Re: Request for enabling Config options in Linaro kernel for new PM tool
cc'ing linaro-dev On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 4:58 PM, Amit Arora wrote: > Hello John, > > We, in Power Management work group, are developing a new tool > (PowerDebug) which will show users/developers various Power Management > related information exported from the kernel. This includes regulator > info., sensor info., clock tree etc. For kernel to display this > information to userspace (via sysfs/debugfs), we need to enable a few > config options. These are: > > CONFIG_PM > CONFIG_REGULATOR > CONFIG_PM_DEBUG > CONFIG_DEBUG_FS > > I believe first couple of these are already enabled by default in > Linaro kernel. Do you mind enabling others too, so that PowerDebug > works with the default kernel installed ? > John, are you using the 'enforce check' system from ubuntu kernels that make sure that certain config options always have expected values? It might be worth adding these to our enforce system since we want all our kernel flavours to enable these options. Cheers, Amit ___ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
Re: Pull request (v2) for OMAP4 Pandaboard support
On 11/4/2010 2:45 AM, John Rigby wrote: Anand, What kernel config should I use? Thanks for working on this. I had a custom config based on the omap3_defconfig. I notice now that with plain old omap3_defconfig, as also with omap_4430sdp_defconfig, there're a couple of build breaks. I'll send a follow on series to fix that. For now, you can use: - omap3_defconfig with CONFIG_USB_MUSB disabled (you get a non-SMP kernel that boots on OMAP3/4) - Anand ___ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
Launch Control PPA
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello everyone. With the help of Paul Larson we now have a Launch Control PPA. Currently it does not have the most interesting package (dashboard) but we're slowly getting there. The ppa is at: https://edge.launchpad.net/~linaro-infrastructure/+archive/launch-control I have created a daily build of the first package: python-linaro-json. This package contains the JSON utilities that I've developed for launch control. As soon as the dust settles out and I'm comfortable with packaging I'll release and upload a non-daily build. (Q: what is the best way do to that with launchpad?) Next in the queue for that PPA is a python package for working with dashboard bundle files (extracted from the current dashboard code base). I hope that those two packages can make it to natty eventually and help the nice folks in Ubuntu QA to produce test results not as unstructured text files but as bundle files. Hopefully this will allow them to store those files as they currently do and later on decide to either push them to a dashboard instance of their choice or convert them to launchpad subunit format (yes! it's _should_ be possible to convert all data to subunit) once that is ready for production. Feedback welcome :-) Best regards ZK -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJM0sq1AAoJEKkR4hQBRI+lPgkH+wTHOgbPvPSj6hsA8e2WlB9D 7zgbnZ4JTvmY+6bmDqdzD6obaAHSIlyU1fdNUyoV6MdlahswsnHueS8I55Nya6cd h2ZpURcY9HFnJkbOmW20XBIh2kzIZGmP7tYEnE+iCOGEaULYfZpaoKH8fZlxoEif 6BupMm2bOFnlORP8DXaxb3VgSKEtV5sOjrwYhAx3Uql7qO6notFhBQZVjRdwWXpV aItqkml/K/MxfYdXYjZqtj8FGXrhRlZV+QSASvLJqPIRZJFc96BSmSZ1yv8b6xiX TAxD81gmgmj3SFIrbPAIPkfqb7MApXwXWyjyGdk0gVeJdZYUkNtw3OK9mcNJ5aQ= =QK3g -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
Linaro Infrastructure Team Weekly Report (2010-10-21 to 2010-11-04)
All, The "weekly" report for the Linaro Infrastructure team covers the past two weeks due to UDS last week, and the report may be found at:- Status report: https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/Infrastructure/Status/2010-11-04 Burndown chart:http://people.canonical.com/~pitti/workitems/maverick/linaro-infrastructure.html The Infrastructure related blueprints, of which currently there are 4 active ones (4 from the last report), are showing that there are 11 work items in progress (11 last report), and 12 work items to undertake (12 last report). arm-m-validation-dashboard;0 work items completed since last report; 2 in progress;8 to do arm-m-image-building-console; 0 work items completed since last report; 7 in progress;3 to do arm-m-automated-testing-framework; no change in status from last report; 1 in progress;0 to do arm-m-testsuites-and-profilers;no change in status from last report; 1 in progress;1 to do In arm-m-image-building-console, 6 items are awaiting review before they can be completed. UDS preparations occupied the time leading up to UDS for all team members. Subsequent to UDS, the focus has been on preparing Blueprints for the next cycle. Specifics accomplished this week include:- * Preparing for, and holding the Infrastructure Stakeholder meeting * Drafting Blueprints for the next cycle * Got QEMU working with current images Please let me know if you have any comments or questions. Kind Regards, Ian ___ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
Re: Pull request (v2) for OMAP4 Pandaboard support
On Thu, 4 Nov 2010, Anand Gadiyar wrote: > On 11/4/2010 2:45 AM, John Rigby wrote: > > Anand, > > > > What kernel config should I use? Thanks for working on this. > > > > I had a custom config based on the omap3_defconfig. I notice now that with > plain old omap3_defconfig, as also with omap_4430sdp_defconfig, there're a > couple of build breaks. I'll send a follow on series to fix that. I merged your previous pull request BTW. If you have more fixes please add them on top. Nicolas ___ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
Re: Request for enabling Config options in Linaro kernel for new PM tool
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 5:39 AM, Amit Kucheria wrote: > cc'ing linaro-dev > > On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 4:58 PM, Amit Arora wrote: >> Hello John, >> >> We, in Power Management work group, are developing a new tool >> (PowerDebug) which will show users/developers various Power Management >> related information exported from the kernel. This includes regulator >> info., sensor info., clock tree etc. For kernel to display this >> information to userspace (via sysfs/debugfs), we need to enable a few >> config options. These are: >> >> CONFIG_PM >> CONFIG_REGULATOR >> CONFIG_PM_DEBUG >> CONFIG_DEBUG_FS >> >> I believe first couple of these are already enabled by default in >> Linaro kernel. Do you mind enabling others too, so that PowerDebug >> works with the default kernel installed ? >> > > John, are you using the 'enforce check' system from ubuntu kernels > that make sure that certain config options always have expected > values? > > It might be worth adding these to our enforce system since we want all > our kernel flavours to enable these options. Yes I do use it and I will add these options. ___ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
Re: Launch Control PPA
On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 16:01:09 +0100, Zygmunt Krynicki wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hello everyone. > > With the help of Paul Larson we now have a Launch Control PPA. > Currently it does not have the most interesting package (dashboard) but > we're slowly getting there. > > The ppa is at: > https://edge.launchpad.net/~linaro-infrastructure/+archive/launch-control > > I have created a daily build of the first package: python-linaro-json. > This package contains the JSON utilities that I've developed for launch > control. As soon as the dust settles out and I'm comfortable with > packaging I'll release and upload a non-daily build. (Q: what is the > best way do to that with launchpad?) I'm not quite sure what you're asking here, but I think one good practice is to have a 'dailies' ppa (e.g. ~linaro-infrastructure/+archive/launch-control-dailies) and a separate releases ppa (which might be named like the current one) that you upload releases to manually. Cheers, mwh ___ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
Re: Launch Control PPA
On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 10:33:40 +1300, Michael Hudson wrote: > separate releases ppa (which might be named like the current one) that > you upload releases to manually. Or trigger recipe builds in to manually. Thanks, James ___ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
Re: Launch Control PPA
On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 17:55:46 -0400, James Westby wrote: > On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 10:33:40 +1300, Michael Hudson > wrote: > > separate releases ppa (which might be named like the current one) that > > you upload releases to manually. > > Or trigger recipe builds in to manually. I was thinking that for releases, you'd want a non-native package. But maybe that's just being picky :-) Cheers, mwh ___ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
