Re: libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.9' not found
wing wrote: hi, i am trying to run lilypond under some application. However, i got the following error: lilypond: /usr/lib/mozart/platform/linux-i486/lib/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.9' not found (required by lilypond) Since i am a newbie on linux, i am not sure about what infomation is needed for fixing this problem. Here's some basic info may help OS: Linux 2.6.25.5-1.1-default i686 System: openSUSE 11.0 (i586) lilypond version: 2.10.33-73.1 hope lilyponders can help with this=) thanks! Best, wing. Hi Wing, I'm not sure what you mean by using Lilypond under some application. Do you mean you're using a graphical front end to Lilypond? If so, then I don't know what to do. If you're using Lilypond by itself, then proceed with following advice... The first thing I would try is getting the newest version of Lilypond, which is 2.12.2-1. This is a stable release. http://lilypond.org/web/install/ I suspect that you got 2.10.33 from the Suse repository, and at the time it was probably the latest stable Lilypond. 2.12 is much better and it's worth installing for that reason (and for the much better documentation), but it might also fix this dependency problem. If you installed Lilypond using the Suse package manager, be sure to remove it the same way before installing the new version. To install the new version, download the installer script from the Lilypond site to your desktop, then use the command line: cd ~/Desktop sudo sh ./lil[tab] (tab-complete the script's filename to be sure it's accurate) Press enter, then type your password and it'll install. HTH, Jon -- Jonathan Kulp http://www.jonathankulp.com ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Good luck, Valentin
Valentin Villenave wrote Monday, February 02, 2009 10:49 PM Greetings everybody, Hi Valentin Wow! This is a major work! It must be the largest LilyPond score ever! I compiled the full score last night to peruse, and it looks awesome. The pdf file is 6.65 Mb! I haven't yet been able to look at it musically, but I thought I'd let you know that it can be downloaded easily from your git site (although you need to be git-aware to do this), and compiled under Vista. I had to change only the \includes in main.ly from \include "./foo/bar.ly" to \include "foo/bar.ly" but otherwise it worked first time out of the box. There are a few warnings, mainly about beam slopes and between-system-padding, nothing serious. It took quite a time to compile on my 2Gb laptop, partly because I inadvertently started two compiles of the full score simultaneously (I now realise!), which caused quite a bit of paging, as you might imagine. It should compile much faster on a 4Gb machine, or one at a time! the past couple of weeks has been exhausting and has almost been preventing me from following our mailing lists, but at least it's done now. As John said, there are still two performances on tommorrow and Thursday evening, but at least my work is done. I'm not surprised! I can't imagine even transcribing a work of this magnitude, let alone composing it! I think it has been quite a success indeed. It's funny and straightforward, and both the audience and the perfomers seem to find it amusing. I can't wait to examine it more closely now I have the score. We had a pretty decent media coverage, and not one single interview has been published without mentioning LilyPond and the special terms of the opera's license. As soon as I have more time (any day now), I'll tell you more about that (this very evening, I'm even advertising LilyPond on TV!). One other thing worth mentioning is that this project has allowed me to demonstrate LilyPond power and beauty. Some musicians have asked me to reprint their parts with a different layout, bigger staves, thicker barlines, more time to turn their pages, etc; all of which I've been able to do impressively quickly and perfectly; not to mention more complicated stuff such as clean transpositions, clefs fine-tuning etc. Several musicians have made nice compliments about the quality of their printed parts. Absolutely! It looks beautiful! As this opera is adapted from a comic book, I have included some graphics into the score, and it has been quite pleasant to see the musicians smile while playing, and to hear the conductor say "let's start back from... hem.. well, from the little drawing that looks like a castle". I'm looking forward to discovering what the watering can means :) The license I have chosen wraps together the GPL for the source code (this way you may use any function, macro, PostScript or even chunks of music), and a CC by-nc-sa for the "narrative work" (characters, story, etc.), which has allowed us to "sell" our stuff to the opera house. Since this license is copyleft, it will also cover any derivative work such as the video recording that has been made, which I plan to offer on the Internet, with convenient subtitles. This also means that the recorded music may be remixed, and redistributed in a non-commercial approach. (We'll wait for several months, and then see if we can remove the -nc- term from the license.) In the meantime, you can have a look at http://valentin.villenave.info/opera/download.html (in French) and at the source code: http://repo.or.cz/w/opera_libre.git As for the title, I think that would be "The Foreign Affair"...; by the way, I'm looking for a skilled translator to translate the subtitles. (and/or translate the libretto into English or other languages.) An opera promoter friend of mine is quite keen on comic opera. I intend to show him this. If you ever hear of a translation into English let me know. I'm afraid I don't have any language skills, though. Whether you want to read it, translate it, reproduce it, rewrite it accordingly to your tastes or needs, be my guest: this work is meant for everyone, and I'd be really happy if it could have a life of its own after my work is done. Many, many thanks for all your work on this, and for LilyPond. Cheers, Valentin Trevor ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Good luck, Valentin
2009/2/4 Trevor Daniels : > Wow! This is a major work! It must be the largest LilyPond score > ever! I compiled the full score last night to peruse, and it looks > awesome. The pdf file is 6.65 Mb! Thanks a lot, but this is nothing compared to Nicolas' work :-) (I haven't had a chance to have a look at Kieren's works either, but I'm sure it's quite impressive too.) > I haven't yet been able to look at it musically, but I thought I'd let you > know that it can be downloaded easily from your git site (although > you need to be git-aware to do this), and compiled under Vista. Oh, thanks for testing. Alternatively, the PDF can be downloaded at my homepage (I'll make an English version too). > I had to change only the \includes in main.ly from > \include "./foo/bar.ly" to \include "foo/bar.ly" Well, this is Windows. The reason why I have "./" is just in case I might need to rearrange the subdirectories, and do a find-and-replace in the paths. > but otherwise it worked first time out of the box. There are a few > warnings, mainly about beam slopes and between-system-padding, > nothing serious. Yes. It used to compile without a *single* warning, but since I had to make a few modifications in a rush, I guess this isn't true anymore... > It took quite a time to compile on my 2Gb laptop, partly because I > inadvertently started two compiles of the full score simultaneously (I now > realise!), which caused quite a bit of paging, as you might > imagine. It should compile much faster on a 4Gb machine, or one > at a time! Yes. RAM is the key, indeed. > I'm not surprised! I can't imagine even transcribing a work of this > magnitude, let alone composing it! Trust me, the LilyPonding was the fun part :-) > I can't wait to examine it more closely now I have the score. I'm looking forward to have a multi-language version. The source code is well localized, and there are only a couple of files to translate (possibly with some modifications in the vocal parts, that could be easily achieved using tags). > I'm looking forward to discovering what the watering can means :) This is because there's a character whom everyone think of as the castle's gardener, until we discover it's actually God :-) > An opera promoter friend of mine is quite keen on comic opera. > I intend to show him this. If you ever hear of a translation into English > let me know. I'm afraid I don't have any language skills, > though. Hopefully, the subtitles will be easy enough to translate (even roughly); this could then lead to an English version of the score itself. > Many, many thanks for all your work on this, and for LilyPond. Well, I'm not sure I deserve that... Unlike most of you guys, I had a personal, selfish reason to be working on LilyPond :-) Cheers, Valentin ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Good luck, Valentin
Trevor Daniels wrote: It took quite a time to compile on my 2Gb laptop, partly because I inadvertently started two compiles of the full score simultaneously (I now realise!), which caused quite a bit of paging, as you might imagine. It should compile much faster on a 4Gb machine, or one at a time! I downloaded the code and started compiling but after about 15 minutes had to interrupt it because I needed to go to work. When I get to work this morning I'll start compiling and see if it'll run its course while I'm doing other things. My laptop also has 2GB of RAM so it'll have to work hard. :) Congrats on the successful premiere, Valentin! Can't wait to see the video. Best, Jon -- Jonathan Kulp http://www.jonathankulp.com ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.9' not found
Jonathan Kulp wrote: wing wrote: hi, i am trying to run lilypond under some application. However, i got the following error: lilypond: /usr/lib/mozart/platform/linux-i486/lib/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.9' not found (required by lilypond) Since i am a newbie on linux, i am not sure about what infomation is needed for fixing this problem. Here's some basic info may help OS: Linux 2.6.25.5-1.1-default i686 System: openSUSE 11.0 (i586) lilypond version: 2.10.33-73.1 hope lilyponders can help with this=) thanks! Best, wing. Hi Wing, I'm not sure what you mean by using Lilypond under some application. Do you mean you're using a graphical front end to Lilypond? If so, then I don't know what to do. If you're using Lilypond by itself, then proceed with following advice... The first thing I would try is getting the newest version of Lilypond, which is 2.12.2-1. This is a stable release. http://lilypond.org/web/install/ I suspect that you got 2.10.33 from the Suse repository, and at the time it was probably the latest stable Lilypond. 2.12 is much better and it's worth installing for that reason (and for the much better documentation), but it might also fix this dependency problem. If you installed Lilypond using the Suse package manager, be sure to remove it the same way before installing the new version. To install the new version, download the installer script from the Lilypond site to your desktop, then use the command line: cd ~/Desktop sudo sh ./lil[tab] (tab-complete the script's filename to be sure it's accurate) Press enter, then type your password and it'll install. HTH, Jon Follow Jonathan's advice and you can't go wrong. I too am unsure of your meaning -- while you don't need to compile lilypond yourself, the error you report regarding libstdc++ is typical of missing header files, needed while compiling applications from source code. This particular error could be solved by installing lidstdc++-devel from openSUSE's repository. But again, it's not necessary to do that if you install lilypond via the above method. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Good luck, Valentin
Valentin Villenave writes: > 2009/2/4 Trevor Daniels : > >> I'm not surprised! I can't imagine even transcribing a work of this >> magnitude, let alone composing it! > > Trust me, the LilyPonding was the fun part :-) All the more impressive that you did not get sidetracked to a degree where the task for which the tool was built got left on the wayside. -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Good luck, Valentin
2009/2/4 Jan Nieuwenhuizen : > Wouldn't it be nice to reference some of these great works from lilypond.org? > > [I guess it's a bit late for a concert announcement for The Foreign > Affair'] Actually, I already have something in mind for the LilyPond community platform I plan to launch alongside with the reborn LilyReport. But it's still a top-secret kind of thing (I'll have much more time for that starting Friday). 2009/2/4 David Kastrup : > All the more impressive that you did not get sidetracked to a degree > where the task for which the tool was built got left on the wayside. Definitely not! I have to say that this project wouldn't have even existed without LilyPond. I have learned LilyPond exclusively in order to publish this score, I have paid, developed or suggested quite a bunch of features I needed, etc. Finally, this wonderful community has convinced me there's a bright future (if any) for Free music, Free scores and Free software. Cheers, Valentin ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: phrasing slur continued through a repeat?
On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 11:00:23PM +0100, Robin Bannister wrote:
> Ed Ravin wrote:
>> Would the extra grace notes corrupt the MIDI output?
>
> No. But you can hear them, and you might think that inappropriate. :)
>
> Try out this: { \once \override Rest #'transparent = ##t \grace b4\rest\(
> c8 g8 c8 \) | }
By golly! Invisible and inaudible grace notes! Works great! Could
I trouble you to explain how that works? The invisible part is
straightforward, and I'm guessing the silent rest somehow makes the
grace note silent?
Also, I ended up using a more complex but more readable syntax:
\once \override Rest #'transparent = ##t
\grace { g32 \rest \( } c4 g8 c4. \) |
Since it wasn't immediately obvious that you took a shortcut by
typing in the terms after \grace without any spaces.
Thanks,
-- Ed
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Good luck, Valentin
On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 11:49:49PM +0100, Valentin Villenave wrote: > > The license I have chosen wraps together the GPL for the source code > (this way you may use any function, macro, PostScript or even chunks Great! We can start integrating some of those into lilypond proper in the coming weeks. Glad to hear that the performance was a success, and glad to hear that you have more time in the future. I have a lot of pent-up grumpiness... my team members know almost nothing about computer music, and very little about producing quality code. I am so maoing sick of "research-quality code"... :( But they're not used to me yet, so I've been holding back. It'll be a relief to get back to grumpy lilypond work. I've just about got everything sorted out here. (in case you're wondering about me posting publicly about this, don't worry -- they won't believe that I've been holding back on my criticisms. ;) Cheers, - Graham ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: phrasing slur continued through a repeat?
Am 04.02.2009 um 14:01 schrieb Ed Ravin:
On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 11:00:23PM +0100, Robin Bannister wrote:
Ed Ravin wrote:
Would the extra grace notes corrupt the MIDI output?
No. But you can hear them, and you might think that inappropriate. :)
Try out this: { \once \override Rest #'transparent = ##t \grace b4
\rest\(
c8 g8 c8 \) | }
By golly! Invisible and inaudible grace notes! Works great! Could
I trouble you to explain how that works? The invisible part is
straightforward, and I'm guessing the silent rest somehow makes the
grace note silent?
Also, I ended up using a more complex but more readable syntax:
\once \override Rest #'transparent = ##t
\grace { g32 \rest \( } c4 g8 c4. \) |
Since it wasn't immediately obvious that you took a shortcut by
typing in the terms after \grace without any spaces.
\rest after a note simply places a rest where that note would be.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Lilypond SVG output in 2.12.1
I figured out what I'd done as I was going to sleep last night - funny how these things come to you! I'd failed to update the font file in .fonts so the files were still those of the last Lilypond release I was using - i.e. 2.10.33. Done this now, and it's working so no need for hexadecimal corrections. The original sed script still fixes the file. All the best, Vivian. Op Feb 4, 2009, om 2:15 AM heeft Benjamin Esham het volgende geschreven: Vivian Barty-Taylor wrote: I've had a look at making this correction using a sed script, but can't find anything in the documentation relating to the handling of hexadecimal numbers. Does anyone have any ideas, before I write a script manually correcting each grob? Does anyone know where the SVG output is generated and in what language? I might be able to fiddle with the source code too, as it seems to be quite a straightforward adjustment. Hi Vivian, I'm not sure about sed, but this would probably be trivial in (g) awk. Are you familiar with that language at all? -- Benjamin D. Esham | bdes...@gmail.com | bdesham128 (AIM) “Given that sooner or later we're all just going to die, what's the point of learning about integers?” — Calvin ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Good luck, Valentin
Trevor Daniels wrote: Valentin Villenave wrote Monday, February 02, 2009 10:49 PM Greetings everybody, Hi Valentin Wow! This is a major work! It must be the largest LilyPond score ever! I compiled the full score last night to peruse, and it looks awesome. The pdf file is 6.65 Mb! I haven't yet been able to look at it musically, but I thought I'd let you know that it can be downloaded easily from your git site (although you need to be git-aware to do this), and compiled under Vista. I had to change only the \includes in main.ly from \include "./foo/bar.ly" to \include "foo/bar.ly" but otherwise it worked first time out of the box. There are a few warnings, mainly about beam slopes and between-system-padding, nothing serious. It took quite a time to compile on my 2Gb laptop, partly because I inadvertently started two compiles of the full score simultaneously (I now realise!), which caused quite a bit of paging, as you might imagine. It should compile much faster on a 4Gb machine, or one at a time! Success! The full score compiled in 3 hours, 6 minutes. Ubuntu 8.04, 2GB RAM, and some kind of Intel dual-core processor. It's a beautiful score, Valentin. Do you think this work would be appropriate for college students to perform? We have a pretty decent bunch of singers here and they do a production every year. Maybe I'll pitch it to the director. They like comedies. Congrats again and thanks for sharing with us. :) Jon -- Jonathan Kulp http://www.jonathankulp.com ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Good luck, Valentin
2009/2/4 Graham Percival : > Great! We can start integrating some of those into lilypond > proper in the coming weeks. Definitely. I'll talk more about that later. > Glad to hear that the performance was a success, and glad to hear > that you have more time in the future. I have a lot of pent-up > grumpiness... my team members know almost nothing about computer > music, and very little about producing quality code. I am so > maoing sick of "research-quality code"... :( But they're not used > to me yet, so I've been holding back. It'll be a relief to get > back to grumpy lilypond work. I've just about got everything > sorted out here. Aaaah, that feels so comforting! Graham, you have no idea how sick I was, thinking you were leaving the project before you and I have had time for our usual arguments... Now that you're not leaving anymore, I guess I'll stop writing "Cheers" in my mails as a tribute to you :-) > (in case you're wondering about me posting publicly about this, > don't worry -- they won't believe that I've been holding back on > my criticisms. ;) There are things only you and I can imagine :) 2009/2/4 Jonathan Kulp : > Success! The full score compiled in 3 hours, 6 minutes. Ubuntu 8.04, 2GB > RAM, and some kind of Intel dual-core processor. It's a beautiful score, > Valentin. Do you think this work would be appropriate for college students > to perform? We have a pretty decent bunch of singers here and they do a > production every year. Maybe I'll pitch it to the director. They like > comedies. If they do, they should like this project (wait for the video, it's really funny). The instrumental parts are tough, and would probably require at least a couple months of serious work. As for the singers, I've been trying hard to keep it fun to sing. The King is undoubtedly the most demanding role, and your director should be careful with the casting. And of course, there's always the possibility of playing the whole thing with piano accompaniment, or with a special arrangement. > Congrats again and thanks for sharing with us. :) This is the least I can do. Regards, Valentin ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Good luck, Valentin
"Trevor Daniels" writes: > Wow! This is a major work! It must be the largest LilyPond score > ever! I compiled the full score last night to peruse, and it looks > awesome. The pdf file is 6.65 Mb! I'd probably be more impressed if I were not working in the company responsible for the PDFTeX bug reports concerning output files of more than 2GB size. -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: phrasing slur continued through a repeat?
Ed Ravin wrote: I'm guessing the silent rest somehow makes the grace note silent? I wanted a rest (for silence). If you say just "r32", lilypond gives you silence OK, but also does the vertical positioning automatically, so you can't adjust the slur any more. \rest lets you do the vertical positioning yourself: http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.12/Documentation/user/lilypond/Writing-rests#Rests And \grace just squashes everything up; not just notes, but rests too. Omitting those spaces isn't primarily a shortcut, more an idiom for a common readability style. Most of the snippets are done like that. Cheers, Robin ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Good luck, Valentin
Hi David, The pdf file is 6.65 Mb! I'd probably be more impressed if I were not working in the company responsible for the PDFTeX bug reports concerning output files of more than 2GB size. The impressive part is not the absolute size of the PDF file — as you note, there are many larger PDFs out there — but the size of the *LILYPOND-GENERATED* PDF. As a comparison, the full score of my multidisciplinary work "Just Out of Reach" (six musicians and three actors, ~ 1hr) was less than 1MB. =) Cheers, Kieren. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Good luck, Valentin
Kieren MacMillan writes: > Hi David, > >>> The pdf file is 6.65 Mb! >> >> I'd probably be more impressed if I were not working in the company >> responsible for the PDFTeX bug reports concerning output files of more >> than 2GB size. > > The impressive part is not the absolute size of the PDF file — as you > note, there are many larger PDFs out there — but the size of the > *LILYPOND-GENERATED* PDF. I would not mind having smaller output created. With probably a thousand elements per page, I am not sure that there is that much leeway, however. -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Good luck, Valentin
Op woensdag 04-02-2009 om 10:41 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef Valentin Villenave: > > Wow! This is a major work! It must be the largest LilyPond score > > ever! I compiled the full score last night to peruse, and it looks > > awesome. The pdf file is 6.65 Mb! > > Thanks a lot, but this is nothing compared to Nicolas' work :-) > (I haven't had a chance to have a look at Kieren's works either, but > I'm sure it's quite impressive too.) Wouldn't it be nice to reference some of these great works from lilypond.org? [I guess it's a bit late for a concert announcement for The Foreign Affair'] Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Good luck, Valentin
Valentin Villenave wrote: Definitely not! I have to say that this project wouldn't have even existed without LilyPond. I have learned LilyPond exclusively in order to publish this score, I have paid, developed or suggested quite a bunch of features I needed, etc. Finally, this wonderful community has convinced me there's a bright future (if any) for Free music, Free scores and Free software. Cheers, Valentin Now that I've compiled your score I understand why you implemented the "showFirstLength" feature. Wow. I mean, I was pretty stoked to get it for working on my 4-minute orchestral score but it would be indispensable on a score as big as yours. Well done! Jon -- Jonathan Kulp http://www.jonathankulp.com ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
longfermata over measure rest?
Hello List \fermataMarkup does the trick for a regular fermata over a measure rest, is there something like \longfermataMarkup ? Any other way to do this ? Regards Tom ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
function to fit music within a given range?
Is there an existing function/snipped that will adjust the octave of music to within a given range of notes? For example, I have a melody played by many instruments in a score, but some instruments can't reach the higher notes, so those notes must be shifted to a lower octave; I'd like to avoid copying & rewriting that part (and quoteDuring has become just as messy). thanks! -cj ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
My solution to rhythmic slashes and midi playback
Wanted to make a post after finding a good way to tackle rhythmic slashes in
song without having the midi catch it on the playback:
---
slashon = { \override Staff.Rest #'style = #'slash
\override Staff.Rest #'glyph-name = "2slash"
\override Staff.Rest #'stencil = #ly:note-head::print }
slashoff = { \revert Staff.Rest #'style
\revert Staff.Rest #'glyph-name
\revert Staff.Rest #'stencil }
slashheadon = { \override NoteHead #'style = #'slash
\set Staff.midiMaximumVolume = #0 }
slashheadoff = { \revert NoteHead #'style
\set Staff.midiMaximumVolume = #5 }
dynamicson = { \override Score.DynamicText #'transparent = ##f }
dynamicsoff = { \override Score.DynamicText #'transparent = ##t }
-
I use the slashon\off for pure quarter rest slashes that won't jump around when
transposing. This is for your basic improv section in a jazz chart. I got this
one from
http://www.nabble.com/Rhythmic-slashes,-are-just-too-...@-$--hard-to-do-td8949934.html
. But for the times when I like to notate specific rhythms with rhythmic slash
NOTEHEADS while still not having the midi catch it, I'll use the slashheadon/off
just before the slashes start. You kick in the midivolume=0 by using a dynamic
of any type. So the section will look like this:
{ c8 c c c c c c c
\slashon r4 r4 r4 r4 \slashoff
\slashheadon \dynamicsoff r4\f r b8 b b4
\slashheadoff c8\f \dynamicson c c c c c c c
}
Hope this helps somebody, I've been trying to get a system going for my slashes
and finally found something that works!
-Brian
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
What does this warning mean?
Here's a snippet of the error - --- Processing `F:/Lilypond Files/test.ly' Parsing... *programming error: file name not normalized: RasJammie\SaxHooked.ly* continuing, cross fingers programming error: file name not normalized: RasJammie\SaxDaddy.ly continuing, cross fingers -- Whatever it means, the output works as expected. Just curious about the warning. -- Chip ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: longfermata over measure rest?
tom,
On Feb 4, 2009, at 10:31 PM, Tom Hall wrote:
\fermataMarkup does the trick for a regular fermata over a measure
rest, is
there something like \longfermataMarkup ? Any other way to do this ?
R1^\markup{\musicglyph #"scripts.ulongfermata"}
regards,
sb
--
Simon Bailey
Oompa Loompa of Science
+43 699 190 631 25
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Possible in Ubuntu?
Hello, yesterday I installed Lilypond in Ubuntu. But I don't see it in the program's list. How can I work with it? I'm not sure. Jvuz ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: What does this warning mean?
Hi Chip LilyPond prefers forward slashes in its filenames, irrespective of what the local operating system standard is. Trevor - Original Message - From: "Chip" To: Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 7:24 AM Subject: What does this warning mean? Here's a snippet of the error - --- Processing `F:/Lilypond Files/test.ly' Parsing... *programming error: file name not normalized: RasJammie\SaxHooked.ly* continuing, cross fingers programming error: file name not normalized: RasJammie\SaxDaddy.ly continuing, cross fingers -- Whatever it means, the output works as expected. Just curious about the warning. -- Chip ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
