Re: GNU Libtool 1.5.8 released.
On Fri, Aug 13, 2004 at 03:57:59AM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On Thu, 2004-08-12 at 18:12, Peter O'Gorman wrote: > > Bob Friesenhahn wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 12 Aug 2004, Tim Mooney wrote: > > > > > >> Why just Linux? Isn't this essentially the same issue that the multi-ABI > > >> commercial UNIXes have? > > > > > > > > > Seems like it to me. > I am not sure. Solaris-gcc applies traditional multilibs, i.e. it is > using multilib subdirs (A subdir of PREFIX/lib). There is precedent for doing it both ways: IRIX 6.2 and later have /usr/lib, /usr/lib32 and /usr/lib64 for the three supported ABIs (O32, N32 and N64 respectively). > How do other Linux vendors (Debian, SuSE etc.) handle this issue? > I would expect them to be facing the same problems as RH and to have > similar work-arounds applied to libtool. SuSE also ship biarch systems with separate 64-bit /usr/lib64 and 32-bit /usr/lib, I believe Mandrake do too, and I believe Debian haven't worked out how (or whether) to do biarch yet. joe ___ Libtool mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
Mala direta por e-mail - As melhores listas de email
Mala direta por e-mail. Cadastros selecionados. As melhores listas de e-mails selecionados por estados, atividades e profissões. Listas atualizadas para mala direta via e-mail marketing. Visite http://www.promonet.mx.gs Cadastros altamente selecionados para divulgação de produtos por email marketing. Listas de e-mails e programas grátis para divulgação via correio eletrônico. Mala direta por e-mail. Visite agora: http://www.promonet.mx.gs ___ Libtool mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
64 bit support
Hi, Okay, I've had a peek at what we've got for 64 bit support currently, and it is not a really good situation. Inside a macro named "_LT_AC_LOCK" we have tests for various 64 bit architectures that then change the value of LD. Unfortunately, it looks like the link line actually uses the value of CC rather than LD, so I don't think this code has much effect. We may need to fix this :-p I'll be away for 10 days or so starting Sunday (yay!), so I hope someone else comes up with solutions for everything and that Gary gets the alpha out before I return :) Peter -- Peter O'Gorman - http://www.pogma.com ___ Libtool mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
Re: 64 bit support
On Fri, 13 Aug 2004, Peter O'Gorman wrote: Okay, I've had a peek at what we've got for 64 bit support currently, and it is not a really good situation. Inside a macro named "_LT_AC_LOCK" we have tests for various 64 bit architectures that then change the value of LD. Unfortunately, it looks like the link line actually uses the value of CC rather than LD, so I don't think this code has much effect. A while back I adjusted things so that GCC -m options like -m64 are preserved, and unfortunately, that is about as good as it currently gets. :-( I do build 64-bit apps regularly, but only as a simple build. Bob == Bob Friesenhahn [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen ___ Libtool mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
59-Home Loans as low as 2.94%
Hey Would you REFlNANCE if you knew you'd SAVE TH0USANDS? We'll get you lnterest as low as 2.92%. Don't believe me? Fill out our small online form and we'll show you how. Get the house and/or car you always wanted, it only takes 2 minutes of your time: http://www.infostead.biz ___ Libtool mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
