Re: Installed vs built library
On Thu, 28 Aug 2003 17:42:26 -0500, Tim Mooney wrote: > Luigi Ballabio said (at 11:23am...: > >>What am I doing wrong? >> >>Thanks, >> Luigi >> >>P.S. Almost forgetting: libtool 1.4.3, automake 1.7.6, >>autoconf 2.57 > > The libtool maintainers want to focus their efforts on libtool 1.5, and > will likely encourage you to use that version instead. If you try libtool > 1.5 and encounter the same problem, send another message to the libtool > list with information similar to what you provided in your original message. Tim, thanks for the tip. I just installed libtool 1.5, and the problem does persist. Bye, Luigi ___ Libtool mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
Installed vs built library
Hi all, it's probably something stupid I'm doing. However, here's the problem. Inside a project I'm building a shared library in a sub-directory and a test-suite executable in another. The related lines of the respective Makefile.am are lib_LTLIBRARIES = libFoo.la and bin_PROGRAMS = foo-test-suite foo_test_suite_LDADD = ../lib/libFoo.la TESTS = foo-test-suite Now, if I don't have a previous version of libFoo installed, make && make check works fine. However, if this is not the case, running 'make check' causes the installed library to be loaded rather than the newly-built one. What am I doing wrong? Thanks, Luigi P.S. Almost forgetting: libtool 1.4.3, automake 1.7.6, autoconf 2.57 ___ Libtool mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
