Re: segfault in 2.14.2 debian package

2011-10-25 Thread Federico Bruni

Il 24/10/2011 20:44, Don Armstrong ha scritto:

You're not running Debian. This looks like an issue with guile-1.8
which has been fixed in Debian but not in Ubuntu, or you're mixing and
matching Debian and Ubuntu packages and have found a API/ABI issue. In
any event, this isn't a problem with the Debian packages, so I can't
really help you.


Believe me, I'm using Debian:

# lsb_release -a
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID:Debian
Description:Debian GNU/Linux testing (wheezy)
Release:testing
Codename:wheezy


This is the version of guile-1.8:

# aptitude show guile-1.8
Package: guile-1.8
State: installed
Automatically installed: yes
Version: 1.8.8+1-6


I'm not mixing Debian/Ubuntu.
Maybe my sources.list is not much clean (http.us.debian.org is a "double 
entry" and it shouldn't probably be there). I'm asking for help on 
italian debian users list.

Do you tink there's something that may affect lilypond installation?


deb http://ftp.it.debian.org/debian/ testing main non-free
deb-src http://ftp.it.debian.org/debian/ testing main

deb http://security.debian.org/ wheezy/updates main
deb-src http://security.debian.org/ wheezy/updates main

# Debian Multimedia
deb http://www.debian-multimedia.org/ wheezy main non-free


# Lumiera Depot
deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian/ wheezy main
deb http://lumiera.org/debian/ squeeze experimental
deb-src http://lumiera.org/debian/ squeeze experimental



___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: slightly offtopic,

2011-10-25 Thread ole

Am 25.10.2011 um 08:57 schrieb David Rogers:

> Francisco Vila  writes:
> 
>> 2011/10/25 ole : 
>>> Option+a did the trick (I'am on Mac OS X using Jedit with LilypondTool), 
>>> very easy... 
>> If you newly discovered that, how could you have written it in your email in 
>> the first place?
> 
> (If the mail client is set for UTF-8 but the editor is not... or if someone 
> has the feeling "This is Lilypond; I'll have to find hard ways of doing 
> everything...") :)

I just copy & paste it from an .doc in the mail
but did not try that with my .ly file (exactly because I thougth that it could 
not be that easy...:-))

ole
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Updates to bagpipe.ly

2011-10-25 Thread Sven Axelsson
On 21 October 2011 00:52, Jon Chalk  wrote:
> I think I may have found a small problem with bagpipe.ly...  Each
> embellishment that uses \small should have a \normalsize after it.

Man, I can't believe I haven't noticed that before! Or anyone else
using bagpipe.ly for that matter.

Anyhow, for now, just change line 94 in
share/lilypond/VERSION/ly/bagpipe.ly from

  \grace $notes

to

  \small \grace $notes \normalsize

You can also remove all other instances of \small in the file, since
they are now redundant.

Graham, or anyone on the bug sqad: Do you want me to submit a proper
diff for this change?

-- 
Sven Axelsson
++[>++>+++>++>++
><-]>.+..>+.>+.<<-.>>+.>.<<.
+++.>-.<<++.>>.<++.>>>++..>>.<.

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Making feathered beams more variable

2011-10-25 Thread harm6

Hi David,

David Nalesnik-2 wrote:
> 
> Hi Harm,
> 
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Thomas Morley <
> thomasmorle...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> (...)
>> Values like "0" or values greater than the stem-count are faking
>> \override
>> Beam #'grow-direction = #LEFT (RIGHT). (This is not very elegant: switch
>> on
>> the color in \layout).
>>
> 
> I'm not sure what I'm supposed to see here -- looks fine to me.  (There
> must
> be a way to get around needing to give a non-existent "feather" a length
> of
> 0.001 to avoid division by zero, though, but my head gets a bit tangled up
> thinking about it!)
> 
I'm looking for a method to integrate something like:

(if (= number 0)
 use: \override Beam #'grow-direction = #LEFT
(if (>= number stem-count)
 use: \override Beam #'grow-direction = #RIGHT
 otherwise use: \override Beam #'stencil = (grow-beam-var arg)

into the Beam-stencil-override.

I'm aware of the possibility to create a function to do that, but this is
not intended.

So, is it possible to program (grob-property-set! grob 'grow-direction LEFT)
somewhere in a stencil-override?


>>One little problem: With values between 0 and 1 (p.e. 0.5 or 0.8) I
retrieve
>> every time the same output. Well, no one would ever enter such strange
>> values and perhaps I'm a little bit paranoic, but could it be, that
>> there's
>> a problem I can't see?
>>
> 
> I think I solved this problem by changing the definition of the variable
> x-L.  So now you can create all sorts of questionable subtleties (see
> image)
> :)
> 
Thanks a lot for improving my function several times and answering all my
questions about beams!


There are two problems left.
First tiny problem:
The output with kneed-beams is ugly in some cases:
This example gives a overlooking stem at beam-end (test-code only)

xy = \once\override Stem #'french-beaming = ##t

\relative c {
\once\override Beam #'stencil = #(grow-beam-var 5)
f32 [ \xy f''' f,,, \xy f''' f,,, \xy f''' f,,, \xy f''' f,,, \xy
f''']
}

I'm not sure how to fix. 'french-beaming only works with the inner stems. 
Is there a default-command I can't find? Should I integrate something into
the definition of grow-beam-var? Or create a separate override for this
stem?


Regarding the following example I'm not sure: should the peak point up or
down? What do you think?

\relative c' {
\override Beam #'auto-knee-gap = #4
\override Beam #'stencil = #(grow-beam-var 16)
c''32 [b a g
f g a b
c b a g
f g a b
e,,, c''' b a
g a b c
d c b a
g a b c]
c1
}

Second problem.
I tried to use \featherDuration with my Definition, but it doesn't work as
expected (seems it works only once a beam):

\relative c'' {
 \override Beam #'stencil = #(grow-beam-var 7)

 a64 [
 \featherDurations #(ly:make-moment 1 2)
 {a a a
 a a a a}

 a 
 \featherDurations #(ly:make-moment 2 1) 
 {a a a
 a a a a

 a a a a
 a a a a

 a a a a
 a a a} a]
 a2
}

Any idea?

Many thanks,
  Harm

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://old.nabble.com/Making-feathered-beams-more-variable-tp32705102p32718725.html
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: segfault in 2.14.2 debian package

2011-10-25 Thread Don Armstrong
On Tue, 25 Oct 2011, Federico Bruni wrote:
> Il 24/10/2011 20:44, Don Armstrong ha scritto:
> >You're not running Debian. This looks like an issue with guile-1.8
> >which has been fixed in Debian but not in Ubuntu, or you're mixing and
> >matching Debian and Ubuntu packages and have found a API/ABI issue. In
> >any event, this isn't a problem with the Debian packages, so I can't
> >really help you.
> 
> Believe me, I'm using Debian:

Ah, sorry. If you are running Debian, please file a bug using
reportbug against lilypond. That will give me enough additional
information that I can at least start to see what is going wrong.
 

Don Armstrong

-- 
Where I sleep at night, is this important compared to what I read
during the day? What do you think defines me? Where I slept or what I
did all day?
 -- Thomas Van Orden of Van Orden v. Perry

http://www.donarmstrong.com  http://rzlab.ucr.edu

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: segfault in 2.14.2 debian package

2011-10-25 Thread Federico Bruni


Il 25/10/2011 20:05, Don Armstrong ha scritto:

Ah, sorry. If you are running Debian, please file a bug using
reportbug against lilypond. That will give me enough additional
information that I can at least start to see what is going wrong.


Filed a report here:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=646632

Hope it's ok.
Thanks,
Federico
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Updates to bagpipe.ly

2011-10-25 Thread Colin Campbell

On 11-10-25 07:38 AM, Sven Axelsson wrote:

On 21 October 2011 00:52, Jon Chalk  wrote:

I think I may have found a small problem with bagpipe.ly...  Each
embellishment that uses \small should have a \normalsize after it.

Man, I can't believe I haven't noticed that before! Or anyone else
using bagpipe.ly for that matter.

Anyhow, for now, just change line 94 in
share/lilypond/VERSION/ly/bagpipe.ly from

   \grace $notes

to

   \small \grace $notes \normalsize

You can also remove all other instances of \small in the file, since
they are now redundant.

Graham, or anyone on the bug sqad: Do you want me to submit a proper
diff for this change?




Yes, please!

Cheers,
Colin

--
I've learned that you shouldn't go through life with a catcher's mitt on both 
hands.
You need to be able to throw something back.
-Maya Angelou, poet (1928- )


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: gregorian.ly omissions

2011-10-25 Thread Bill Mooney

Greetings Trevor,
Thank you for the clarification regarding episema usage in LP.
There was a bit of confusion here with some things working at 
cross-purposes, as well as a bit of confusion within my personal CPU! :)

It's nicely sorted now, and is working well.

If you feel able, could you point me in the right direction to enable 
making the Gregorian markings 'ictus' 'circulus' etc larger than their 
defaults?


Thanks again,
Regards
Bill

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Spacing

2011-10-25 Thread GRAEME F ST CLAIR
I just built a hymn under 2.14.2 using the Hymn structure 
from Learning Lilypond 2.12.3 secn 3.2.3 "Voices & 
Vocals".  The structure is unaltered, except that I have 
added a \version and a \header (and there are only 2 vv 
iso 4!).


I find that the first system is kind of jammed up against 
the header line giving the poet and composer, and I'd like 
some more vertical white space in there.


Secondly, the whole thing is in 3 systems, with room for a 
fourth, so I also have some spare real estate on the page.


What directives, commands, instructions etc should I be 
looking at to put a little more "air" into its appearance?


Rgds, GFStC.




___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Spacing

2011-10-25 Thread Bill Mooney

You wrote...
++
I just built a hymn under 2.14.2 using the Hymn structure from Learning 
Lilypond 2.12.3 secn 3.2.3 "Voices & Vocals". The structure is 
unaltered, except that I have added a \version and a \header (and there 
are only 2 vv iso 4!).


I find that the first system is kind of jammed up against the header 
line giving the poet and composer, and I'd like some more vertical white 
space in there.


Secondly, the whole thing is in 3 systems, with room for a fourth, so I 
also have some spare real estate on the page.


What directives, commands, instructions etc should I be looking at to 
put a little more "air" into its appearance?


Rgds, GFStC.
++

There was a query about spacing sometime recently with a response by 
Reinhold Kainhofer who has a clever site which allows one to generate 
empty music score sheets in a variety of layouts.

From one of these I made use of the following:-
+++
\paper {
left-margin = 20\mm
right-margin = 10\mm
% top-margin = 10\mm
bottom-margin = 10\mm
 % oddHeaderMarkup = ##f
%  evenHeaderMarkup = ##f

  pages=4 %fiddle this to suit
  systems-per-page=3 %fiddle this to suit
  ragged-bottom=##f
  ragged-last-bottom=##f
  ragged-last=##f
  ragged-right=##f

  top-system-spacing #'basic-distance = #7
  top-markup-spacing #'basic-distance = #5
  last-bottom-spacing #'basic-distance = #10
  markup-system-spacing #'basic-distance = #7

  top-system-spacing #'stretchability = #60
  top-markup-spacing #'stretchability = #40
  last-bottom-spacing #'stretchability = #60

  markup-system-spacing #'stretchability = #60
  system-system-spacing #'stretchability = #40
}
+++
By fiddling with the number of systems per page and the number of pages, 
and some of the other values it is possible to make a very pleasing 
layout from your existing file...
It would pay to read this paper block in conjunction with the LP manuals 
to fully understand what is being done!


Hope this helps

Regards
Bill

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user