Re: FAI 3.3.3 + Ubuntu Lucid

2010-03-19 Diskussionsfäden Stephan Hermann
Hi Waldemar,


On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 08:40:19 +0100
Waldemar Brodkorb  wrote:

> Hi Stephan,
> Stephan Hermann wrote,
> 
> > Hi Guys,
> > 
> > I'm porting the last changes from Waldemar and others to a new FAI
> > Package for Ubuntu Lucid (which will be 10.04 LTS).
> > 
> > Looks like, that the server stuff (pxe dhcp etc.) is all
> > working...so no worries here.
> > 
> > Now, Using an Ubuntu Lucid Kernel, (generic flavour) the boot up
> > process stops at something around the lines:
> > 
> > Console: switching to colour framebuffer device 80x30
> > 
> > I tried to disable it via modeset but failed here..
> 
> May be some of the upstream stuff get reverted by my old stuff?
> Can you try 3.3.4 without any changes to FAI itself (may be just
> NFSROOT needs some touching for the correct package names.)

I'll give it a shot :) 

>  
> > Does anyone has an idea, what could that be and how someone can
> > workaround it?
> > 
> > Waldemar, did you have any success using a lucid boot kernel for
> > your install client?
> 
> Yes, sure. We are using always lucid kernels.

So, even as tftp boot kernel ?

Regards,

\sh
-- 
| Stephan '\sh' Hermann| OSS Dev / SysAdmin |
| JID: s...@linux-server.org | http://www.sourcecode.de/  | 
| GPG ID: 0xC098EFA8   | http://leonov.tv/  |
| FP: 3D8B 5138 0852 DA7A B83F DCCB C189 E733 C098 EFA8 |


Re: FAI 3.3.3 + Ubuntu Lucid

2010-03-19 Diskussionsfäden Waldemar Brodkorb
Hi Stephan,
Stephan Hermann wrote,

> Hi Waldemar,
> 
> 
> On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 08:40:19 +0100
> Waldemar Brodkorb  wrote:
> 
> > Hi Stephan,
> > Stephan Hermann wrote,
> > 
> > > Hi Guys,
> > > 
> > > I'm porting the last changes from Waldemar and others to a new FAI
> > > Package for Ubuntu Lucid (which will be 10.04 LTS).
> > > 
> > > Looks like, that the server stuff (pxe dhcp etc.) is all
> > > working...so no worries here.
> > > 
> > > Now, Using an Ubuntu Lucid Kernel, (generic flavour) the boot up
> > > process stops at something around the lines:
> > > 
> > > Console: switching to colour framebuffer device 80x30
> > > 
> > > I tried to disable it via modeset but failed here..
> > 
> > May be some of the upstream stuff get reverted by my old stuff?
> > Can you try 3.3.4 without any changes to FAI itself (may be just
> > NFSROOT needs some touching for the correct package names.)
> 
> I'll give it a shot :) 
> 
> >  
> > > Does anyone has an idea, what could that be and how someone can
> > > workaround it?
> > > 
> > > Waldemar, did you have any success using a lucid boot kernel for
> > > your install client?
> > 
> > Yes, sure. We are using always lucid kernels.
> 
> So, even as tftp boot kernel ?

Yes, sure. All necessary stuff to boot a lucid kernel and initrd is
in upstream integrated, as far as your NFSROOT takes care of any
package name differences between Debian and Ubuntu.

Have fun,
Waldemar


Re: resizing an lvm volume with setup-storage

2010-03-19 Diskussionsfäden Nicolas Courtel

Michael Tautschnig a écrit :

Hello,

I'm trying to resize the /usr volume while installing a host in
squeeze with 3.3.4~beta2+experimental1, and setup-storage strangely
removes the volume before trying to resize it:

Starting setup-storage 1.2.1+exp
[...]
vg0/usr will be resized
[...]
Executing: lvremove -f vg0/usr
[...]
Executing: lvresize -L 8192 vg0/usr
Command lvresize -L 8192 vg0/usr had exit code 5
[...]

Following is the config file; as it's the first time I use this
option it might be wrong somewhere.




[...]

You might in fact be the first one ever to use this feature :-) Seriously, it's
pretty likely this is somehow broken. Would you mind pasting the full output
with debug enabled? I've just checked the code and there *is* a check for resize
at the respective part, but maybe I'm missing something or whatever.

  
Woaw, the first one, I feel somehow like Neil Armstrong :-) . The paste 
is below, in this case I have preserved 2 other volumes, but the result 
is the same if I don't.


http://paste.debian.net/64852/

--
Nicolas



Re: resizing an lvm volume with setup-storage

2010-03-19 Diskussionsfäden Michael Tautschnig
[...]

> Woaw, the first one, I feel somehow like Neil Armstrong :-) . The
> paste is below, in this case I have preserved 2 other volumes, but
> the result is the same if I don't.
> 

I think you haven't landed yet :-) There are still some obstacles out there in
space. But let me give you some new coordinates: 3.3.4+experimental1. That
version ought to work better.

Best,
Michael



pgp1EQobsNdrP.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: FAI 3.3.3 + Ubuntu Lucid

2010-03-19 Diskussionsfäden Stephan Hermann
Hi Guys,

ok...ubuntu lucid server + fai 3.3.4 == success.
I'll add some tweaks for Ubuntu (which are necessary) and will push
that to the FAI PPA.

Thomas,

I know I'm pinching you now, but can we actually move from a native
package to a non-native?

Regards,

\ſh

On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 09:46:16 +0100
Waldemar Brodkorb  wrote:

> Hi Stephan,
> Stephan Hermann wrote,
> 
> > Hi Waldemar,
> > 
> > 
> > On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 08:40:19 +0100
> > Waldemar Brodkorb  wrote:
> > 
> > > Hi Stephan,
> > > Stephan Hermann wrote,
> > > 
> > > > Hi Guys,
> > > > 
> > > > I'm porting the last changes from Waldemar and others to a new
> > > > FAI Package for Ubuntu Lucid (which will be 10.04 LTS).
> > > > 
> > > > Looks like, that the server stuff (pxe dhcp etc.) is all
> > > > working...so no worries here.
> > > > 
> > > > Now, Using an Ubuntu Lucid Kernel, (generic flavour) the boot up
> > > > process stops at something around the lines:
> > > > 
> > > > Console: switching to colour framebuffer device 80x30
> > > > 
> > > > I tried to disable it via modeset but failed here..
> > > 
> > > May be some of the upstream stuff get reverted by my old stuff?
> > > Can you try 3.3.4 without any changes to FAI itself (may be just
> > > NFSROOT needs some touching for the correct package names.)
> > 
> > I'll give it a shot :) 
> > 
> > >  
> > > > Does anyone has an idea, what could that be and how someone can
> > > > workaround it?
> > > > 
> > > > Waldemar, did you have any success using a lucid boot kernel for
> > > > your install client?
> > > 
> > > Yes, sure. We are using always lucid kernels.
> > 
> > So, even as tftp boot kernel ?
> 
> Yes, sure. All necessary stuff to boot a lucid kernel and initrd is
> in upstream integrated, as far as your NFSROOT takes care of any
> package name differences between Debian and Ubuntu.
> 
> Have fun,
> Waldemar


-- 
| Stephan '\sh' Hermann| OSS Dev / SysAdmin |
| JID: s...@linux-server.org | http://www.sourcecode.de/  | 
| GPG ID: 0xC098EFA8   | http://leonov.tv/  |
| FP: 3D8B 5138 0852 DA7A B83F DCCB C189 E733 C098 EFA8 |



Re: resizing an lvm volume with setup-storage

2010-03-19 Diskussionsfäden Nicolas Courtel

Michael Tautschnig a écrit :



I think you haven't landed yet :-) There are still some obstacles out there in
space. But let me give you some new coordinates: 3.3.4+experimental1. That
version ought to work better.
  
Well, /usr is not removed any more, but the kernel seems unhappy : 
http://paste.debian.net/64861/


--
Nicolas