32 Microcode Update Driver: v1.08 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> apm: BIOS version 1.2 Flags 0x07 (Driver version 1.14) nbd: registered device at major 43 loop: enabling 8 loop devices inserting floppy driver for 2.4.0-test12 Floppy drive(s): fd0 is 1.44M FDC 0 is a post-1991 82077 usb.c: registered new driver usbdevfs usb.c: registered new driver hub usb-uhci.c: $Revision: 1.251 $ time 12:33:13 Dec 14 2000 usb-uhci.c: High bandwidth mode enabled usb-uhci.c: USB UHCI at I/O 0xd400, IRQ 10 usb-uhci.c: Detected 2 ports usb.c: new USB bus registered, assigned bus number 1 hub.c: USB hub found hub.c: 2 ports detected parport0: PC-style at 0x378 [PCSPP] hdc: ATAPI DVD-ROM drive, 512kB Cache, UDMA(33) Un
Re: system freeze on 2.4.0-test10 or greater
I found that removing modules 'r128' and 'agpgart' my machine doesn't freeze. P. ----- Patrizio Bruno DADA spa / Ed-IT Development Staff Borgo degli Albizi 37/r 50122 Firenze Italy tel +39 05520351 fax +39 0552478143 PGP PublicKey available at: http://www.keyserver.net/en/ - - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: Kernel 2.4.0-test12 hang
t; CONFIG_DUMMY_CONSOLE=y > CONFIG_FB_VESA=y > CONFIG_VIDEO_SELECT=y > CONFIG_FBCON_CFB8=y > CONFIG_FBCON_CFB16=y > CONFIG_FBCON_CFB24=y > CONFIG_FBCON_CFB32=y > CONFIG_FONT_8x8=y > CONFIG_FONT_8x16=y > CONFIG_SOUND=m > CONFIG_SOUND_ES1371=m > CONFIG_USB=y > CONFIG_USB_DEVICEFS=y > CONFIG_USB_UHCI_ALT=y > CONFIG_USB_MOUSE=y > CONFIG_MAGIC_SYSRQ=y > > -- > Cheers > John Summerfield > http://www2.ami.com.au/ for OS/2 & linux information. > Configuration, networking, combined IBM ftpsites index. > > Note: mail delivered to me is deemed to be intended for me, for my disposition. > > > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > - Patrizio Bruno DADA spa / Ed-IT Development Staff Borgo degli Albizi 37/r 50122 Firenze Italy tel +39 05520351 fax +39 0552478143 PGP PublicKey available at: http://www.keyserver.net/en/ - - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: Why isn't init PID 1?
Yes, in this situation "sash" is the process with pid '1', you should run this script through init and not viceversa, the first process launched takes pid 1. P. On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Paul Powell wrote: > Hello, > > I have a bootable linux CD that runs a custom init. > Under most versions of linux init runs as process ID > one. Under my bootable CD, it runs as process ID 15. > I need it to run as PID 1 so that I can execute a > kill(-1,15) without killing init. > > The boot CD uses and initrd image to load drivers. > The linuxrc file looks like: > > #!/bin/sash > > aliasall > > echo "Loading aic7xxx module" > insmod /lib/aic7xxx.o > echo "Loading ips module" > insmod /lib/ips.o ips=ioctlsize:512000 > echo "Loading sg module" > insmod /lib/sg.o > echo "Loading FAT modules" > insmod /lib/fat.o > insmod /lib/vfat.o > > echo "Mounting /proc" > mount -t proc /proc /proc > init > umount /proc > > Does it run as PID 15 because I execute insmod and > mount before running init? > > Thanks, > Paul > > __ > Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35 > a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > - Patrizio Bruno DADA spa / Ed-IT Development Staff Borgo degli Albizi 37/r 50122 Firenze Italy tel +39 05520351 fax +39 0552478143 PGP PublicKey available at: http://www.keyserver.net/en/ - - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: Disk is cheap?
I built a embedded dvd/cdda/mp3 player based on linux, using a p200mmx with 24mb with a bus of 75mhx, but it still takes about 20 seconds to boot, I think that an embedded device (for home use) should boot in less than 5 seconds, how could be possible with a slow p133? (I've also tried a p133 on 66mhz of bus and it takes almost 35 seconds to boot) However, first or last old hardware will finish, and who wants to build an embedded device should use high cost embedded hardware (high cost for me). P. On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Robert Kaiser wrote: > > > Everyone who says, disk is cheap, ought to donate me one. > > Everyone who says, memory is cheap, has to send me some. > > :-) > > Perhaps a more convincing argument may be that in embedded devices, > disk as well as memory and CPU power are _not_ cheap. > > The more resources Linux requires, the less are it's chances of being > accepted as a viable alternative in embedded systems. > > > I'm still stuck with a P-133, 56 MB RAM (60-70 ns, some EDO, > > some FPM) and not only Linux but also W2K on a 2.1 and a 0.8 GB > > HDD. > > That would be _a_ _lot_ for an embedded system! > > > Robert Kaiser email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > SYSGO RTS GmbH > Am Pfaffenstein 14phone: (49) 6136 9948-762 > D-55270 Klein-Winternheim / Germany fax: (49) 6136 9948-10 > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > - Patrizio Bruno DADA spa / Ed-IT Development Staff Borgo degli Albizi 37/r 50122 Firenze Italy tel +39 05520351 fax +39 0552478143 PGP PublicKey available at: http://www.keyserver.net/en/ - - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/