Re: GNU Libtool 2.4 released [stable]

2010-09-27 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
‎Thanks for the explanation!

On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 7:17 AM, Ralf Wildenhues  wrote:
>> Also, why not take the value of the sysroot from the DESTDIR automake 
>> variable?
>
> Because we know DESTDIR far too late, only at 'make install' time and
> not yet at the time we link against dependent libraries (that may
> already be installed below the sysroot).

But you do relink the libraries when 'make install' is executed.
So why not relink it with proper sysroot?

Alon

___
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool


Re: GNU Libtool 2.4 released [stable]

2010-09-27 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello Alon,

* Alon Bar-Lev wrote on Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 03:41:36PM CEST:
> On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 7:17 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> >> Also, why not take the value of the sysroot from the DESTDIR automake 
> >> variable?
> >
> > Because we know DESTDIR far too late, only at 'make install' time and
> > not yet at the time we link against dependent libraries (that may
> > already be installed below the sysroot).
> 
> But you do relink the libraries when 'make install' is executed.

Yes, that requirement has not gone away.

> So why not relink it with proper sysroot?

I'm not sure I understand the question.  Care to post a small example
that shows what you mean, that goes wrong, and what you would have
expected instead?

Thanks,
Ralf

___
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool