Re: Installable ARMv8 cross-toolchain

2012-11-03 Thread Loïc Minier
On Sat, Nov 03, 2012, Marek Vasut wrote:
> I need to catch up with you in there ;-) What do you use for a bootloader on 
> these armv8 devices?

No bootloader at the moment, but a boot wrapper!  ;-)

At the moment, ARMv8 work is mostly on virtual platforms (I guess there
might be some people with expensive FGPAs too); the two virtual
platforms Linaro is using are:
* the free (as in beer) ARMv8 Foundation model ("Foundation")
* the pre-built ARMv8 Versatile Express model ("VE RTSM")

ARM recently published some information on the various models at:
http://www.arm.com/fvp

The two virtual platforms are relatively similar; the main differences
are:
* VE model has a MMC while the Foundation model has an AMBA virtio block
  device
* VE has a RTC while Foundation model hasn't
* VE has an AMBA LCD (clcd) while Foundation model hasn't

At least the first difference prevents us from sharing a single Device
Tree with all devices between the two platforms (kernel oops when
starting the Foundation model with the MMC listed or vice-versa).

To boot the platform, a small boot wrapper is combined with the kernel,
device tree, and kernel cmdline into an ELF .axf file for the model to
run.

This page explains how to rebuild kernel + device tree + boot wrapper:
https://wiki.linaro.org/HowTo/BuildArm64Kernel
(the boot wrapper is maintained by Catalin Marinas on git.kernel.org)


The plan is to switch to a full bootloader -- likely Tianocore (UEFI) --
when available as it's painful to have to rebuild the .axf whenever the
kernel or kernel cmdline change, and real hardware wouldn't use a boot
wrapper anyway.

I guess you're asking because you consider an U-Boot port?  :-)

Cheers,
-- 
Loïc Minier

___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev


Re: Support for Raspberry Pi

2012-11-03 Thread Loïc Minier
Hi Geert,

On Fri, Nov 02, 2012, Geert Schuring wrote:
> Could you tell me if you have any plans to enable Ubuntu on the Raspberry Pi
> (ARMv6) ?

Short answer: an Ubuntu ARMv6 port for the Raspberry Pi isn't a Linaro
target, but we're taking patches and we're interested in some bugs!  :-)

There are two main reasons for that:
- Linaro doesn't have the capacity to do large scale distro ports, this
  is usually mainly the job of distros, and we're sometimes giving a
  hand
- Linaro is all about the future of ARM, so the focus is mainly on ARMv7
  and ARMv8 at this point

That said, there is hope!  First, a bunch of Linaro folks have a
Raspberry Pi and play with it; second, I believe Ubuntu's armel port is
being re-targeted to ARMv5, so Ubuntu armel binaries should eventually
run on the Pi.

Linaro does directly care about toolchain regressions you might
encounter on ARMv5/ARMv6 (or even on x86), so please do report us any
toolchain regressions caused by Linaro patches.

 Cheers,
-- 
Loïc Minier

___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev


Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/3] EXYNOS: Add support for Exynos4x12

2012-11-03 Thread Marek Vasut
Dear Chander Kashyap,

> ping

CCing custodian.

> On 2 October 2012 15:16, Chander Kashyap  wrote:
> > This patch series popultes Register addresses, clock structure and
> > gpio structure for Exynos4x12.
> > 
> > Changes in v2:
> > - Fixed the GPIO base address macro for
> > exynos4x12_gpio_part3_get_nr
> > 
> >   in arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/gpio.h
> > 
> > Chander Kashyap (3):
> >   EXYNOS: EXYNOS4X12: Populate Exynos4x12 register addresses
> >   EXYNOS: EXYNOS4X12: Add clock structure for EXYNOS4X12
> >   EXYNOS: EXYNOS4X12: Add gpio structure for EXYNOS4X12
> >  
> >  arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/clock.h |  276
> >  ++ arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/cpu.h  
> >  |   48 +-
> >  arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/gpio.h  |   85 +
> >  3 files changed, 402 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > 
> > --
> > 1.7.9.5

Best regards,
Marek Vasut

___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev


Re: Installable ARMv8 cross-toolchain

2012-11-03 Thread Marek Vasut
Dear Wookey,

> After a fair amount of dicking about I have managed to build a
> cross-toolchain for arm64/aarch64 which installs on Ubuntu Quantal. It
> even builds packages, although it has at least one notable limitation,
> and I have no idea if it produces working code yet :-)
> 
> The main limitation is that the default library search paths have come
> out as the old dpkg-cross ones, not the new multiarch ones. If someone
> can tell me where to fix that it would be very helpful and I'll try
> and put an updated one in the repo.
> 
> In the meantime you can work round it effectively using
> /etc/dpkg/buildflags. (see wiki page below for details)
> 
> The cross-toolchain only supports C, C++ and fortran with no extras
> like libssp, libmudflap etc, because there is no architecture support
> for them yet.
> 
> I started a port page to keep track of things here:
> http://wiki.debian.org/Arm64Port
> 
> And if you want to set up a quantal chroot and see if you can build
> things, details are here:
> https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/DevPlatform/CrossCompile/arm64bootstrap
> 
> The bottom line is that you can debootstrap (or sbuild-createchroot) a
> quantal chroot, add the bootstrap repo and do 'apt-get install
> crossbuild-essential-arm64' and get a working cross-build environment.
> 
> The repo is here:
> http://people.debian.org/~wookey/bootstrap.html
> 
> That should be useable for both dpkg-cross style bulding or
> multiarch-style bulding.
> 
> The repo also contains updated dpkg-cross, multiarch python, multiarch
> perl, updated dpkg with buildprofile/staging support, sbuild (although
> in fact I think stock sbuild should work OK), and dose-builddebcheck
> which can tell you what things are currently cross-buildable from
> available binaries and sources. Most of that is pretty new and not
> very well tested but 'it works for me'.
> 
> More arm64 packages will be along soon (dose3 currently indicates 40
> more buildabale packages), but there is plenty still to fix for a full
> debootstrap-able arm64 package set.
> 
> Anyone keen to help with bootstrapping the port is very welcome. There
> will be a session about it at UDS next week, and a more general one on
> distro bootrapping at the Armv8 minisummit a the co-located linaro
> connect. And I'll be giving a talk about this stuff at Linxconf-Europe
> in Barcelona the week after.
> 
> I think that's all for now. Enjoy, and tell me what breaks :-)

I need to catch up with you in there ;-) What do you use for a bootloader on 
these armv8 devices?

> Wookey

Best regards,
Marek Vasut

___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev