RE: Question about shlibpath_overrides_runpath / relinking
Ralf Wildenhues <> wrote: > Hello Markus, > > * Duft Markus wrote on Mon, Oct 01, 2007 at 01:55:55PM CEST: >> >> Still i feel, that relinking should not be neccessary with my >> compiler [...] Is there any other way to tell libtool, that it >> should not relink, which does not break anything else. > > AFAIR we fixed that in CVS HEAD, for MinGW/MSYS. No, I'm sorry I > don't remember exactly, but grepping ChangeLog entries, the change > on 2004-10-12 sounds like it could do the trick. Hi! Thanks for the answer, but i can't find an entry with the date 2004-10-12 in libtool-1.5.24's ChangeLogs, maybe it's only in HEAD? Since i don't currently wan't HEAD to come into play, i guess that means relinking, or some hack in ltmain.in for my compiler Thanks anyway, Markus > > Hope that helps. > > Cheers, > Ralf > > > ___ > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool ___ http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
Re: Question about shlibpath_overrides_runpath / relinking
Hello Markus, * Duft Markus wrote on Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 09:03:20AM CEST: > Ralf Wildenhues <> wrote: > > * Duft Markus wrote on Mon, Oct 01, 2007 at 01:55:55PM CEST: > >> > >> Still i feel, that relinking should not be neccessary with my > >> compiler [...] Is there any other way to tell libtool, that it > >> should not relink, which does not break anything else. > > > > AFAIR we fixed that in CVS HEAD, for MinGW/MSYS. No, I'm sorry I > > don't remember exactly, but grepping ChangeLog entries, the change > > on 2004-10-12 sounds like it could do the trick. > > Thanks for the answer, but i can't find an entry with the date > 2004-10-12 in libtool-1.5.24's ChangeLogs, maybe it's only in HEAD? Yes, we fixed that in HEAD, but not in branch-1-5. Cheers, Ralf ___ http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
