Re: Project management

2007-04-21 Thread Baruch Shpirer
You can look at NetOffice, seems like a good option
netoffice.sourceforge.net

take a look at the list in the wikipedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_project_management_software


On Fri, April 20, 2007 21:00, Andre Bar'yudin wrote:
> Hello guys,
>
>
> What software would you recommend for project management under Linux?
> Currently I need to keep track of time spent on each project.  It has to
> be web-based.
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> Andre.
>
>
> --
> Andre Bar'yudin
> http://www.SoftDynamic.com
>
>
>
> =
> To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
> the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command echo
> unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> !DSPAM:462902d350922043921182!
>
>
>


Best regards

Baruch Shpirer
http://www.shpirer.com

Paranoids are people too, they have their own problems. It's easy to
criticize, but if everybody hated you, you'd be paranoid too.


=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Project management

2007-04-21 Thread Yuval Hager
ביום שישי 20 אפריל 2007, 21:00, כתבת:
> Hello guys,
>
> What software would you recommend for project management under Linux?
> Currently I need to keep track of time spent on each project.  It has to
> be web-based.
>

Look in the archives for a thread titled "Just another project management 
question".

--y
-- 
yuval

To unsubscribe, 
send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]



File system for large directories?

2007-04-21 Thread Amos Shapira

Hi,

Our servers have to deal with huge amounts of small files (tens, sometimes
hundreds of thousands of files IN ONE DIRECTORY).

Currently they use ext3 but I wonder wether this is the prefered FS.

I used to be fond of ReiserFS v3 until I got beaten by it not recovering
from a partition resizing excercise.

Trying to find the answer on the net I found:

http://librenix.com/?inode=3296 (Circa 2003, recommends ReiserFS v4, which
isn't in the mainstream kernel yet).

and

http://www.debian-administration.org/articles/388 (Circa 2006, recommends
XFS).

The later compared handling of large trees (i.e. not necessarily single
directory with lots of files in it).

Does anyone have good and up to date recommendations for such situation?

The files are e-mail messages which are writen, transferred then deleted.

I'm also thinking about better ways to handle the files (e.g. putting every
few thousands of them in a .zip file to transfer, spreading them across a
two-level directory tree etc) but I'd rathertry to keep the changes to the
existing software and scripts the the minimum which is required to speed
things up.

Thanks,

--Amos


Groupware hosting

2007-04-21 Thread Gil Freund

Hi,

Is there a local ISP providing groupware (Zimbra, Scalix or
OpenXchange) hosting. This is for a small site (5-8) users.

Sub 20 users licensing is expensive, and free/GPL version is not
appropriate due to the outlook factor.

Thanks

Gil

--
Gil Freund, Systems Analyst
---
Sysnet consulting
[EMAIL PROTECTED],  http://www.sysnet.co.il
voice: +972-54-2035888, Fax: +972-8-9356026

=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: File system for large directories?

2007-04-21 Thread Marc A. Volovic
Quoth Amos Shapira:

> Hi,
> 
> Our servers have to deal with huge amounts of small files (tens,
> sometimes hundreds of thousands of files IN ONE DIRECTORY).
> 
> Currently they use ext3 but I wonder wether this is the prefered FS.

Ext3 is - last I chaecked (about two years ago) possibly the worst
filesystem for dealing with LOTS of files in a single directory. Reiser 3
was very good (did not try reiser 4).

However, I am very wary of reiser now - what with poor (or, maybe, not so
poor) Hans being in jail, reiserfs may be going the way of the dodo.

I'd run bonnie (just the creation/deletion tests) for JFS, XFS and Ext4
(which is starting to make an appearance here and there). IIRC - XFS is
ALSO not very good with lots of small files.

> I'm also thinking about better ways to handle the files (e.g. putting every
> few thousands of them in a .zip file to transfer, spreading them across a
> two-level directory tree etc) but I'd rathertry to keep the changes to the
> existing software and scripts the the minimum which is required to speed
> things up.

B-sort em? Switch the back-end to database (assuming the blobs are small)?

-- 
---MAV
Marc A. Volovic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Swiftouch, LTD +972-544-676764

=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Groupware hosting

2007-04-21 Thread Marc A. Volovic
Quoth Gil Freund:

> Sub 20 users licensing is expensive, and free/GPL version is not
> appropriate due to the outlook factor.

Scalix provides 25 outlook licenses in the community open edition...

-- 
---MAV
Marc A. Volovic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Swiftouch, LTD +972-544-676764

=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Groupware hosting

2007-04-21 Thread Gil Freund

On 4/21/07, Marc A. Volovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Quoth Gil Freund:

> Sub 20 users licensing is expensive, and free/GPL version is not
> appropriate due to the outlook factor.

Scalix provides 25 outlook licenses in the community open edition...


True, however:
1.  Scalix is a free (as in beer), there is still HP/Samsung code in it.
2.  Scalix has the least feature

This is probably the way I will go.



--
---MAV
Marc A. Volovic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Swiftouch, LTD +972-544-676764




--
Gil Freund, Systems Analyst
---
Sysnet consulting
[EMAIL PROTECTED],  http://www.sysnet.co.il
voice: +972-54-2035888, Fax: +972-8-9356026

=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: File system for large directories?

2007-04-21 Thread Gil Freund

On 4/21/07, Amos Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Hi,

Our servers have to deal with huge amounts of small files (tens, sometimes
hundreds of thousands of files IN ONE DIRECTORY).


Do you access them locally or remotely, if so, how?



Currently they use ext3 but I wonder wether this is the prefered FS.


I have found ReiserFS outperformed EXT3 on a similar site, this,
however was made irreverent, as access was via done mainly via NFS.



I used to be fond of ReiserFS v3 until I got beaten by it not recovering
from a partition resizing excercise.


Resizing a partition is not a good indicator. There are too many other
factors involved.



Trying to find the answer on the net I found:

http://librenix.com/?inode=3296 (Circa 2003, recommends ReiserFS v4, which
isn't in the mainstream kernel yet).

and

http://www.debian-administration.org/articles/388 (Circa
2006, recommends XFS).

The later compared handling of large trees (i.e. not necessarily single
directory with lots of files in it).

Does anyone have good and up to date recommendations for such situation?

The files are e-mail messages which are writen, transferred then deleted.

I'm also thinking about better ways to handle the files ( e.g. putting every
few thousands of them in a .zip file to transfer, spreading them across a
two-level directory tree etc) but I'd rathertry to keep the changes to the
existing software and scripts the the minimum which is required to speed
things up.


Benchmark your own environment. Hardware specs (RAID, RAM, CPU, etc)
can tilt the results. Repeat the benchmarks for about 3-5 time. I like
Bonnie++. Look for the results that best match your environment (Read,
Write, Create, etc).



Thanks,

--Amos




--
Gil Freund, Systems Analyst
---
Sysnet consulting
[EMAIL PROTECTED],  http://www.sysnet.co.il
voice: +972-54-2035888, Fax: +972-8-9356026

=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: wmv player for redhat 9

2007-04-21 Thread Geoffrey S. Mendelson
On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 06:07:05PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I am looking for wmv movie player.
> Are there any recommendations for such a player.

WMV is a type of file, not a type of compression. You need both a WMV
player and a CODEC (enCODerdECoder) for the types of compression.
One codec for audio and one for video).

MPLAYER and VLC (www.videolan.org) both play WMV files, if the have
the correct codec is at this time a guess.

Geoff.


-- 
Geoffrey S. Mendelson, Jerusalem, Israel [EMAIL PROTECTED]  N3OWJ/4X1GM
IL Voice: (07)-7424-1667  Fax ONLY: 972-2-648-1443 U.S. Voice: 1-215-821-1838 
Visit my 'blog at http://geoffstechno.livejournal.com/

=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]



vixie-cron acting weird (actually not acting at all)

2007-04-21 Thread shimi

Hi All,

Sorry for being so verbose, but I was not really sure which of all those 
details is important to understand the source of the problem :)

I've installed a new machine into production on Thursday (19 Apr 2007).
Machine is still running since then:
$ uptime
 21:10:43 up 2 days, 10:11,  2 users,  load average: 0.02, 0.04, 0.01

The machine is a Dual Core Xeon 3GHz. with HyperThreading enabled (so "grep 
processor /proc/cpuinfo | wc -l" says "4").

Machine is running Gentoo Linux, with kernel 2.6.19-gentoo-r5, x86_64.

Now for my problem. 

I installed the system with Vixie-Cron, and crond appears to be running. It 
appears in the processlist, and it sits in the Ss state on ps. So far - very 
normal.

According to the logs, until April 20th, 19:00, processes ran exactly when 
they were defined to run (I have a process that runs every 15 minutes).
From 19:00 until 23:16:55 (note the 1 minute and 55 seconds after the round 
hour quarter) - there is a complete silence in the logs. 

It then resumed running with the same delta from the quarter hour until 
00:02am on Apr 21. A bit later, I see that ntpd reports that ntp had no 
servers available to sync (at 2:31am). Doesn't seem related, but I am 
mentioning it anyways, as cron is, after all, time based. 

Occasionally from that time I see Gentoo's run-crons acting at some hours, 
like 2:50am, 03:07:17am (where is removes the lastrun of cron.daily and 
04:26:15am where it ran cron.weekly). At 03:14:25am I also see ntpd 
synchronized back against 192.43.244.18, stratum 1.

There  is another run-crons at 05:40am, and weirdly enough, cron kicks back to 
life at Apr 21, 07:45:41am, with my regular 15-minutes task, which it 
executes once. Since then, silence until 09:00am where only CERTAIN tasks are 
executed (and the every-15 minutes DOES NOT), and again silence until 
17:16:13 where the every-15 kicks in, then it works at 17:33 and 17:46, and 
since then, silence again.

I tried restarting cron at 20:51:27, the restart got logged. Didn't seem to 
have any effect. on 21:20:31 I see a run-crons, yet the every-15 does not 
work.

I tried stracing the crond process, and I got the following:
Process 6796 attached - interrupt to quit
stat("crontabs", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0750, st_size=120, ...}) = 0
stat("/etc/cron.d", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0755, st_size=96, ...}) = 0
stat("/etc/crontab", {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=1365, ...}) = 0
rt_sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK, [CHLD], [], 8) = 0
rt_sigaction(SIGCHLD, NULL, {0x40272b, [], SA_RESTORER|SA_RESTART, 
0x2b28e1e255c0}, 8) = 0
rt_sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, [], NULL, 8) = 0
nanosleep({9, 0},

Which I gather should have existed from sleeping pretty quickly, but did not. 
Only after some time I got this (first line is continuing of last snippet) :

{9, 0})   = 0
clone(child_stack=0, flags=CLONE_CHILD_CLEARTID|CLONE_CHILD_SETTID|SIGCHLD, 
child_tidptr=0x2b28e2125e10) = 6941
rt_sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK, [CHLD], [], 8) = 0
rt_sigaction(SIGCHLD, NULL, {0x40272b, [], SA_RESTORER|SA_RESTART, 
0x2b28e1e255c0}, 8) = 0
rt_sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, [], NULL, 8) = 0
nanosleep({10, 0}, 0x7fffc8ed59c0)  = ? ERESTART_RESTARTBLOCK (To be 
restarted)
--- SIGCHLD (Child exited) @ 0 (0) ---
rt_sigreturn(0x11)  = -1 EINTR (Interrupted system call)
wait4(-1, [{WIFEXITED(s) && WEXITSTATUS(s) == 0}], WNOHANG, NULL) = 6941
wait4(-1, 0x7fffc8ed59dc, WNOHANG, NULL) = -1 ECHILD (No child processes)
stat("crontabs", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0750, st_size=120, ...}) = 0
stat("/etc/cron.d", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0755, st_size=96, ...}) = 0
stat("/etc/crontab", {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=1365, ...}) = 0
rt_sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK, [CHLD], [], 8) = 0
rt_sigaction(SIGCHLD, NULL, {0x40272b, [], SA_RESTORER|SA_RESTART, 
0x2b28e1e255c0}, 8) = 0
rt_sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, [], NULL, 8) = 0
nanosleep({30, 0},   

I did the same strace on my cron at my computer at home, which appeared to be 
sleeping for a different period (namely, 60), but this doesn't look so 
important, as the sleep on my computer at home ends rather quickly and I see 
many scans of crontabs, /etc/cron.d and /etc/crontab, which is normal 
behavior, I guess.

So I am thinking there is something maybe wrong with nanosleep(). But what can 
it be? My guess is related to time drifting due to all those CPUs, but in 
that case, why did it work great in the begining?

I didn't try rebooting the machine, which might have solved the problem 
(either temporarly or not), but wanted to try and solve it (or at least 
understand the problem) before I might get it gone.

So, any hint from you guys will be greatly appreciated.

Thanks,

-- Shimi

To unsubscribe, 
send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: vixie-cron acting weird (actually not acting at all)

2007-04-21 Thread yaron
Hi,

I think that your problem is in the crontab time and day  configuration. 
Can you send the relevant crontab time and date configuration.

Yours,

Yaron Kahanovitch


- Original Message -
From: "shimi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "linux-il" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: 21:36:53 (GMT+0200) Asia/Jerusalem שבת 21 אפריל 2007
Subject: vixie-cron acting weird (actually not acting at all)


Hi All,

Sorry for being so verbose, but I was not really sure which of all those 
details is important to understand the source of the problem :)

I've installed a new machine into production on Thursday (19 Apr 2007).
Machine is still running since then:
$ uptime
 21:10:43 up 2 days, 10:11,  2 users,  load average: 0.02, 0.04, 0.01

The machine is a Dual Core Xeon 3GHz. with HyperThreading enabled (so "grep 
processor /proc/cpuinfo | wc -l" says "4").

Machine is running Gentoo Linux, with kernel 2.6.19-gentoo-r5, x86_64.

Now for my problem. 

I installed the system with Vixie-Cron, and crond appears to be running. It 
appears in the processlist, and it sits in the Ss state on ps. So far - very 
normal.

According to the logs, until April 20th, 19:00, processes ran exactly when 
they were defined to run (I have a process that runs every 15 minutes).
>From 19:00 until 23:16:55 (note the 1 minute and 55 seconds after the round 
hour quarter) - there is a complete silence in the logs. 

It then resumed running with the same delta from the quarter hour until 
00:02am on Apr 21. A bit later, I see that ntpd reports that ntp had no 
servers available to sync (at 2:31am). Doesn't seem related, but I am 
mentioning it anyways, as cron is, after all, time based. 

Occasionally from that time I see Gentoo's run-crons acting at some hours, 
like 2:50am, 03:07:17am (where is removes the lastrun of cron.daily and 
04:26:15am where it ran cron.weekly). At 03:14:25am I also see ntpd 
synchronized back against 192.43.244.18, stratum 1.

There  is another run-crons at 05:40am, and weirdly enough, cron kicks back to 
life at Apr 21, 07:45:41am, with my regular 15-minutes task, which it 
executes once. Since then, silence until 09:00am where only CERTAIN tasks are 
executed (and the every-15 minutes DOES NOT), and again silence until 
17:16:13 where the every-15 kicks in, then it works at 17:33 and 17:46, and 
since then, silence again.

I tried restarting cron at 20:51:27, the restart got logged. Didn't seem to 
have any effect. on 21:20:31 I see a run-crons, yet the every-15 does not 
work.

I tried stracing the crond process, and I got the following:
Process 6796 attached - interrupt to quit
stat("crontabs", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0750, st_size=120, ...}) = 0
stat("/etc/cron.d", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0755, st_size=96, ...}) = 0
stat("/etc/crontab", {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=1365, ...}) = 0
rt_sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK, [CHLD], [], 8) = 0
rt_sigaction(SIGCHLD, NULL, {0x40272b, [], SA_RESTORER|SA_RESTART, 
0x2b28e1e255c0}, 8) = 0
rt_sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, [], NULL, 8) = 0
nanosleep({9, 0},

Which I gather should have existed from sleeping pretty quickly, but did not. 
Only after some time I got this (first line is continuing of last snippet) :

{9, 0})   = 0
clone(child_stack=0, flags=CLONE_CHILD_CLEARTID|CLONE_CHILD_SETTID|SIGCHLD, 
child_tidptr=0x2b28e2125e10) = 6941
rt_sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK, [CHLD], [], 8) = 0
rt_sigaction(SIGCHLD, NULL, {0x40272b, [], SA_RESTORER|SA_RESTART, 
0x2b28e1e255c0}, 8) = 0
rt_sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, [], NULL, 8) = 0
nanosleep({10, 0}, 0x7fffc8ed59c0)  = ? ERESTART_RESTARTBLOCK (To be 
restarted)
--- SIGCHLD (Child exited) @ 0 (0) ---
rt_sigreturn(0x11)  = -1 EINTR (Interrupted system call)
wait4(-1, [{WIFEXITED(s) && WEXITSTATUS(s) == 0}], WNOHANG, NULL) = 6941
wait4(-1, 0x7fffc8ed59dc, WNOHANG, NULL) = -1 ECHILD (No child processes)
stat("crontabs", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0750, st_size=120, ...}) = 0
stat("/etc/cron.d", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0755, st_size=96, ...}) = 0
stat("/etc/crontab", {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=1365, ...}) = 0
rt_sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK, [CHLD], [], 8) = 0
rt_sigaction(SIGCHLD, NULL, {0x40272b, [], SA_RESTORER|SA_RESTART, 
0x2b28e1e255c0}, 8) = 0
rt_sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, [], NULL, 8) = 0
nanosleep({30, 0},   

I did the same strace on my cron at my computer at home, which appeared to be 
sleeping for a different period (namely, 60), but this doesn't look so 
important, as the sleep on my computer at home ends rather quickly and I see 
many scans of crontabs, /etc/cron.d and /etc/crontab, which is normal 
behavior, I guess.

So I am thinking there is something maybe wrong with nanosleep(). But what can 
it be? My guess is related to time drifting due to all those CPUs, but in 
that case, why did it work great in the begining?

I didn't try rebooting the machine, which might have solved the problem 
(either temporarly or not), but wanted to try and solve it (or at least 
understand the problem) before I might get it gone.

So, any hint from you guys will 

Re: vixie-cron acting weird (actually not acting at all)

2007-04-21 Thread shimi

On Saturday 21 April 2007 22:08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think that your problem is in the crontab time and day  configuration.
> Can you send the relevant crontab time and date configuration.
>
> Yours,
>
> Yaron Kahanovitch


Hi Yaron,

Did you mean the scheduled jobs? 

I have this on my personal cron:
$ crontab -l 
# DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE - edit the master and reinstall.
# (/tmp/crontab.fhqcE6 installed on Fri Apr 20 16:43:58 2007)
# (Cron version V5.0 -- $Id: crontab.c,v 1.12 2004/01/23 18:56:42 vixie Exp $)
*/30 * * * *  >/dev/null 2>&1
1 0 1 * * php  >/dev/null 2>&1

I actually did not mention the above in the original post, but it was supposed 
to run as well. Actually, I found out about the problem when the first 
command of the two did not run (and some web page that I expected to update 
as a result, did not update since 17:33:17 today, again note the non-round 
time)

And there's the system global /etc/crontab (where the 15-minutes command I was 
talking about ran from) :

*/15 * * * *root
*/15 * * * *root
*/15 * * * *root
*/15 * * * *root

(none of them run when the problem exists...)

And Gentoo's run-crons is also running from /etc/crontab :

*/10  *  * * *  roottest -x /usr/sbin/run-crons && /usr/sbin/run-crons

Thanks again,

-- Shimi

=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: wmv player for redhat 9

2007-04-21 Thread Hetz Ben Hamo

Hi,


WMV is a type of file, not a type of compression. You need both a WMV
player and a CODEC (enCODerdECoder) for the types of compression.
One codec for audio and one for video).


Actually, like AVI, it's a container which supports different codecs.
You can (theoritaclly speaking) wrap a Quicktime Movie inside a WMV
file :)


MPLAYER and VLC (www.videolan.org) both play WMV files, if the have
the correct codec is at this time a guess.


Depends which build/version you use. the SVN version of FFMPEG (the
backend that both VLC and MPlayer uses) has a full native
WMV7/8/9/VC-1 (microsoft's "HD") decoding support, so I guess that the
latest mplayer/vlc (from their CVS/SVN trunk) do not require those
DLL's to play the files. It might be needed for the latest release of
MPlayer though.

Thanks,
Hetz
--
Skepticism is the lazy person's default position.
Visit my blog (hebrew) for things that (sometimes) matter:
http://wp.dad-answers.com

=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]



System Clock is crazy? [was: Re: vixie-cron acting weird (actually not acting at all)]

2007-04-21 Thread shimi

Replying to myself because I found the CAUSE, but not the REASON.

toast ~ # date
Sun Apr 22 01:25:13 IDT 2007
toast ~ # date
Sun Apr 22 00:52:25 IDT 2007
toast ~ # date
Sun Apr 22 01:25:14 IDT 2007
toast ~ # date
Sun Apr 22 00:52:26 IDT 2007
toast ~ # date
Sun Apr 22 01:25:15 IDT 2007
toast ~ # date
Sun Apr 22 00:52:27 IDT 2007
toast ~ # date
Sun Apr 22 01:25:17 IDT 2007
toast ~ # date
Sun Apr 22 00:52:29 IDT 2007
toast ~ # date
Sun Apr 22 01:25:18 IDT 2007
toast ~ # date
Sun Apr 22 00:52:32 IDT 2007
toast ~ # date
Sun Apr 22 01:25:21 IDT 2007

Appears time is alternating 32 minutes back and forth all the time (perhaps 
every second or so?). The kernel internal timekeeping seems to work. If I 
issue a "sleep 5" at the shell, it returns after 5 seconds. However if I TIME 
that command I am receiving very weird results, like:

# time sleep 5

real-.m+*.253s
user0m0.000s
sys 0m0.000s

# time sleep 5

real33m7.761s
user0m0.000s
sys 0m0.000s

Obviously 'time' is looking at the same alternating value that 'date' is. Same 
goes for 'ps' - I look at the process start time, and every time I invoke 
'ps', all the values go 32 minutes back and forth in time.

I stopped ntpd and it is still happening so this is not the cause.

Still looking for ideas :)

Thanks,

-- Shimi

=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: File system for large directories?

2007-04-21 Thread Amos Shapira

On 22/04/07, Marc A. Volovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Quoth Amos Shapira:

> Hi,
>
> Our servers have to deal with huge amounts of small files (tens,
> sometimes hundreds of thousands of files IN ONE DIRECTORY).
>
> Currently they use ext3 but I wonder wether this is the prefered FS.

Ext3 is - last I chaecked (about two years ago) possibly the worst
filesystem for dealing with LOTS of files in a single directory. Reiser 3
was very good (did not try reiser 4).

However, I am very wary of reiser now - what with poor (or, maybe, not so
poor) Hans being in jail, reiserfs may be going the way of the dodo.



If Reiser3 is already in mainline and stable - wouldn't it be supported even
if Hans/Nemesis vanishes?
Reiser4 is not relevant because I want to stick to mainline kernels, much
preferably Debian supplied kernels.

I'd run bonnie (just the creation/deletion tests) for JFS, XFS and Ext4

(which is starting to make an appearance here and there). IIRC - XFS is
ALSO not very good with lots of small files.



Will try to do that, though again - if ext4 isn't in the mainline yet then
it's not relevant for me.


I'm also thinking about better ways to handle the files (e.g. putting
every
> few thousands of them in a .zip file to transfer, spreading them across
a
> two-level directory tree etc) but I'd rathertry to keep the changes to
the
> existing software and scripts the the minimum which is required to speed
> things up.

B-sort em? Switch the back-end to database (assuming the blobs are small)?



I'm thinking of databases sometimes (the files are around 4k on average) but
it feels like Hans Reiser was sort of right about that - a filesystem can be
used as a database for this sort of data.


Cheers,

--Amos


Re: File system for large directories?

2007-04-21 Thread Amos Shapira

On 22/04/07, Gil Freund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


On 4/21/07, Amos Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Our servers have to deal with huge amounts of small files (tens,
sometimes
> hundreds of thousands of files IN ONE DIRECTORY).

Do you access them locally or remotely, if so, how?



They are writen locally, then transferred over FTP to Windows machines.


I used to be fond of ReiserFS v3 until I got beaten by it not recovering
> from a partition resizing excercise.

Resizing a partition is not a good indicator. There are too many other
factors involved.



I just became worry of the admin tools available for ReiserFS. It's
wonderfull when everything is dandy (and survived many power failures at my
previous home) but then when I needed to do something else, which I hear is
trivial with ext3 for instance, it failed measerebly.

Benchmark your own environment. Hardware specs (RAID, RAM, CPU, etc)

can tilt the results. Repeat the benchmarks for about 3-5 time. I like
Bonnie++. Look for the results that best match your environment (Read,
Write, Create, etc).



It looks like Bonnie++ is what everyone and his dog are doing. I'll try to
see how can I do that (hardly any headroom in terms of spare hardware to
shift things around).

Cheers,

--Amos


Re: Groupware hosting

2007-04-21 Thread Amos Shapira

On 22/04/07, Gil Freund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


True, however:
1.  Scalix is a free (as in beer), there is still HP/Samsung code in it.
2.  Scalix has the least feature



*least* features?  I haven't got around to test it myself but their web site
left me with the impression it aims (and achieves) for the goal of providing
all the features of Outlook/Exchange (yes, implied joke here about virus
infections :), and it's 100% transparent to Outlook users.

What sort of features does it lack?

--Amos


Re: Groupware hosting

2007-04-21 Thread Gil Freund

On 4/22/07, Amos Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

On 22/04/07, Gil Freund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> True, however:
> 1.  Scalix is a free (as in beer), there is still HP/Samsung code in it.
> 2.  Scalix has the least feature

*least* features?  I haven't got around to test it myself but their web site
left me with the impression it aims (and achieves) for the goal of providing
all the features of Outlook/Exchange (yes, implied joke here about virus
infections :), and it's 100% transparent to Outlook users.

What sort of features does it lack?


Scalix has mail, contact and group scheduling (and Outlook like Ajax client).

OX and Egroupware go beyond that: Project management, DMS, Wiki,
discussion groups, linking, etc.

Zimbra has Zimlets, which can offer similar functions.



--Amos





--
Gil Freund, Systems Analyst
---
Sysnet consulting
[EMAIL PROTECTED],  http://www.sysnet.co.il
voice: +972-54-2035888, Fax: +972-8-9356026

=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Groupware hosting

2007-04-21 Thread Amos Shapira

On 22/04/07, Gil Freund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


On 4/22/07, Amos Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 22/04/07, Gil Freund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > True, however:
> > 1.  Scalix is a free (as in beer), there is still HP/Samsung code in
it.
> > 2.  Scalix has the least feature
>
> *least* features?  I haven't got around to test it myself but their web
site
> left me with the impression it aims (and achieves) for the goal of
providing
> all the features of Outlook/Exchange (yes, implied joke here about virus
> infections :), and it's 100% transparent to Outlook users.
>
> What sort of features does it lack?

Scalix has mail, contact and group scheduling (and Outlook like Ajax
client).

OX and Egroupware go beyond that: Project management, DMS, Wiki,
discussion groups, linking, etc.

Zimbra has Zimlets, which can offer similar functions.



OK, so just to clarify this - sounds to me like Scalix provides the same
functionality as Exchange, isn't it?

I understand how the other features could be useful for group cooperation,
but my main focus is finding a replacement for Exchange that Outlook users
can live with (with hope that one day I'll be able to get rid of it in my
office).

PS - what's "linking"?

Thanks.

--Amos


Re: System Clock is crazy? [was: Re: vixie-cron acting weird (actually not acting at all)]

2007-04-21 Thread Valery Reznic

--- shimi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> 
> Replying to myself because I found the CAUSE, but
> not the REASON.
> 
> toast ~ # date
> Sun Apr 22 01:25:13 IDT 2007
> toast ~ # date
> Sun Apr 22 00:52:25 IDT 2007
> toast ~ # date
> Sun Apr 22 01:25:14 IDT 2007
> toast ~ # date
> Sun Apr 22 00:52:26 IDT 2007
> toast ~ # date
> Sun Apr 22 01:25:15 IDT 2007
> toast ~ # date
> Sun Apr 22 00:52:27 IDT 2007
> toast ~ # date
> Sun Apr 22 01:25:17 IDT 2007
> toast ~ # date
> Sun Apr 22 00:52:29 IDT 2007
> toast ~ # date
> Sun Apr 22 01:25:18 IDT 2007
> toast ~ # date
> Sun Apr 22 00:52:32 IDT 2007
> toast ~ # date
> Sun Apr 22 01:25:21 IDT 2007
> 
> Appears time is alternating 32 minutes back and
> forth all the time (perhaps 
> every second or so?). The kernel internal
> timekeeping seems to work. If I 
> issue a "sleep 5" at the shell, it returns after 5
> seconds. However if I TIME 
> that command I am receiving very weird results,
> like:
> 
> # time sleep 5
> 
> real-.m+*.253s
> user0m0.000s
> sys 0m0.000s
> 
> # time sleep 5
> 
> real33m7.761s
> user0m0.000s
> sys 0m0.000s
> 
> Obviously 'time' is looking at the same alternating
> value that 'date' is. Same 
> goes for 'ps' - I look at the process start time,
> and every time I invoke 
> 'ps', all the values go 32 minutes back and forth in
> time.
> 
> I stopped ntpd and it is still happening so this is
> not the cause.
May be you have ntpdate running ?
ntpd by itself don't change time, but ntpdate did.

You can disconnect your box from the network and check
again how tine behave.

Valery,



> 
> Still looking for ideas :)
> 
> Thanks,
> 
>   -- Shimi
> 
>
=
> To unsubscribe, send mail to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
> the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g.,
> run the command
> echo unsubscribe | mail
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]