$B1|MM>R2p=j(B

[info]

  $B7k:'@83h$KK~B-$7$F$$$k1|MM$,[EMAIL PROTECTED]&$+!#(B
  $B2H;v$r$7$F0i;y$r$7$F!"=w$O$=$3$G=*$o$j$J$s$G$7$g$&$+!#(B
  $B$=$s$J1|MM$N$?$a$KMQ0U$5$l$?Ev%5%$%H!#(B
  $B$7$+$7$J$,[EMAIL PROTECTED],ITB-$.$_$G$9!#(B

   $B!Z(B $B1|MM>R2p=j$h$jL5NA>R2p$N$*CN$i$;(B $B![(B
 $B:#!"EEOCG'>Z$9$k$H#1#2#0#0#01_J,$N%]%$%s%H$,L5NA$G$b$i$($^$9!#(B
 http://live.livedear.com/?num=012000
 $B"($3$N%a!<%k$,[EMAIL PROTECTED](B


  [EMAIL PROTECTED]"$J$?$N$46a=j1|MM$r<+F0E*$K$4>R2p$9$k%7%9%F%`Ek:\(B
  $B:GBg#1#0?M$4>R2pOH$+$i#2#0?MOH$K$^$G3HBgCf$G$9!#(B
  [EMAIL PROTECTED];o$K9-9p$r:\$;$F$$$k$?$a1|[EMAIL PROTECTED],(B
  $B$?$$$X$sB?$/EPO?$5$l$F$*$j$^$9!#(B
  [EMAIL PROTECTED];$s$+!)(B


 $BEPO?L5NA!"B`2q<+M3$G0B?4$N%7%9%F%`(B
 http://live.livedear.com/?num=012000
$BEPO?$7$FMM;R$r8+$F$9$0$d$a$F$b#O#K$G$9!*(B

 $B'$'$'$'$'$'$'$'$'$'$'$'$'$'$'$'$'$'$'$'$'$'$'$'$'$'$'$'$'$'$(B
  $B:[EMAIL PROTECTED],5^A}$7$F$$$k0Y!"[EMAIL PROTECTED]pJs%a!<%kG[?.Dd;_$O%3%A%i$^$G(B
 $B"-"-"-"-"-"-(B
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]


___
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool

Mega offrr

[Blaze Hughes]

 
Hello, Welcome to PharmOnlin lection e S enlightenment hop
- one of the  Roentgenrays leading onIine pharmaceutical shops
 


  
 prentice V

 Gopster G

 unravel AL

 kleptomania Ll

  
 dactyl lA
R Boston A  lampooner Cl
I inwoven S V foundry A
 parlor UM
 and many other.
 
-  bowling Save over 50%
- Worldwide  S forgot HlPPlNG
- Total c dispiteous onfidentiaIity
-  trainman Over 5 miIIion customers in 130 countries
 
Have a nice  higher day!
___
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool

Re: FYI: ksh bug on Tru64 UNIX causes current libtool failure

[Ralf Wildenhues]

Hi Nicolas, others,

This is a gentle reminder that this issue with Libtool HEAD/branch-2-0
on Tru64 sh is still unsolved.  It'd be nice to get a solution into the
next 2.0 release candidate, should such a solution exist.

* Nicolas Joly wrote on Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 07:59:58PM CEST:
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 03:31:22PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > * Nicolas Joly wrote on Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 01:27:25PM CEST:
> > > On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 12:35:00PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > > > * Nicolas Joly wrote on Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 12:10:47PM CEST:
> > > > > 
> > > > > In the mean time, i tested the solution where `print -r' and `ksh'
> > > > > tests are swapped (attached patch). It seems to go a little further
> > > > > (no more `print' error messages), but seems to fail in another ksh
> > > > > problem/bug :
> > 
> > [ which ends in a segmentation fault. ]

> > OK, let's cut this testing a little short.  It seems that Tru64 fails to
> > provide any decent kind of shell for its users.
> > 
> > I consider just putting a note about Tru64 into README (branch-1-5)
> > resp. doc/notes.texi (HEAD).   Proposal would be one of the following
> > (whichever works and passes the test suite):
> > 
> > | Note that Tru64 V5.1B ksh has some bugs which make it hardly useable for
> > | libtoolized packages.  Please set
> > |   BIN_SH=xpg4; export BIN_SH
> > | in your environment for configuring and building.
> 
> This one does not work ... It will solve the `print' problem, but will
> lead to the shell crash a little later.
> 
> with `BIN_SH=xpg4' set, `/usr/bin/posix/sh' is executed instead of the
> classic `/bin/sh'; and, unfortunately, this is a hard link to `ksh'.
> 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] [~]> ls -ldi /usr/bin/posix/sh /usr/bin/ksh 
>   482 -rwxr-xr-x   2 bin  bin   307248 Oct 16  2002 /usr/bin/ksh
>   482 -rwxr-xr-x   2 bin  bin   307248 Oct 16  2002 /usr/bin/posix/sh
> 
> > | Note that Tru64 V5.1B ksh has some bugs which make it hardly useable for
> > | libtoolized packages.  Please set
> > |   lt_ECHO='printf %s\\n'; export lt_ECHO
> > | in your environment for configuring and building.
> > 
> > (s/lt_ECHO/ECHO/g for branch-1-5).

Regards,
Ralf


___
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool