Re: aleatoric box / frameEngraver
Sorry, Thomas... I forgot to mention that I want to place repeat signs in the middle of the bar! Mea culpa. That's why at first I tried to modify frameEngraver. It would be great to have something like: \repeatStart c'4 d' e' \repeatStop s4*3 \repeatExtenderStop Here is function that I try to modify: \version "2.16.2" #(define my-grob-descriptions '()) #(define my-event-classes (ly:make-context-mod)) defineEventClass = #(define-void-function (parser location class parent) (symbol? symbol?) (ly:add-context-mod my-event-classes `(apply ,(lambda (context class parent) (ly:context-set-property! context 'EventClasses (event-class-cons class parent (ly:context-property context 'EventClasses '() ,class ,parent))) \defineEventClass #'frame-event #'span-event \defineEventClass #'frame-extender-event #'span-event #(define (add-grob-definition grob-name grob-entry) (let* ((meta-entry (assoc-get 'meta grob-entry)) (class (assoc-get 'class meta-entry)) (ifaces-entry (assoc-get 'interfaces meta-entry))) (set-object-property! grob-name 'translation-type? list?) (set-object-property! grob-name 'is-grob? #t) (set! ifaces-entry (append (case class ((Item) '(item-interface)) ((Spanner) '(spanner-interface)) ((Paper_column) '((item-interface paper-column-interface))) ((System) '((system-interface spanner-interface))) (else '(unknown-interface))) ifaces-entry)) (set! ifaces-entry (uniq-list (sort ifaces-entry symbolhttps://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: aleatoric box / frameEngraver
Hi Karol, Harm-- On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 5:56 AM, Karol Majewski wrote: > Sorry, Thomas... I forgot to mention that I want to place repeat signs in > the middle of the bar! Mea culpa. That's why at first I tried to modify > frameEngraver. It would be great to have something like: > > \repeatStart c'4 d' e' \repeatStop > s4*3 \repeatExtenderStop > I believe this would be a matter of revising the stencil function which creates the box to draw two repeat bar lines instead. This, hopefully, is workable without building the bar lines up from scratch. > > Here is function that I try to modify: > [BTW, I've been working at this, and added some features to what you're quoting here: a bracket for indicating timing, and the possibility of breaking the whole affair across lines. I'll try to post it later today with some comments about problems. I'm at my wit's end with it, so I'd welcome any help anyone could offer.] --David ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
fermata on dotted notes on the top line
I don't know if this is the right forum for posting unfortunate examples
of LilyPond's output but I came across this one:
\version "2.16"
\score {
f''4.\fermata
}
The fermata seems connected visually with the dot on the note, it looks
better to me dragged further away, which I have done for the score in
question using Denemo.
Just in case anyone has a ready answer to my email earlier (LilyPond
grace note synchronization feature) but assumes someone else has
answered it, I would very much appreciate guidance on it ...
Richard
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: fermata on dotted notes on the top line
Richard Shann wrote
> I don't know if this is the right forum for posting unfortunate examples
> of LilyPond's output but I came across this one:
>
> \version "2.16"
> \score {
> f''4.\fermata
> }
>
> The fermata seems connected visually with the dot on the note, it looks
> better to me dragged further away, which I have done for the score in
> question using Denemo.
this looks a bit ugly - I'vel added an issue to the tracker
https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3456&thanks=3456&ts=1373898751.
two quick workarounds:
f''4.- \tweak #'padding #2 \fermata
or
\dotsDown f''4. \fermata
thank your Robert for reporting this
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/fermata-on-dotted-notes-on-the-top-line-tp148048p148049.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: fermata on dotted notes on the top line
Hmm, that does like quite bad.
But Eluze has the right idea:
I would just use something like
f''4.- \tweak #'padding #1 \fermata
...as a temporary fix :)
-Ben
Eluze wrote
>
> Richard Shann wrote
>> I don't know if this is the right forum for posting unfortunate examples
>> of LilyPond's output but I came across this one:
>>
>> \version "2.16"
>> \score {
>> f''4.\fermata
>> }
>>
>> The fermata seems connected visually with the dot on the note, it looks
>> better to me dragged further away, which I have done for the score in
>> question using Denemo.
> this looks a bit ugly - I'vel added an issue to the tracker
> https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3456&thanks=3456&ts=1373898751.
>
> two quick workarounds:
>
> f''4.- \tweak #'padding #2 \fermata
>
> or
>
> \dotsDown f''4. \fermata
>
> thank your Robert for reporting this
>
> Eluze
-
composer | sound designer
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/fermata-on-dotted-notes-on-the-top-line-tp148048p148050.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: fermata on dotted notes on the top line
What I actually used was a tweak to the offset, as I hadn't got round to
adding padding as an option in Denemo; Eluze has pricked my conscience
about this and I have now added an option to tweak the padding of such
objects by right clicking on the typeset score and choosing Padding from
the pop-up menu.
Richard
On Mon, 2013-07-15 at 09:38 -0700, SoundsFromSound wrote:
> Hmm, that does like quite bad.
>
> But Eluze has the right idea:
> I would just use something like
>
> f''4.- \tweak #'padding #1 \fermata
>
> ...as a temporary fix :)
>
> -Ben
>
>
>
> Eluze wrote
> >
> > Richard Shann wrote
> >> I don't know if this is the right forum for posting unfortunate examples
> >> of LilyPond's output but I came across this one:
> >>
> >> \version "2.16"
> >> \score {
> >> f''4.\fermata
> >> }
> >>
> >> The fermata seems connected visually with the dot on the note, it looks
> >> better to me dragged further away, which I have done for the score in
> >> question using Denemo.
> > this looks a bit ugly - I'vel added an issue to the tracker
> > https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3456&thanks=3456&ts=1373898751.
> >
> > two quick workarounds:
> >
> > f''4.- \tweak #'padding #2 \fermata
> >
> > or
> >
> > \dotsDown f''4. \fermata
> >
> > thank your Robert for reporting this
> >
> > Eluze
>
>
>
>
>
> -
> composer | sound designer
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/fermata-on-dotted-notes-on-the-top-line-tp148048p148050.html
> Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> ___
> lilypond-user mailing list
> lilypond-user@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Appoggiatura or not appoggiatura?
John Kliewe writes:
> Many thanks to the lilypond-user group for their advice on measure #47
> of the Chopin Nocturne #3 (Op 9 No 3). Urs' article on voices was
> particularly helpful.
>
> My next challenge appeared in measure #69. This is working for me :
>
> \version "2.16.0"
> \relative c'
> { \clef treble
> \time 6/8
> \key b \major
> ais'4.\p \once \override Slur #'stencil = ##f \appoggiatura {b8[\( ais
> gisis ais]}
> <<
> {dis4 b8}
> \new Voice
> {\stemUp
> \once \override TupletBracket #'bracket-visibility = ##f
> \once \override TupletNumber #'stencil = ##f
> \times 1/2
> {dis8 \teeny d cis c}
> \normalsize b8}
> >>
> \oneVoice
> ais4 gis8\)
> }
>
> At first I assumed that both tuplets were appoggiatura, but I couldn't
> get that to work. I also tried cue notes, but merging the head of a
> cue note with a full-size note head was no good either. So my final
> version (above) treats the first tuplet as an appoggiatura, but the
> second is a new voice in a smaller font.
>
> I'm delighted with the results. But I do wonder if anyone in the group
> thinks I may have missed a better approach?
Not better, but another possible way:
\version "2.16.0"
\relative c'
{ \clef treble
\time 6/8
\key b \major
ais'4.\p \once \override Slur #'stencil = ##f \appoggiatura {b8[\( ais
gisis ais]}
<<
{dis4 b8}
\new Voice
{\stemUp
{ dis8*1/2[ \teeny d cis c}
\normalsize b8]}
>>
\oneVoice
ais4 gis8\)
}
--
David R
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
feature request: abs-fontsize available for all text grobs
Hello, There are a lot of places where I would like to use abs-fontsize: InstrumentName, LyricText, etc. It would be nice if there were a built-in, intuitive, consistent, direct method of setting an absolute font size, e.g., \override InstrumentName.font-size = #(abs-fontsize . 10) How difficult would this be to implement? (I'm happy to contribute a few euros in sponsorship funds.) Thanks, Kieren. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Uneven note spacing
Greetings List,
In the following example from a piece I am setting, the composer wants
the notes in the tuplets exactly evenly spaced, but I see considerable
unevenness here. There are two questions. First, is this really the
classical and canonical way to space tuplet notes when in the cross
staff situation here? Secondly, even if it is, how can I make them
evenly spaced out?
If I use proportional notation, the only way to spread them out evenly
is to use such a large value that the score becomes ridiculously widely
spaced.
The dodecaphonic accidental style is required in this piece.
Any help appreciated!
Andrew
\version "2.17.21"
\paper {
ragged-right = ##t
}
% move to upper staff, stems down
upsd = #(define-music-function (parser location) ()
#{
\change Staff = upper
\stemDown
#}
)
% move to lower staff, stems up
downsu = #(define-music-function (parser location) ()
#{
\change Staff = lower
\stemUp
#}
)
upper = \relative c'' {
\clef bass
\time 1/4
s4 s4 s4 s4 s4 s4
}
lower = \relative c {
\clef bass
\time 1/4
\override TupletBracket.bracket-visibility = ##t
\tupletDown
\tuplet 7/8 {
r16. a32^.[
\once \override Stem.beaming = #(cons (list 0 1 2) (list 1 2))
\upsd g'_.
\once \override Stem.beaming = #(cons (list 0 1) (list -1 0 1)) f_.
\downsu bes,^.]
}
\stemUp
\tuplet 7/8 {
ces32[ \upsd ces ces \downsu ces \upsd ces \upsd ces \downsu ces]
}
c4 c4 c4 c4
}
\score {
<<
\new Staff = "upper" { \upper }
\new Staff = "lower" { \lower }
>>
\layout {
\context {
\Score
\accidentalStyle Score.dodecaphonic
}
}
}
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: feature request: abs-fontsize available for all text grobs
Am 15.07.2013 20:30, schrieb Kieren MacMillan: Hello, There are a lot of places where I would like to use abs-fontsize: InstrumentName, LyricText, etc. It would be nice if there were a built-in, intuitive, consistent, direct method of setting an absolute font size, e.g., \override InstrumentName.font-size = #(abs-fontsize . 10) I had thought of such a feature some months ago; my syntax proposal would be something like \set fontScaling = #absolute or \set fontScaling = #relative perhaps with a better keyword. By the way, a feature like this would come in handy for eps inclusions, too – I remember that I had to define a \epsfile-mm command in analogy to the implemented \epsfile to allow for dimensions to be set in millimeters. How difficult would this be to implement? My estimations in such situations go horribly wrong each time, so I just state "I don't know" for safety reasons ;-) Marc (I'm happy to contribute a few euros in sponsorship funds.) Thanks, Kieren. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
LSR preview broken?
I've just added a snippet to the LSR (`Percent repeat counters for piano music'), but I'm not able to preview it. Since I don't have a 1.14 lilypond binary, I can't check whether the problem is in the file (it compiles fine with 1.16 and the current development version). However, even adding a very simple lilypond snippet which certainly displays fine doesn't succeed. I thus wonder whether the LSR preview for non-approved snippets currently work at all... Werner ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Dash one sibling of a slur/PhrasingSlur/Tie
Hi, in an edition I prepare I often have the situation that I want to dash one sibling of a Slur (because the original edition forgot to start a slur before the line break. Is there a convenient way to do so without having to define two curves and tweak them independently? Thanks Urs ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
