Re: guile 1.6.4

2003-08-11 Thread Michael Ossmann
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 10:07:24PM +0200, Jan Kohnert wrote:
Content-Description: signed data
> Does anybody know where to find guilde 1.6.4 for download?

The Gentoo project has it here:

http://gentoo.oregonstate.edu/distfiles/guile-1.6.4.tar.gz

mossmann


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Lilypond-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: suppress key sig changes at end of bar

2003-08-11 Thread Mats Bengtsson
Lienhard Stephen - Princeton wrote:
Hello all,

I am fairly new to Lilypond.  I have read the documentation and search 
through the mailing list archives but could not find out how I can stop 
getting the key sig from showing up at the end of the bar when there is 
a key change at the begining of the next system.  I realize this is not 
the "correct way" to notate music, but this is for some exercises I'm 
putting together.

I've tried:

\property Score.keySignature \override #'break-visibility = 
#end-of-line-invisible  but that did nothing for me.
You are extremely close, LilyPond is case sensitive. If you replace
"keySignature" by "KeySignature", everything should work fine.
   /Mats



___
Lilypond-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Jazz Combo Template

2003-08-11 Thread Graham Percival
On Mon, 07 Jul 2003 22:31:35 -0400
Rick Sutphin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Attached is a template for a small jazz combo (4 horns and rhythm
> section). It handles part extraction and chord names on the score (once
> at top) and on individual parts. I put it together with ideas from the
> lilypond website and some suggestions from [EMAIL PROTECTED] (any
> hare-brained ideas or stupid mistakes our most likely  mine,
> unfortunately).

Looks good, although I haven't tested it yet (waiting for 1.8 to compile).
I personally give all Lilypond input files a .ly suffix; I use "sc" to
denote files that produce output (such as "score.ly", then "sc-vln1.ly",
"sc-fl.ly", etc.  I'm not suggesting that the "sc" prefix is a good idea,
but I think that giving all Lilypond files a ".ly" _is_ a good idea.

This file raises another question -- should we extend the templates
section to include multiple files?  Currently they all demonstrate
how to set up a score with all music in one file, but that's not too
practical to use for a large orchestra piece, for example.  Shall we
include something like "orchestra.tar.gz", which produces a directory
with multiple files?

Apart from benefitting newbies, this could help experienced users
understand each other's scores better.  Currently I think we all have
our own "coding" standards, both in terms of individul parts (ie how
many bars per line, what kind of indenting, whether you use "a-(" or
"a(", etc) and in terms of the overall structure of the work (ie do
you have a "strings.ly" in which you define all the string parts, or
split it up into "vln1.ly", "vlc.ly", etc?  Do you use a "global.ly",
and if so, how much do you stick in there?)

For the purposes of help / teaching, we ask that people submit short
examples which demonstrate the problem, but occasionally we want to
look at the whole piece -- arranging a Mutopia piece for a different
instrument combination, perhaps study purposes (either to study the
music itself, or just to learn more about Lilypond), etc.

If we more-or-less agreed on how to structure works and how we should
write the input files, it would be easier to share input files.  Of
course we'd all need to change some of our personal coding habits -- if
we wanted to follow whatever standards we use, of course.  There's no
way this could be anything but voluntary, even if we _wanted_ to try to
force a standard (which I'm sure nobody wants!).

Cheers,
- Graham


___
Lilypond-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Congrats on YARPR

2003-08-11 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Hans Forbrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> After having installed 1.7.-11,-12,-21,-24,-27 .  I have to join
> everyone else in congratulating 'the team' on YARPR (Yet Another Real
> Phenomenal Release).  The install was painless and the regression test
> and reprocessing was indeed flawless.

Thanks!

> The only wishes for the near future specifically related to install:
> 
> 1) Add a comment at the end of the "make install" reminding people to
> look up to the previous section for building the docco - the sequence
> seems strange because (if I understand correctly) you need Lily
> installed to "make web"  (talk about a minor nit-pick)

No, you need not have lilypond installed; the lilypond made in the
build is used to process the documentation.

> 2) Add a 'make install-doc' to move the documentation to a preferred
> location.  (eg: I tend to use /usr/local/doc/)  This allows the build
> source to be archived.

What you want is:

   make
   make web
   make web-install webdir=/some/non/fhs/compliant/path

(try `make help')

Jan.

-- 
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien   | http://www.lilypond.org



___
Lilypond-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: context sensitive

2003-08-11 Thread Graham Percival
On Sun, 03 Aug 2003 12:45:21 +0300
Aaron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there a way to retreive context sensitive help for lilypond from
> within either emacs or vim???

No.

Here's my suggestion: keep a web browser open, with the page set to
a downloaded copy of the Lilypond manual (download it so that it's fast
to load, and because that reduces the load on the Lilypond server).
When you want to read up on grace, switch from vim to the web browse
and search for that topic.  Most of the time you can find the right place
from the table of contents in the manual.

If you're on Linux, I'd stick the web browser on a different desktop, for
fast switching between it and your vim session.

Cheers,
- Graham


___
Lilypond-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


[Fwd: [TeX-music] Indiana Univ. sheet music online]

2003-08-11 Thread Mats Bengtsson
This email from the MusixTeX mailing list may be of interest
also to you Lilypond users.
  /Mats

 Original Message 
Subject: [TeX-music] Indiana Univ. sheet music online
Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2003 17:44:17 +0200 (W. Europe Daylight Time)
From: I. Oppenheim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Indiana University Library has a website with
online copies of a number of song cycles by the great
20th century composers, and even more... they have a
section with complete Opera scores, Orchestral and
Choral scores, Chamber music scores, Piano sheet music,
etc. etc...
http://www.dlib.indiana.edu/variations/

Quite interesting project.

 Groeten,
 Irwin Oppenheim
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ~~~*
 Chazzanut Online:
 http://www.joods.nl/~chazzanut/
___
TeX-music mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://sunsite.dk/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
--
=
Mats Bengtsson
Signal Processing
Signals, Sensors and Systems
Royal Institute of Technology
SE-100 44  STOCKHOLM
Sweden
Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463 
Fax:   (+46) 8 790 7260
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe
=


___
Lilypond-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user