Re: time signature
> Hi, > > Is there some way to hide time signatures or have stemless notes? Certainly! Read the section on 'Invisible grobs' in the reference manual (in chapter 'Tuning Output'). /Mats ___ Lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
auto-accidentals in different octaves
Hi .. I've just started using Lilypond in conjunction with NoteEdit and I'm very impressed so far, however one little thing is annoying me. If I put an accidental in a bar, lets say high Db, then LP automatically puts a flat in front of the D's in other octaves, which as any musician will tell you is not what is automatically implied. True, some people will explicitly put a natural in front of other octave D's to emphasise that they are in fact natural, but LP is making the wrong assumption here. Is there any way to turn off this behaviour? -- Cheers, Glen ___ Lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: auto-accidentals in different octaves
Citat Glen Coates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi .. I've just started using Lilypond in conjunction with NoteEdit > and > I'm very impressed so far, however one little thing is annoying me. If > I > put an accidental in a bar, lets say high Db, then LP automatically puts > a > flat in front of the D's in other octaves, If this is really true then you have found a bug, but I assume that you made a typo and that you meant Db's instead of D's (or did you mean "natural sign" instead of "flat"?) > which as any musician will > tell > you is not what is automatically implied. True, some people will > explicitly put a natural in front of other octave D's to emphasise > that > they are in fact natural, but LP is making the wrong assumption here. No, this is definitely not true - I know a lot of musicians - and we ALL agree that accidentals needs to be repeaten in new octaves. Kurt Stone has more on 20th century common notation - and he also states this. > Is > there any way to turn off this behaviour? You don't state which Lily you use. In 1.4.anything there's not much you can do. I don't think it's possible to turn off the auto-accidentals - and if you remove the accidental engraver completelhy I don't even think that explicit accidentals are typeset. In 1.5.enough you can add \property Score.autoAccidentals = #'((measure-any-octave . 0)) (Syntax about to change - as soon as I get time) to the start of the music. measure-any-octave means that the accidentals are remembered for a number of measures and in all octaves. 0 means that they "survive" over 0 bar lines. That is: They die at the end of the measure. If you wan't to turn off automatical accidentals (and place them yourself with ! and ?) then use \property Score.autoAccidentals = \turnOff Rune Zedeler Otte Ruds Gade 44A 4tv 8200 Århus N Tel: 86786563 ___ Lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
(no subject)
Is it possible to make (untested)
\score {
\notes
<
\context Staff = sup <
\clef G
\context Voice = vone { a' c'' e'' e'' }
>
\context Staff = sdown <
\clef F
\context Voice = vtwo { a a \translator Staff = sup a' a' }
\context Voice = vthree { f f f f, }
>
>
}
typeset as (also untested)
\score {
\notes
<
\context Staff = sup <
\clef G
\context Voice = vone { a' c'' \stemUp e'' e'' }
>
\context Staff = sdown <
\clef F
\context Voice = vtwo
{ \stemUp a a \translator Staff = sup \stemDown a' a' }
\context Voice = vthree { \stemDown f f \stemBoth f f, }
>
>
}
without specifying the stemUp, etc, within the score?
Is it possible to make Staff-crossing voices using the voicify-scm-function?
(cc'ing devel because I assume that the answer is "no")
-Rune
___
Lilypond-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
