Re: bad executable for Win - 2.13.11
胡海鹏 - Hu Haipeng wrote Saturday, January 16, 2010 10:24 PM I downloaded 2.13.11, but the error dialog for "whatever can't be 'read'" appears when compiling. I recall 2.11.50 and 51 have this problem. Haipeng I've downloaded 2.13.11 and compiled all the snippets in the pitches section of the Notation Reference without error. Could you please post a short example which shows the problem. Trevor ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
vertical spacing issue
Hello, I think, vertical spacing issues have been discussed often here. But even playing around with VerticalAxisGroup doesn't get my score in an acceptible design. The demerit is that the staves are pinned together while the dynamics line gets huge space. Can you get me a hint, what I have to tweak to control the spacing -- and probably same important where I have to add the tweaks? The complete score is at http://dj1na.gmxhome.de/score/LR3.ly Best regards, Helge ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
ANN: Frescobaldi 1.0.1 released and new development features
Hi all, Frescobaldi 1.0.1 has been released, a bugfix release in the stable 1.0 branch, including some bugfixes and stability improvements and a new Galician translation contributed by Manuel A. Vázquez. Download: http://lilykde.googlecode.com/files/frescobaldi-1.0.1.tar.gz The development branch is also shaping up nicely, and is quite usable even if there is not yet a package release. Most compelling new feature in the development branch is that you can configure multiple versions of LilyPond (installed on different places on your system; the binaries don't need to be in your PATH). You can configure a default version to use, but Frescobaldi can also choose a suitable version of LilyPond depending on the \version statement in your document. A custom Run LilyPond dialog has been added (Ctrl+Shift+M or shift-click the LilyPond icon) to choose a particular version and set other parameters for a LilyPond run). This way you can play and test with development releases of LilyPond while still using a stable LilyPond for your production work. Other niceties are that it is possible to assign keyboard shortcuts to articulations in the Quick Insert panel (right-click the articulation buttons), and a new dialog to insert characters from the Unicode table. Some expansions in the Expansions Dialog now have default keyboard shortcuts. The documentation has been improved. You can get the development branch of Frescobaldi by entering these commands: svn checkout http://lilykde.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/frescobaldi cd frescobaldi cmake . && make && sudo make install You can keep your copy of Frescobaldi up-to-date with: cd frescobaldi svn update && cmake . && make && sudo make install The development branch of Frescobaldi requires Python 2.6, KDE 4.2 or higher and SIP 4.9.1 or higher (at least 4.9.3 recommended). See also the INSTALL file in the frescobaldi directory. Bug reports and wishes are very welcome. Enjoy and best regards, Wilbert Berendsen -- Frescobaldi, LilyPond editor for KDE: http://www.frescobaldi.org/ Nederlands LilyPond forum: http://www.lilypondforum.nl/ ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
problem with accents
I'm using version 2.12.1. If I put an accented vowels (such as à, è, ì, ò, ù) in a .ly file, the PDF output doesn't show it at all. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: problem with accents
Make sure you save the file in utf-8 format. Cheers, - Graham On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 5:17 PM, Battista Lonardi wrote: > I'm using version 2.12.1. > If I put an accented vowels (such as à, è, ì, ò, ù) in a .ly file, the PDF > output doesn't show it at all. > > ___ > lilypond-user mailing list > lilypond-user@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user > > ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Compound time signature in early music
As I don't know Scheme very well I need assistance with this problem ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: footers
Thanks also.
On 1/16/2010 10:20 PM, i...@soundand.com wrote:
Long ago I was given this to work with and you can alter it as you need.
copyright = \markup { \tiny \override #'(baseline-skip . 0.5)
\center-column
{ "CC lic 2.5 some rights reserved your name or whatever 2009"
"see http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/2.5/";
} }
The final page will still have the lilypond information.
Hope this helps
Jay
--
Regards,
~Michael~
If you have received this message in error, please notify the original sender
immediately by return e-mail and delete this message, along with any
attachments, from your computer/handheld. Thank you.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Adding Rehearsal Marks, v2.12.2
Apologies...I'm sure this is addressed somewhere (...but I did search the documentation and this forum!). How do I add rehearsal letters to an existing score without going through and adding a "\mark" for every letter in every part? Thanks so much! Randy -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Adding-Rehearsal-Marks%2C-v2.12.2-tp27204042p27204042.html Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Compound time signature in early music
On 17.01.2010, at 20:30, M. E. wrote: As I don't know Scheme very well I need assistance with this problem ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user This is a wonderful example of a bad question. (In fact, it isn't a question at all.) It lacks context, anyone attempting to help you will need more information. Have you read http://catb.org/~esr/faqs/ smart-questions.html ? It's not a very long read, and the topics it covers are very useful. The few things I would say to you are: 1) Read the Learning Manual once through. It's not very long, and it's a very useful tool to understanding how to get what you want out of lilypond. 2) do a quick search on the mailing list archive at http:// lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/ for your topic. The default search is by score, but I find reverse chronological order to usually be more helpful. After all that is done: 1) Ask a question (not simply a statement of need) 2) when asking your question, make it specific. As this is a volunteer program, you're more likely to be helped if you help yourself. Tell us what you want to do, what you've tried, and what the result has been. That provides much needed context.___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Adding Rehearsal Marks, v2.12.2
On 18.01.2010, at 00:21, rasAK wrote: Apologies...I'm sure this is addressed somewhere (...but I did search the documentation and this forum!). How do I add rehearsal letters to an existing score without going through and adding a "\mark" for every letter in every part? Thanks so much! Randy This is probably best answered in the Notation Reference, section 3.3.2, different editions from one source ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Adding Rehearsal Marks, v2.12.2
>This is probably best answered in the Notation Reference, section
> 3.3.2, different editions from one source
I looked through that section, but it wasn't clear to me how that solves my
problem.
I'm doing instrumental parts for a double-choir Bach motet. The result will
be 9 parts (2 each of Vln I, Vln II, Vla, Cello + Double Bass). With 30
rehearsal letters in the piece, I don't want to have to do that in 9
separate parts if I can avoid it. Not to mention if (heaven forbid!) there
were any changes.
What I ended up doing was:
1) creating a separate part containing only rests AND the rehearsal letters.
2) I then added this part to my individual part \score { } sections.
3) Finally, I used \override to hide all staves with rests-only.
I just wasn't sure whether there was a better (standard?) way to do this.
Randy
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Adding-Rehearsal-Marks%2C-v2.12.2-tp27204042p27204346.html
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Adding Rehearsal Marks, v2.12.2
Hi Randy,
> What I ended up doing was:
> 1) creating a separate part containing only rests AND the rehearsal letters.
> 2) I then added this part to my individual part \score { } sections.
> 3) Finally, I used \override to hide all staves with rests-only.
>
> I just wasn't sure whether there was a better (standard?) way to do this.
Yes.
1. Create a global variable — in it, include all time signatures, key
signatures, rehearsal letters, tempo changes, etc.: anything that every part
should contain. [Note: To "kill time", use skips, *not* rests!]
2. Create variables for each part's music.
3. Combine (using << ... >>) the global variable with the part's music variable
in the score and part(s).
There are lots of examples in the LSR and docs on how to do this.
Good luck!
Kieren.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Adding Rehearsal Marks, v2.12.2
rasAK wrote: Apologies...I'm sure this is addressed somewhere (...but I did search the documentation and this forum!). How do I add rehearsal letters to an existing score without going through and adding a "\mark" for every letter in every part? Thanks so much! Randy You might have a look in the Snippet Repository, at "Printing Marks On Every Staff". Colin -- When you find a big kettle of crazy, it's best not to stir it. - Scott Adams, "Dilbert" Sept 22,'09 ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Missing graphic files
On Jan 16, 2010, at 5:18 PM, John Mandereau wrote: Hi Patrick, Le samedi 16 janvier 2010 à 16:47 -0600, Patrick Karl a écrit : I am a relative newcomer to LilyPond. I happened upon the "Guide for the Absolute Beginner" at http://wiki.lilynet.net/index.php/ Guide_for_the_Absolute_Beginner. While it appears to be quite a nice introduction to LilyPond, it turns out that all of the graphic images (I haven't actually verified that they are _all_ missing, but I haven't found any that are present) are missing. Is it possible to resurrect these graphics? Without them, the Guide is mainly just frustrating. It's possible to resurrect these graphics by calling LilyPond on the source snippets that should still be present in that Guide, but I'm so buried under a ton of other LilyPond-related work that I can't do this myself. If you think that Guide is worthwhile besides what already exists -- especially check out the section Introduction of lilypond.org future website and the tutorial this Introduction guides to (the tutorial are two first chapters of the Leraning Manual), then please send your request for resurrecting graphics on that wiki page to LilyPond users list lilypond-u...@gnu.org. I would be willing to regenerate all of the missing graphics if someone would be able to put them in the proper place. Why do you think they disappeared? Regards, Patrick ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Compound time signature in early music
Apologies for the earlier errant message; most of the original message disappeared in transit it seems. As I don't know Scheme very well, I need assistance with the following problem. I would like to create a compound time signature, but with one of the columns consisting only of a time signature symbol rather than a pair of numbers e.g., C 6/2. I'm aware of the example in the LSR and one written to this list by Valentin some time ago: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2008-01/msg00623.html However, these are limited to numerated time signatures only. Any help with my grob mystery would be appreciated. Mark ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
One Line Column Markup
Hi, I'm sure what i'm trying is quite simple but I can't find the solution.
Is there a way of printing a column in the space of one standar line?
I'm trying something like these:
\version "2.12.2"
\markup{
4
\column { \super a . }
}
These gives me something like these:
a
4
.
Not what I'm looking for. What I need is to put the "a" character over
the "." character and both in the same line hight of the "4"
character.
I hope its clear. Thanks to anybody.
tdy
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: One Line Column Markup
without checking, have you tried \line {4 \center-column {\super a .}}?
On 18.01.2010, at 06:48, Pato Press wrote:
Hi, I'm sure what i'm trying is quite simple but I can't find the
solution.
Is there a way of printing a column in the space of one standar line?
I'm trying something like these:
\version "2.12.2"
\markup{
4
\column { \super a . }
}
These gives me something like these:
a
4
.
Not what I'm looking for. What I need is to put the "a" character over
the "." character and both in the same line hight of the "4"
character.
I hope its clear. Thanks to anybody.
tdy
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: One Line Column Markup
without checking, have you tried \line {4 \center-column {\super a .}}?
On 18.01.2010, at 06:48, Pato Press wrote:
Hi, I'm sure what i'm trying is quite simple but I can't find the
solution.
Is there a way of printing a column in the space of one standar line?
I'm trying something like these:
\version "2.12.2"
\markup{
4
\column { \super a . }
}
These gives me something like these:
a
4
.
Not what I'm looking for. What I need is to put the "a" character over
the "." character and both in the same line hight of the "4"
character.
I hope its clear. Thanks to anybody.
tdy
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Software versions in text
I'm putting together a book of folk tunes, and would like to reference the versions of software used. I kown you can automatically pick up the Lilypond version (and have done so). However, is there a similar way of getting the JEdit and LilyPondTool versions? -- Mark Austin -- For Whigs admit no force but argument -- ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Software versions in text
Mark Austin wrote: I'm putting together a book of folk tunes, and would like to reference the versions of software used. I kown you can automatically pick up the Lilypond version (and have done so). However, is there a similar way of getting the JEdit and LilyPondTool versions? I'm not entirely sure what you need, but some ideas: In the settings folder of jedit, ~/.jedit or c:\documents and settings\you\.jedit there is the activity.log: it contains the jEdit version string: [notice] jEdit: jEdit version 4.3 The current version of LilyPondTool can be got from the LilyPondTool.props file, which is zipped in the LilyPondTool.jar plugin.lilytool.LilyToolPlugin.version=2.12.894 ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
