FireFox font size.
Hi there,
Sorry for bringing it up here. I tried on many resources and discussion groups. Here I
feel I use the ultimate but also last resort.
My screen is high resolution but too small - laptop. I added: DisplaySize 286 215 to
/etc/X11/xorg.conf Display section and KDE seems to understand the fonts size just fine
(konqueror). but FireFox doesn't comply and everything is just too small.
I want to make firefox "do" menu->View->Text Size->Increas to all pages I go
into.
I tried to do in chrome/userContent.css:
body {
font-size: 120% !important;
}
but that didn't change parts of the pages that had style assigned to them.
Any idea?
--
Regards.
David Harel,
==
Home office +972 77 4422234
Fax:+972 77 4422234
Cellular: +972 54 4534502
Snail Mail: Amuka
D.N Merom Hagalil
13802
Israel
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: New DMCA in Israel?
ציטוט Dan Armak: On Thursday 17 August 2006 12:45, Shlomi Fish wrote: I also sent a message through the Meretz contact form (which worked fine in Firefox) and I suggest everyone to do the same. What kind of messages do you think would be most effective? Ones based on technological arguments, or on logical & moral ones, on common sense, on experience in other countries that have this kind of law, ... For a moral argument, I'd suggest doing a little research and compiling a list about up-start artists who use file-sharing as a promotional means "for the poor" - i.e. P2P's value both as an economical tool (for free market believers such as me) and as an 'equalizer' for more left-leaning people (as Meretz claim to be though I really don't know). I don't think any law that is moral and just should be rejected on technicalities (technological arguments) so the Right Thing(TM) is to show the law is unjust. I'd gladly write everything, but they might not read a long message. And the tiny textarea on the submission page doesn't inspire confidence that a long message would be read. Maybe there's a better way to contact them, such as email? Once you have a couple of contacts of legitimate-content distributors, you can work something out of my first paragraph - in fact, if you'll do the research, I can write something short and convincing myself; I think I'm pretty good at that. = To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: basic iSCSI configuration refuses to work :-(
> so, is there a config error here, or should I dump the whole iSCSI > concept? is there a way to install a red-hat cluster of three CENTOS3 > machines with no common storage? I just need IP addresses and processes > moving around between the nodes, the application vendor ONLY supports > Red Hat 3 and its clustering, but won't supply instructions or > recommended procedures. aggh! As far as I remember, RHEL3 Cluster Manager cannot work without shared storage and doesn't support iSCSI device as a shared storage (at least, RH doesn't promise that this configuration will work stable) Rgds, Vitaly = To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: basic iSCSI configuration refuses to work :-(
Quoting Vitaly Karasik, from the post of Sun, 20 Aug: > > so, is there a config error here, or should I dump the whole iSCSI > > concept? is there a way to install a red-hat cluster of three > > CENTOS3 machines with no common storage? I just need IP addresses > > and processes moving around between the nodes, the application > > vendor ONLY supports Red Hat 3 and its clustering, but won't supply > > instructions or recommended procedures. aggh! > > As far as I remember, RHEL3 Cluster Manager cannot work without shared > storage and doesn't support iSCSI device as a shared storage (at > least, RH doesn't promise that this configuration will work stable) it works just fine. RHEL Cluster with two common raw devices for the quorum, I didn't bother setting up GFS at the end, since it was not important. I was very disappointed from the RH cluster manager though. all it does it move a list of services without dependency on eachother. it's quite a lot but it's missing some needed features, like defining a logical link or block - service A and B must migrate to new nodes together, but not to one that already runs service C for instance. nope, I can only define to which nodes each service migrates and that's it. For instance, y client wanted a very simple case where three machines run two services. if any of the three machines fails, the other two take over the two services that need to run, but I can't have both services migrating to the same node, and now I cannot prevent this using this tool, I'll have to make funny improvizations in the startup files to get it to "fail" for the cluster manager and force it to migrate it further to another node if this one is busy. this is an ugly kludge, and the only "right" solutiong, per RHEL, is to have 4 rather than 3 machines, each pair takes care of one service and that it. rediculous :-( -- Pop Psychologist Ira Abramov http://ira.abramov.org/email/ = To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Annotative attachments - Desirable feature for E-mail client applications
On Sat, 2006-08-19 at 22:23 +0300, Omer Zak wrote: > On Sat, 2006-08-19 at 12:04 +0300, Diego Iastrubni wrote: <> בשבת, 19 באוגוסט 2006, 09:32, נכתב על ידי Omer Zak: > > > Today I received an E-mail message, which I wanted to save and add a > > > note for myself about it (annotation). > > > I found that I know of no E-mail application, which can do this. With Mozilla Thunderbird you can do Message->Edit as new, and then add more attachments or type more stuff. when you then save the message as draft it will be saved with your modifications to the draft folder. Alternatively you can do then Tools->send copy to->[any email folder] but you have to also send it or save as draft for the copy to be stored. You can also remove attachments from messages you received, and I think I remember reading somewhere that you can also add attachments to existing messages, but I failed to figure out how to do it. > > http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=132626 > Nice work, turning my idea into a feature request. > > Someone already added to the above a note about his having found 2 other > feature requests related to the above, but aiming at the general goal of > abusing E-mail clients as general-purpose hierarchical information > management software. Regarding the second feature request mentioned on issue 132626, GNOME Evolution, while also having "Edit as new" (though its always disabled - I can't figure out when it is enabled) have also an option to "post new message to folder", allowing you to quickly add notes to an email folder in the form of "internal messages". > This reminds me of the abusive interchangeability of spreadsheet and > database management software having the likes MS-Excel and MS-Access. Indeed, though these feature are mostly local to the offending user, so I don't think they can adversely affect other users who don't like this abuse, unlike with MS-Excel which allows people to send me databases, UI designs, use cases, to do lists, protocol specifications and what not in the form of unparsable XLS files :-( -- Oded ::.. Amnesia used to be my favorite word, but then I forgot it. = To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: basic iSCSI configuration refuses to work :-(
RH Cluster is a bad joke. I have used various HA solutions, including VCS, SunCluster, HACMP, and even MSCS, and without a doubt, RH Cluster sux. It lacks features, and its main defense mechanism against split-brain is "Shoot the Other in the Head" via its UPS, it's Fibre link, or the likes (they call if "Fence"). Instead of better logic (how to detect split-brain? How to prevent it?), they use brute-force in a way I didn't like. In my simple tests (used HTTPD as a resource) the cluster was unable to recover from a simple "pkill httpd" on the active node, and completely flunked my tests. I would recommend you check Linux-HA. It is looking OK, seems adjustable to your needs, and would probably work better. It is a bit more complicated to setup (although it's not too complicated), but it can be controlled via simple scripts, which can probably do what you wanted it to do. Ez. Ira Abramov wrote: Quoting Vitaly Karasik, from the post of Sun, 20 Aug: so, is there a config error here, or should I dump the whole iSCSI concept? is there a way to install a red-hat cluster of three CENTOS3 machines with no common storage? I just need IP addresses and processes moving around between the nodes, the application vendor ONLY supports Red Hat 3 and its clustering, but won't supply instructions or recommended procedures. aggh! As far as I remember, RHEL3 Cluster Manager cannot work without shared storage and doesn't support iSCSI device as a shared storage (at least, RH doesn't promise that this configuration will work stable) it works just fine. RHEL Cluster with two common raw devices for the quorum, I didn't bother setting up GFS at the end, since it was not important. I was very disappointed from the RH cluster manager though. all it does it move a list of services without dependency on eachother. it's quite a lot but it's missing some needed features, like defining a logical link or block - service A and B must migrate to new nodes together, but not to one that already runs service C for instance. nope, I can only define to which nodes each service migrates and that's it. For instance, y client wanted a very simple case where three machines run two services. if any of the three machines fails, the other two take over the two services that need to run, but I can't have both services migrating to the same node, and now I cannot prevent this using this tool, I'll have to make funny improvizations in the startup files to get it to "fail" for the cluster manager and force it to migrate it further to another node if this one is busy. this is an ugly kludge, and the only "right" solutiong, per RHEL, is to have 4 rather than 3 machines, each pair takes care of one service and that it. rediculous :-(
Re: basic iSCSI configuration refuses to work :-(
Quoting Ez-Aton, from the post of Mon, 21 Aug: > RH Cluster is a bad joke. agreed > I would recommend you check Linux-HA. It is looking OK, seems adjustable > to your needs, and would probably work better. It is a bit more also agreed. > complicated to setup (although it's not too complicated), but it can be > controlled via simple scripts, which can probably do what you wanted it > to do. while all that is true, and there's nothing I'd like better than to put in a different, better mechanism, it's the customer's demand that I do it that way. why? because they are a windows shop, they know zilch about Linux and are adamant about NOT having to learn it, and they have this specific product to set up that is built on top of a third party vendor's system which IS linux based, and that product comes with specific demands for a RH cluster, for absolutely no good reason. I can sit and recommend all day. the customer will disagree and I'll be off the project... (in fact, I probably am as we speek, they seem to be blaming me for bugs in that third party vendor's annoying undocumented system) -- An intelligence failure Ira Abramov http://ira.abramov.org/email/ = To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
