Re: Ties or multiple voices

[S]

Thanks Simon!



2015-10-05 20:57 GMT+02:00 Simon Albrecht :

>
>
> On 05.10.2015 19:00, S wrote:
>
>> My question may need some clarification. Especially the third example,
>> which should look something like this:
>>
>> Inline afbeelding 1
>>
>> \relative c''{
>><<{2. r4}\\{4 a8 c}>>
>> }
>>
>> The tie starting at the b on the third beat in the second voice looks a
>> little awkward. It may be theoretically correct, but it looks artificial to
>> me since the only movement at that point is c# to d.
>>
>> What I basically want to know is when it is OK to introduce a new voice
>> to get rid of these ties.
>>
>
> It’s OK whenever it serves legibility or is desired by the composer.
> You’re completely free to add another voice (that would be \voiceTwo for
> the crotchet b and \voiceThree for the beamed quavers group), if you find
> it sensible, or the performer will have less trouble reading the music.
>
> HTH, Simon
>
>
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Two questions about key signatures

[Jacques Menu]

Hello TM,

Is that the kind of things you’re aiming at?


http://lilypondblog.org/2013/09/automatic-generation-of-scales-in-various-modes-for-all-21-pitches/

JM

> Le 7 oct. 2015 à 05:24, T. Michael Sommers  a écrit :
> 
> On 10/5/2015 2:59 PM, Simon Albrecht wrote:
>> On 05.10.2015 11:33, T. Michael Sommers wrote:
>>> Hmmm. When I change from a key with sharps or flats in it to one with
>>> no sharps or flats, the cancelling accidentals still appear.  I can
>>> understand that, since otherwise there would be no indication that the
>>> key had changed, but for my application, it's a little annoying.
>> 
>> { \key as \minor ces \key c \major c }
>> 
>> How on earth would the performer know that the second one is a c natural
>> if there is no key cancellation?
> 
> That's what I said.  My application, though, is not something to be 
> performed, so that's not a problem.  I'm just creating a chart of all the 
> keys in all the modes.
> 
> -- 
> T.M. Sommers -- tmsomme...@gmail.com -- ab2sb
> 
> ___
> lilypond-user mailing list
> lilypond-user@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: How to get X/Y-extent of a bezier-curve?

[Thomas Morley]

2015-10-06 14:49 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup :
> Thomas Morley  writes:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm going to write a generic bow-stencil.
>> Below you'll find a boiled down example.
>>
>> The main problem: how to determine the correct extents.
>> Looks like I need to calculate the actual X/Y-extents of the resulting
>> bezier-curve.
>> Though, obviously my maths-skills are not sufficient.
>
> Oh, that's a nuisance.
>
>> Any hints?
>
> I'd just call make-path-stencil and use the bounding box results from
> that.  No need to reinvent the wheel.

Yep.
Using make-path-stencil is much more straight-forward.
Thanks.

If someone interested, I'll attach an image with an excerpt of my test-suite.

I plan to replace make-parenthesis-stencil and to implement
https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/3088/

>
> While this particular wheel could likely profit from a do-over with more
> of a view towards efficiency and numerical robustness, there is no point
> in code duplication.

I think we could replace the body of current
make-bezier-sandwich-stencil with make-path-stencil.
But obviously you think about some deeper modification.
Could you give some details?

Cheers,
  Harm
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: How to get X/Y-extent of a bezier-curve?

[Thomas Morley]

2015-10-06 15:15 GMT+02:00 BB :
> I do not really understand what you desire to get. May be my response is not
> helpful but silly.

The constructed bezier-curves should get correct bounding-boxes.
Which can be watched by doing
\markup \box \stencil #whatever-stencil

>
> #(define pts-list
>   '((12 . 8)
> (5 . 8)
> (2 . 2)
> (15 . 2)))
>
> In your List you have the start point defined with ay (x.y)= (2,2) and the
> end point (15,2) - that is the last pair of coordinates.
>
> Looks like I need to calculate the actual X/Y-extents of the resulting
> bezier-curve.
>
> The x extent of your curve therefore is 15-2 = 13.

Ofc true for `pts-list', but not for the rotated derivates

> The y extent is harder to calculate as it depends on the parameters of the
> bezier definition. A good description is here:
> http://www.math.ucla.edu/~baker/149.1.02w/handouts/bb_bezier.pdf

Thanks for it.

>
> The line override does nothing?
>
>  \override #'(box-padding . 0)

Play around with different values.

>
> If you set (0,0) instead of (2.2) the starting point is at (0.0) and this is
> the rotation center. (You rotate in your example around this point.) Then
> you have to change the last corrdinate pair to (13,0) for to get the seme
> base length and to stay in the box.
>
> The first coordinate pair of the definition in
>
> #(define pts-list
>
> controls the steepness of the start and end of the curve and the form,
> please see the link above for details.
>
> May be I missed the point?


I followed David's hint with up to now convincing results.
`make-path-stencil' does correct bounding-boxes out of the box.

Cheers,
  Harm

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: How to get X/Y-extent of a bezier-curve?

[David Kastrup]

Thomas Morley  writes:

> 2015-10-06 14:49 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup :
>> Thomas Morley  writes:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I'm going to write a generic bow-stencil.
>>> Below you'll find a boiled down example.
>>>
>>> The main problem: how to determine the correct extents.
>>> Looks like I need to calculate the actual X/Y-extents of the resulting
>>> bezier-curve.
>>> Though, obviously my maths-skills are not sufficient.
>>
>> Oh, that's a nuisance.
>>
>>> Any hints?
>>
>> I'd just call make-path-stencil and use the bounding box results from
>> that.  No need to reinvent the wheel.
>
> Yep.
> Using make-path-stencil is much more straight-forward.
> Thanks.
>
> If someone interested, I'll attach an image with an excerpt of my test-suite.
>
> I plan to replace make-parenthesis-stencil and to implement
> https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/3088/
>
>>
>> While this particular wheel could likely profit from a do-over with more
>> of a view towards efficiency and numerical robustness, there is no point
>> in code duplication.
>
> I think we could replace the body of current
> make-bezier-sandwich-stencil with make-path-stencil.
> But obviously you think about some deeper modification.
> Could you give some details?

No, not really.  When I tabled this issue, I thought that
make-bezier-sandwich was dead for some reason but I think that it's used
in several places such as (obviously related) slurs.  And I found it
awkward to use the undertie as the basic shape and derive parentheses
via rotation.  And I thought this was essentially user-level code
needing significant modification.

All in all, I had a significant number of misconceptions about the work
involved with completing this issue and even though becoming gradually
aware of them I never picked up that dropped ball again.

It should be reasonably low-hanging fruit.

With regard to my comments to make-path-stencil's operation, the numeric
code is just not what I like.

If you take a look at the following, it is quite inefficient since it
repeats a lot of calculations instead of assigning partial results to
let-bound variables.  It also uses the straight PQ formula whereas the
usual way to avoid numerical inaccuracies is to use the PQ formula only
for the zero where the sign of the +/- does not lead to cancellation and
get the other zero via Viata's rule.

(define (bezier-part-min-max x1 x2 x3 x4)
  ((lambda (x) (list (reduce min 1 x) (reduce max -1 x)))
   (map
(lambda (x)
  (+ (* x1 (expt (- 1 x) 3))
 (+ (* 3 (* x2 (* (expt (- 1 x) 2) x)))
(+ (* 3 (* x3 (* (- 1 x) (expt x 2
   (* x4 (expt x 3))
(if (< (+ (expt x2 2) (+ (expt x3 2) (* x1 x4)))
   (+ (* x1 x3) (+ (* x2 x4) (* x2 x3
(list 0.0 1.0)
(filter
 (lambda (x) (and (>= x 0) (<= x 1)))
 (append
  (list 0.0 1.0)
  (map (lambda (op)
 (if (not (eqv? 0.0
(exact->inexact (- (+ x1 (* 3 x3)) (+ x4 (* 3 
x2))
 ;; Zeros of the bezier curve
 (/ (+ (- x1 (* 2 x2))
   (op x3
   (sqrt (- (+ (expt x2 2)
   (+ (expt x3 2) (* x1 x4)))
(+ (* x1 x3)
   (+ (* x2 x4) (* x2 x3)))
(- (+ x1 (* 3 x3)) (+ x4 (* 3 x2
 ;; Apply L'hopital's rule to get the zeros if 0/0
 (* (op 0 1)
(/ (/ (- x4 x3) 2)
   (sqrt (- (+ (* x2 x2)
   (+ (* x3 x3) (* x1 x4)))
(+ (* x1 x3)
   (+ (* x2 x4) (* x2 x3)
   (list + -


-- 
David Kastrup

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: How to get X/Y-extent of a bezier-curve?

[BB]

Just for fun tried to undertie all the text with one unertie

\markup \line {

\undertie {

\underline "underlined"

\undertie "undertied"

\override #'(offset . 5)

\override #'(thickness . 1)

\undertie "undertied"

\override #'(offset . 1)

\override #'(thickness . 5)

\undertie "undertied"

"Eng" \undertie "ele" "en"

}

}


It is only possible to override the vertical coordinate? It is  not 
possible to override start and end coordinate to produce inclined ties?


Regards

On 07.10.2015 12:14, Thomas Morley wrote:

2015-10-06 14:49 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup :

Thomas Morley  writes:


Hi all,

I'm going to write a generic bow-stencil.
Below you'll find a boiled down example.

The main problem: how to determine the correct extents.
Looks like I need to calculate the actual X/Y-extents of the resulting
bezier-curve.
Though, obviously my maths-skills are not sufficient.

Oh, that's a nuisance.


Any hints?

I'd just call make-path-stencil and use the bounding box results from
that.  No need to reinvent the wheel.

Yep.
Using make-path-stencil is much more straight-forward.
Thanks.

If someone interested, I'll attach an image with an excerpt of my test-suite.

I plan to replace make-parenthesis-stencil and to implement
https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/3088/


While this particular wheel could likely profit from a do-over with more
of a view towards efficiency and numerical robustness, there is no point
in code duplication.

I think we could replace the body of current
make-bezier-sandwich-stencil with make-path-stencil.
But obviously you think about some deeper modification.
Could you give some details?

Cheers,
   Harm


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: How to get X/Y-extent of a bezier-curve?

[Thomas Morley]

2015-10-07 13:13 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup :
>> Thomas Morley  writes:

>> I think we could replace the body of current
>> make-bezier-sandwich-stencil with make-path-stencil.
>> But obviously you think about some deeper modification.
>> Could you give some details?
>
> No, not really.  When I tabled this issue, I thought that
> make-bezier-sandwich was dead for some reason but I think that it's used
> in several places such as (obviously related) slurs.

Well:

git grep make-bezier-sandwich-stencil
scm/fret-diagrams.scm:(make-bezier-sandwich-stencil
scm/stencil.scm:(define (make-bezier-sandwich-stencil coords thick xext yext)
scm/stencil.scm:(make-bezier-sandwich-stencil

Not much.

> And I found it
> awkward to use the undertie as the basic shape and derive parentheses
> via rotation.

The code in my initial mail uses coord-rotate (not
ly:stencil-rotate-absolute as in Jans suggestion)
What do you think about this method?

Ofcourse it was heavily simplified, maybe best to put up a patch to
have the full code for more detailed discussion.

> And I thought this was essentially user-level code
> needing significant modification.
>
> All in all, I had a significant number of misconceptions about the work
> involved with completing this issue and even though becoming gradually
> aware of them I never picked up that dropped ball again.
>
> It should be reasonably low-hanging fruit.
>
> With regard to my comments to make-path-stencil's operation, the numeric
> code is just not what I like.
>
> If you take a look at the following, it is quite inefficient since it
> repeats a lot of calculations instead of assigning partial results to
> let-bound variables.  It also uses the straight PQ formula whereas the
> usual way to avoid numerical inaccuracies is to use the PQ formula only
> for the zero where the sign of the +/- does not lead to cancellation and
> get the other zero via Viata's rule.
>
> (define (bezier-part-min-max x1 x2 x3 x4)
[...]

No promise, but maybe I'll take a look.
Not that I know about Viata's or L'hopital's rule, but google maybe
helpfull, otherwise I'll reask

Cheers,
  Harm

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: How to get X/Y-extent of a bezier-curve?

[Thomas Morley]

2015-10-07 13:14 GMT+02:00 BB :
> Just for fun tried to undertie all the text with one unertie
>
> \markup \line {
>
> \undertie {
>
> \underline "underlined"
>
> \undertie "undertied"
>
> \override #'(offset . 5)
>
> \override #'(thickness . 1)
>
> \undertie "undertied"
>
> \override #'(offset . 1)
>
> \override #'(thickness . 5)
>
> \undertie "undertied"
>
> "Eng" \undertie "ele" "en"
>
> }
>
> }
>
>
> It is only possible to override the vertical coordinate? It is  not possible
> to override start and end coordinate to produce inclined ties?

Well, undertie is not yet implemented in the source ...

>
> Regards
>
>
> On 07.10.2015 12:14, Thomas Morley wrote:

> I plan to replace make-parenthesis-stencil and to implement
> https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/3088/

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: How to get X/Y-extent of a bezier-curve?

[David Kastrup]

Thomas Morley  writes:

> 2015-10-07 13:13 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup :
>
>> If you take a look at the following, it is quite inefficient since it
>> repeats a lot of calculations instead of assigning partial results to
>> let-bound variables.  It also uses the straight PQ formula whereas the
>> usual way to avoid numerical inaccuracies is to use the PQ formula only
>> for the zero where the sign of the +/- does not lead to cancellation and
>> get the other zero via Viata's rule.
>>
>> (define (bezier-part-min-max x1 x2 x3 x4)
> [...]
>
> No promise, but maybe I'll take a look.
> Not that I know about Viata's or L'hopital's rule, but google maybe
> helpfull, otherwise I'll reask

Uh, it's Vieta's rule, sorry for the typo.  L'hopital is a rule for the
limit of fractions (basically, when f/g -> 0/0 you might get the
limiting value by looking at the limit of the quotient of derivatives
f'/g' instead).  No idea how it would apply here.

-- 
David Kastrup

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Stem-to-stem slurs

[David Nalesnik]

On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 11:36 PM, Javier Ruiz-Alma 
wrote:

> Other than adding \shape overrides, is there a way to tell LP to anchor
> the slurs to the stems instead of noteheads?
>
>
>
> %%---Begin snippet
>
> \version “2.18.2”
>
> <<{ \clef bass 2  }\\{ f'4( e') d'( c') }>>
>

Try:

<<{
  \clef bass 2  }
  \\
  { f'4-\tweak positions #'(0.5 . 0) ( e') d'-\tweak positions #'(0 .
-0.5)( c')
}>>

Adjust numbers to your liking.

David
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Stem-to-stem slurs

[Kieren MacMillan]

Hi Javier,

> Other than adding \shape overrides

Why do you want to avoid \shape overrides?

Cheers,
Kieren.


Kieren MacMillan, composer
‣ website: www.kierenmacmillan.info
‣ email: i...@kierenmacmillan.info


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: How write cross-staff slur (in combination with lyrics)

[Michael Rivers]

This isn't meant to be sung by a singer. This is from a beginner's piano
method (I'm a piano teacher). The words are to give a sense of the stress in
the meter, to give the player an idea of the mood of the piece, and possibly
for the player to sing along. The slurs, though, are entirely for the
pianist and have nothing to do with the lyrics. I don't really have an
opinion if it is a good idea to introduce young musicians to non-standard
notation. Personally, my students and I pretty much ignore the texts (which
are usually of poor quality anyway) and play as it were a normal piano
score.



--
View this message in context: 
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/How-write-cross-staff-slur-in-combination-with-lyrics-tp182033p182126.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Lilypond to Finale [Notepad]

[Kieren MacMillan]

Hello all!

Well, it finally happened… I got a commission for an arrangement with the 
following restriction:

"The music should be engraved using either Sibelius or Finale music engraving 
program. Please submit the engraved arrangements as open files and also as 
PDF-files.”

I’ve already asked the commissioner/publisher, and this term is non-negotiable. 
The commission fee is sufficient to do the arrangement, but not generous enough 
for me to [in addition] hire someone to engrave it in Finale or Sibelius. And 
I’m certainly not going to invest a lot of time (or *any* money!!) in Finale or 
Sibelius.

So before I give my final answer to this commissioner, I want to know if anyone 
has had experience with converting a relatively simple Lilypond score (SATB + 
piano) to the free Notepad version of Finale [p.s. Is there a Sibelius 
equivalent?] — via MusicXML, I’m assuming — and from there into the full 
version (which the commissioner/publisher will eventually have to do).

If it’s 1 hour or less from a finished Lilypond score to having a “converted” 
file to send, then I’ll consider it; otherwise, it’s not worth my time taking 
this commission.

Thanks,
Kieren.


Kieren MacMillan, composer
‣ website: www.kierenmacmillan.info
‣ email: i...@kierenmacmillan.info
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Stem-to-stem slurs

[Simon Albrecht]

On 07.10.2015 14:50, Kieren MacMillan wrote:

Hi Javier,


Other than adding \shape overrides

Why do you want to avoid \shape overrides?


Because they have to be done for each slur individually?
At any rate, it would be easier to, say, \override Slur.attachment = 
#'Stem (as opposed to #'NoteHead).

Just brainstorming.

Yours, Simon

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Lilypond to Finale [Notepad]

[Jacques Menu]

Hello Kieren,

One possibility is to scan a PDF produced by LP by PhotoScore Ultimate and then 
export it, either to Sibelius directly or as MusicXML first. Finale can import 
the same XML file too.

If you can send the PDF to me, I can try and we’ll see how good the results are.

JM

> Le 7 oct. 2015 à 22:48, Kieren MacMillan  a 
> écrit :
> 
> Hello all!
> 
> Well, it finally happened… I got a commission for an arrangement with the 
> following restriction:
> 
> "The music should be engraved using either Sibelius or Finale music engraving 
> program. Please submit the engraved arrangements as open files and also as 
> PDF-files.”
> 
> I’ve already asked the commissioner/publisher, and this term is 
> non-negotiable. The commission fee is sufficient to do the arrangement, but 
> not generous enough for me to [in addition] hire someone to engrave it in 
> Finale or Sibelius. And I’m certainly not going to invest a lot of time (or 
> *any* money!!) in Finale or Sibelius.
> 
> So before I give my final answer to this commissioner, I want to know if 
> anyone has had experience with converting a relatively simple Lilypond score 
> (SATB + piano) to the free Notepad version of Finale [p.s. Is there a 
> Sibelius equivalent?] — via MusicXML, I’m assuming — and from there into the 
> full version (which the commissioner/publisher will eventually have to do).
> 
> If it’s 1 hour or less from a finished Lilypond score to having a “converted” 
> file to send, then I’ll consider it; otherwise, it’s not worth my time taking 
> this commission.
> 
> Thanks,
> Kieren.
> 
> 
> Kieren MacMillan, composer
> ‣ website: www.kierenmacmillan.info
> ‣ email: i...@kierenmacmillan.info
> ___
> lilypond-user mailing list
> lilypond-user@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Lilypond to Finale [Notepad]

[Urs Liska]

Well, you should at least try how far Frescobaldi's MusicXML export will bring 
you.

Urs

Am 7. Oktober 2015 22:48:15 MESZ, schrieb Kieren MacMillan 
:
>Hello all!
>
>Well, it finally happened… I got a commission for an arrangement with
>the following restriction:
>
>"The music should be engraved using either Sibelius or Finale music
>engraving program. Please submit the engraved arrangements as open
>files and also as PDF-files.”
>
>I’ve already asked the commissioner/publisher, and this term is
>non-negotiable. The commission fee is sufficient to do the arrangement,
>but not generous enough for me to [in addition] hire someone to engrave
>it in Finale or Sibelius. And I’m certainly not going to invest a lot
>of time (or *any* money!!) in Finale or Sibelius.
>
>So before I give my final answer to this commissioner, I want to know
>if anyone has had experience with converting a relatively simple
>Lilypond score (SATB + piano) to the free Notepad version of Finale
>[p.s. Is there a Sibelius equivalent?] — via MusicXML, I’m assuming —
>and from there into the full version (which the commissioner/publisher
>will eventually have to do).
>
>If it’s 1 hour or less from a finished Lilypond score to having a
>“converted” file to send, then I’ll consider it; otherwise, it’s not
>worth my time taking this commission.
>
>Thanks,
>Kieren.
>
>
>Kieren MacMillan, composer
>‣ website: www.kierenmacmillan.info
>‣ email: i...@kierenmacmillan.info
>___
>lilypond-user mailing list
>lilypond-user@gnu.org
>https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

-- 
Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail gesendet.___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Lilypond to Finale [Notepad]

[Jacques Menu]

Just tried :

- Finale 2014 produces something after display error messages. That can 
be rather good for a single basson staff (the beams are lost), but less good 
for two SATB examples I’ve tried: one has empty staves, and the other one needs 
some clean up;
- Sibelius 7.1.3 uniformly produces a blank page, without error 
messages showing up in dialogs.

JM

> Le 7 oct. 2015 à 23:26, Urs Liska  a écrit :
> 
> Well, you should at least try how far Frescobaldi's MusicXML export will 
> bring you.
> 
> Urs
> 
> Am 7. Oktober 2015 22:48:15 MESZ, schrieb Kieren MacMillan 
> :
> Hello all!
> 
> Well, it finally happened… I got a commission for an arrangement with the 
> following restriction:
> 
> "The music should be engraved using either Sibelius or Finale music engraving 
> program. Please submit the engraved arrangements as open files and also as 
> PDF-files.”
> 
> I’ve already asked the commissioner/publisher, and this term is 
> non-negotiable. The commission fee is sufficient to do the arrangement, but 
> not generous enough for me to [in addition] hire someone to engrave it in 
> Finale or Sibelius. And I’m certainly not going to invest a lot of time (or 
> *any* money!!) in Finale or Sibelius.
> 
> So before I give my final answer to this commissioner, I want to know if 
> anyone has had experience with converting a relatively simple Lilypond score 
> (SATB + piano) to the free Notepad version of Finale [p.s. Is there a 
> Sibelius equivalent?] — via MusicXML, I’m assuming — and from there into the 
> full version (which
> the commissioner/publisher will eventually have to do).
> 
> If it’s 1 hour or less from a finished Lilypond score to having a “converted” 
> file to send, then I’ll consider it; otherwise, it’s not worth my time taking 
> this commission.
> 
> Thanks,
> Kieren.
> 
> 
> Kieren MacMillan, composer
> ‣ website: www.kierenmacmillan.info 
> ‣ email: i...@kierenmacmillan.info
> 
> lilypond-user mailing list
> lilypond-user@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail gesendet.
> ___
> lilypond-user mailing list
> lilypond-user@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Two questions about key signatures

[T. Michael Sommers]

On 10/7/2015 5:50 AM, Jacques Menu wrote:


Is that the kind of things you’re aiming at?


http://lilypondblog.org/2013/09/automatic-generation-of-scales-in-various-modes-for-all-21-pitches/


Exactly.  Except I'm doing it manually, instead of programmatically, 
since I think that will help me learn them all.  Thanks for the link.


--
T.M. Sommers -- tmsomme...@gmail.com -- ab2sb

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Stem-to-stem slurs

[Javier Ruiz-Alma]

| My apologies. On further research, the feature to anchor slurs to stems 
existed way before I knew of LilyPond, just no longer available.I'm sure I 
searched for this for an earlier 
project:http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2005-08/msg00177.html



 |

 On Wednesday, October 7, 2015 2:04 PM, Simon Albrecht wrote:
   
 

 On 07.10.2015 14:50, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
> Hi Javier,
>
>> Other than adding \shape overrides
> Why do you want to avoid \shape overrides?

Because they have to be done for each slur individually?
At any rate, it would be easier to, say, \override Slur.attachment = 
#'Stem (as opposed to #'NoteHead).
Just brainstorming.

Yours, Simon


 
   ___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user