Re: [PATCH v2] scsi: storvsc: Do not flag MAINTENANCE_IN return of SRB_STATUS_DATA_OVERRUN as an error

2024-12-04 Thread Ewan Milne
On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 1:13 PM Cathy Avery  wrote:
>
> This patch partially reverts
>
> commit 812fe6420a6e789db68f18cdb25c5c89f4561334
> Author: Michael Kelley 
> Date:   Fri Aug 25 10:21:24 2023 -0700
>
> scsi: storvsc: Handle additional SRB status values
>
> HyperV does not support MAINTENANCE_IN resulting in FC passthrough
> returning the SRB_STATUS_DATA_OVERRUN value. Now that SRB_STATUS_DATA_OVERRUN
> is treated as an error multipath ALUA paths go into a faulty state as 
> multipath
> ALUA submits RTPG commands via MAINTENANCE_IN.
>
> [3.215560] hv_storvsc 1d69d403-9692-4460-89f9-a8cbcc0f94f3:
> tag#230 cmd 0xa3 status: scsi 0x0 srb 0x12 hv 0xc001
> [3.215572] scsi 1:0:0:32: alua: rtpg failed, result 458752
>
> MAINTENANCE_IN now returns success to avoid the error path as
> is currently done with INQUIRY and MODE_SENSE.
>
> Suggested-by: Michael Kelley 
> Signed-off-by: Cathy Avery 
> ---
> Changes since v1:
> - Handle error and logging by returning success as previously
>   done with INQUIRY and MODE_SENSE [Michael Kelley].
> ---
>  drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c | 7 ++-
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c b/drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c
> index 7ceb982040a5..d0b55c1fa908 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c
> @@ -149,6 +149,8 @@ struct hv_fc_wwn_packet {
>  */
>  static int vmstor_proto_version;
>
> +static bool hv_dev_is_fc(struct hv_device *hv_dev);
> +
>  #define STORVSC_LOGGING_NONE   0
>  #define STORVSC_LOGGING_ERROR  1
>  #define STORVSC_LOGGING_WARN   2
> @@ -1138,6 +1140,7 @@ static void storvsc_on_io_completion(struct 
> storvsc_device *stor_device,
>  * not correctly handle:
>  * INQUIRY command with page code parameter set to 0x80
>  * MODE_SENSE command with cmd[2] == 0x1c
> +* MAINTENANCE_IN is not supported by HyperV FC passthrough
>  *
>  * Setup srb and scsi status so this won't be fatal.
>  * We do this so we can distinguish truly fatal failues
> @@ -1145,7 +1148,9 @@ static void storvsc_on_io_completion(struct 
> storvsc_device *stor_device,
>  */
>
> if ((stor_pkt->vm_srb.cdb[0] == INQUIRY) ||
> -  (stor_pkt->vm_srb.cdb[0] == MODE_SENSE)) {
> +  (stor_pkt->vm_srb.cdb[0] == MODE_SENSE) ||
> +  (stor_pkt->vm_srb.cdb[0] == MAINTENANCE_IN &&
> +  hv_dev_is_fc(device))) {
> vstor_packet->vm_srb.scsi_status = 0;
> vstor_packet->vm_srb.srb_status = SRB_STATUS_SUCCESS;
> }
> --
> 2.42.0
>

Reviewed-by: Ewan D. Milne 




RE: [PATCH net] net :mana :Request a V2 response version for MANA_QUERY_GF_STAT

2024-12-04 Thread Haiyang Zhang



> -Original Message-
> From: Shradha Gupta 
> Sent: Wednesday, December 4, 2024 12:48 AM
> To: linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org; net...@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> ker...@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Shradha Gupta ; KY Srinivasan
> ; Haiyang Zhang ; Wei Liu
> ; Dexuan Cui ; Andrew Lunn
> ; David S. Miller ; Eric
> Dumazet ; Jakub Kicinski ; Paolo
> Abeni ; Long Li ; Konstantin
> Taranov ; Souradeep Chakrabarti
> ; Erick Archer
> ; Shradha Gupta ;
> sta...@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: [PATCH net] net :mana :Request a V2 response version for
> MANA_QUERY_GF_STAT
> 
> The current requested response version(V1) for MANA_QUERY_GF_STAT query
> results in STATISTICS_FLAGS_TX_ERRORS_GDMA_ERROR value being set to
> 0 always.
> In order to get the correct value for this counter we request the response
> version to be V2.
> 
> Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org
> Fixes: e1df5202e879 ("net :mana :Add remaining GDMA stats for MANA to
> ethtool")
> Signed-off-by: Shradha Gupta 

Reviewed-by: Haiyang Zhang 
Thanks.



Re: [PATCH v2] scsi: storvsc: Do not flag MAINTENANCE_IN return of SRB_STATUS_DATA_OVERRUN as an error

2024-12-04 Thread Martin K. Petersen
On Wed, 27 Nov 2024 13:13:24 -0500, Cathy Avery wrote:

> This patch partially reverts
> 
>   commit 812fe6420a6e789db68f18cdb25c5c89f4561334
>   Author: Michael Kelley 
>   Date:   Fri Aug 25 10:21:24 2023 -0700
> 
>   scsi: storvsc: Handle additional SRB status values
> 
> [...]

Applied to 6.13/scsi-fixes, thanks!

[1/1] scsi: storvsc: Do not flag MAINTENANCE_IN return of 
SRB_STATUS_DATA_OVERRUN as an error
  https://git.kernel.org/mkp/scsi/c/b1aee7f03461

-- 
Martin K. Petersen  Oracle Linux Engineering