Re: Arpeggios from chordmode?
Is there as simple way to get chord mode to return:
c4 e g
instead of
4
Is something like that what you wanted ?
#(use-modules (ice-9 receive))
%% see http://www.gnu.org/software/guile/manual/guile.html#Multiple-Values
#(define (chords-list->seq-list lst)
(receive (notes others)
(partition (lambda(x) (ly:duration? (ly:music-property x
'duration)))
lst)
(map (lambda(x)
(let ((elts (list x)))
(if (pair? others)(begin
(set! elts (append elts others))
(set! others '(
(make-music 'EventChord 'elements elts)))
notes)))
chordsToSeq = #(define-music-function (parser location music)(ly:music?)
(music-map
(lambda (x)
(if (eq? 'EventChord (ly:music-property x 'name))
(make-music 'SequentialMusic 'elements
(chords-list->seq-list (ly:music-property x 'elements)))
x))
music))
music = \chordmode {d4:min7\f g:7 c:maj7}
\new Voice \chordsToSeq \music
%%
Gilles<>___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Transparent Measure
Dear Shelby, I would try it with \stopStaff and and \startStaff I think You have something in mind like one can find in some scores of Lutoslwaski, don't You? > I'd like to be able to insert a transparent measure (remove the staff > lines) at > any point in a staff. > > I've tried: > > \overrride StaffSymbol #'transparent = ##t > > But it only works at the beginning of a Staff, and cannot be changed back > to > engrave the lines. > ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Lilypond with the Command Line
Hello, I am wondering if it is possible to compile a lilypond source file on the command line but pass arguments on the command line. For example let's say the source file by default prints as a treble clef. Could you pass a command on the command line and tell Lilypond to process the source file and change it to a bass clef instead? without changing the source file permanently? Could this be done using the Scheme evaluate function? http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.12/Documentation/user/lilypond-program/Command-line-options-for-lilypond#Command-line-options-for-lilypond Please let me know if this is possible and if so where I might find some info on it. Thanks, Carl ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Lilypond with the Command Line
On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 03:31:21PM -0400, cte...@wesleyan.edu wrote: > I am wondering if it is possible to compile a lilypond source file on the > command line but pass arguments on the command line. For example let's say > the source file by default prints as a treble clef. Could you pass a > command on the command line and tell Lilypond to process the source file > and change it to a bass clef instead? without changing the source file > permanently? Could this be done using the Scheme evaluate function? Yes. Use \tag, and look on LSR for more information. There's 1 or 2 examples of this there. Cheers, - Graham ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Renaissance lute and tab
2011/7/24 Janek Warchoł : > Hmm, does this work or is this just a proof-of-concept? I wasn't able > to determine it after reading > http://www.gnu.org/software/guile/manual/html_node/Exactness.html I suppose it might break if users try to make pitches with really extreme real numbers; it could cause a numerical overflow if int64 is too small to hold the numerator or denominator. > If this works, should i wrap it into a patch and put it on Rietveld or > will you do it yourself? Well, there is an alternative which might be preferable: only allow fractions as the third argument (via the predicate ly_is_fraction). Cheers, Neil ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
