Re: libtool 1.3 : bug in calculating the file name if compiler doesn't support -c and -o
On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 01:34:34AM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Sep 11, 2000, Michael Matz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > output_obj=`$echo "X$srcfile" | $Xsed -e 's%^.*/%%' -e 's%\.[^.]*$%%'`.${objext}
>
> Yep
Applied.
Thankyou =)O|
Gary.
--
___ _ ___ __ _ mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/ __|__ _ _ ___ _| | / / | / /_ _ _ _ __ _| |_ __ _ ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| (_ / _` | '_|// / |/ /| |/ / _` | || / _` | ' \/ _` | _ \
\___\__,_|_|\_, /|___(_)___/\__,_|\_,_\__, |_||_\__,_|//_/
home page: /___/ /___/ gpg public key:
http://www.oranda.demon.co.uk http://www.oranda.demon.co.uk/key.asc
Re: Web page problem and release schedule
On Sun, Sep 10, 2000 at 11:05:28AM +0100, Nick Hudson wrote: > "Gary V. Vaughan" wrote: > > > > On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 12:39:30PM +0100, Nick Hudson wrote: > > > Is there a release schedule for 1.4 or MLB(1.5?). Just curious. > > > > When it's ready =)O| > > > > I'm working really hard to get 1.4 into shape rigt now, so maybe in > > the next month or so? > > I sent a patch to libtool-patches for NetBSD that I'd like in 1.4. I'm > also trying to make sure that libtool works on all platforms for NetBSD > and I think that libtool will need updating for this. I just wanted to > make sure that everything was ready in time for the next release. I probably have it marked for attention in my email backlog. I do intend to make sure everything we have is applied (or rejected if necessary) and not forgotten before 1.4 is released. Don't be afraid of reminding me from time to time if you your patch doesn't arrive. [[I always mail the author of a patch when I apply (or reject) it]] Cheers, Gary. -- ___ _ ___ __ _ mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] / __|__ _ _ ___ _| | / / | / /_ _ _ _ __ _| |_ __ _ ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (_ / _` | '_|// / |/ /| |/ / _` | || / _` | ' \/ _` | _ \ \___\__,_|_|\_, /|___(_)___/\__,_|\_,_\__, |_||_\__,_|//_/ home page: /___/ /___/ gpg public key: http://www.oranda.demon.co.uk http://www.oranda.demon.co.uk/key.asc
Re: Web page problem and release schedule
On Sun, Sep 10, 2000 at 11:05:28AM +0100, Nick Hudson wrote: > "Gary V. Vaughan" wrote: > > > > On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 12:39:30PM +0100, Nick Hudson wrote: > > > [I hope this is the right place for the page problem...] > > > > > > I've noticed that the > > > > > > http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool/future.html > > > > > > page seems to have a cvs conflict in it. Take a look a the left hand bar > > > around the "Future Directions" heading > > > > Indeed. How strange. The is no conflict in my local copy, and if I > > try to cvs update nohing happens. I guess the live copy update > > procedure has screwed up. I just updated that page and committe it, > > so a new live version should show up some time in the next 24 hours. > > > > Thanks for the heads up. > > No problem. Unfortunatley it still seems to be there - perhaps it takes > longer that 24 hrs. Hmm. The update happened, but there is now an additional conflict at the bottom of that page =(O| I don't know who to report this to. Alexandre, do you know who is responsible for the web updates on www.gnu.org? Cheers, Gary. -- ___ _ ___ __ _ mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] / __|__ _ _ ___ _| | / / | / /_ _ _ _ __ _| |_ __ _ ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (_ / _` | '_|// / |/ /| |/ / _` | || / _` | ' \/ _` | _ \ \___\__,_|_|\_, /|___(_)___/\__,_|\_,_\__, |_||_\__,_|//_/ home page: /___/ /___/ gpg public key: http://www.oranda.demon.co.uk http://www.oranda.demon.co.uk/key.asc
-export-symbols-regex and C++
Hi, I've been trying to use -export-symbols-regex with a C++ library, but the way this feature currently works means that you get the mangled versions of the symbols. This seems less than ideal for (at least) a couple of reasons: * The mangled versions really are a cryptic implementation detail of the compiler. * Different systems may use different name mangling schemes. Libtool is meant to aid portability which argues for presenting the unmangled names to be matched. What seems to be needed is a demangling step before the regexp is matched, and a remangling step after (so the symbols match those in the library). If GNU nm is being used, we can demangle with that - otherwise we need to find a similar switch, or perhaps include a small utility. But is demangling always reversible? Can we be sure that we'll get back to the symbol we started with, or do we need to make a map of what the demangling did? Cheers, Olly
HEAD Daily snapshot shot not available
The daily snapshot of the head cvs branch isn't available from ftp.ffii.org at the moment. It seems to have fallen over when Gary move ltconfig into libtool.m4 and not recovered. Can someone please fix this. Thanks, Nick
