Re: [lfs-support] Installing Binutils and GCC after adjusting toolchain
Hey guys, Note that we've switched topic in thread, hate to be rude like this but i'm just making sure that the original help-request is still open and waiting for a guardian angel to share his/her mighty wisdom and help me work out why I'm stuck, Kind regards, Kaleb. Link to topic : http://linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/lfs-support/2012-November/043946.html On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 4:37 PM, William Harrington wrote: > > On Nov 14, 2012, at 2:31 AM, Paige Thompson wrote: > > what do I do when I get to this part and it just keeps telling me no such > file or directory no such file or directory no such file or directory: > > chroot "$LFS" /tools/bin/env -i \ > HOME=/root TERM="$TERM" PS1='\u:\w\$ ' \ > PATH=/bin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/usr/sbin:/tools/bin \ > /tools/bin/bash --login +h > > > > http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html#any-no-such-file > > Make sure it isn't linked to host libs ( /lib instead of /tools/lib ) > > Sincerely, > > William Harrington > > -- > http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support > FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html > Unsubscribe: See the above information page > > -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] Installing Binutils and GCC after adjusting toolchain
Hi, and thanks for the respond
Throughout the book i've encountered 0 problems or errors and everything
goes according to the book. It just seems weird that everything works as
intended at chapter 6.10 then somewhere between that and compiling
bin-utils and GCC it messes up somewhere, could this be something that i
maybe mistyped earlier and i'm not experiencing the effects from. (Note
that EVERY test till this point have been 100% accurate to what to book
states it should be)
But to anwser your questions:
>>Then when i run:
> >#grep 'SEARCH.*/usr/lib' dummy.log |sed 's|; |\n|g'
>> SEARCH_DIR("/tools/i686-pc-linux-gnu/lib")
>> SEARCH_DIR("/usr/lib")
>> SEARCH_DIR("/lib");
>>
>> which is also not correct
>That seems to be correct - please compare it to the book - 3
>matches, for /tools/i686-pc-linux-gnu, /usr/lib, /lib. For this
>part I don't see any error - please point it out if I'm wrong!
The book says it should be:
SEARCH_DIR("/usr/i686-pc-linux-gnu/lib")
SEARCH_DIR("/usr/local/lib")
SEARCH_DIR("/lib")
SEARCH_DIR("/usr/lib");
So I'm somehow still pointing to /tools while it seems that i should be
searching in /usr and /lib, i think this might a main reason why it isn't
working.
>Are you doing something unusual ? That probably includes building
>on a virtual machine, using the package_users hint, and building on
>mingw or whatever on windows. Or using minimalist packages (dash,
>busybox). If this is a straight build linux from linux, did you
>check the host against the Host System Requirements in the preface ?
I'm building on a virtual PC running Centos 6.3 which i think fit the Host
System Requirements, other then that I'm not using anything the book
doesn't tell me to and i haven't skipped anything, I'm just doing what the
book is telling me to do. Have the logs been of any help maybe?
pastebin.com/dCjzz5yb << or is there anything else i can supply you
with to help me?
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 7:50 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 09:01:42AM +0100, Kaleb van Ingen Schenau wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm having a bit of a problem which is stopping me from continueing with
> > LFS, after chapter 6.10 "Adjusting the Toolchain" i run the sanity check
> > and all results come out as they are supposed to be according to the
> book.
> >
>
> Hi, thanks for the prompt after the thread got hijacked :) I'm not
> at my best at the moment, and I haven't built for 32-bit in a very
> long time. But I'm now at my desktop instead of ssh'ing to the
> server from a tty on the netbook, so let's see if I can offer
> anything -
>
> > But after i install Binutils MPFR, MPC, GMP, ZLIB, FILE and Gcc (not in
> > that order)
> I will assume you followed the book's order :)
> > the results of the test discribed in the install/compile
> > section of GCC dont come out as they are supposed to be when i run:
> > #echo 'main(){}' > dummy.c
> > #cc dummy.c -v -Wl,--verbose &> dummy.log
> > #readelf -l a.out | grep ': /lib'
> >
> > i get : [Requesting program interpreter: /lib/ld-linux.so.2] which is
> > intented
> > when i then run :
> > #grep -o '/usr/lib.*/crt[1in].*succeeded' dummy.log
> > it gives me:
> > /usr/lib/crt1.o succeeded
> > /usr/lib/crti.o succeeded
> > /usr/lib/crtn.o succeeded
> >
> > instead of the intended:
> > /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.7.1/../../../crt1.o succeeded
> > /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.7.1/../../../crti.o succeeded
> > /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.7.1/../../../crtn.o succeeded
> >
> Not wrong, just different :) If you work out where these files are
> (i.e. step up a directory for every '../') you will see that they
> actually are in /usr/lib in both your result and what the book
> expects.
>
> In my own 64-bit logs they have ... 4.7.1/../../../lib64/crt1.o
> which implies that the book's version is expected on 32-bit.
> > Then when i run :
> > #grep -B4 '^ /usr/include' dummy.log
> >
> > it states:
> > Ignoring nonexistent directory
> >
> "/tools/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.7.1/../../../../i686-pc-linux-gnu/include
> > Ignoring duplicate directory "/tools/include"
> > #include "..." search starts here:
> > #include <...> search starts here:
> > /usr/include
> >
>
> On 64-bit I get an 'Ignoring nonexistent directory' message,
> followed by /usr/lib/gcc/.../include /usr/local/include
> /usr/lib/gcc
Re: [lfs-support] Installing Binutils and GCC after adjusting toolchain
make install was run and no errors what so ever, what i'll do is go back to
my snapshot i made after 6.10, i tried this before but im gonna go ahead
and do it again just to see if i dont have my old gcc-build folder hanging
around.
Ill let you know if i encounter the same problem again after the 3rd
attempt of getting past this.
You will hear from me soon,
Kaleb
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 1:49 AM, Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 12:42:03AM +0100, Kaleb van Ingen Schenau wrote:
> > Hi, and thanks for the respond
> >
> > Throughout the book i've encountered 0 problems or errors and everything
> > goes according to the book. It just seems weird that everything works as
> > intended at chapter 6.10 then somewhere between that and compiling
> > bin-utils and GCC it messes up somewhere, could this be something that i
> > maybe mistyped earlier and i'm not experiencing the effects from. (Note
> > that EVERY test till this point have been 100% accurate to what to book
> > states it should be)
> > But to anwser your questions:
> > >>Then when i run:
> > > >#grep 'SEARCH.*/usr/lib' dummy.log |sed 's|; |\n|g'
> > >> SEARCH_DIR("/tools/i686-pc-linux-gnu/lib")
> > >> SEARCH_DIR("/usr/lib")
> > >> SEARCH_DIR("/lib");
> > >>
> > >> which is also not correct
> >
> > >That seems to be correct - please compare it to the book - 3
> > >matches, for /tools/i686-pc-linux-gnu, /usr/lib, /lib. For this
> > >part I don't see any error - please point it out if I'm wrong!
> >
> > The book says it should be:
> > SEARCH_DIR("/usr/i686-pc-linux-gnu/lib")
> > SEARCH_DIR("/usr/local/lib")
> > SEARCH_DIR("/lib")
> > SEARCH_DIR("/usr/lib");
> >
> > So I'm somehow still pointing to /tools while it seems that i should be
> > searching in /usr and /lib, i think this might a main reason why it isn't
> > working.
> >
> You were right all along, it doesn't match : I'll have to blame the
> prescription painkillers I'm on (only ibuprofen and paracetomol!).
> Sorry, no idea how I misread what the book says.
>
> > >Are you doing something unusual ? That probably includes building
> > >on a virtual machine, using the package_users hint, and building on
> > >mingw or whatever on windows. Or using minimalist packages (dash,
> > >busybox). If this is a straight build linux from linux, did you
> > >check the host against the Host System Requirements in the preface ?
> >
> > I'm building on a virtual PC running Centos 6.3 which i think fit the
> Host
> > System Requirements, other then that I'm not using anything the book
> > doesn't tell me to and i haven't skipped anything, I'm just doing what
> the
> > book is telling me to do. Have the logs been of any help maybe?
> > pastebin.com/dCjzz5yb << or is there anything else i can supply you
> > with to help me?
> >
> [ snipping my original reply below this - please don't top post, and
> trim what you are replying to. ]
>
> I've no idea about virtual machines, maybe someone else can offer
> suggestions about specific changes (if any) needed - but I don't
> recall seeing problems from them apart from selecting the right
> kernel options.
>
> So to recap, hopefully correctly - your include directories from
> gcc are not as expected, and the SEARCH_DIRs begin in /tools.
>
> That last point is correct for 6.10 (hmm, maybe I was looking there
> instead of 6.17 when I replied).
>
> Going back to check my _own_ (64-bit) logs from 7.2 (with a lot of
> things collected up), in 6.10 I see that I have:
> ignoring nonexistent directory
>
> "/tools/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.7.1/../../../../x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/include"
> ignoring duplicate directory "/tools/include"
> #include "..." search starts here:
> #include <...> search starts here:
> /usr/include
> /tools/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.7.1/include
> /tools/include
> /tools/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.7.1/include-fixed
>
> and
> SEARCH_DIR("/tools/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib64");
> SEARCH_DIR("/tools/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib");
> SEARCH_DIR("/usr/lib"); SEARCH_DIR("/lib");
> (this time, word-wrapping has mad a long line become 3 individual
> lines).
>
> I *think* that looks as if your results at the end of 6.17 match,
> or are at least similar to, your results in 6.10 ? Is it possible
> that you omitted 'make install' after running the tests on gcc ?
>
> Other than that, I'm again out of ideas.
>
> ĸen
> --
> das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce
> --
> http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
> FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
> Unsubscribe: See the above information page
>
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] Installing Binutils and GCC after adjusting toolchain
Still no luck, i've made a 100% sure i start with a fresh copy of the
extracted gcc.4.7.1.tar.bzp2 and i use a fresh gcc-build directory.
I can give you a summary of my actions if that helps.
1. untar binutils, run the test, apply patch
2. make a binutils-build directory
3. prepare the compile (copy pasting the config prefixes)
4. Compile and copy the command that has to be run afterwards from the book
5. install GMP, MPFR and MPC
6. untar GCC to gcc.4.7.1, switch to the gcc-4.7.1 folder, run the commands
and make the gcc-build folder inside my gcc-4.7.1 folder.
7. Prepare for compille by copy pasting all the commands.
8. Make , ulimit -s 32768, make -k check, check the summary (all good and
matching the log results from the LFS website)
9.Make install
10. create the links by using the "ln" commands while still in the
gcc-build dir.
11. run the test, while still in the gcc-build dir.
12. get messed up results
13. cry myself to sleep holding a little tux.
I'm praying one of u guys/girls will now tell me that i made a simple
mistake and can provide a easy fix because i'm starting to run out of
back-up plans.
regards,
Kaleb
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 9:52 AM, Kaleb van Ingen Schenau <
k.ingen.sche...@gmail.com> wrote:
> make install was run and no errors what so ever, what i'll do is go back
> to my snapshot i made after 6.10, i tried this before but im gonna go ahead
> and do it again just to see if i dont have my old gcc-build folder hanging
> around.
> Ill let you know if i encounter the same problem again after the 3rd
> attempt of getting past this.
>
> You will hear from me soon,
> Kaleb
>
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 1:49 AM, Ken Moffat wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 12:42:03AM +0100, Kaleb van Ingen Schenau wrote:
>> > Hi, and thanks for the respond
>> >
>> > Throughout the book i've encountered 0 problems or errors and everything
>> > goes according to the book. It just seems weird that everything works as
>> > intended at chapter 6.10 then somewhere between that and compiling
>> > bin-utils and GCC it messes up somewhere, could this be something that i
>> > maybe mistyped earlier and i'm not experiencing the effects from. (Note
>> > that EVERY test till this point have been 100% accurate to what to book
>> > states it should be)
>> > But to anwser your questions:
>> > >>Then when i run:
>> > > >#grep 'SEARCH.*/usr/lib' dummy.log |sed 's|; |\n|g'
>> > >> SEARCH_DIR("/tools/i686-pc-linux-gnu/lib")
>> > >> SEARCH_DIR("/usr/lib")
>> > >> SEARCH_DIR("/lib");
>> > >>
>> > >> which is also not correct
>> >
>> > >That seems to be correct - please compare it to the book - 3
>> > >matches, for /tools/i686-pc-linux-gnu, /usr/lib, /lib. For this
>> > >part I don't see any error - please point it out if I'm wrong!
>> >
>> > The book says it should be:
>> > SEARCH_DIR("/usr/i686-pc-linux-gnu/lib")
>> > SEARCH_DIR("/usr/local/lib")
>> > SEARCH_DIR("/lib")
>> > SEARCH_DIR("/usr/lib");
>> >
>> > So I'm somehow still pointing to /tools while it seems that i should be
>> > searching in /usr and /lib, i think this might a main reason why it
>> isn't
>> > working.
>> >
>> You were right all along, it doesn't match : I'll have to blame the
>> prescription painkillers I'm on (only ibuprofen and paracetomol!).
>> Sorry, no idea how I misread what the book says.
>>
>> > >Are you doing something unusual ? That probably includes building
>> > >on a virtual machine, using the package_users hint, and building on
>> > >mingw or whatever on windows. Or using minimalist packages (dash,
>> > >busybox). If this is a straight build linux from linux, did you
>> > >check the host against the Host System Requirements in the preface ?
>> >
>> > I'm building on a virtual PC running Centos 6.3 which i think fit the
>> Host
>> > System Requirements, other then that I'm not using anything the book
>> > doesn't tell me to and i haven't skipped anything, I'm just doing what
>> the
>> > book is telling me to do. Have the logs been of any help maybe?
>> > pastebin.com/dCjzz5yb << or is there anything else i can supply you
>> > with to help me?
>> >
>> [ snipping my original reply below this - please don't top post, and
>> trim what you are replying to. ]
>>
Re: [lfs-support] Booting into LFS chapter 9.2
I'm not a 100% sure which drivers i need, luckily i have snapshots before every major step in the book (I'm running LFS on a virtual machine), so i've just gone back to before compiling the kernel and have configured to install all possible harddrive drivers to see how that works out. I must add that im trying to boot off a partition that isn't currently set a a bootable partition in FDISK on the host OS, could this be relevent to the errors I'm getting? On sdb i have a bootable 100mb partition that doesn't contain anything because /boot is set to be mounted with all the other folders in " / ". It seems to be able to read the grub file as configured in the .cfg but it's just stalling at the mounting of the root partition. I'll let you know if installing extra drivers helped me or has set me back further. regards, Kaleb -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] Booting into LFS chapter 9.2
Hey guys, thanks for the responses, I started to think about the error that i was getting : "[2.396063] No filesystem could mount root, tried: ext3 vfat msdos iso9660" And then it came to me that my filesystem wasn't listed there, which is ext2, so i went back to re-compiling the kernel and found that ext2 isn't enabled by default, so when i enabled it and compiled, my system started. So thanks for the help with my school assignment, and ill make sure to register my system on the LFS website. ON THE BLFS! thanks again, Kaleb -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
